Asee peer logo
Displaying results 3541 - 3570 of 8077 in total
Conference Session
Capstone Design in ECE
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mike Borowczak, Erebus Labs; Andrea Carneal Burrows Borowczak, University of Wyoming
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. In addition to his industry experience, he has spent two years, while completing his PhD in Computer Science and Engineering, as a National Science Foun- dation GK-12 fellow - teaching and bring real-word STEM applications in two urban high schools. He has authored peer-reviewed articles, presented at national/international conferences, and taught under- graduate/graduate courses in both Hardware Security (computer science & engineering) as well as STEM Education and Outreach.Dr. Andrea Carneal Burrows, University of Wyoming Dr. Andrea C. Burrows received a Curriculum and Instruction: Science Specialization research Ed.D. from the University of Cincinnati, M.S. in Science
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Constanza Miranda, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile; Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
by analyzing in detail the context where the negotiations were made, and seestep-by-step how the teams were able to reach agreement.      Figure 5. Images from “Sticky Notes”    Tool 02: Using Sticky Notes, a boundary object to negotiate in larger teams    These boundary objects shown in Figure 5, were usually present with large groups of individualsinvolved in the negotiation (i.e. when externals were invited to a meeting). “There were just toomany people to have everybody write on the board,” a student remarks. Sticky notes entailedlittle squares that have an adhesive on one of its sides and that could be placed on a surface. Theyshowed to be useful when there were large amounts of
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division Technical Session 8
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Isaac L. Howard PE, Mississippi State University
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
favorable for materials courses, offering some evidence the applied focus has beenwell received. Other information collected from students (e.g. exit interviews, surveys, impactstatements) also suggest the applied focus has been well received with average responses on a 10point scale being in the 9 to 10 range in most cases.MSU’s materials program is in some ways similar to the University of Arkansas (UA)approaches described a few years ago that were reported to be favorably received bypractitioners4. Both align more closely to professional (as opposed to academic) models forlaboratory activities. MSU uses professional specifications (e.g. ASTM, AASHTO, state DOT)as opposed to laboratory manuals. Also, writing assignments are more closely aligned
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Technical Session 11: Curricular and Program Innovations
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rolfe Josef Sassenfeld, New Mexico State University; John Ross Tapia, New Mexico State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
further engagestudents in their coursework and to introduce freshman to some of the basic concepts ofengineering. A form of “student-centered education” where the instructor acts as a guide to theexperiential learning process is preferred over the traditional class lecture format according toSpencer & Mehler[10]. Hixson[4] refer to this as instructor “role-modeling,” where the instructoradvises and nudges the students through a thought process. The decisions are ultimately made bythe students and they are the owners of their solution. The research presented by Ambrose[1]similarly advocates the use of experiential learning opportunities. To better provide students withtimely feedback, the in-class methods of peer instruction, case studies, and
Conference Session
Novel Teaching Methods in a Multidisciplinary Context
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Troy J. Vogel, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Princess Imoukhuede, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
), CHBE unidisciplinary (n=194). Table 1. Project Timeline Week BIOE CHBE BIOE CHBE Crossdisciplinary Crossdisciplinary Unidisciplinary Unidisciplinary 1 Receive project & begin Receive project Receive project & Phase I & begin Phase I begin Phase I 2 Complete Phase I, meet Meet with BIOE peers & Complete Phase I Complete Phase I with CHBE peers & share review Phase I write-up Phase I write-up 3 BIOEs support CHBE
Conference Session
Reimagining Engineering Information Literacy: Novel Perspectives on Integration, Assessment, Competencies & Information Use
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Fosmire, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Amy S. Van Epps, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nastasha E Johnson, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Libraries
contributions. Video gamedesigners also have embraced badges to encourage longer game play, providingrecognition/rewards and the ability to show those badges to peers as a measure of achievementin the game.5 The Open Badge Infrastructure (OBI), on the other hand, is an initiative to takebadging into a truly internet-centric environment. In particular, the OBI is attempting to distill themost important characteristics of a badging system and creating open protocols that allow thosewho bestow credentials to communicate across organizations and communities.According to Havalais the OBI “represents a framework for making badges (microcredentialswith icons) machine-readable, portable, and verifiable in distributed digital networks… OBI-compliant badges
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4B: Assessing Student Motivation and Student Success
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew J Jensen, Florida Institute of Technology; Jessica Ha, Florida Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
coordination, as well as thestrength of the student and academic affairs collaboration, mostly depend on the institutionalenvironment and the characteristics of the students, faculty, and staff who will participate12, 13.First-Year SeminarsSince the late 1800s, the primary focus of first-year seminars has been to assist students duringtheir adjustment to college and to increase their chances of being successful14 (Boyer, 1987).Gardner (1986) contends that students are much more likely to be successful throughout collegeif a strong foundation is provided during their first year. As such, the purpose of first-yearseminars is to help students establish a connection with the college as well as their peers. Ageneral assumption is that students will acquire
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Charles E. Pierce, University of South Carolina; Nicole Berge, University of South Carolina; Joseph V. Flora, University of South Carolina; Fabio Matta, University of South Carolina; Robert Petrulis, EPRE Consulting LLC; Ethan Washam, STV Engineers
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
to be critical in expediting acquisition ofresearch skills. In other words, each class period was designed to facilitate hands-on and minds-on learning opportunities through peer-peer and peer-instructor interactions. A significant number of communication- based activities were integrated throughout the course, including in-class and out-of- Research   class written responses, in-class discussion Triangle   pairs and discussion groups, poster
Conference Session
Nontraditional Teaching Approaches
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cedrick Kwuimy, University of Cincinnati; Jeff Kastner, University of Cincinnati; Yuan Chen, Center for Enhancement of Teaching and Learning, Chongqing University, China
Tagged Divisions
International
, carrier flow and small-signal models; (iii) light emission and detection with semiconductor junctions. Students received videos weeks before the class and the average length of the video was 23 minutes. Some concepts were covered over 2 or 3 videos (to be discussed in a single class). The class was organized as described in the figure below.Before class In class After class  Watch the videos  Quiz Students  Take notes  Discuss about  Check their understanding  Write question questions from video  Extend their learning  Group activity
Conference Session
Works in Progress I
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Lei Xie, Texas A&M University; Michael Beyerlein, Texas A&M University; Rodney Boehm, Texas A&M University; Jill Zarestky, Colorado State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
assess impact of good supply chain practices such as coordinated decision making in stochastic supply chains, handling supply chains during times of crisis and optimizing global supply chains on the financial health of a company. She has published her research in Journal of Business Logistics, International Jour- nal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management and peer-reviewed proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.Lei Xie, Texas A&M University Lei Xie is a doctoral student at Texas A&M University. He is currently majoring in Human Resource Development in the Department of Educational Administration & Human Resource Development. His research interests include conflict
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 2: Identity and Sense of Belonging
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David R. Ely, Ivy Tech Community College, Lafayette; Jason E. Bice, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kendra A. Erk, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
to develop a comprehensive theoretical and numerical multiscale strategy to accelerate the battery design process. He has presented his work nationally and internationally and has publications in several peer-reviewed journals. Currently, he is investigating the kinetics of nanoparticle dissolution at the mesocontinuum level using the phase field method. The goal is to develop a com- prehensive, theoretical and numerical strategy to predict the dissolution kinetics of small particles from experimentally measurable parameters to accelerate the particle engineering process during formulation development. Example applications include researching the effects of engineered particle size distribu- tions in solid dosage
Conference Session
Programmatic Integration of Liberal Education
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Rebecca Balakrishnan, University of Manitoba; Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba; Priya Subra Mani
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Paper ID #30819Program: Study DesignMs. Rebecca Balakrishnan, University of Manitoba I am a career development professional with 8 years of experience working with post-secondary students at University of Manitoba on all aspects of career exploration, planning and job search. This takes a variety of forms, including one-on-one appointments, facilitating workshops, and writing resources. Recently, as part of my Master of Education in Counselling Psychology thesis, I have collaborated with faculty in the Faculty of Engineering to integrate career development activities into the Biosystems Engineering curriculum.Dr
Conference Session
Retention Programs for Women Students
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gretchen Hein, Michigan Technological University; Amy Monte, Michigan Technological University; Kerri Sleeman, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
students in general and underrepresented groups in particular. Project RISE(Retention Initiative in Science and Engineering) initiated campus Learning Centers in gatewaycourses. Through this program, various centers have been developed and staffed since the 1990s.There are viable learning centers in Chemistry, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering,Mathematics, Physics, and Engineering (Statics, Dynamics, Mechanics of Materials). In addition,the university supports the MTU Writing Center, Modern Language Learning Lab, Center forComputer-Assisted Language Instruction, and tutoring services. The Learning Centers areutilized in two ways. First, students who need help with homework or course concepts can obtainassistance on an as-needed basis from
Conference Session
FPD4 - Teaching Methods for First Year Students
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Haungs, California Polytechnic State University; John Clements, California Polytechnic State University; David Janzen, California Polytechnic State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Improving Engineering Education through Creativity, Collaboration, and Context In a First Year CourseAbstractOver the past few years, Computer Science and some Engineering disciplines have suffered froma decrease in student enrollment, poor retention, and low women and minority representation. Wesuggest three issues with first-year courses that contribute to this trend. First, students find itdifficult to see how their assignments and course material relate to real-world applications.Second, students tend to perceive engineering as an individual endeavor requiring littleinteraction with peers. Last, early engineering assignments are often overly constrained, possiblyto ease grading, allowing minimal room for student creativity.In this
Conference Session
FPD1 - Early Success and Retention
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Donna Reese, Mississippi State University; Robert Green, Mississippi State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
effort into these courses in order to retain these students in engineeringmajors. However, many of the students in the MSU class, approximately 90%, will decide not tomajor in engineering. While this is a beneficial outcome for the students involved, it limits theamount of faculty effort that the college is able to invest in this course. Other pre-engineeringcourses (e.g., Howard and Musto5; Pazos, Drane, Light, and Munkeby8) use peer team projects orsoftware that students will use in follow-on engineering classes to motivate students to continuein engineering. The typical student in MSU’s pre-engineering designation is not mature enoughto successfully navigate this type of project. In addition, the one-hour format of the course limitsthe types
Conference Session
Tools for Teaching and Learning
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Sterling E. Skinner; Eric G. Chapman; Sheldon Jeter
Total:___ ___Picture taken _____ Measurements complete: _______Comments: Page 8.675.10“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2003, American Society for Engineering Education”Addendum 3: Peer Assessment Form Team Citzenship Rating Form: Name: __________________________ EM103 Introduction to Design Date: ________________ Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Please write the names of all the members of your team, INCLUDING YOURSELF, and rate the degree to which each member fulfilled his
Conference Session
Expanding Access and Opportunities for M/30
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrea L. Welker PE, Villanova University; Leslie Ann McCarthy P.E., Villanova University; John Komlos, Villanova University; Alfred Andrew Fry
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
Foundation Design the students are asked to research a geotechnical topic of theirchoosing using a variety of sources. The students are asked to find four sources: one source thatis available/accessible to the general public, one general web source, one peer-reviewed journalarticle, and one other type of printed reference such as a conference or technical periodicalarticle. They are then asked to summarize the information in these sources. Lastly, they are askedto compare the sources considering the intended audience, contradictions amongst the sources,communication style, quality, trustworthiness, and biases. The ability to properly format thebibliography continues to be the most troublesome aspect of writing for the students. In addition
Conference Session
Retention Strategies in Action Part I
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Frankie Santos Laanan, Iowa State University; Dimitra Jackson, Iowa State University; Mary Darrow, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Two Year College Division
among students who leave Engineering,5 otherstudies draw attention to additional factors that discourage students from continuing inEngineering majors. The factors include the level of self-confidence of Engineering students andinteraction with faculty, staff and peers.5Theoretical frameworkAstin’s theory of student involvement1 is most appropriate for this study. The theory of studentinvolvement highlights the development of students and how factors within the collegeenvironment affect the persistence and perception of students. Astin posited that “studentinvolvement refers to the amount of physical and psychological energy that the student devotesto the academic experience” (p. 297). Astin1 further explains that involvement is defined bywhat
Conference Session
Assessment & Continuous Improvement in ECET: Part II
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Youakim Al Kalaani, Georgia Southern University; Shonda Bernadin, GSU
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
Curriculum Mapping Worksheet (CMW)A good example of how multiple course-level outcomes contribute to a program-level outcomewould be with respect to the program outcome g. Rubric-based analyses of laboratory reportsare made in five courses in the curriculum. An attempt was made to sample reports at variouslevels (sophomore-junior-senior) in the curriculum. Rubric-based assessments of presentationsfrom at least two different courses also contribute to satisfying this outcome. In addition tohaving the instructor assess the presentation, student-peer evaluations and additional facultyevaluations (other than the instructor) are reported. Along with course exit and senior exitsurveys addressing communication skills, the program-level outcome is
Conference Session
Think Outside the Box! K-12 Engineering Curriculum
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Courtney Bonuccelli, Washington State University; Denny Davis, Washington State University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
(high melting point, low weight, high strength, or high flexibility)? ≠ Cost – what is a reasonable cost for the consumer: initial purchase costs, upkeep, disposal, etcFigure 3: Students testing set of liquids on a plastic penny and copper penny surface. By the end of the first day, the following learning should be achieved: (a) Writing Hypothesis - students will demonstrate that they can write a hypothesis using the correct form and accurately reflecting the question being posed (b) Following Procedures - students will identify the materials needed for each activity Page 15.961.6
Conference Session
Launching Successful Academic Careers
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Steven Fleishman, Western Washington University; Janet Braun, Western Washington University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
organization. Research activity andproject based instructional best practices could cover effective activity planning, includingpitfalls to avoid, and departmental / university protocol.While there typically are orientation sessions for grant writing provided by senior faculty orfoundation administrators, this can be one of the more difficult areas for those new to academia.Tips for effective, or at the very least, ineffective methods from colleagues in the same contentarea could make the difference in a successful R&D program or grant proposal.Another area of concern for new faculty deals with the successful implementation of courses ofindependent study. Best practices, or even departmental SOP’s could help to provide definitionof consistent
Conference Session
New Faculty Issues and Concerns
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Juan Lopez; Roger Gonzalez; Paul Leiffer
between various responsibilities and the order of howinformation and responsibility flows within the team. The PM is responsible for the overallmanagement of the project and team while still having a specific technical responsibility on theteam. The selection of the PM is an extremely important decision. This person must not onlyhave developed a love for discovery, but have had previous experience on the team so as tounderstand the overall goals of the project. This person should possess leadership skills and havethe respect of their peers. Almost always, the selected PM comes from students who participatedas junior members of the team and performed well. The PI selects the PM with input from thelikely ELs, who themselves are usually selected
Conference Session
Outreach and Freshman Programs
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Patsy Brackin; Clark Merkel
Total:___ ___Picture taken _____ Measurements complete: _______Comments: Page 8.610.10“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2003, American Society for Engineering Education”Addendum 3: Peer Assessment Form Team Citzenship Rating Form: Name: __________________________ EM103 Introduction to Design Date: ________________ Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Please write the names of all the members of your team, INCLUDING YOURSELF, and rate the degree to which each member fulfilled his
Conference Session
Course Development and Services
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Ed Crowley; Susan Miertschin
Objective” Analysis,as well as a “Goal Action Form”. These exercises were modeled after and are available online inthe University of Waterloo’s Self-Assessment Career Development eManual. The student’sresults are posted to their private offline reflection workbook.Meaningful reflection often includes dialogue and conversation with a coach, a mentor, anadviser, or a peer. At this stage the professor, or other adviser, often must help students build asolid vision of their future goals. Once the audience and the future goals have been selected thestudent then must analyze what to include in their portfolios.Once, the students have completed their preplanning phase, they are ready to begin gatheringartifacts that represent their best IT efforts and
Collection
2001 Annual Conference
Authors
John Brown; Patricia Click
education, student groups work closely with a faculty member to tackle variouscourse-related projects within the classroom. In contrast, collaborative learning, which is morewidespread in higher education, entails a faculty member acting as a mentor or facilitator tostudent groups that do most of their work outside of the classroom (Matthews, Cooper,Davidson, and Hawkes). Collaborative learning promotes discussion, peer teaching, and criticalthinking (Russo).The primary difference between active learning and older models of learning is that the teacher isno longer the sole source of knowledge in the classroom. Much of the recent fascination withcollaborative learning has, in fact, grown out of our changing view of what knowledge is--ourassumptions
Collection
2001 Annual Conference
Authors
Teresa Larkin-Hein
postingcomments and questions to the listserv. The listserv will be moderated in that all postings willfirst be sent to me. I will then determine their appropriateness and forward them on to thelistserv. You are encouraged to actively participate in any listserv discussions that may takeplace. I expect that all postings will be professional in nature and adhere to proper “e-mailetiquette.” You may use the listserv to pose questions to your peers regarding material beingdiscussed in class, homework questions, lab questions, etc. You may also use the listserv to posea topic for discussion related to our in-class discussions. Feel free to discuss other items ofrelated interest such as “physicsy” items in the news, etc. In addition, I will occasionally use
Collection
2001 Annual Conference
Authors
Lisa Ritter; Barbara Lazarus; Susan Ambrose
is, learning how to deal constructively with criticism and how tosupport one’s ideas in argument.The fundamental purpose of a doctoral program is to help the student become a professional whogenerates ideas within an extremely specialized field. Undergraduates spend most of their timereading and writing about established theories and research. By contrast, doctoral studychallenges the student’s ability to learn in a completely different way. It focuses study in onediscipline, and requires that one conduct original research and formulate her own theories.Challenge: As she progresses in graduate work, most of the student’s learning will come througha series of formal and informal exchanges in which others—both faculty and peers—willchallenge
Conference Session
Faculty Tools
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joshua A. Enszer, University of Notre Dame; Jessica A Kuczenski, Century College; Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame; Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
ABET6.Our undergraduate program strives to produce engineers who are a step ahead of their peers andhave begun to look beyond entry-level jobs. Our primary goals are to improve the educationalprocess outside the classroom and to encourage students to take a more active role in their ownpersonal and curricular development. In order to connect student activities and abilities to theobjectives of our overall program, we established a set of “six tools” that we feel are essential forgraduates to become successful engineers. Further, we would like to implement a project thatencourages our students to make connections among their curricular options and between theirstudents and extracurricular pursuits. Another goal is to add to the department’s
Conference Session
Post BS Entrepreneurship Education Needs
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jerome Schaufeld, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Gretar Tryggvason, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; McRae Banks, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
proposition, its commercial feasibility, the various risk factors, and the resourcesrequired. The class was divided into five separate groups, but all groups worked on the sameoverall problem. Additionally, excerpts from the writings of thought leaders on innovation, suchas Carlson, Christensen, and Porter, were included. To give us more time for extendeddiscussions, the class met twice a week, for two lecture hours each time. The syllabus for the fallof 2009 is shown in figure 1.Our institution operates on a somewhat unusual academic calendar where each semester is splitinto two seven-week terms. Terms A and B are taught in the fall (September to December) andterms C and D are taught in the spring (January to April). During each academic term
Conference Session
Learning Styles
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Daniel Knight; Jacquelyn Sullivan; Lawrence Carlson
Learning Laboratory (ITLL) and Program at theUniversity of Colorado at Boulder, hands-on curricula are an integral part of lower divisionengineering projects courses and K-12 engineering outreach programs. 2 3 An extensiveevaluation plan has been developed to investigate the efficacy of these curricula. One componentof this evaluation plan is the assessment of student skill development. This type of assessment isaccomplished by several methods, including instructor assessment, peer assessment, and self-assessment. The present study focused on student self-assessment of skills in the ITLL First-Year Engineering Projects course.Student skill self-assessment is a useful component of the projects course evaluation plan.Instructors from a wide range of