). How big can a community of practice become? Retrieved fromhttp://wenger-trayner.com/resources/size/[6] Roberts, M. & Haden, C. (2014). Assessment of systems learning in an undergraduate civil engineering courseusing concept maps, Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June.[7] Penn, M. & Parker, P. (2011). Introduction to infrastructure: An introduction to civil and environmentalengineering. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.[8] Parker, P., Penn, M., Roberts, M., Hart, S., Haden, C. & Thompson, K. (2016). Crowdsourcing an outline for amodel introductory infrastructure course using a modified Delphi process. Proceeding of the 2016 ASEE AnnualConference, New Orleans, LA, June (Submitted
, W., Lv, X., Fan, H. (2010). “A New Strategy for Outstanding Engineering Talents Training in the USA: A Review on the Implementation of Grand Challenge Scholars Program”. Research in Educational Development 23, 63-68.[2] Ministry of Education. (2010). “The Ministry of Education Start to Implement A 19 Plan for Educating and Training Outstanding Engineers —— for the Industry, the World and the Future, the Culture of Excellence Talented Engineer”. China University Teaching 07, 4-5.[3] Zuo, J. (2014). “The Study on Enforcing Route of ‘The Outstanding Plan’ Based on the Angle of University-Enterprise Collaboration” . China Higher Education Research 02, 70-73.[4] Zhang, W., Liu, S., Hao, X
uncertainty to a relevant environmental engineering scenario.AssessmentBoth indirect assessment (an indicator of perception of outcome attainment) and directassessment (an embedded indicator of performance in outcome attainment) are used to assesscourse outcomes in our program. Because both types of data are important, all outcomes areevaluated using an overall assessment score, which is based on indirect data from surveys (Likertscale) and performance based (embedded) indicators. The indirect score is based on a scaledassessment (1-5 Likert scale) from student surveys using the web-based end of course feedbacksystem and the instructor’s assessment. The students and instructor(s) review each courseoutcome and determine to what degree cadets can
. Service oriented programming: A new paradigm of software reuse.In Software Reuse: Methods, Techniques, and Tools, volume LNCS 2319, pages 39-47, 2002.8. K. Sung, C. Hillyard, R. L. Angotti, M. W. Panitz, D. S. Goldstein, and J. Nordlinger. Game-themedprogramming assignment modules: A path-way for gradual integration of gaming context into existingintroductory programming courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2010.9. Q. Yu, X. Liu, A. Bouguettaya, and B. Medjahed. Deploying and managing web services: issues,solutions, and directions. The VLDB Journal, 17:537-572, May 2008.
), 61-69.2. Hartmann, B. L., & Jahren, C. T. (2015). Leadership: Industry Needs for Entry-Level Engineering Positions.Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(3), 13-19.3. Cox, M. F., Cekic, O., & Adams, S. G. (2010). Developing Leadership Skills of Undergraduate EngineeringStudents: Perspectives from Engineering Faculty. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(3-4),22-33.4. Gonzalez, V. Roger. et. al. (2015). Engineering Leadership: A new Engineering Discipline, Paper #26.635.1.ASEE PEER. Seattle, Washington.5. Crumpton-Young, L., McCauley-Bush, P., Rabelo, L., Meza, K., Ferreras, A., Rodriguez, B., & ... Kelarestani, M.(2010). Engineering Leadership Development Programs a Look at What Is Needed and
, Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning, in R.E. Mayer (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 19-30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.24. J. Sweller, P. Ayres, and S. Kalyuga, Cognitive Load Theory, New York: Springer, 2011.25. J.E. Kemp and D.C. Smellie, Planning, Producing, and Using Instructional Technologies (7th ed.), New York: HarperCollins, 1994.26. K. Burke, A pragmatic approach to criticism of multimedia, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 6(1), 57-75, 1977-78.27. R. Slawson, Multi-Image Slide/Tape Programs, Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1988.28. R.D. Owens and G.O. Coldevin, Effects of varied temporal visual overlapping in multi-image tape-slide presentations
administration for the engineering tutoring center consists of a director, coordinator,faculty liaison, and student employees. The director, faculty liaison, and coordinator have workedas a team on the continuous development and assessment of the day-to-day activities in the center. The director has been the main position guiding the growth and direction of ACE. Thedirector meets with departments to discuss course support in ACE and works to garner facultysupport and participation. S/he determines course support needs, works to provide newopportunities through ACE such as workshops and help sessions, provides direction for datacollection and analysis for ACE activities, advises ACE coordinator, and researches scientificliterature to improve
=8378 NAFSA. NAFSA’s guide to education abroad. NAFSA: Association of International Educators, Washington DC: 2005. Office of International Affairs. (2014). 20152020 Strategic Plan. Retrieved from: http://www.depts.ttu.edu/international/attachments/oia/OIAStrategicPlan.pdf . Rhodes, Gary and Richard Sutton, Glosssari Project, University of Georgia. Presented at the NAFSA Conference, Houston, TX, May 2012. Spencer, S. E. & Tuma, K. (2007). The guide to successful shortterm programs abroad (2 ed.).
-other- than-graduation rates.html?pagewanted=all&_r=05. Steve Bossart, Senior Energy Analyst, DOE “Smart Grids & Microgrids for Government & Military Symposium” October 24-25, 2013, Arlington, VA.6. X. Fang, S. Misra, G. Xue, D. Yang. Smart grid – the new and improved power grid: a survey. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials (2011).7. B. Flores, "CAMPUS DIVERSITY FACTS”, http://research.utep.edu/ Default .aspx?tabid=44271, 1995-2007, (accessed 4/1/2015).8. J.V. Koch, “TQM: Why is its impact in higher education so small?,” TQM Magazine, vol. 15, no. 5, 2003, pp. 325.9. R. Schroeder, et al., “TQM in Education: Changing the Culture of Schools ” 1997; nsf.gov. http://www.nsf.gov
representatives • Nominate commissioners • Recruit and assign program evaluators• ABET relies on the services of almost 2,200 volunteer experts supported by 33 full-time and 10 part-time staff. 4ABET‟s 35 Member Societies6ABET Accreditation StatisticsAs of 1 October 2015 … 3,569 Programs• Accredited programs by commission: ASAC: 81 CAC: 429 EAC: 2437 ETAC: 640 Domestic Non-DomesticCommission Programs Institutions Programs InstitutionsASAC 80 62 1 1CAC 377 296 52 35EAC 2071 424 366
Paper ID #19700A Consulting Engineering Model for the EE Capstone ExperienceProf. Arnold Stanley Berger PhD, University of Washington, Bothell Arnold S. Berger is an Associate Professor and former Chair of the Division of Engineering and Math- ematics in the School of STEM at the University of Washington Bothell where he teaches classes in embedded systems, computer system design, digital and analog circuitry. He is also the program admin- istrator for the UWB Capstone program. Dr. Berger is the author of two books on the subjects of computer architecture and embedded systems. Before coming to UWB he was an engineer and
. The Journal of Higher Education, 3(8):411, November 1932. [3] Lene Arnett Jensen, Jeffrey Jensen Arnett, S. Shirley Feldman, and Elizabeth Cauffman. It’s Wrong, But Everybody Does It: Academic Dishonesty among High School and College Students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2):209–228, April 2002. [4] Michael Kerwin. Cheating epidemic? Denver Post, June 2013. [5] Emily Hendricks, Adena Young-Jones, and James Foutch. To Cheat or Not to Cheat: Academic Dishonesty in the College Classroom. LOGOS: A Journal of Undergraduate Research, 4:68–75, 2011. [6] E. Mavis Hetherington and Solomon E. Feldman. College cheating as a function of subject and situational variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(4):212, 1964. [7
Telescope. Retrieved from Modeling Community Blog: https://blog.nomagic.com/thirty-meter-telescope-sysml-model/Pearce, P., & Friedenthal, S. (2013). A Practical Approach for Modelling Submarine Subsystem Architecture in SysML. Proceedings from the 2nd Submarine Institute of Australia (SIA) Submarine Science, Technology and Engineering Conference.Systems Architecture Guild. (n.d.). Retrieved from YouTube: http://tinyurl.com/showmethewowUniversity of Detroit Mercy. (2017, February 12). Master of Science in Product Development. Retrieved from Graduate Catalog: http://www.udmercy.edu/catalog/graduate2016- 2017/programs/eng-sci/product-development/index.htmUniversity of Detroit Mercy. (2017, February 12). MPD
. Garcia, M., Numers, Stephanie von, and Twamley, Erin (2014, May 8). Educated and Equipped: Energy & Manufacturing Training. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved January 23, 2015 5. Tseng, Tzu-Liang Bill, Chiou, Richard, Mandal, Paras, Smith, Eric.D, Belu, Radian G and Salcedo, Oscar H. "Fusing Green Energy into Manufacturing Engineering Education to Cultivate Technical Success." 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.6. Smith, R. T., and S. A. Melnyk. "Green Manufacturing: Integrating the Concerns of Environmental Responsibility with Manufacturing Design and Execution." Dearborn, MI: Society for Manufacturing Engineering (1996).7
-education-in-the-u-s-doesn-t-add- up/ 2. Booth, J.L. and Koedinger, K.R. (2008). “Key Misconceptions in Algebraic Problem Solving.” Proceedings of the 30th Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Pp. (64-70). 3. Epp, S.S. (2003). “The Role of Logic in Teaching Proof.” The Mathematical Association of America. 4. Goetting, M.M. (1995). “The College Student’s Understanding of Mathematical Proof.” University of Maryland. 5. Green, E. (2014). “Why do Americans stink at Math?” The New York Times Magazine. 6. Harel, G. and Sowder, L. (1998). “Students’ Proof Schemes: Results from Exploratory Studies.” Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III. American Mathematical Society. Pp
research work.References[1]. Stickel, Micah. “ Teaching Electromagnetism with the Inverted Classroom Approach:Student Perceptions and Lessons Learned”, 24.1160.1-24.1160.15, 2014 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition Proceedings[2]. Dori, Yehudit Judy, and John Belcher. "How does technology-enabled active learning affectundergraduate students' understanding of electromagnetism concepts?." The journal of thelearning sciences 14, no. 2 (2005): 243-279.[3]. Mukhopadhyay, S. C. "Teaching electromagnetics at the undergraduate level: acomprehensive approach." European journal of physics 27, no. 4 (2006): 727.[4]. Mandyam, Shreekanth and Robert Krchnavek, “Real electromagnetism for real engineersReally!”, 2153-5965, 6.832. 1 - 6.832.5, 2001 ASEE
iscontacted to determine if they want to work with more than one team. If not, the teams presenttheir ideas and why they are the best qualified team for the project to the faculty advisor and theoriginator who then select the team. The other team(s) must then apply to work on other projects.In the case of larger development project, the faculty generate partners with municipalities anddesign engineers to provide relevant site specific data to include survey data, utility locations,and wetland delineations to list some examples. Students are broken into multiple teams.Industry partners (i.e. state and municipal engineers, state and federal regulators, andmultidisciplinary consulting engineers) provide input and feedback to the student groups to
Line, vol. 12, no. 9, May-June 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.prism-magazine.org/mayjune03/graduate.cfm [Accessed Dec. 2, 2017].[3] Y. Matsuda and N. Okada, “Community diagnosis for sustainable disaster preparedness”, Journal of Natural Disaster Science, vol. 28, no.1, pp. 25–33, 2006.[4] A. Maskrey, “Revisiting community-based disaster risk management”, Environmental Hazards, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 42–52, 2011.[5] S. Santa-Cruz, G. Fernández de Córdova, M. Rivera, M. Vilela, V. Arana and J. Palomino, “Social sustainability dimensions in the seismic risk reduction of public schools: A case study of Lima, Peru”, Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2016.[6] J. Klein, “A
million people [10]. Making the estimated 88.4% equate to justover 278.5 million people that owned a computer. By virtue of that assessment alone, thepopulation who own a computer has increased by 2,685% since the 1980’s. Conversely, testing in the field of Civil Engineering has remained relatively stagnant.OSHA provides videos and computer-based courses as can be seen on their website. However,these educational tools are not regularly updated or improved with technology [11]. Individualshear the risks, learn about the safety protocols, and see the injuries and deaths associated withfalls, but this is all occurring on paper or through videos. Being able to translate what is seen onpaper, or through short video clips to a person’s life is
students to identifyopportunities where OR could be used to create positive change is discussed. This exercise alsorevealed important gaps in student understanding of the types of problems that can be addressedusing OR. This misunderstanding will be used to drive changes in the future offerings of thecourse, and serve as a reminder that faculty sometimes make assumptions about student learningthat are not correct.Background on the University of San DiegoThe University of San Diego is a private school with a liberal arts tradition. Addressing socialissues in the classroom is an important part of the school’s identity. Community service-learninghas been practiced since the early 1990’s, USD is recognized as a Community EngagementInstitution by the
and experiences rather than generalities: Humans do not usually think through general definitions and logical principles. Rather, they think through experiences they have had and imaginative reconstructions of experience. You don’t think and reason about weddings on the basis of generalities, but in terms of the weddings you have been to and heard about and imaginative reconstructions of them. It’s your experiences that give weddings and the word ‘wedding’ meaning(s). Furthermore, for humans, words and concepts have their deepest meanings when they are clearly tied to perception and action in the world. [5]In Magnitude Museum, players learn nanotechnology concepts and concepts relating todimensions
,” The Research Journal for Engineering Education, 106, pp 245-272, 2017.11. P. Rogers, D. C. Davis, S. Winfree, K. Ash, B. Ibrahim and L. Ding. Early Validation of the Motivation in Team Projects (MTP) Assessment. In Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Columbus, OH, 2017.
Neuron Simulators, August 21, 2017. Retrieved November 26, 2017, from https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1660086&HistoricalAwards=f alse[4] “High School Engineering Design”. June 2013. Retrieved November 26, 2017, from https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/HS%20ETS%20DCI%20combined%2 06.13.13.pdf[5] Yafremava, L. S., Rogers, J. J., & Lewis, M. A, “Robotic Tools in Neuroscience Education”, AAAI, January 26, 2007. Retrieved November 26, 2017, from http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/2007/SS-07-09/SS07-09-043.pdf[6] Scott G. Paris, Kirsten M. Yambor, and Becky Wai-Ling Packard, "Hands-On Biology: A Museum-School-University Partnership for Enhancing Students
becurious about techniques for connecting with students and creating new value, studies need to bedone to evaluate if UGTAs recognize if they gain the skill of entrepreneurially minded thinkingin a professional setting.7. References[1] Kern Engineering Entrepreneurial Network (KEEN), “The Handbook for EML,” KEEN’zine Engineering Unleashed, vol. 5. [Online]. Available: http://online.fliphtml5.com/zyet/ykie/#p=1. [Accessed Jan. 28, 2019].[2] S. J. Krause, J. A. Middleton, E. Judson, K. R. Beeley, and Y. Chen, “Factors Impacting Retention and Success of Undergraduate Engineering Students,” in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, June 14-17, 2015.[3] J. Crowe, R. Ceresola, and T. Silva
each other’s roles and tasks. Furthermore, students have shown significant improvement in communication, teamwork, public speaking, and presentation skills. Due to the focus on VEX Robotics Competition, the course development differs highly from many different STEAM programs in that it focuses mainly on the field of mechatronics and robotics engineering. Bibliography [1] “2018-19 VEX Robotics Competition Game.” VEX Robotics, VEX RECF, 4 Feb. 2019, www.vexrobotics.com/vexedr/competition/vrc-current-game. [2] N. S. Salzman, G. D. Ricco, and M. W. Ohland, (2014), “Pre-college engineering participation among first-year engineering students”, Prc. Of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18
] Viswanathan, Madhubalan, and Srinivas Sridharan. "Product development for the BoP: Insights on concept and prototype development from university‐based student projects in India." Journal of Product Innovation Management 29.1 (2012): 52-69.[5] Kulkarni, Y. “Fab Lab 0.0 to Fab Lab 0.4 - Learning from running a lab in an Indian Village.” Fab12. 2016[6] Fox, S. “Third Wave Do-It-Yourself (DIY): Potential for Prosumption, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship by Local Populations in Regions without Industrial Manufacturing Infrastructure.” Technology in Society. 39, 18-30. 2014.[7] Blikstein, Paulo, and Dennis Krannich. "The makers' movement and FabLabs in education: experiences, technologies, and research." Proceedings of the 12th
. Select or design specific graded events as assessment artifacts that directly evaluate the student expectations defined by PC, minimizing artifacts of coarse granularity such as semester average or course grade(s). d. Conduct a review process to down-select candidate assessment artifacts to a manageable and ABET review-tenable subset that adequately evaluates the program student population. e. Ensure alignment among the new assessment artifacts, individual course learning objectives, learning experiences, revised PCs, and institutional and ABET outcomes. [9, pp. 39-53]4. Evaluation, Reporting, and Analysis: Revise or create a comprehensive evaluation
://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/best-arduino-projects/[4] S. Moran, Popular Science, August 19, 2013, “A 12-Year-Old's Quest To Remake Education,One Arduino At A Time”, [Online] https://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-08/short-circuit#page-5 [Accessed Jan. 25, 2018][5] L. Harris, “Arduino in Science education” [Online] Available:http://moodle.asta.edu.au/course/view.php?id=57 [Accessed Jan. 25, 2018].[6] A. Tatoglu & I. Russell, University of Hartford, 2016 ASEE Mid-Atlantic SectionConference, “IMPLEMENTING SELF LEARNING SKILLS WITH MULTIDICIPLINARYROBOTICS COURSES”, [Online] https://www.hofstra.edu/pdf/academics/colleges/seas/asee-fall-2016/asee-midatlantic-f2016-tatoglu.pdf [Accessed Jan. 25, 2018][7] For example, see M. Geddes “Arduino Project
, pp. 95-118, 2012.[4] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004.[5] J.E. Froyd, M.W. Ohland, “Integrated engineering curricula,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94 no. 1, pp. 147-164, 2005.[6] A. Godwin, “The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity,” in Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26-29, 2016, ID 14814.[7] K.L. Meyers, M.W. Ohland, A.L. Pawley, S.E. Silliman, K.A. Smith, “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Global Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 119-131, 2012.[8] S. Reed, K. O’Connor, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns, D.M. Amos