Representation: Theory, Applications, and MPEG-7 Standardization, Springer, 2003.20. S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 721–741, 1984.21. Stan Z. Li, Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis, Springer, 2001. Page 13.371.15Appendix A : Initial Course Syllabus UNC Charlotte Machine Vision Lab - ECGR3090/6090/8090 Syllabus http://www.visionlab.uncc.edu/index2.php?option=com_content&task=... ECGR3090/6090/8090 SYLLABUS Written by Andrew Willis
dailyclassroom who participated in an OST. Three teachers surveyed were directly involvedeither with an Energy Club, a Math Club or FAME. The Fellows surveyed were eitherfacilitators of their own Math Club(s) or assisted the two graduate Fellows in FAME orEnergy Club. This survey was designed to capture the perspective of each person filling Page 13.1235.10out the survey with respect to the student, the teacher, the school, the Fellow or thegraduate Fellow. For example, if a Fellow were filling out the survey, then they wouldthink about their students in the OST Club when answering the question, “Doesparticipation in the OST Club positively affect the students
Testing. The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential.Cambridge, UK: The Cambridge Press.20. Massachusetts, D.o.E. (2001). Massachusetts science and technology/engineering framework. Malden, MA:Massachusetts Department of Education.21. American Educational Researchers Association, American Psychological Association, and the National Councilon the Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological measurement.22. Urdan, Timothy C. (2001). Statistics in Plain English. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Publishers.23. Bordens, Kenneth and Abbott, Bruce. (2005). Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach. New York,NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.24. Miertschin, S., Goodson, C., Faulkenberry, L., Steward, B
Conference. Honolulu, HI.[5] Adams, J., Tashchian, A. & Shore, T.H. (1999). Frequency, recall and usefulness of undergraduateethics education. Teaching Business Ethics 3: 241-253.[6] Bekir, N., Cable, V., Hashimoto, I, & Katz, S. (2001). Teaching engineering ethics: A new approached. stProceedings of the 31 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, # 0-7803-6669-7/01. Reno, NV.[7] Muskavitch, K.M.T. (2005). Cases and goals for ethics education: Commentary on “connecting case-based ethics instruction with educational theory. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 431-434.[8] Rogers, T.B., Kniper, N.A., & Kirker, W.S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personalinformation. Journal of Personality and Social
and has given presentations at national and international conferences. She served as Section Coordinator for the Twin Cities Section (1988-1989) and has been a Vice President on the Board of Directors for the Eastern Division (1994), Measurement Science and Technology (1995 to 1997), Publications (2001), Operations (2002-2004) and now Learning & Development (2005-present) where she is involved in developing long term objectives in metrology Education and Training. She has received the following awards for her work in metrology • NCSLI Best Paper Award (co-author), Applied Category (2007)• Arthur S. Flemming Award (2004); • Algie Lance “Best Paper” Award (tied
; Exposition Copyright 2009, American Society for Engineering Education”and keep asking until you get an answer. The second is suggested by the NSPE and is known asthe “P-L-U-S” Framework. The individual should consider whether the action is consistent with:Policy/Regulations, Laws/Regulations, Universal societal/organizational values, andself/personal values.AssessmentTo demonstrate that students have a basic understanding of the importance of ethics, I usedseveral methods. At the end of the class session, I asked students to write down what were thetwo most important things they learned in the class. A number of students were surprised athow wide spread the misconduct was at Enron. Several noted that it involved financial
Labor by the National Center for O*NET Development.[5] www.transana.org[6] Committee on the Engineer of 2020, Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2005.[7] Educating Engineers: Designing for the future of the field. The Carneige Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching 2008.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award 0722221. Anyopinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF
Kuldip S. Rattan is a Professor of Electrical Engineering and Frederick A. White Distinguished Professor of Professional Service at Wright State University. He is a Co-PI on WSU's National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education. He conducts research in the area of electrical control systems, and is active in engineering education reform. He has been the recipient of the CECS Excellence in Teaching Award in both 1985 and 1992, and of the CECS Excellence in Service Award in 1991, 1996 and 2003.Michael Raymer, Wright State University Michael L. Raymer is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science & Engineering at Wright State University. He is a Co-PI on WSU's National
followingeducational objectives: 1. Design experiments to optimize the performance of a CVD reactor. o Identify key reactor inputs and determine relationship between input levels and achieved thin film uniformity. Select Select the Choose an response/ independent appropriate dependent variables/ experimental variable(s) factors design Draw Analyze the Perform the conclusions/ data using experiment inferences appropriate (collect data
is a coherent rigorous verbal framework specifying aconcept. A discussion of the conflicts between the infinities of everyday experience and formalinfinities based on axioms can be found in reference 12.The interesting conversations13 of a knowledgeable father with his six-year old son, Nic, providean insight on how a child's intuition builds an image of the concept of infinity. In the beginningof the conversations Nic imagines infinity as a very huge number, much bigger than 10, biggerthan a million, probably bigger than a "googol" (1 followed by a hundred 0's). Nic's infinity canbe operated on like any other number in arithmetic ("infinity" + "infinity" = "two infinity", andthere is "half infinity" as well). Nic also invents a number
any concepts from physics course that you can apply to the project?Questionnaire # Yes No Physics principles (questionnaire II) II 11 3 Resistance and voltage relation n=14 Flow of electricity Force = mass * acceleration Applied forces and how it affects the distance(s) and amount of work needed to accomplish the task. This was applied to the angle at which the ladder should be and the weight of the farmer applied upon the ladder.Note: Not all students responded for Questionnaire II.Table IIB show how an idea
engine torque by dividing the power by the engine speed in radians/s. Apply the proper unitconversions to express the torque in kN-m.5. Compute the fuel efficiency. The fuel efficiency is defined here as net power divided by the energy content of thefuel supplied. Using the mass of air (m) and specific work per cycle (w) computed above, the lower heating value ofthe fuel (LHV) and the air fuel ratio (AFmass) from the combustion calculation, the efficiency is given as ηfuel = (mairℜw)/(mfuelℜLHV) = (AFmass w)/(LHV)6. Repeat the steps above for complete combustion with 130% theoretical air.7. Repeat the steps above for combustion with 80% theoretical air. Assume that the products contain unburned fuel(5% of the
-surveys; however,participation in the survey is voluntary. Surveys are administered electronically and via email byUNC Charlotte under the direction of Dr. Audrey S. Rorrer. The pre-survey is provided duringthe first week of the program. The post-survey is provided during the last week of the program.Survey responses are collected and de-identified before being made available to the PI. The firstyear of the VisREU Site resulted in lackluster student participation—less than 4 studentscompleted surveys. Greater effort was made in 2015 to stress the importance of feedback. As aresult, 92% (11 out of 12) students completed pre-surveys, 67% (8 out of 12) completed post-surveys. The following sections present survey responses from 2015 VisREU Cohort
to FPGA • Understand the need for current limiting resistors for LEDs and calculate a proper value • Place a button, seven-segment display, or other device into a prototyping area, wire it to the programmable logic device, and successfully program the PLD to interface with the new component(s). With these teaching objectives, there were some specific objectives the board design had toachieve. These design objectives are listed below. • The board should be easy to solder • The board should be sufficiently low-cost to account for mistakes • The board should have a prototyping area The OwlBoard is based on a modified open source Numato Mimas board, which is men-tioned in Section 5.2. The OwlBoard
Solar Cell E Electric T Thermal CHP Combined Heat & Power NG Natural Gas PV Photovoltaic ST Solar ThermalReferences[1] U.S. Department of Energy - Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. (2015,February 7). Solar Resource Data API. Golden, Colorado, United States.[2] Cuttica, J. J., & Haefke, C. (2009, May 14). Midwest CHP Application Center. Retrieved fromEnergy.Gov: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/pdfs/webcast_2009-0514_chp_in_facilities.pdf[3] Blank, L., & Tarquin, A. (2008). Basics of Engineering Economy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.[4] Damm, C. J. (2015, Feb 16). Price Values of Installed Solar Systems. (S
grant to travel to Europe to seekrare journal volumes and books to add to the library collection. Crosland traveled to eightEuropean countries, such as Great Britain, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. Shereturned with many issues of important scientific journals, which were unavailable during WorldWar II. Crosland also obtained additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, the NSF, andGeorgia Tech Alumni clubs to purchase scientific works. She purchased and was given manyrare journal volumes and missing issues, the value of which well exceeded the travel expenses.In her letter to a donor who helped to make her trip possible, Crosland wrote: “I was quiteflattered when Professor A. J. S. Pippard, Dean of Engineering of the Imperial