students experience work in diverse teams. Concurrent with the 2016presidential election and during the collection of interview data as a part of this larger study, ashift occurred in the national discourse around diversity. As such, we sought to understand howthis shift in the national discourse did or did not influence engineering students in STEMclassrooms. As a part of acknowledging the changing sociopolitical discourse occuring on anational scale in our own research, we included additional interview questions related to studentsattitudes about recent national events while conducting our planned research on students’attitudes about diversity. We felt that this shift in the research plan was warranted to capture howstudent attitudes may be
with each instructionalclass periods consisting of 45 minutes of one-sided discourse with the instructor teaching from aPowerPoint presentation, followed by up to 5 minutes of multiple choice iClicker questions onthe material just covered (as a note, instructional class periods are considered any class periodnot devoted to examinations or group presentations). The significant time, effort, and planning required to restructure an entire course fromtraditional lecture-based to “flipped” can be prohibitive (or at least discouraging) for someuniversity instructors who may already have a full workload [15], [18]–[21]. In a “flipped” or“inverted” class, instructional content is delivered to students out of class (typically throughvideo
influenced theoutcomes for students, and that international experiences tended to be more intense [23]. In ourcomparison, the China program provided more cultural intensity, but both programs seem tohave provided research intensity (i.e., opportunities to be challenged and develop). However, thecultural experience may have outshone the research challenges for the China participants, as theycertainly focused more on those topics during their interviews.Both IRES programs have several more years remaining, and we plan to continue collecting datafrom both programs. As we build up a larger pool of participants across years, we will alsoexplore the results of the pre/post surveys for cultural intelligence that we have administered. Weare curious to see
social capital, and 6. Insufficient collaborative space. 1. Supportive academic advising at UC DavisOne theme that emerged from the focus groups was the helpfulness of department academicadvisors at UC Davis. The positive impact of these advisors was brought up on five uniqueoccasions throughout the three focus groups. The students described that the advisors werehelpful for staying on track for course and university requirements. UC Davis departmentadvisors work with only one to three majors, and therefore have the knowledge to suggest coursesequences and help plan degree requirements. In one of the focus groups, a student shared howtheir advisor guided them through the process of appealing a grade with an instructor andprovided useful
sessions suchas panels, round tables, workshops and training sessions such as Safe Zone training. The ADChas a vision, mission and published strategic plan, [2] and is an entity to which authors candirectly submit papers.The development of, and institutionalization of the Best Diversity Paper award within ASEE wasa major undertaking that required drafting of the process for soliciting and identifying bestpapers, judging them on a consistent rubric, and disseminating the top papers. The ASEEDiversity Committee crafted a proposal, vetted it internally, worked with ASEE IT staff tocustomize the paper handling system, Monolith, and then vetted with the ASEE Board ofDirectors. The ASEE Board of Directors approved the award and institutionalized it as
general plan as was used for Calculus I. We then present the results ofapplying the full toolkit to the new Calculus II course. Pass rate and GPA improvements inCalculus II were evident immediately after scale up in the spring of 2016. Sufficient time hasnow passed so that we can apply the full set of assessment tools built for Calculus I to measurethe effectiveness of the Calculus II transformation on academic performance in post-requisitecoursework and on student retention in STEM. Page 1 of 151.0 IntroductionThe grade earned in mathematics courses is critical when considering student retention inengineering and in STEM majors. For example, the work by Budny
pharmaceutical, to everydaymanufactured goods [14].There are many articles in the engineering education literature that focus on manufacturingeducation. An article published in 2015 discussed the implications of having a manufacturinginternship or co-op experience on industrial engineering students. The perceptions of thestudents changed significantly with regards to working in the manufacturing sector upongraduation [15]. The “four pillars of manufacturing knowledge” was developed and ismaintained by the Society for Manufacturing Engineers [16]. In a 2014 paper, Ermer presentedthe four pillars of manufacturing knowledge in the education plan for a mechanical engineeringconcentration of a general engineering program, specifically in the manufacturing
rest of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the details of the QuestionFormulation Technique and its use in our study. Section 3 presents our proposed approach for thespecific problem identified in our overall project. Section 4 presents and discusses the empiricaldata mining results obtained. Section 5 provides a summary of our paper with a plan for futurework.2. The Question Formulation TechniqueThe ability to formulate salient questions is a critical life skill that enables the student to moredeeply engage with the content being learned. Questions serve the purpose of making clear andconcrete that which is unknown or misunderstood by the student. By making the unknownconcrete, a pathway for exploration, engagement and
enterprising andinnovative university vary between the two models [11].MethodologyTo answer our question we adopted a qualitative exploratory approach [12]. The data is based onsemi-structured interviews with actors that are part of the support systems for entrepreneurshipeducation in five engineering schools in Chile: Universidad de Chile (UChile), PontificiaUniversidad Católica de Chile (PUC), Universidad de Santiago (USACH), Universidad AdolfoIbáñez (UAI) and Universidad de of Talca (UTalca). The selection criteria prioritized thevariability of Ingeniería 2030 schools. The sample considers one university from each of theselected projects. Each Ingeniería 2030 project commits to transform engineering in Chilefollowing a different strategic plan, but
Acculturative Stress Components and Their Relationship with Depression Among International Students in China. Stress and Health, vol.32, pp.524-532, Dec. 2016.[18] W. Wen, D. Hu, and J. Hao, “International students’ experiences in China: Does the planned reverse mobility work?” International Journal of Educational Development, vol.61, pp.204-212, July. 2018.[19] X. J. Ding, “Exploring the experiences of international students in China,” Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 20, pp. 319-338, Apr. 2016.[20] M. Tian and J. A. Lowe, “Intercultural identity and intercultural experiences of American students in China,” Journal of Studies in International Education, vol.18, pp.281-297, July. 2014.[21] H. C. Sheu
focused upon utilizing the concepts andequations in problems or applications.Each of the Advanced sections received the same level and method of instruction during eachlesson. The only alteration was the addition of the historical references into the lesson plan for theAdvanced intervention group A1 (see Table 2).All of the students in the second-semester course completed nine laboratory experiments in formalgroups and one in-lab writing event. Each lab group submitted a report on each experiment andthe report consisted of a results, analysis, and conclusion sections. All of the experimentsexamined physics concepts that were part of the course material. In the writing event, studentswere tasked with analyzing and discussing provided data in a two
24.2%In addition, all students who indicated a willingness to be interviewed were contacted, and fourinterviews were conducted. Interview questions asked them about choosing to major inengineering, their current career plans, their plans to use their engineering skills in volunteering,the main things they took from the class, how (if at all) it changed their thinking, how they thinkabout ethics, and if they thought the skills and information from their general education courseswould be useful in their careers.Survey data was analyzed to see if survey responses in any areas changed significantly betweenthe pre- and post-surveys using paired sample t-tests. Results were also analyzed, usingindependent sample t-tests, to see if groups of students
respective competitions. This requirement provideda clear guideline for students and established competition travel as a reward instead of anexpectation.The largest changes made were philosophical shifts. As explained above, previous efforts assumedthat all project instruction was done informally by advisors and that classroom sessions were foradministrative usage. Starting in Fall 2015, the department approved a plan to use classroomsessions for a mix of instruction, project work, and reporting of results by all teams. To furtherconnect the classroom sessions with the projects, all faculty advisors agreed to participate inclassroom sessions. Practically, this has implications for teaching load and may not be feasible forall readers. At Lawrence
smartphone nearby. It means that we can approximately measure the distance between the smartphones by observing their RSS values. Of course the RSS fluctuation can occur in this case as well, but the distance between the smartphones carried by the same student is very short. Hence the RSS values tend to be stable and high. Fig. 14 depicts the RSS values between two smartphones located less than 1m distance. The RSS values are quite higher than those of the previous measurements, and thus the attendance cheating can be detected. We plan to substantiate this idea as future work. Figure 15. The RSSs and the numbers of observed beacon frames when multiple beacons (i.e.,smartphone) are located at the same position. 3. BLE signal
context, 4) clarification of self-concept, 5) sense of self in response tofeedback from respected others, 6) self-acceptance and self-esteem, and 7) personal stability andintegration.3 (p 49) As students develop in this vector they become more comfortable with whothey are, and a solid sense of self appears.Developing purpose includes three major categories, 1) vocational plans and aspirations, 2)personal interests, and 3) interpersonal and family commitments.3 (p 50) Students move fromhaving no purpose or sense of who they want to be to unifying their disparate goals and interestswithin a larger, meaningful purpose.Developing integrity includes 1) humanizing values- shifting away from applyinguncompromising beliefs and towards the use of
more than others, hands-on experience is an essential element of learning. Inengineering, many concepts simply cannot be fully taught in a lecture hall or out of a textbook.The teaching of these concepts requires the development of a supplement to the textbook, whichdemonstrates the interplay between basic electromagnetic theory and engineering practice.5 Inthe long term, the plan is to create a laboratory component for EE 330 in which the students willspend two hours every week complementing what they have learned in lecture and practiced inhomework problems with hands-on experience using current tools and technology to solve real-world problems. In the short term, two new hands-on laboratory activities have been created tocompliment the four
experiences as the reason for the decision to pursue full-time employmentimmediately following undergraduate graduation in place of an original plan to continue intograduate studies. The subjects stated two reasons for these change in plans. First that for thecareer field they had chosen to enter, an advanced degree was not necessary and/or was notparticularly useful. The added fear that turning down a job offer to instead attend graduate schoolwould account for a lost opportunity with that employer in the future was cited as an additionalreason for a change in academic and career plans.Not surprisingly, full-time subjects all agreed that their previous co-op experiences specificallyhelped eased the transition to full-time employment as an engineer
achieve sharedaims in engineering education: encourage student autonomy and exploration, grow diverselearning communities and environments, and positively impact retention for those students atrisk of leaving.Prior Work on Maker SpacesTo date, there have been a number of studies of academic and non-academic maker spaces thatprovide answers to important questions. To identify best practices for those planning new makerspaces, Wilczynski2 conducted a review of six of the first university maker spaces illuminatingthe need for 1) a clear mission statement, 2) user training, 3) proper staffing, 4) collaboration, 5)alignment with student work schedules, and 6) attention to creating a maker community oncampus. Similarly, Barrett et al.,1 reviewed
Civil and Urban Engineering department. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Assessing Gender Differences between Student Motivations for Studying EngineeringAbstractThis research paper investigates what motivates students to major in engineering, and how themotives differ between men and women. It aims to address curriculum planning in first-yearengineering programs to improve retention and diversity. Previous research has identified coursepractices – such as team-based projects – that have positively impacted engagement of women inengineering. Understanding the motivations for students to choose engineering can connect thereasons why certain curricular
done to ensure that the childrenparticipating in the program were provided with a high quality experience as the lead facilitatorwas chosen because of her demonstrated ability to work well with children. As such, should theactivity not work out as planned, she could improvise so that the children still gained somethingfrom the experience and had fun during their after school session.After the initial soft pilot at the Kroc Center, the activities were then open for facilitation (betapilot) at other schools. One of the faculty members involved in the project offered students inher junior level mechanical engineering course extra credit if they facilitated an activity at anarea school. Approximately 50% of the students enrolled in the course took
Journal of Engineering Education, Shuman is the Founding Editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University in Operations Research and a B.S.E.E. from the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Shuman is an ASEE Fellow.Dr. Cheryl Matherly Dr. Cheryl Matherly is Vice Provost for Global Education at The University of Tulsa, where she has responsibility for the strategic leadership of the university’s plan for comprehensive internationalization. Dr. Matherly’ co-directs the
student needs. Some Scholars continuemeeting once a week through graduation while others make appointments as needed. Advisingcovers academic planning and success strategies, transition issues, and any personal problemsthat may impact a Scholar’s retention in STEM or at Rice. All student performance is activelymonitored, enabling advisors to intervene even if students are being seen less frequently. RESP’slongitudinal, intrusive advising model proved so successful it has been adapted for other Ricestudents through the development of the Office of Student Success Initiatives. RESP additionallyprovides ongoing term-time programming to address common transition issues, training inlearning and study technique, and student professional development.The
, where he has been teaching Construction Graphics/Quantity Take-Off, CAD & BIM Tools for Construction, Building Construction Systems, Building Construction Estimating, Heavy/Highway Construction Estimating, Construction Planning, and Construction Project Management. Dr. Lee’s main research areas include Construction Informatics and Visual Analytics; Building Information Modeling (BIM), Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Construc- tion Management; and Interactive Educational Games and Simulations. E-mail: leen@ccsu.edu. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Team Building for Collaborative Learning Environment in Construction
IME Elect (END XXX) 3 Prod Plan. and Control IME 483 (END 421) 3 Integr. Eng. Design IME 490 (END 492) 3 Plantwide Process Control IME 476 3 Eng. Ethics & Prof. PHIL323 (ITB 217E) 3 Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Interdisciplinary Studies IS XXX 3 3 TOTAL 15 18The number of credit hours taken at SIUE is 67 and the number of credit hours taken at ITU is 76,making the total 143. Although this number is well above the SIUE’s requirements, it is the
on the relationship between these constructs being the same amongst male and femalestudents. Page 26.732.4InstrumentationA quantitative survey was used to explore differences in construction education-domain levelself-efficacy and motivation among construction management students. The following constructsfrom Elliott’s6 Construction Training Attitudes and Intentions Scale (CTAIS) were utilized fordata collection: planned training behavior (PTB), construction training self-efficacy (CTSE), andtraining motivation attitudes (TMA). The CTAIS identifies characteristics intended to contributeto attrition and performance in construction training
, [and] collaborative learning.”1 Faculty at FloridaGulf Coast University (FGCU) set out to improve their gateway course to the engineeringcurriculum, a one-credit hour course common across three of the four programs within the U. A.Whitaker College of Engineering, being mindful not only of including identified high impacteducational practices, but also incorporating the University’s upcoming 5-year QualityEnhancement Plan (QEP), which focuses on “improving student learning in relation to Writing,Critical Thinking, and Information Literacy.”b The result of these efforts is a course with anemphasis on the development of information literacy, teamwork, and communication skills,focusing on engineering innovations related to the Grand Challenges
the Judging-Perceiving domain. This effect was independent of the effect of exam grade on peer evaluationscore. Those with a preference for Judging (characterized by a planned and organized approachand a preference to make a decision and move on) were found to receive peer evaluation scores1.07% higher on average (p = 0.001) than those with a preference for Perceiving (characterizedby flexibility, spontaneity, and holding off making a decision in order to collect moreinformation).Table 3: Examination of influence of exam grades, gender, and MBTI domains on peerevaluation score. Peer Evaluation Score (2006-2013) Slope of peer
Taiwan’s. The students will also go on cultural field trips. These trips willimmerse the students in Taiwanese culture.Overall, there were 70 students from the United States, Taiwan, China, and the Philippines.Students from SJSU, Beijing Institute of Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, MapúaInstitute of Technology, Republic of China (ROC) Air Force Academy, and CYCU were mixedinto ten groups which collaborated on business projects. The students were split into teams andhad three weeks to come up with a business plan to present to the judges by the end of theprogram. Unless there was a field trip, the students had class on Monday through Friday from 8-12pm, a lunch break, and then lab from 2-5pm. Needless to say, the SJSU students spent a
with advisors and mentors, and provided brainstorming andsupport to help negotiate these relationships.Evaluation MethodologyAssessment and evaluation were an integral part of this project from its initial conception. Thebudget for this project proposed, and was funded, with an explicit eye for evaluation and anexperienced educator was hired to plan, execute, and evaluate the program. Approval for Page 26.825.5research with human subjects was obtained from the University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB), and participants were provided with an informed consent form and had the option toparticipate in the discussion series with—or without
introduce our students to our instructional design module: the H-O-H DesignChallenge. This smaller-scale, less-intense design exercise combines elements of design crea-tivity, decision making, engineering and cost assessments, project planning, and technical (oral)communication. A habitat-like structure is to be designed by arranging a variety of hexagonalprisms - differing in weight and functional characteristics - upon a site map of hexagonal spaces.The overall goal is to design a buoyant structure that is aesthetically appealing, cost competitiveand functionally sound, with adequate anchorage. Our H-O-H (or H2O, for short) designexercise was modeled after the ‘Delta Design’ project of MIT3, with appropriate adaptations tothe marine