engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the
Page 23.1344.4also the specialized fields of engineering practiced in all of the application groups.Purposes for Portfolio Assessment of Engineering Project WorkOver the 5+ years that the portfolio has been used, engineering department faculty haverefined the approach to facilitate its use for both student and faculty purposes20 so as toaddress a full range of typical engineering design project activities. For students, havingto assemble the portfolio motivates them to create, select and document best-practiceexamples of their engineering work, reflect on the significance of each artifact to theproject, and evaluate its impact on their own formation as an engineer. As previouslystated, the portfolio becomes a professional showcase they can
].Identifying and overriding our unconscious biases can have a positive impact on interpersonalcommunication and reduce the barriers for others’ success.Why engineering education?Each profession has its own culture, and engineering education culture specifically can beresistant to learning about and addressing unconscious bias. Cech’s research identifies threepillars of engineering education culture that decrease a student’s level of engagement with publicwelfare over time [11]. The three pillars: depoliticization, social/technical dualism, andmeritocracy; affect how engineers engage with public welfare, which can be extended to apply toother social issues such as unconscious bias. To effectively raise awareness of unconscious biasand encourage
Laboratory (SBML) at the CBE. Ms. Walker holds B.S. degrees in both Biology and Bio-Resources Engineering and an M.S. degree in Environmental Engineering, all from Montana State University. In addition, Diane oversees and conducts testing projects for industry and provides quality assurance for a federally-funded contract held by the SBML.Alfred Cunningham, Montana State University Dr. Cunningham is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Montana State University. He is a founding member of the Center for Biofilm Engineering (CBE) and coordinates CBE’s industrial research and education programs as part of the Center’s 23 member Industrial Associates Program. Integration of graduate and undergraduate
the engine.While some of this work was conducted by M.S.-level graduate students, the majority of thework was performed by undergraduate Mechanical Engineering students. Over the years, 13undergraduate students worked on various parts of this project, while 2 graduate students workedon the project. Of those 2 graduate students, one began work on the project as an undergraduatestudent.The use of undergraduates in research is hardly a new concept. Many examples can be found inthe literature regarding research projects using undergraduates.2-4 Studies have been conductedconcerning the impacts of research experiences on undergraduates, with respect to learningenhancements and the potential for attracting students to graduate school.5-7 One
single rubric can be used forboth. The instructor grades a student report using the rubric, and aspects of the rubric areused as embedded indicators for assessing program outcomes. Thus, essentially all of theeffort required to collect program assessment data is integrated into the routine task ofgrading.Overall Approach to Assessing Measurable OutcomesBecause program outcomes speak to the capabilities of graduates, the Rowan UniversityChemical Engineering department has settled on an assessment strategy that focuses onthe two courses in the curriculum that best reflect real engineering practice: Chemical Plant Design- This is the program’s capstone design experience. Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic- This is a multidisciplinary
) Fellowship, Aggies Commit to Professional Student Educational Experiences, Graduate Teaching Lecturer Fellowship, and Climate Award. She was also the only academic recipient of the Texas and Louisiana Engineering News Record (ENR) Top Young Professional Award in 2017. Dr. Kermanshachi is currently directing a very vibrant construction engineering and education research group and advising several Ph.D. and Master’s students c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Analysis and Assessment of Graduate Students’ Perception and Academic Performance Using Open Educational Resource (OER) Course MaterialsMs. Thahomina Jahan Nipa, University of Texas at Arlington Ph.D. Student, Department of Civil
designs and make revisions to improve them. Thismanner of effectively executing iterations of designs is conducive to an active and compellinglearning environment. In addition to communicating design concepts to others, rapid prototyping is also useful inverifying the feasibility of new design objectives. Through creating prototypes, students canexamine whether or not their designs operate as intended and might detect problems that wouldnot be apparent without a physical model. Thus, prototypes can be used for functional testing anddesign validation. [9]2. Course Design The course was designed with input from student staff of the Institute’s oldest student-runmakerspace, undergraduate and graduate research students, as well as recent
warranted emphasis. Undergraduate research integrationinto curriculum promises benefits: student engagement and development of employer-desiredskills such as communication, teamwork, analytical reasoning, and the application of knowledgeto real-world settings. This paper details the FLC’s efforts to incorporate more research intoseven undergraduate classes by using discovery learning pedagogies and to begin compiling alist of best practices to share with others. The fact that these efforts span different undergraduategrade levels and disciplines offers key insights for any undergraduate program. Further,discussions about the formation and collaboration of the FLC at this university presents a guideto others for starting one of their
construction project engineer for a construction contractor and as a research engineer for the Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory in Port Hueneme California. His teaching interests include construction equipment, cost estimating and construction process design. His research interests include highway and heavy construction methods, road maintenance methods and innovations in construction process administration.Dr. Natalya A. Koehler Koehler, Franklin University, OH Instructional Design Faculty Franklin University, OHDr. Aliye Karabulut Ilgu, Iowa State University Page 24.1400.1 c
creation of open educational resources for Physicsand Mechanical Engineering?SQ2. What are current best practices pertaining to the creation of open educational resources forPhysics and Mechanical Engineering?SQ3. What are strategic institutional and/or context-specific supports to enhance the creation ofopen educational resources for Physics and Mechanical Engineering?MethodologyAppreciative InquiryIn order to gather evidence for the above research questions, appreciative inquiry (AI) researchmethodology was employed to gather relevant qualitative data over a one-month period inJanuary 2020. AI is a distinctive form of practice-based research methodology with an explicittransformational agenda for strategic visioning to systematically enhance and
Systems Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Dr. Allam’s interests are in spatial visual- ization, engineering design education, diffusion of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of learning management systems for large-sample educational research studies, curriculum development, and fulfill- ing the needs of an integrated, multi-disciplinary first-year engineering educational environment through the use of active and collaborative learning, real-world application and examples, problem-based and project-based learning, classroom interaction, and multiple representations of concepts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Faculty Pre and Post Reflections
unique perspectives that each author brings, in terms ofethnicity, culture, gender, sexual orientation, and class [13], [14] also helps ensure that the datawas cross-checked amongst the team for rigor and trustworthiness of the findings.MethodsA qualitative case study design was used to explore the experiences and understanding of ethicalmentoring principles for eight graduate students and four faculty within science and engineeringusing research mentoring relationships as a developmental factor [15]. The ethical mentoringprinciples were used to inform selection of vignettes or ‘case studies’ from Johnson’s mentoringguide for higher education faculty [3]. This vignette technique was selected because it allowsparticipants explore the attitudes
improvements in senior designproject definition, coordination and management will be recommended to help achieve theoverall international experience outcomes to any project.Hypothesis:A previous study showed that including an international component into a typical civilengineering design project provided improvements in students’ motivation, attitude andexperience when compared to a typically classroom project. The research questions for thisstudy was whether a local domestic setting project, with the same level of interaction with localcommunities, can have the same impact on students’ outcome as the international projects.IntroductionThe primary goals in offering a service learning project within the framework of a traditionalcurriculum are to
courses ranging from Intro to Civil & Environmental Engineering for first year students to a seminar on Profes- sional Practices and Ethics to seniors. He is also heavily involved with the online graduate program. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Integrating Ethics into the Curriculum through Design CoursesAbstractTo address shortcomings in traditional engineering ethics curriculum a series of assignmentswere integrated into a senior level steel design course. The goal of the ethics component beingintroduced in a steel design course was to improve student internalization of ethics curriculumthrough assignments that were relevant to the design class material and everyday
bothsurprised and delighted by the impact of the event and their project.Finally, one thing that all of the students suffered from on this capstone project was a lack offoresight. The design project was structured so that faculty research and pre-project prep wouldguide/facilitate the work, not dictate the final results. This working method allowed for a greatdegree of student input (far greater than any other capstone deign project), but it also meant thatstudents were operating with reserved confidence and expectations. In the end, there was a gooddegree of original/inventive design, but stereotypes of engineers and artists prevailed. Theengineering students craved structure and focus, and the architecture and dance students sawstructure and focus as
, intelligent processin which designers generate, evaluate, and specify concepts for devices, systems, or processeswhose form and function achieve clients’ objectives or users’ needs while satisfying a specifiedset of constraints.” [1]. Therefore, it can be assumed that PBL is actually the most appropriatepedagogical model for both engineering design and SE Education. Even though PBL seems to be the most adequate model for teaching SE, there are a numberof open research questions and challenges regarding this pedagogical model. Some of themhave been identified by Dym et al. [1]Current practices in SE educationInterstingly, current SE education programs do not pay much attention to the design of compe-tency models, nor to the adoption of SE standards
in Engineering Education department. Her research interest includes graduate studies, global engineering, design for community services. Page 26.442.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Defining and Assessing Global Engineering Competency: Methodological ReflectionsIntroductionResearchers face manifold challenges as engineering education continues to grow and evolve asa distinct field of scholarly activity. For instance, discussions about criteria for evaluatingengineering education research have intensified, including through published
Paper ID #19732”Hiring Other Classes”: Working across Departmental Boundaries in Inter-disciplinary Projects for Senior EngineersDr. Cynthia H. Carlson PE, PhD, Merrimack College Dr. Carlson worked as a water resources engineer for 10 years prior to earning her doctorate, contributing to improved water management in communities within the United States, Middle East, and Singapore. She has been a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) since 2002. Dr. Carlson’s research interests are broadly characterized as ’how civil engineering impacts public health’, and include storm water man- agement, modeling environment/engineering
who mentor the civil engineering design projects. The projects expose the civil engineering students to real world design problems. The students gain first hand experi- ence communicating professionally, developing schedules, meeting deadlines and preparing professional quality reports and presentations. Prof. Brunell is the director of the Water Resouces graduate program. She also teaches Fluid Mechanics, Surveying and Water Resources.Dr. Keith G. Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology Dr. Keith G. Sheppard is Senior Advisor to the Dean in the Charles V. Schaefer, Jr. School of Engineer- ing and Science and a professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science. His research interests have
lens for gathering,implementing, and iterating on potential best practices and insights in the coaching of designlearning. It can serve as a reflection tool for instructors and design coaches to help them identifythe strengths of their coaching method as well as uncover the pain points of students. This workalso has the potential to hold significance not only in design education, but in experientiallearning more broadly. To facilitate such impacts and sharpen the next generation of this idea,we seek feedback on this work-in-progress effort from the design education community, insupport of refining of the playbook structure. Please let us know your thoughts on its overallcomponents, layout, and functioning. What may be missing or overlooked
women engineers are mannish looking,” Mrs. Loomis explained, “but a woman defeats her own purpose if she tries to make herself into a masculine type engineer.” The feminine qualities and talents a woman brings to engineering earn for her the acceptance in every type of engineering, according to Mrs. Loomis. These include “a woman’s special talent for detail and thoroughness in research, her loyalty and sense of obligation to her employer, and her creative ability, whether it is in designing or in a time study to do a job more efficiently.”Taken together, SWE archive data deliver a clear message: Women may do the prototypicallymasculine work of engineering, but only if they retain their normative femininity. Ultimately, solong as women
skills must be suited for the modern way of doing engineering and to the modernengineering business. One of the drivers for power engineering education at the graduate level isthe pertinence and excitement of research projects. However, the long term research work onmore difficult topics tends to be more motivational for graduate students and to encourageundergraduate students to pursue graduate studies in power and energy engineering. A full list ofgrand challenges is too expensive to produce, but a sampling below illustrates the types ofmaterial that excite and may serve to recruit) students. Among the new attractive research powerand energy areas are: conducting research to effectively develop and design commercial super-conductivity
campus Katreena Thomas is a graduate student at Arizona State University in the Engineering Education Systems and Design Doctoral program. She is a member of the Shifting Perceptions, Attitudes, and Cultures in Engineering (SPACE) Lab group and her research interests include broadening participation in engineer- ing, engineering leadership, and experiential learning experiences in engineering. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and her M.S. in Human Systems Engineering from Arizona State University.Julia Machele Brisbane, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Julia Brisbane is a Ph.D. student in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Tech and an
Systems Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Dr. Allam’s interests are in spatial visual- ization, engineering design education, diffusion of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of learning management systems for large-sample educational research studies, curriculum development, and fulfill- ing the needs of an integrated, multi-disciplinary first-year engineering educational environment through the use of active and collaborative learning, real-world application and examples, problem-based and project-based learning, classroom interaction, and multiple representations of concepts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Role of Instructional Coaching
-disciplinary Approach to Project Based LearningMeta-disciplinary or interdisciplinary learning provides a platform for students to gaincollaborative teamwork skills that are transferrable to their professional career. The courseprovided an encouraging environment for students to collaborate and develop common eco-district design vocabulary and protocols. Student teams researched and prepared formal casestudies of exemplar eco-district design projects, and identified best practices used in the designprocess. They discovered why an interdisciplinary approach is a necessity for successfulplanning, implementation, and management of high-performance districts.The interdisciplinary process of the course emphasizes creating a collaborative environment
statistical thinking for engineering in general andthe design component in particular.3) Estimation: A main challenge of a project design is the number of variables and theirinteractions during the design process. Often, the system stretches beyond designers’ capabilityto grasp all of the details simultaneously [1] .One strategy for coping with the many variables is:to bring the system back within the limits of human mental capacity by focusing selectively on alimited number of factors, preferably the most significant ones. Designers are usually good atestimation. They are able to size up parameters, sort them out in terms of their relativeimportance, and neglect the ones that have less impact on the project. Today’s graduates are notgood at
and industrial management experience. He received his BSME and MSME degrees from Michigan Technological University.Thomas Wolff, Michigan State University THOMAS F. WOLFF is Associate Professor of Civil Engineering and Associate Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Studies at Michigan State University. From 1970 to 1985, he was a geotechnical engineer with the St. Louis District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Since 1985, on the faculty of MSU, he has taught undergraduate and graduate courses in geotechnical engineering and reliability analysis. His research and consulting has focused on the design and evaluation of dams, levees and hydraulic structures, and he has been involved in several studies
practices and tools (SEPTs), that is, the tools and techniques for designing,implementing, and maintaining software over time. As a result, the productivity or reliability ofengineering work involving software can be hampered by problems that could have been avoidedwith the use of modern best practices in software engineering. Despite a history of research onSEPTs in computing fields (e.g., computer science and software engineering) and computationalscience fields (e.g., computational physics and bioinformatics), the use of SEPTs in engineeringfields is not well understood.To address this problem, in this paper, we present ongoing work investigating how practitionersand undergraduate students in non-computing engineering disciplines understand and
) Diversifying the U.S. engineering workforce: A new model. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1), 19-32.3. Kim, Y., Baylor, A. L., & PALS Group (June 2006) Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The role of agent competency and type of interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(3), 223-243.4. Baylor, A. L., & Kim, Y. (2004) Pedagogical agent design: The impact of agent realism, gender, ethnicity, and instructional role. Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3220/2004, 592-603.5. Yelamarthi, K. & Mawasha, P. R. (July-December 2008) A pre-engineering program for the under-represented, low-income and/or first generation college students to pursue higher education