applications. The objectives of the laboratory experiments werewell defined; however, the students determined the process of conducting the experiment. Theinformation provided to the students focused on the rationale behind developing standardizedlaboratory procedure and their broad ranging applications on the civil engineering industry.The transportation course, which is traditionally a lecture course, was redesigned to ensure thatevery student actively participates and understands the physical elements of transportationdesign. Throughout the course, the faculty conducted a stimulating and engaging exercise ofrequiring students to solve practical problems during class in teams of two immediately aftercovering the relevant theory. The practical
An Experimental Process Course Graham Walker Mechanical engineering department Manhattan College1 Introduction In many industrial environments today an engineer is expected to perform tests or simpleexperiments. This will become ever truer in the future as more and more design is done offshore andoutsourced to countries such as India and China. Consequently, it will become even more important forfuture engineering graduates to be familiar with testing and experimental procedures. A typical engineering curriculum has a number of laboratory courses distributed throughout itsfour years
-yearenrollment growth projections in engineering, these problems will continue into the foreseeablefuture. In an effort to address the conceptual gap in electrical engineering learning within theframework of the resource limitations described above, Arkansas Tech University set out toinstitute a laboratory education method more closely integrated with the classroom lectures.Several requirements were developed for implementation of the new program.Lab exercises would be coupled with the university’s existing Electrical Circuits 1 course andwould consist of simple and focused experiments designed to reinforce the current classroomtheoretical concepts. To provide the needed synchronization between classroom and laboratoryexercises and provide immediate
most effective when conducted with hands-on applications and real-life projects.To optimize the students’ understanding of fluid power systems, they need to interact with individualcomponents and systems made by these components, ideally during their operation. However, this effectiveand widely implemented approach is limited in execution because of safety concerns, budgets, the numberof participants, visibility, and available space. In addition, physical testing environments must be properlyinstrumented to showcase system changes and operations, which can be costly and time-intensive. Thiswork showcases a solution to these challenges by introducing a fully immersive and interactive MixedReality (MR)/Virtual Reality (VR) laboratory for gear
current research interests mainly focus on Smart Structures Technology, Structural Control and Health Monitoring and Innovative Engineering Education.Mr. Alec William Maxwell, San Francisco State University Alec Maxwell is currently an graduate student in the School of Engineering at San Francisco State Uni- versity (SFSU). Besides actively conducting research on innovative tools for engineering education in the Intelligent Structural Hazards Mitigation Laboratory at SFSU with Prof. Zhaoshuo Jiang, he also serves the community as the President of the American Society of Civil Engineers for the SFSU chapter.Prof. Zahira H Merchant, San Francisco State UniversityDr. Philip Scott Harvey Jr., University of Oklahoma Scott
talents and interests.9Lyman Briggs CollegeThe Lyman Briggs College is a residential learning community devoted to studying the naturalsciences and their impact on society. In a single facility, the college encompasses physics,chemistry, biology, and computer laboratories; classrooms; faculty, administrative, and academicsupport staff offices; as well as student residences.10Broad Residential Option for Academic Distinction (BROAD) Freshman ProgramBusiness students participating in the Broad Residential Option for Academic Distinction(BROAD) Freshman Program live in a single residence hall and have roommates also in theprogram. These students are able to enroll in reserved sections of high-demand freshmanclasses, such as writing, arts &
. However, Allendoerfer et al. [15] foundthat student perceptions of faculty support are significantly influenced by class size andinstitution type. Astin [16] noted that institution type does not have a strong influence on theeffectiveness of undergraduate education, but that the environment created by faculty andstudents plays a stronger role.The purpose of this study is to examine several educational factors (i.e., institution type, classsize, class meeting time, class length and format, laboratory format, and faculty attributes) thatmay correlate with the amount of knowledge gained in the conceptual understanding ofgeotechnical engineering topics. The study was carried out at six institutions with civilengineering programs: The Citadel
outreach initiatives, minority and diversity programs, and to the NSF-ADVANCE initiative at Michigan Tech. Oliveira is a member of the IEEE Photonics Society, the IEEE Women in Engineering Society, and the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). Page 25.56.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A HANDS-ON COURSE IN DATA COMMUNICATIONS FOR TECNOLOGISTSAbstractTraditional undergraduate communication courses have focused on analog transmission systems,which can be coupled with a fairly simple laboratory component. The emergency of
(c) organizational change. These studies have revealed that peersand teams unite the themes of meaningful and consequential learning and equity and inclusion.2. Meaningful and consequential learningOur focus of curriculum reform has been towards shifting activity to meaningful, consequentiallearning in activity-based studio and laboratory courses to better prepare students to connect theknowledge they are learning in school to the messy, open-ended work they will encounter aspracticing engineers (NAE, 2020). Meaningful, consequential learning centers on work thatpositions students on teams in the role of engineers where they need to identify core foundationalprinciples as conceptual tools to progress (Johri & Olds, 2011). We draw upon
Massive Online Circuits LabAbstractThis work describes the design and implementation of EE40LX: Electronic Interfaces, the firstlarge-scale analog circuits laboratory hosted offered by edX. EE40LX revolved aroundconstructing a robot, emphasizing hands-on circuit building over circuit analysis to keep thecourse broadly accessible. With over 80 thousand students from over 190 nations enrolled acrossone year, this course is the largest and most distributed open analog circuits laboratory of itskind. Its sheer scale necessitated careful design of the robot project and a robust rubric for peergrading. This paper presents a detailed description of the course and its instructional design. Intotal, 856 robots were built and over 2233 students earned a
hardware, software and courseware learning ecosystem that has beencreated to capture student attention and develop a broader skill set. Laboratory and in-classexercises use POGIL (Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning) – based laboratory modules toengage students in learning through exploration, critical thinking, and team and cooperativeparticipation exercises. Laboratory and in-class exercises are designed to teach the student howto explore a new technology to be able to learn more about it. In fact, learning how to learn is akey outcome. Laboratory hardware is designed to provide easy connection to real-world devicesand allow students to extend their explorations from classroom theory to the practical applicationof technology they are
Page 11.739.2deferring it until their last semester. Second, it was determined that only the laboratory portionof the course contained only a few experiments and it was decided that the laboratory portion ofthe course needed to be strengthened. The strengthening of the laboratory portion of the courseis the emphasis of this paper.Experiment EnhancementA review of experiments used at other universities in conjunction with a first course in materialswas performed. As part of this review, lab report requirements were also examined. Informationwas obtained from: 1) a visit to another campus (University of Tennessee – Knoxville) toobserve laboratory sessions and equipments, 2) discussions with colleagues from otheruniversities, and 3) experiments
University, West Lafayette Nancy L. Denton, PE, CVA3, is a professor in Purdue University’s School of Engineering Technology, where she serves as associate head for MET. She is on the Vibration Institute’s Board of Directors, chairing the Academic Committee and serving on the Certification Scheme Committee. She is a Fellow of ASEE and a member of ASME. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Tensile Comparison of Polymer Specimens Produced by Different ProcessesAbstractThe tensile test identifies key mechanical properties of materials, making it a commonelement in many materials science laboratory classes. In the sophomore-level mechanicscourse for the mechanical engineering technology (MET
excellentopportunity to effectively train students on state-of-the-art applications, a broad spectrum ofengineering and science fundamentals, and the interrelationships between multiple engineeringdisciplines. We describe our experience and lessons-learned in teaching an advancedundergraduate-level GNSS capstone design course in the department of Electrical and ComputerEngineering at Virginia Tech over the past 15 years. We report on the objectives of the course,the topic selection, the capabilities of laboratory hardware, approaches to GNSS data extractionand analysis, and the importance of the accompanying teaching laboratory. Student perceptionsof specific measurable learning objectives are provided which underscore the importance of ahands-on laboratory
, masters, anddoctoral levels with instructional opportunities in and out of the classroom. Practitionerengagement (e.g. agencies, consultants, contractors, material suppliers, private laboratories) hasbeen a key component of this process, and is the focus of this paper. Practitioner involvement is:1) important to the educational process; 2) not always easy to obtain; 3) not always easy toeffectively utilize; 4) a key to the presence or absence of balance; and 5) debated amongsteducation literature. Key items that resonate through this paper are the student opportunitiescreated by balance, and how practitioners fit into this balance.Industry and agency collaboration concepts are nothing new and are discussed in literature1-5.The amount or extent of
toward implementation on a broader scale.This introductory paper outlines the WEI framework as a work in progress vision consisting of aVirtual Classroom, Virtual Laboratory, and Virtual Studio as three pillars of the Virtual LearningEnvironment. At the time of the authorship of this paper, the Virtual Classroom model has beenlaunched and student assessment has been conducted at California Polytechnic State Universitiesat both Pomona and San Luis Obispo. Presented herein are details of the WEI framework, thepedagogy of the packaged curriculum with the available online streaming teaching modules,details of the launched pilot program, and students’ perceptions of the pilot program coursecontent and its delivery through the NEESacademy powered by
vibrations courses,course goals and their relation to Mechanical Engineering Technology program outcomes,student evaluation of the course value and effectiveness, and plans for continuous improvement.It will also discuss current laboratory activities, the selection of textbook and laboratory manualmaterials, and vibration laboratory equipment needs.IntroductionThe course is currently entitled Vibrations for Technologists and has been offered twice to date;the Fall semester of 2001 and the Fall semester of 2002. Each offering has had 14 students.Based on laboratory capacity, the course limit has been set at 16 students. It will continue to beoffered every fall semester. In addition to providing basic vibration theory, the course is set upto address
used comes when the student is faced withthe task of working through laboratory assignments that cover assembly language programming,to some complexity, and microcontroller-peripheral interfacing at the same time. In Fall of 2003, Page 25.38.2Mississippi State University began a process to address this issue. Previous to this time, theintroductory microcontrollers course was set up in this fashion, with a heavy emphasis onassembly language programming. The course was modified to discuss assembly coding, but tohave the majority of the focus of the topics geared toward embedded system concepts and designprototyping, including hardware
pedagogy of teaching chemical reaction engineering is continually advancing through theuse of new computational tools such as POLYMATH and MATLAB; interactive computer ap-plications; and a new emphasis in textbooks on relating theory to industrially relevant chemicalreactions. What is currently lacking in this area are chemical reaction engineering experimentsthat employ realistic reaction engineering systems. Nearly all of the reaction engineering ex-periments, reported in the literature, employ simple experiments that can be described using asingle overall reaction. In addition most laboratory experiments do not examine the process fluidmechanics of the reactor and how this effects the product distribution. As a result, students onlyvisualize
required for undergraduate teaching in Mechanical Engineering andMechanical Engineering Technology that are “student centered” and bring relevance to theclassroom1. The global world we now all live in requires us to provide new innovators to createnew products at a very rapid pace compared to past generations. In forming these new directions,we need to reengineer the laboratory experience. We need to rethink traditional methods tobecome more flexible and challenging to the individual student. If we wish to encourageinnovation, a new method of delivery that is different from the traditional laboratory instructionneeds to be developed.2, 3, 9, 10 Allowing the student to use higher order learning which includesproblem development, experimental
Coarsening, Best Choice clustering requiredsignificant modifications to the original algorithm in order to accommodate the changes. Inaddition to the lists and maps constructed in the previous part, a special map was constructed forstudents who are connected via mutually enrolled non-lecture courses. These could be tutorial orlaboratory sections. The rationale behind removing lectures is to reduce the density of theconnections in the network. There would be more opportunities for cohort-based collaborationsin tutorial and laboratory sections, as opposed to during lectures. Hence, effective cohorts couldstill be formed by disregarding lecture sections.Using the two sets of constructed lists and connectivity maps, for students connected by allcourses
based approach.2 Online classes are simply treated as extensions of an oncampus course. In summer 2010, we set out to create a pedagogical model that could be used forour online courses. This model is designed to be tailored specifically for the online setting andreplaces the typical satellite model used in online education. In Summer 2010, we applied thesatellite model for an electrical circuits course, in which students viewed pre-recorded lecturesand worked on the same laboratory, homework, and examinations as traditional students. TheSummer 2010 course is used as a benchmark to measure our progress in the Summer 2011course.In the design of our methodology, we sought to make key changes to the way a course is taught.We sought to deemphasize
., theoretical concepts, laboratory testing, and engineering design) in traditionalgeotechnical engineering education. Many students find geotechnical engineering education to be disconnected from theirinterests and career aspirations, leading them to perceive geotechnical jobs as tedious,challenging, and irrelevant. As a result, current geotechnical engineering education oftenfails to establish a strong interaction with students[1, 2]. To overcome these challenges andraise students’ interest in geotechnical engineering, traditional group projects ingeotechnical engineering courses are being replaced with creative, project-basedparticipation games, such as mixed reality games, to illustrate engineering principles usingreal-world applications. Based on
contamination, and use of experiment-centric pedagogy in STEM fields.Hannah Abedoh, Morgan State UniversityDr. Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University Dr. Oludare Owolabi, a professional engineer in Maryland, joined the Morgan State University faculty in 2010. He is the director of the Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Smart Innovation and Resilient Engineering Research Lab at Morgan State UniversityArnesto Bowman, Morgan State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Enhancing student engagement and enthusiasm in undergraduate physics laboratory experiments at a historically black university by using hands-on devices via experiment-centric pedagogyAbstractPolicy
of concepts introduced in each course.Curricular design of both courses as well as assessments of concurrent registration in the coursesis presented. Specific laboratory design, fabrication, and measurement experiments conducted inthe RF and microwave engineering course that helps emphasize concepts introduced in theengineering electromagnetics course are outlined.IntroductionRadio frequency (RF) and microwave engineering courses are commonly taught as an electricalengineering elective in the senior or graduate years of study.1 Concepts introduced in RF andmicrowave courses benefit from a solid understanding of passive and active circuits, and time-varying electromagnetic field theory.2 With regard to electromagnetic fields, wave
BaseAbstractA “device dissection” laboratory, based initially on light driven devices, was conceivedand realized in the early 1990s as a means of introducing new engineering students to thefield of engineering1. The varieties of summer and semester engineering uses for thisfacility were summarized in an earlier paper2 of related title “A Lab for All Seasons, ALab for All Reasons.” The present paper, “A Lab for All Reasons, A Lab for AllSeasons: Enlarging the Participant Base,” extends utilization of our engineeringlaboratory to non-engineering faculty and to non-engineering students. The first of thesenewer forays involves utilization of the lab as an enrichment adjunct to courses taught inother non-engineering departments, here with examples from
AC 2007-1391: A LAB FOR ALL SEASONS, A LAB FOR ALL REASONS:COLLABORATIVE REPRESENTATIONS OF ENGINEERING WITHIN THEUNIVERSITYDavid Ollis, North Carolina State University Page 12.53.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Lab for All Reasons, A Lab for All Seasons: Enlarging the Participant BaseAbstractA “device dissection” laboratory, based initially on light driven devices, was conceivedand realized in the early 1990s as a means of introducing new engineering students to thefield of engineering1. The varieties of summer and semester engineering uses for thisfacility were summarized in an earlier paper2 of related title “A Lab
session of basicinformation can be conducted to provide all students with the necessary backgroundinformation. Laboratory or hands-on experiences are difficult to provide due to the largecost of the nanotech instrumentation, environmental conditions necessary and biohazardsassociated with nanomaterials. This report will present our efforts to develop ananotechnology curriculum within the Department of Electrical and ComputerEngineering Technology at Purdue University.Introduction The interdisciplinary field of nanotechnology provides many exciting challengesin curriculum development. A number of courses1,2 and curriculums3,4 are beingintroduced at this time. Books on the subject have been published5-7 although few withthe feel of a
expectations3.Truss Bridge LaboratoryThe second portion of the lecture is a brief tutorial on basic engineering concepts as theyapply to a truss bridge. Some concepts that are covered include, but are not limited to,tension, compression, neutral axis, stress, strain, buckling, and deflected shapes3. Theseconcepts are related to the students through demonstration with a foam board anddrawings on the blackboard. The instructor conveys the purpose of the laboratory, whichis to design and build a truss bridge, in teams, that will hold the most weight and “cost”the least. Finally, the instructor discusses the main failure modes for the bridge, so thatthe students could apply the engineering concepts they learned to design a more effectivebridge. For example
-director of Broadband, Mobile and Wireless Networking Laboratory at the Department of Electrical Engineering of Wright State University.Dr. Zhiqiang Wu, Wright State University Dr. Zhiqiang Wu received his BS from Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications in 1993, MS from Peking University in 1996, and PhD from Colorado State University in 2002, all in electrical engineering. He has worked at West Virginia University Institute of Technology as assistant professor from 2003 to 2005. He joined Wright State University in 2005 and currently serves as full professor. Dr. Wu is the author of national CDMA network management standard of China. He also co-authored one of the first books on multi-carrier transmission