Paper ID #6119Not All the Same: A Look at Early Career Engineers Employed in DifferentSub-OccupationsMs. Samantha Brunhaver, Stanford University Samantha Brunhaver is a fifth year graduate student at Stanford University. She is currently working on her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in engineering education. Samantha completed a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University in 2008 and a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in Design for Manufacturing from Stanford in 2010.Dr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford UniversityMichelle Marie Grau, Stanford University Michelle Grau is a senior
presented the results of a survey of engineering study abroad programs thatgave light to some best practices and assessment methods of undergraduate internationalexperiences. Lohmann et al.9 described a quasi-experimental research effort to measure theeffectiveness of study abroad programs using an instrument developed by the InterculturalCommunications Institute10. The Handbook of Intercultural Competence11 acknowledges,however, that developing reliable instruments for this complex construct is challenging due tothe influence of so many external factors and recognizes the efforts of few institutions, includingLohmann et al.9, in measuring impact. Further, Deardoff11 is an advocate of triangulation inwhich assessment instruments are complemented by
Engineering and Management from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Her educational research interests are focused on improving construction management education.Dr. Ross A. Perkins, Boise State University Dr. Perkins is an associate professor in the Department of Educational Technology at Boise State Uni- versity, where he also serves as the coordinator of the department’s Ed.D. program. His research inter- ests include the diffusion and adoption of technologies and innovations for education, mobile learning, instructional design for distance education in STEM and other disciplines, and ICT integration in devel- oping nations. He is the Co-PI on two grants funded by the National Science Foundation
moved from the Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where he was the Head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, in 2010. Tryggvason received his doctorate from Brown University in 1985 and spent a year as a postdoctoral researcher at the Courant Institute. After fifteen years as a professor of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics at the University of Michigan, he moved to WPI in 2000. He has also held short term visiting positions at Caltech, NASA Lewis Engineering Research Center, University of Marseilles, and University of Paris VI. Professor Tryg- gvason is well known for his research on numerical simulations of multiphase and free-surface flows, vortex flows, and flows with phase changes. He is an
Century, Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press (2005). 2. Duderstadt, J. J., Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, (2007). 3. Boyer, E. ,Reinventing Undergraduate Education (The Boyer Commission Report). New York: Carnegie Foundation (2001). 4. Clough, G. W. (Chair), The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academy of Engineering, Washington, D.C., National Academies Press (2004). 5. Council on Competitiveness, Innovate America: Thriving in a
competition2,3, although the pool ofqualified people is quite small. Innovation is key to our industry, and our focus here is to developthe capability of our graduates to innovate4,5 in a field that requires depth and intensecomprehension. The applied mathematicians and aerospace engineers who led the remarkableadvances in high speed designs in the latter half of the 20th century are either retired or nearingretirement. Transferring their knowledge base to the upcoming generation is a concern6, becausethe recipient must have the preparation and discipline needed to grasp the knowledge. This putsthe onus teachers to ensure that candidates aspiring to jobs in the leading aerospaceestablishments have firm basic knowledge and personal discipline in this
through which they impact student performance.Talia Sidne Finkelstein, Oregon State UniversityDr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is in- terested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels
-order application of a systematic Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Arlington, March 21 – 23, 2013. Copyright 2013, American Society for Engineering Educationproduct development life-cycle methodology. A generic methodology has been developed tosupport research portfolio planning and its execution for evolutionary and revolutionary N+3generation commercial subsonic large long haul aircraft concepts and associated with past,present, and future technologies.This study investigated in total 5 case studies for 5 unique technology portfolios, 1 marketsegments (Boeing B777-300ER, 335 PAX), and 2 design scenarios
active learning. We believe that engineering education needs fundamental modifications and new approaches to match the needs of the 21st Century. In previous papers and presentations, we have discussed classes and curricula that are based on the Deweyan pragmatic philosophy and argued that they have tremendous potential for creating critical thinkers and lifelong learners and therefore more adaptable problem solvers than the current crop of engineering-‐education graduates. Authors have also identified the studio model as the best course structure for accommodating Deweyan philosophy. However, a shift to that model requires a comprehensive review
in Figure 3, could be incorporated into the solutioncomponent of the challenge-based learning model. Seminar participants engaged in a briefdesign cycle practice exercise in order to better understand the process. They were asked to pairup and given the challenge of designing a free standing prototype of a structure that will preventa golf ball size object (for example, an egg) dropped from 6 feet from impacting the floor. Theywere given 10 minutes to complete the task, 2 sheets of 8.5x11 inch paper, 6 inches of tape and arubber band. The seminar ended by outlining the goals of CEEMS, as indicated in the grantproposal so that the participants would be aware of their role and the project’s wider scope whichintends to establish a cadre of
Engineering Education. 94(1), 41 – 55.4. ABET Board of Directors (2011). 2012 – 2013 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Baltimore, MD.5. Butcher, D. R. (2006). Redefining engineering for the year 2020, ThomasNet.Com Industrial Market Trends.6. Turns, J., C. J. Atman, et al. (2005). "Research on Engineering Student Knowing: Trends and Opportunities." Journal of Engineering Education: 27-41.7. Dym, C., A. Agogino, et al. (2006). "Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning." IEEE Engineering Management Review 34(1): 65-92.8. Whitman, L., Toro-Ramos, Chaparro, B., Hinckle, V. Z., Davidson, C. and C. Wilkinson. (2009). "A practical global design competition," Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering
. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Angela Bielefeldt, P.E., is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She is currently the associate chair for Un- dergraduate Education in CEAE and has served as the ABET assessment coordinator since 2008. She began incorporating service-learning (SL) projects into the capstone design course for environmental en- gineering in 2001. This began her journey to determine how to rigorously assess the learning outcomes for students who worked on SL projects as compared to other types of projects in the course. Her engineering education research interests also include students
State University program outcomes areachieved by exposing students to a variety of subject material across the undergraduatecurriculum and effectively teaching students across these courses how to preserve and enhancethe engineering profession including ethical and legal practices. The Department of Industrialand Systems Engineering of NC A&T engineering courses that specifically address ethics intheir objectives is GEEN 100- Engineering Design and Ethics, INE 289- Engineering Teams andLeadership, INE 389- Systems Approaches for Industrial and Systems Engineers, and INE 489-Professionalism and Ethics for Industrial and Systems Engineers. In order to effectively enhancethe engineering ethics curriculum and to assess and document the current
significant departure from the traditionalapproaches to engineering education and requires engaging learners in the kind of collaborativeknowledge work that is needed to solve complex problems. Knowledge building is aninstructional approach designed to meet this need.Knowledge building, as developed by Bereiter and Scardamalia, has been written aboutextensively, has formed the basis for considerable research, has been the conceptual focus of aninternational educational research community, and has led to the development of a web-basedtool (Knowledge Forum) designed to facilitate sustained discourse6-11. Although knowledgebuilding is being used around the world to prepare graduates to succeed in the knowledgeeconomy, its potential for reforming
, more broadly, STEM education. His research interests are in theories of cognition, how these theories inform the design of instruction, how we might best design instructional technology within those frameworks, and how the research and development of instructional technologies can inform our theories of cognition. He is also interested in preparing future STEM faculty for teaching, incorporating instructional technology as part of instructional design, and STEM education improvement and reform.Mr. Timothy J Hinds, Michigan State University Timothy J. Hinds is the Academic Director of the Michigan State University College of Engineering CoRe (Cornerstone & Residential) Experience program and a Senior Academic
. Experience of changing theculture in courses and undergraduate research is touched upon, and some metrics are presented togauge the fact that the approach is effective.In conclusion, the list provided at the beginning of the paper is repeated:a. Graduates must know and be able to use what they are supposed to have learned. The idea that the bachelor’s degree is just intended to provide a flavor and trigger interest in engineering, with actual competence coming through lifelong learning, runs into serious trouble in an environment where global corporations can recruit smart, competent graduates from all over the world who can start making an impact immediately.b. There is a large opportunity for improvement in depth of learning. The
Outcomes Assessment Program. His current research explores innovations in the classroom and their diffusion.Dr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University Page 23.1114.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Summer Faculty Immersion as a Strategy to DiffuseEngineering Education Innovations: First Year Results Juan C. Morales, Universidad del Turabo Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University Page 23.1114.2Abstract This paper presents the first-year results of a five-year, externally-funded facultydevelopment program
placing the items in order to achieve the “best flow” for their laboratory. Theyare also asked to put some cards in a separate pile if they reflect what is required as part of thelaboratory infrastructure versus specific measurement flow. During the debriefing, the instructorasks teams to sacrifice one card from their selection to consider minimum impact on the finalresult. The point of the exercise is to show that all of these cards are part of the major categoryheadings of the ISO/IEC 17025 standard and that sacrificing one component will be detrimentalto the quality of their measurement results.The standard is reviewed at this point and two key sections are highlighted, one on the topic ofdocument control and one on records management. Both
engineering and technical project management. Tanya most recently taught mathematics at the Denver School of Science and Technology, the highest performing high school in Denver Public Schools.Dr. Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, BoulderDr. Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder BEVERLY LOUIE is the director for teaching and learning initiatives in the Broadening Opportunities through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center in CU’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in chemical engineering from CU, and a D.Phil. in mechanical engineer- ing from the University of Oxford, England. Dr. Louie’s research interests are in the areas of engineering student retention and
authors also suggest the use of active pedagogies(guided practice, learning by doing), and integration of ethics issues in design courses, whichinherently consider ethical tradeoffs presented by design problems [6].The importance of instruction in ethics and professionalism has been recognized generally by thebusiness and higher education communities. Consider, for example, Bryant University andBentley University – two business-oriented universities that showcase a focus on “ethicalreasoning” (an element of Bryant’s First-Year Gateway core curriculum), and a “commitment tobusiness ethics” where students learn about “management and moral behavior (highlightedthemes of Bentley’s general academic approach of integrating business studies with
Paper ID #6144Connecting Cognitive Domains of Bloom’s Taxonomy and Robotics to Pro-mote Learning in K-12 EnvironmentJames Muldoon, Polytechnic Institute of NYU James Muldoon received B.S. degrees in Computer Engineering and Computer Science from the Univer- sity of South Florida, Tampa, FL, in 2012. Upon graduation, he started research for a M.S. degree in Computer Engineering in the Wireless Telecommunications Lab under the supervision of Dr. Sundeep Rangan at Polytechnic Institute of NYU. He is currently serving as a teaching fellow at the Fort Greene Prep Middle School under NYU-Poly’s GK-12 program funded by the
Paper ID #6759Negotiating Masculine Spaces: Attitudes and Strategies of First-Year Womenin EngineeringDr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communica- tion and teamwork in engineering, design education, and engineering identity. She was awarded a CA- REER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is co-PI on NSF . Her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication
engineering practices?Results of a survey of high school teachers on their perceptions of student motivation andlearning as well as the impact of the competition on student career plans are also presented.1. IntroductionTeachers want their students to succeed in what they are taught and seek testing instruments toassess their learning. Sometimes regular testing instruments are not adequate. For such reasonsteachers have students participate in academic competitions. Competitions expose and enhancestudent’s practical understanding of the subject matter by providing a platform to practice.Competitions help students become successful, build teamwork, and assist in improving studentskills. The experience of going through a design, build, and test cycle
Puebla (UDLAP) is a Mexican private institution of higherlearning committed to first-class teaching, public service, research and learning in a wide rangeof academic disciplines including business administration, the physical and social sciences,engineering, humanities, and the arts. Since 1959, the Commission on Colleges of the SouthernAssociation of Colleges and Schools (SACS) has accredited UDLAP in the United States.The Food Engineering program from UDLAP is approved by the Institute of Food Technologists(IFT) and accredited by the Consejo de Acreditación de la Enseñanza de la Ingeniería (CACEI),which is the peer-accrediting agency of the US Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) in Mexico. Graduates of UDLAP’s Food
. “Globalization presentsengineering educators with new challenges as they face the need for graduates who can functioncomfortably in an increasingly distributed team context which crosses country and culturalboundaries”16.Furthermore, both students and professors themselves comprise a diversity that is widelyacknowledged. If, for example, one “googles” the keywords “engineering school diversity professor student,” one will easily find a number of universities addressing the diversity of their student populations. When students work together, “it remains a big challenge for students with different educational backgrounds, practical experience and ethnic backgrounds, to coordinatetheir knowledge, thinking and activities”17. In addition, “googling” “diverse
to progress beyond thelower tiers of Bloom’s taxonomy. [3] Over the past year, we have developed and implemented an instructional method thatemploys blended classroom methods to improve student learning. Dubbed “Thayer 2.0,” [Figure2], the method leverages technology and blends some of the best characteristics of the C&MEMethod, the original Thayer Method, and the Khan Academy. In conjunction with a literaturereview, a beta test of Thayer 2.0 was conducted during the spring semester of academic year2013 to gauge student feedback and to establish operating procedures and instructional best-practices for a broader implementation. The lessons learned from development and student inputare discussed in this paper. A broader test, which
design and teach a STEM-based unit of work. Robyne’s pedagogical focus is on providing the best learn- ing environment for individual student growth and her current research interest is how learning to teach provides engineering students with the cognitive, conative and metacognitive skills needed for effective problem-solving in the engineering workplace. Page 21.46.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Preparing the Global Engineer: How learning to teach in a Service-LearningProject Develops Effective Oral Communication Skills in Engineering Students.AbstractGlobalisation
University Mona Eskandari is a graduate student in mechanical engineering at Stanford University with a focus in biomechanics.Mr. Jackie Liao, Stanford University Jackie Liao is a Master’s student in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University in the Dynamic Design Lab (DDL) under Professor Chris Gerdes. Jackie is currently designing the sensing systems for vintage race cars with a focus on driver input measurements such as steering wheel angle, throttle, brake and clutch measurements. Jackie has worked with Ford Motor Company and Microsoft Research Asia.Mr. Zubair Ahmed Zubair Ahmed and his family immigrated to the U.S. in 2005, and he is a Master’s Degree candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford. He is a co
a project manager and senior con- sultant. He has taught and developed undergraduate and graduate courses in electronics, power systems, control and power electronics, electric machines, instrumentation, radar and remote sensing, numerical methods and data analysis, space and atmosphere physics, and physics. His research interests included power system stability, control and protection, renewable energy system analysis, assessment and design, power electronics and electric machines for wind energy conversion, radar and remote sensing, wave and turbulence simulation, measurement and modeling, numerical modeling, electromagnetic compatibility and engineering education. During his career Dr. Belu published several
scope and accuracy. Also, simulations (e.g., for electronicdesign) used in industrial practice for verifying designs and checking faults are orders ofmagnitude more expensive than educational simulations [15]. The second approach involvesusing the Internet to allow students to manipulate and observe real equipment andinstrumentation located at a distance. This approach is often referred to as remote labs. Remotelabs deal with real phenomena and equipment and can be used to build skills as well asknowledge. At National University, we have used a combination of both approaches describedhere [16]. Implementation of tools such as ELVIS (Educational Laboratory VirtualInstrumentation Suite) and Emona DATEx (Digital Analog Telecommunications