3 persons. On Tuesday and Thursday the classes met in a standard lecture hall classroom, andexams were always administered on either Tuesday or Thursday. Some Tuesday and Thursdayclass meetings of CALC-II-2T meet in a new ALC on campus. 59% of the students in CALC-II-1T also took CALC-III.3.2 The Flipped Class Redesign PlanAfter reviewing literature on flipped classes, specifically Talbert16 and Bishop and Verleger14 theinstructor set about developing a flipped classroom redesign plan for CALC-II and CALC-III.Content and learning objectives already existed for these courses and were familiar to instructor.What remained was to establish a structure for the courses that followed the flipped class model.Content was divided into units, and
course.Assessment 3. Pre/post Scenario AnalysisAdditionally, students were given a scenario involving the use of a potentially hazardouschemical used in a medical product. The pre-test, issued in the beginning of the first termof “Humanitarian Engineering Past and Present,” asked them how they would respondgiven the issues embedded in the scenario – environmental racism, following governmentregulations/company policy, dealing with multiple perspectives, and possiblewhistleblowing. In the post-test, which was delivered at the end of the second term, theywere asked to review and critique their pre-test responses.Pre-test responses typically just re-stated the problem and did not provide a detailedaction plan. In their post-test critique of their earlier
the information chosen in the concept selection step to move towards generating novel ideas. Idea Generation Formally determining potential problem solutions. Idea Evaluation Determining the efficiency and appropriateness of the proposed solution. Implementation Planning Testing the chosen problem solution. Monitoring Searching for evidence to determine the problem solution’s level of success.By emphasizing the parallels between the creative process and the scientific method, faculty whohad previously thought of creativity as being outside the bounds of technical engineering maynow see how the
Total 526 118 417 1,061answers, respectively. (Note that these intentional interactions do not preclude spontaneous en-gagement by the instructor.) Table 3 shows the number of interactions that are designed into eachof the courses offered in the program. There are over a thousand opportunities for students to en-gage. Note that while “raise hand” only engages one or a few students, “poll” and “short answer”engage every student through the learning management system. Of course, individual instructorsmight deviate slightly from the instruction design by skipping planned interactions or adding theirown spontaneous activities.The very high levels of interactivity that is designed into the
second is a final oral presentation describing every step of eachproject developed, in presence of the parents, family, and friends. Examples of project (designsfrom the summer camp) are shown in the figures 1 to 8 (Appendix).Lessons learned from summer camp:The activities of the camp and the degree of their success will be shared with other CAM membersto determine the possibility that some of the activities would be implemented on other campuses.Knowing that other campuses in CAM plan to have similar summer camps, we also plan to learnfrom the success of activities from these camps. 1) During the summer, twelve high school students and a teacher participated in the summer camp. A number of lessons were learned from that program among
by the Purdue UniversityCalumet (PUC) Office of Planning and Institutional Research, the retention rate of first time, fulltime students, who began in Fall 2005 in the School of Engineering, Mathematics and Sciencewas 44.8%. This is in line with a previous study by the Departments of Engineering whichindicated that approximately 50% of freshman engineering students do not pass to thesophomore year of study. The results also showed that the retention rate for the School ofTechnology was 56.8%. Furthermore, the graduation rate for minorities needed to be increased.For example, out of 34 baccalaureate degrees issued in Engineering fields during the 2005-2006academic year, there were only five minority students - two African American, two
. Their plans, actions, policymaking,reflections, and frustrations all aim to explore possible reactions to the challenges brought bythese dominant images. 1It is worth noting that the idea of dominant images is not an empirical concept. In other words,the dominant image active learning in American engineering education does not necessarily inferthat most American engineering schools and programs have adopted or developed active learningwell. Rather, dominant images often have normative value. Engineering programs and facultymay have different feelings about active learning, but active learning as a social image is relevantto their educational
students navigate to their degrees by studying major pipelines, pathways, and mostrecently ecosystems. This study, however, drills down to a specific cohort of students - femalestudents in their first semester of a First-Year Engineering (FYE) program. It has been estimatedthat roughly one-half of these students enter into a major their sophomore year different from whatthey initially planned at the beginning of their freshman year. This longitudinal study examines theintended and declared majors of five cohorts of female students as they progressed through FYE,into an engineering discipline, and finally to their earned bachelor degree. Two types of students:Dedicated and Unsure, and three categories of majors: Confident, Middle Ground, and
’ lives that should be furtheraddressed by educational institutions to account for this population of students when planningpolicies and intervention plans. These might include for example “the development of more onlinecourse opportunities [that] may help these students succeed”, as well as offer them moreconvenience. In essence, the commuting aspect of students’ lives introduces the main theme thatif being a commuter means fewer opportunities for skill development, then providing supportonline would be a possible option for giving those commuters more access to skill buildingactivities (Nelson, Misra, Sype, & Mackie, 2016), and enforcing the idea that the traditionalsingular mode of learning followed by universities may not be the best
=> Electrical Water Dispersal System• University of Mississippi Medical Center / C Spire => Sleeping Cap for TBI patientsEach team also mentored four Heads in the Game high school scholars on how to perform research,as well as how to succeed in college. In total, 48 students participated in the Heads in the Gameand Landsharks to Astronauts research programs, including 19 women and 11 African Americans.The eight-week plan for the Heads in the Game and Landsharks to Astronauts programs that wasconducted in the Summer fo 2016 is outlined below:- Week 1: The Heads in the Game scholars will attend seminars on electrical and computerengineering, biomedical engineering, introduction to health and sports performance, andfundamental research
career professional is daunting for anyone, especiallywomen entering a technical field such as engineering. When encountering challenging, gender-based situations, women react in various ways, from ignoring the situation to leaving theengineering field completely. Through a literature review, this paper investigates conceptuallyaligning counterfactual thinking and career motivation theory for early career women engineers.Counterfactual thinking is the creation of alternative scenarios to events that already occurredand imagining different consequences or benefits. Career motivation theory aims to understandcareer plans and decisions. From these theories, this review explores the effects of counterfactualthinking on women engineers’ reactions to
. Davis P.E., The Citadel William J. Davis is Dept. Head & D. Graham Copeland Professor of Civil Engineering and Director of Construction Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. His academic experience includes: transporta- tion infrastructure planning and design, infrastructure resilience, traffic operations, highway safety, and geographic information systems. His research interests include: constructing spatial databases for bet- ter management of transportation infrastructure, improving transportation design, operation, safety and construction, understanding long-term effects of urban development patterns, and advancing active living within the built environment for improved public health. He teaches
BS Maryland at Eastern Shore 15 Virginia State Computer, Manufacturing, Computer science BS, MS UniversityDemand for Engineering at HBCUsTable 1 also highlights the 15 ABET accredited engineering programs at HBCUs. The list alsoincludes Texas Southern University (TSU) in Houston, Texas; the institution was authorized bythe Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) to begin offering two newengineering programs during the fall of 2015 in civil engineering and electrical and computerengineering [13]. According to the school’s enrollment database, TSU has seen consistentgrowth for both programs. Based on the 4-year and 6-year academic plan period, the institutionshould expect to see their first group
andsupervising others, coordinating and planning tasks, and building team cohesion—neither highnor low importance ratings among 38 professional skills. However, within leadership skills thestudents assigned a much higher value to coordinating and planning tasks and building teamcohesion than to motivating and supervising others, which shows that they ascribe different valueto different leadership skills. As in Direito et al.’s study, the participants in Chan et al.’s studiesrated their confidence in leadership skills lower than they did the importance of those skills.While these studies provide us with an understanding of the value that engineering studentsascribe to leadership and other professional skills and of their ability beliefs in these skills
2016 to 2026 makingthe severe workforce shortages of the construction industry a nationwide crisis [1] [2][3][4].Coupled with workforce shortages, lack of diversity and challenging student transitions into theconstruction profession remain a huge concern. These emphasize the need for constructioneducators to attract and prepare minority students who persist into construction professional (CP)roles towards a more competent and diverse construction workforce for improved 21st centurybuilt environments [4]. CPs play a critical role in the design, engineering, planning,development, management, operation, maintenance, sustainability, deconstruction, anddemolition of built environments. The dynamic and competitive construction industry is
connections between their lived experiencesand their current engineering coursework. We targeted two different types of environments, homeand hobbies, which could include activities at home our outside of students’ home. While severalstudents highlighted PLW and/or playing with Legos, as their main exposure to learning andbecoming interested in engineering, one student, Naomi, identified working with her father athome as her source of interest in engineering: … Working with my dad ... I remember I built a dog house ... I took a saw and I started cutting things out and he stopped me. He's like, “No, you need to have a plan. What are you making this house for, which dog? Where are you going to put it?” I had to think of all of
to facilitate exposure to professionalopportunities. Sometimes these events are planned remotely and attended by student cohorts,other times, coaching staff will attend the events with students. Each student is also matchedwith a mentor who is currently in the tech industry and has been found by the coaching staff.There is no formal training for these mentors, and each pairing navigates the particulars ofworking together for the summer. The program requests that the mentor-mentee pair attempt tomeet every other week; however, this is not required. Students also typically informally mentoreach other when returning home while talking through their experiences and challenges in thejob environment. These spontaneous conversations are
prosthetic limb assemblyResults: The management of this year 4 group project was similar to years 2 and 3. Studentsworked on the project according to planned schedule. During the first testing, the client testedboth design. However, there were some mechanical issues during testing. The client alsomentioned a ‘thicker’ foam for the socket would increase comfort for the stump. For the secondtesting, a higher density foam was used in the socket to achieve better comfort and tightnessaround the stump. The client tested both design and preferred the link-lock design as it providedmore stability. The client felt that the ball and socket design “unstable” because of the ball andsocket connection.Conclusion/Lessons learnedThe purpose of this paper was to
introductory engineering classes [4].Learner-centered approaches are based in constructivist learning theories, one of which isDesign-Based Learning (DBL). DBL posits that in problem solving situations, learners draw ontheir own past experiences and pre-existing knowledge to discover phenomena and how thosephenomena are related, and what is desirable to learn next [5]. Learners interact with theirenvironment through exploration, object manipulation, contemplation of questions andcontroversies, and experimentation. DBL activities promote learner-centered discovery asopposed to teacher-centered methods [6] and focus on planning, constructing, evaluating, anditerating a particular device, process, or solution to authentic problems [7], [8]. One
skills needed by future technicians should be considered more in AMCurriculum Framework development of ensure a higher match. This consideration is especiallytrue since the AM Competency Model is the source for employer-desired competencies.5.4. Implications.5.4.1. Implications for educational institutions. Two- and four-year AM degree programs aredeeply connected to their local communities and economy. These programs, such as those atstate and community colleges in Florida, should strongly align with the needs of local employers,and incorporate state and national workforce needs. Curriculum planning committees maybenefit from knowing the extent to which there is topical alignment and rigor in curricula todevelop future AM students. Including
students, this study plan may provide compelling evidence towards curricular needs inboth sketching skills and in human-centered design. If changes in considering humans in designcan be motivated by a simple instruction, further studies will be required to examine how topromote such thinking over time during engineering education.ConclusionThis works-in-progress study protocol presents a plan for the exploration of considering peoplein early idea generation for engineering design. Our overarching goal is to develop scaffoldingthat supports engineering students’ human-centered design practices. We are investigatingwhether a simple intervention to represent people during conceptual sketching will promptstudents to consider human users and all their
measure shared agency have focused on power dynamics involved, not on waysshared agency impacts other contextual aspects of agency. However, the results of these studieshave suggested that shared agency matters when understanding consequentiality. For instance, ina study that investigated whether parents and children’s wishes were taken into account whenformulating a rehabilitation plan for the child, when parents perceived that such wishes weretaken into account—meaning, they had some sense of shared agency—they were more satisfiedthat their child’s needs were being met—meaning, they viewed their input as consequential [13].From a framing agency lens, we might consider formulating a rehabilitation plan as framing aproblem and consider the
participation was virtually identical between student cohorts (Figure 3A). However,School B students were more than twice as likely as School A students to declare a positiveimpact on their predisposition when asked about the impact Discovery had on STEM pursuits(Figure 3B). It is important to note this may simply be indicative of students already perceivingfurther STEM courses in their future regardless of Discovery participation (i.e., selection of “NoImpact”), reflected in consistent indication of plans to take fewer courses after participating inDiscovery. School B students were also about 20% more likely to indicate interest in furtherparticipation in a future offering of Discovery (Figure 3C), despite also indicating a much higherperceived
out of 38 responses (47%) remarked they would form some sort of plan using theidentified knowns, unknowns, and relevant equations. This compared with 15 out of 43 responses(35%) from the control group. The control group had a higher number of responses that suggestedtrying to use relevant equations without mentioning any form of planning (14 versus 8 responses).The other responses were either focused primarily on Free Body Diagrams or looking forunknowns only, or simply using a step-by-step brute force approach.Students in the experimental section were given the opportunity to report how their studypractices changed due to the exams, homework and grading for this course. Overall the responsesgenerally split students across a few divisions
research often takes time: time to buildrelationships with participants; time to reflect on biases in one’s own data generation andanalysis processes; and time to evaluate, revise, and re-implement engineering programs andpedagogies (if applicable) to ensure they are more culturally responsive. In summary, fastresearch is not often reflective research, and responsive research requires self-reflection.[43] Inorder to ensure culturally responsive research designs, qualitative researchers can: • In consultation with participants (where possible), develop and communicate a plan for managing data. • Develop materials for providing professional development to the research team and other relevant stakeholders, with explicit
, building inspectors, suppliers,subcontractors, contractors, construction developers, real estate developers, researchers, andeducators [2][3]. However, most construction curricula are highly tailored to prepare students forproject management and estimating roles. Generally, project managers plan, budget, oversee, anddocument all aspects of their construction projects, while estimators determine the quantities andcosts of construction projects. Furthermore, many construction programs are structured to preparestudents mostly for commercial construction projects [1]. This is logical as most of the employersof undergraduate Construction students offer student opportunities to work on commercialconstruction projects. With the current focus of
. The CFA allows us to analyze the fit of the individual items from thesurvey to the prescribed factors within the given models. The model used was used to explainhow PTO, SOC and BFP all played a role in predicting ethical awareness. To increase thestrength of the study, some questions were created to measure the opposite of the intendedvariable. For example, one of the questions measuring the personal subfactor from the spheres ofcontrol is, “I usually do not set goals because I have a hard time following through on them,” iscounterbalanced by the question “Once I make plans, I am almost certain to make them work.”Because of this difference, many of the scales had to be reverse coded to fit into the models forconfirmatory factor analysis
‘patches’ of poor performance.” Faced with such adverseacademic situations, some students adopt maladaptive behaviors (e.g., self-handicapping andanxiety) that further impair their chances of succeeding in their chosen engineering majors. Incontrast, resilient students would adopt adaptive behaviors, for example, persistence, planning,optimism, and self-determination, among others [8]. We argue that students with high levels ofresilience are better able to come back from initial academic stresses, while those who are lessresilient may decline in their academic performance, lose interest in their major, andconsequently consider dropping out of their engineering program.Measurement approachesAs noted above, resilience is most commonly defined as a
], and the Lumina Foundation 's National Tech Challenge selectedEduGuide's intervention as a model for making college access and success more efficient. Theyhave supported EduGuide with a planning grant to further test and refine the platform, as has theW.K. Kellogg Foundation to help scale-up EduGuide’s platform and program.Assessment of Grit Levels of Participating StudentsOverall, 108 freshman-year STEM students participated in the baseline assessment of students’grit levels in early fall 2017. Of the 108 students, 81 were STEMGrow students, while 27 werenon-STEMGrow students (Control Group). The first post-assessment involved 64 students, 43of whom were STEMGrow students, and 21 were non-STEMGrow students. A total of 38students, 26 STEMGrow
client and the design team. Similarly, many women in Invention andInnovation were reported to have been in charge of the business aspects of the project. Bothclient communication and business planning are introduced in these subsequent courses.Another explanation for the trend of women disproportionately taking on non-technical roles isbecause they lack technical confidence. This explanation corresponds to possibilities discussed inthe focus groups. Women in the focus group believe that women are more likely to take onnon-technical roles in teams because of three main factors: i) they feel that they do not haveenough technical experience to be useful to the team, ii) they are not asked by their malecounterparts to take on technical roles, or