of the Higher Technical School of Telecommunication Engineers, University of Vigo , Spain. From 1999 to 2003, he was the Head of the ICT Area of the University of Vigo. He is author or co-author of more than 200 papers in peer-reviewed international refereed journals and conference proceedings. He has directed several national and international research projects in telematics and technology-enhanced learning fields. He is very involved in activities within the IEEE Education Society (IEEE ES). He is Vice President of IEEE ES for Publications, elected member of the Board of Governors, and member of the Strategic Planning Committee. Since its founding in 2004, he has been a member of the IEEE Ed- ucation Society
Mexican private institution of higher learning committed to first-class teaching,public service, research and learning in a wide range of academic disciplines including businessadministration, the physical and social sciences, engineering, humanities, and the arts. Since1959, the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS)has accredited UDLAP in the United States. Most of the undergraduate engineering programsfrom UDLAP are accredited by the Consejo de Acreditación de la Enseñanza de la Ingeniería(CACEI), which is the peer-accrediting agency of the US Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET) in Mexico.UDLAP lives in a spirit of continuous improvement in the quality of academic programs
datais difficult in practice. A second significant assumption is that the theory of human capital doesnot explicitly model the intellectual ability, emotional commitment, or educational quality at theindividual level. Again, the influence of some of these determinants on the value of humancapital and economic value added of engineering education may be studied, but is not theprimary focus of the current work.Analysis MethodologySalary Data: Salary data was derived from the Payscale’s database, the world's largest store ofindividual employee compensation profiles. Each compensation profile is provided byindividuals motivated to gain access to peer salary comparisons for negotiation purposes. Thedatabase contains profile data for about 4% of the
suspected that it wasn’t because of superiorlearning on the part of the students.Assessing Adjunct PerformanceWhen an instructor teaches a class, the performance of the instructor can be evaluated using anumber of sources including feedback from students taking the class, peer evaluations fromwithin the department, and final overall course grades which are often publically available.The student feedback is almost entirely collected through end-of-semester course surveys whichcan have some shortcomings, such as they: typically occur before the end of the semester; don’tfocus on how the instructor can improve their performance; and often have low studentparticipation when the surveys are conducted online. Student feedback can be finicky andstrongly
the importance ofteamwork in engineering. As students move through the sequence of courses, they are engaged inincreasingly complex hands-on design projects that peer into a variety of engineering disciplines.The focus on the iterative design process allows students choose the topic that interests themmost and learn about engineering disciplines through those choices. Through the Academy,students are engaged during the school day, making science, technology, engineering, and mathpart of their world every day.The first four-year STEM Academy cohort to graduate will do so in 2013. Evidence that theSTEM Academy is moving students beyond the average level of academic preparation are the2011 school wide state NCLB assessment test results, which
the number of STEM professional Page 25.268.8development opportunities for teachers. The professional development offered educatorsopportunities to gain resources and learn interactive techniques to be used in the classroom. Inaddition, there was an increase in the number of near-peer role models from local colleges anduniversities and an expansion of the partnership with the Society of Military Engineers (SAME).The SAME partnership supported elementary school STEM activities efforts and goals. Theseindicators of institutionalization increased both the depth and scope of the Initiative.Option Year 3Today, STEM-UpTM serves 13 elementary schools
- first semester, 3 credit hours) Part II - Engineering Cornerstones (first semester, one hour credit – Introduction to the university mission and values, including study skills, lifelong learning, critical thinking) Part III - Manufacturing Processes Lab (first semester, one credit – Introduction to hands-on processes in the Machine Tool lab and in the Welding lab) Part IV - FIG groups – First-Year Interest Groups – Groupings of students by major/concentration with a Peer Advisor and faculty mentor of the same discipline Part V - Introduction to Engineering practice II (second semester -An introduction to the design process, communication, and further professional skills)Approaches to freshmen coursesA number of
discussion,and peer group studying. Prior to taking the pre-survey, students were informed about theproject with an introductory paragraph on the survey and asked to agree or disagree toparticipate—in other words, participation was optional. All but two students opted to participate.After the survey data were collected at the end of the course, the project evaluator conductedtwo-sample t-tests on all of the survey questions to determine whether the students’ perception oflearning was higher at the end of the semester than it was at the beginning. Within-subjects testscould not be used because of the anonymity of the data. The two-sample t-tests produced thefollowing results on the outcomes questions of interest and the learning style questions
25.1401.4out of doggedness (a strong determination to complete their degree) regardless of theirconfidence, level of enjoyment, or satisfaction13.The academic background that students receive from their high school education has an effect ontheir persistence in engineering. Jackson et al. showed that there were no differences in highschool GPA, ACT or SAT scores, or family background between students who persist than thosewho switch majors. However, the results also showed a difference between men and womenstudents with respect to their academic background. Women students tended to rank themselvesas having lower academic ability in science, math, and writing compared to other high schoolstudents9.In 2009, Pierrako et al. completed focus groups and
wasdriven by the nature of the senior design project itself. The faculty advisor often has a stronginfluence on the creation of an environment that fosters the selling of ideas and innovation. Thestudent team leaders are also responsible for promoting the importance of idea generation andselling those ideas among all team members. Student leaders often have a strong influence overtheir peers. Page 25.1113.9 16 14 12 Responses 10 8 6 4 2
number of competitively selected professors from U.S. and international universities to key elements and the business realities of industry by enabling them to "look over the shoulder" of working professionals at several levels of the technical, business, and management career paths. They will leave the program with an understanding of Boeing's business including its research needs, with an improved understanding of the practical application of technical and business skills and with a network of contacts within Boeing and among their faculty peers that can form the basis of long-term relationships. There have been 149 university participants since the establishment of the program in 1995.”The
Page 25.532.3introducing context in introductory courses,5 alternative instructional strategies,6 summerprograms,7,8 and academic support services such as tutoring, Academic Excellence Workshops(AEWs), and peer mentoring.9 Among the specific programs developed through SOLES are theMath Jam and the Summer Engineering Institute. Math Jam is a two-week intensive summermathematics program designed to improve students’ preparation for college-level math courses.The Summer Engineering Institute (SEI), a two-week residential program held on campus at SanFrancisco State University, aims to introduce students to the engineering educational system andthe engineering profession, recruit students into an engineering field, increase student awarenessof
successful experiencesand reflections in their creative problem solving processes.Implementation Procedures The students were provided with a list of question prompts after they start their creativeproblem solving in their PBSL project. These question prompts correspond to the process modeland strategies, which are categorized into procedural, elaborative, and reflective prompts.Students were required to write down what question prompts were helpful for them to learnrelevant knowledge and may help develop their innovative solutions. To help students focusattention to some important aspects of the problem solving, participants received questionprompts regularly as reminding through e-mails setups in online software platform Blackboardbesides the
the solution (or parts of the solution) to the problem. FeasibilityAnalysis (FEAS): Assessing and passing judgment on a possible or planned solution to theproblem. Evaluation (EVAL): Comparing and contrasting two (or more) solutions to theproblem on a particular dimension (or set of dimensions) such as strength or cost. Decision(DEC): Selecting one idea or solution to the problem (or parts of the problem) from among thoseconsidered. Communication (COM): The participants’ communicating elements of the designin writing, or with oral reports, to parties such as contractors and the community. Other: None ofthe above codes apply. See table 1. Page
presentations employing a more detailed scoring rubricto produce a composite score with input from the module instructor, the collective plenary andother module instructors, and students. Other activities in the discipline modules includedinvited speakers, student/industry panels, and lab tours to introduce the students to the disciplinemajor. A peer assessment was required for each team, and several of the module instructors usedCATME TeamMaker as the assessment tool at the end of the module rotation.Outcomes and AssessmentIn addition to the College’s general freshman survey, students taking the first-year engineeringprojects course are separately given a pre- and post- surveys. Students taking the pilotintroduction to engineering course were given
this context, this paper provides personal observations common across many organizationsbased on the author’s work in SE, project management, organizational development, and teamdevelopment.STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEMDespite the formulation and development of Systems Engineering capability assessment andcompetency models, certifications, education and training courses, et al, system developmentprojects continue to exhibit technical performance issues concerning the engineering of systems.Contributing to this overall problem are several contributory performance effecters: 1. Misperceptions that writing specifications, developing designs, performing integration
nature of the data and the exploratory nature of our research question,analysis followed a descriptive approach that employs elements of phenomenography in order tocapture the breadth and diversity of responses. Case & Light [16] provide an introduction tophenomenography in their recent paper outlining a selection of qualitative methodologies that are“promising but as yet not well represented in engineering education research.” Recent examplesof phenomenography in use in engineering education can be found in Mann et al. [17], who usedit to study student conceptions of sustainable design; Calvo & Ellis [18], who used it to studystudent conceptions of tutor and automated feedback in professional writing; and Zoltowski et al.[19] , who
project that is selected by the team and thecoach (a STEM teacher at the high school), and that has local significance for the students andtheir community. The project continues from one academic year to the next, with moststudents continuing as well. In the course of their HSE experience, the students solve authenticSTEM problems, perform testing and analyses, build prototypes, manufacture parts, staywithin budgets, write business plans, and manage their own project. HSE teams also haveprogram-facilitated access to expertise and mentoring from faculty and students in highereducation and from professionals in industry. Figure 1 contains a model of the team supportoffered by the HSE program. Most HSE teams operate as afterschool activities, but we
Electrical Engineering Laboratory CoursesAbstract This paper presents our experiences and results in developing and delivering newlaboratory experiments for the sophomore level Electric Circuits Lab, and Introduction to DigitalLogic design courses completely online. The paper will clearly outline how we utilized a newpedagogy to re-write our laboratory experiments so that they can be completed by face-to-faceand/or online students using new portable laboratory instrumentation devices, such as the MobileStudioTM board. We also present detailed descriptions on how we used the Adobe ConnectTMsoftware to allow the students to demonstrate their design and laboratory experiment circuits tothe course instructor from a remote location. We have
, writing the programs, and testing the robotsthat students gained a deeper understanding of the concepts.ModelModels were used to illustrate the robotics concepts and design challenges throughout thecurriculum, especially during the building and testing phases. It was important for instructors todemonstrate what the robots were supposed to do because the challenges typically involved therobot interacting with an environment, such as following a line, avoiding obstacles, or picking upan object. It may also involve pushing other robots around. Since these environments are Page 25.404.9dynamic in nature, it makes the challenge more complicated. So
survey consisted of five sections. These included some general background informationabout the respondent, why the respondent joined the Lawrence Tech Formula HybridTMcompetition team, their experiences while being part of the hybrid team, other comments, andinformation related to if the respondent had left the team. Many of these questions are related tointernal use by the author and advisor of the team for the college of engineering at LawrenceTech, so not every question or its responses are included in this paper. There are, however, someresponses worth noting. At the time of this writing only about 17% of the voluntary responseshad been received (n = 8). But enough responses had been received to be of some use and thedata do shed light on
responded to these challenges with enthusiasm, enjoying their collaborations withthose from the other side of the divide, and demonstrating mastery of much of the technical content provided inthe course. In two other respects, outcomes from the course have far exceeded expectations. First, the range ofphysics demonstrated and the quality of images have been worthy of awards and archival publication 2–5. Second,and certainly more importantly, students report that their perception of the world around them has beenbroadened to include fluid physics, in a way that no other course has done. Students write to the instructor yearslater, enthusing about seeing mixing in a liquid soap dispenser, or vortexes in an unusual cloud. This neverhappens with
we had originally planned to prohibit quarter-and three-quarter length joints between deltas, allowing only full side or half joints, to make calculationseasier, but this was too limiting in the creation of successful designs. We also consideredincreasing the internal area requirement from 100 quarter-deltas to 150. However, a larger areawould require more deltas and thus make it difficult for the entire class of twenty teams to play atonce, resource-wise.Writing New InstructionsThe last change we made to the game was writing a new set of instructions (see Appendix) thatincorporated all of the changes that we made. We divided these instructions into three parts: theDesign Task, instructions for the Project Manager, and instructions for the
new ideas than other members of a system”(p. 22). Based on their innovativeness, individuals can be classified into five adopter categories:innovators (2.5%), who are risk-takers willing to try new things and prepared for associateduncertainty; early adopters (13.5%), who are role models assuming leadership in furthering theadoption of the innovation; early majority (34%), who are individuals deliberately adopting aninnovation before the other half of their peers; late majority (34%), who are suspicious ofinnovations and wait until it is perceived as safe to adopt them; and laggards (16%), who are moresuspicious of innovations than the late majority and adopt innovations last.Rogers’s diffusion of innovation model provides us with both a