as Assistant Head for Academic Affairs and Associate Professor of Engi- neering Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. His research background is in cellular biochemistry, tissue engineering, and engineering ethics. He is committed to developing effective ped- agogies for ethical reasoning and engineering design and for increasing the diversity and inclusion of engineering education.David Torres, Purdue University David is a third year doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University pursuing a PhD in Organizational Communication with a minor in data analysis and research methodol- ogy. His research interests reside at the intersection of organizational
− � × 𝑄𝑄𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢 𝑃𝑃𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑉𝑉𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 2 × 𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇In this scoring system all correct answers received 100% of question points if students respondedcorrectly in under 0.5 seconds; the minimum point value for a correct answer was 50% of thetotal question points and wrong answers got zero points.Results and discussionDuring the research period, academic learning performance was compared to determine thelearning impact on students when the in-class practice problems were implemented. Students’knowledge was assessed by weekly assignments and four midterm exams during the semester.The final examination was conducted at the end of semester (week 16). The final
).7. DeLozier, S. J. & Rhodes, M. G. Flipped Classrooms: a Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice. Educ. Psychol. Rev. (2016). doi:10.1007/s10648-015- 9356-98. Freeman, S. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 8410–8415 (2014).9. Prince, M. Does Active Learning Work ? A Review of the Research. J. Eng. Educ. 93, 223–231 (2004).10. Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B. & Zeytuncu, Y. E. Flipping a College Calculus Course: A Case Study. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 18, 142–152 (2015).11. Talbert, R. in Best practices for flipping the college classroom (eds. Waldrop, J. B. & Bowdon, M. A.) 29–43 (Routledge, 2015
Security and Software Engineering Research Center (S2ERC). Prior to joining ISU he was at Northwestern University in Evanston, IL, where he graduated with his Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2006, his M.S. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2002, and his B.S. degree summa cum laude in Computer Engineering in 2001. While at Northwestern University, Dr. Zambreno was a recipient of a National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship, a Northwestern University Graduate School Fellowship, a Walter P. Murphy Fellowship, and the EECS department Best Dissertation Award for his Ph.D. dissertation titled ”Compiler and Architectural Approaches to Software Protection and
Materials in particular. A web based app that does not requireinstallation and could be reached from any device seems to be a convenient option.AcknowledgmentThis research is supported by the Center for Educational Research and Teaching Innovation(CERTI) at Missouri university of Science and Technology (Missouri S&T). The author thanksDiane Hagni, Angie Hammons, and Razmus Kerwin for their support in conducting this research.The author would like to thank Iman Mehdipour, a graduate student at Missouri S&T for hisvaluable contribution in analyzing the collected raw data as well as Jesse Serrano III, anundergraduate student at Missouri S&T for his help on developing instructional documents.Special thanks goes for Dr. Tim Philpot and Dr
engineering work, he is also a published freelance photographer who has works with local and international NGOs. Dr. Striebig was the founding editor of the Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Development and an assistant editor for the Journal of Green Building. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2017 ASEE Annual Conference Building Life Cycle Assessment skills with GREET and SimaPro to engage students in analyzing the sustainability of biofuel alternativesSustainability is important in manufacturing, construction, planning and design. The concepts ofsustainability have been pigeon-holed into graduate
flipped classroom pedagogy and hands-on experimental practice promotes thehierarchy of student learning in groups. The paper concludes with a discussion of need forfurther research on faculty developmental patterns, how they are impacted by varied supports,and the need for more research on the role of student grouping and related outcomes.IntroductionInstructional processes and supporting curriculum in higher education STEM settings areundergoing rapid reform; institutions are now striving to match the needs of incoming students,the expectations of business and industry, and the requirements of technological advances. Newor refined pedagogy is now being implemented that reflects real-world problem solving; theemphasis in today’s STEM classroom is
., “The maker movement in education”, Harvard Educational Review, vol. 84, no. 4, pg. 495-565, 2014.12 Fairweather, J., “Linking Evidence and Practices in STEM Undergraduate Education, A Status Report for National Academies National Research Council Board of Sciences”, http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_0726 37.pdf, Commissioned Papers, Evidence on Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education Workshop 2 October 13-14, 2008.13 Kafai, Y., Fields, D., and Searle, K., “Electronic Textiles as Disruptive Designs: Supporting and Challenging Maker Activities in Schools”, Harvard
a Master of Science in Computer Science from Florida Atlantic University in 2015 and has worked within the Engineering field since completing his degree. The objective of Mr. Terrell’s graduate research was to identify socioeconomic demographic risk factors impacting the life chances of minority groups within 100 of the top populated metropolitan areas in the USA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017A Case-Study Approach to Interlink Humanities with Engineering EducationAbstract:We have developed an executable case-study approach to expose engineering students to socialand community issues. Undergraduate engineering students can team up with social sciencestudents to identify, analyze
Paper ID #18253Weaving Entrepreneurially Minded Learning Throughout a Civil Engineer-ing CurriculumDr. Andrea L. Welker, Villanova University Dr. Andrea L. Welker, PE, is the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and a professor in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova University. Dr. Welker teaches a variety of geotechnical undergraduate and graduate classes. Her research focuses on the geotechnical aspects of stormwater control measures and the use of recycled materials in plastic pipes. In addition to teaching and performing research, she is the senior director of the Civil Engineering
Paper ID #19225The Development and Evaluation of Expert Witness Role Play Instruction forTeaching Engineering EthicsMs. Alison J. Kerr, University of Tulsa Alison Kerr is a graduate student at The University of Tulsa. She is pursuing a doctoral degree in Industrial-Organizational Psychology. Her research interests include training development and evaluation as explored across a variety of academic disciplines and organizational settings. She is currently assist- ing on a number of training projects aimed at developing engineering students on relevant non-technical professional skills including ethical practice and
knowledge regardingSTEAM subjects and potential future careers, then, it in necessary, to establish a workinginterpretation of what STEAM education looks like.In the quest to define criteria to what is STEAM education, the Scientists for Tomorrowinitiative explored existing programs with declared intentions to promote STEM or STEAMeducation. At Virginia Tech’s School of Education, Integrative STEM Education isoperationally defined as "the application of technological/engineering design basedpedagogical approaches to intentionally teach content and practices of science andmathematics education concurrently with content and practices of technology/engineeringeducation. Integrative STEM Education is equally applicable at the natural intersections
holds a M.S. and B.S in Computer Science with a concentration in software engineering from the same university. Her primary research interests are in the areas of low- power high performance digital systems design, asynchronous design, self-timed digital system design and STEM education. As a result of her work, she has numerous peer reviewed journal and conference publications. She recently authored a book entitled ”Low Power Self-Timed Size Optimization for an Input Data Distribution,” which explores innovative techniques to reduce power consumption for portable electronic devices. She was recently awarded the 2016 Chair’s award for Rookie Researcher of the year in the Computer System Technology department. Dr
modalities(examples provided in Figure 7). Students also discuss strengths-based leadership and thediversity of skills within their peer group. We illustrate this idea using the Four Domains ofLeadership Strength (Rath and Conchie, 2008) and point out to our students that by celebratingtheir strengths, they can develop highly functional teams that overcome their individualweaknesses. Further, we implement best practices, making evidence-based adjustments to ourteaching. We model being receptive to constructive criticism by checking with students aftereach unit to see what is or is not effective for their learning. We routinely use this studentfeedback to tweak activities and improve the course. In this way, we generate a classroomenvironment in
practice problems, and took a group quiz at the end of the week.Groups were changed each week. Assessment was by comparing changes in exam performance between the control and studygroups and through a survey. Comments in the survey indicated a change in student attitude when assigned to a group.Students revealed a desire to be supportive in their groups, and said they prepared accordingly –an encouraging result. However, less encouraging, students confessed to preparing less for groupquizzes, knowing others in their groups would provide what they lacked. Exam scores did notindicate a significant difference between the control groups and the test groups.IntroductionThe flipped or inverted classroom has been widely researched and continues to be
participantsfelt that they were better prepared for future studies or employment, they did not feel like thesummer research experience had a significant impact on their future career or degree plans.Finally, while almost all of the participants described their summer research experience aspositive, areas for improvement included better planning and access to mentors, as well as morestructured activities for the teachers to adapt their research activities for the classroomIntroductionResearch experiences for undergraduate students have long been identified as a powerful tool tosupport and prepare participants to pursue graduate education in a science, technology,engineering or mathematics discipline1–3. Initiatives to promote these experiences such as
Paper ID #18562Teaching Entrepreneurial Mindset in a First-Year Introduction to Engineer-ing CourseDr. Chao Wang, Arizona State University Chao Wang received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Wisconsin, Madison. She is currently a senior lecturer in Ira. A Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Teaching Entrepreneurial Mindset in a First Year Introduction to Engineering CourseAbstractWith a mission to graduate engineers who can create personal, economic, and societal valuethrough a lifetime
International Engagement in the Department of Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program, Center for Human- Computer Interaction, and Human-Centered Design Program. His research tend to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Factors Related to Faculty Views Toward Undergraduate Engineering Ethics EducationAbstract This study focuses on faculty members’ views of how engineering ethics should fitwithin their own most frequently taught course and in the undergraduate engineering
rm focused on the evaluation of the use and deployment of technology assisted teaching and learning. Throughout her career, she has served as an external evaluator for a number of NSF-funded projects associated with faculty development, community building, peer review of learning materials, and dissemination of educational innovation. She was PI for the project ”Learning from the Best: How Award Winning Courseware has Impacted Engineering Education.” This research focuses on determining how high quality courseware is being disseminated and what impact it is having on the culture of engineering education as measured by changes in student learning, teaching practices, and the careers of the authors of these
State University. She leads a comprehensive research agenda related to issues of cur- riculum and instruction in engineering education, motivation and preparation of under served populations of students and teachers and in assessing the impact of operationalizing culturally responsive teaching in the STEM classroom. As executive director of the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research, she collaborates on various state and national STEM education programs and is PI on major grant initiatives through NASA MUREP, NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education and NSF DUE . Araceli holds Engineering degrees from The University of Michigan and Kettering University. She holds a Masters degree in Education from Michigan
frequently serves as a mentor and invited speaker at CS education and outreach events.Dr. E. F. Charles LaBerge, University of Maryland, Baltimore County E. F. Charles (Chuck) LaBerge is Professor of the Practice of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering and Undergraduate Program Director for the Computer Engineering Program at UMBC (University of Maryland, Baltimore County), where he teaches a wide variety of courses ranging from Introduction to Engineering for freshmen to Error Correcting Codes and Information Theory for graduate students. From 1975-2008, he was employed by Honeywell’s Aerospace Research and Technology Center and its predecessor organizations
education.References1 ABET. Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs. (2014).2 Phase, I. Educating the Engineer of 2020:: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. (National Academies Press, 2005).3 Ainsworth, S. in Visualization: Theory and practice in science education 191-208 (Springer, 2008).4 Miskioğlu, E. E. in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE. 1-7 (IEEE).5 Kolb, D. A. Learning styles and disciplinary differences. The modern American college, 232-255 (1981).6 Miskioğlu, E. E. Learning in Style: Investigation of Factors Impacting Student Success in Chemical Engineering at Individual and Team-Levels with a Focus on Student Learning Styles, The Ohio State University
in 2009; Brazil in 2010; China in 2012; Costa Rica in 2013; New Zealand in 2014; Italyin 2015; and Chile in 2016. Over 280 students and seventeen different faculty members haveparticipated.This study abroad program was initially designed to address ABET General Criterion 3(h) whichnotes that graduates must have “the broad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental and societal context.” Specific ABETeducational outcomes for the program include: 1) the broad education necessary to understand theimpact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context, 2) recognition of the need for, andan ability to engage in, life-long learning, and 3) knowledge of contemporary issues
SolidWorks every year. Instead, the instructor assigned an “e-text” (SolidProfessor)for the course. This research explores using commercially-produced content to teach thesoftware program portion of a computer-aided design course.Research QuestionsOne goal of the new mechanical engineering program is to identify best practices throughassessment of the courses and program. Another goal of the faculty is to ensure the studentshave a positive experience in each course. After every semester, student evaluations are assessedfor trends and opportunities to improve the course. Most recently for this course, the instructorswanted to gage the students’ opinions regarding the hybrid classroom approach and evaluate howit impacted their learning. Results of an
implications for futureextension of the program to include a greater number of teachers, across a wider range ofgeographical areas.Methodology & MeasurementsThe first three years of the program (Autumn 2012 – Spring 2015) tested different tools todetermine a program with components best equipped to educate the participating teachers, createa professional learning community, and impact teacher practice. Based on established researchand the program’s theoretical model, this would empower the participants to teach materialsscience concepts effectively to their students. Twenty to thirty teachers have participatedannually. Additionally, treatment teachers can participate in the program for multiple years. The2016-2017 iteration of the program has been
seating and desks. Soundproofing was added to both rooms as thestudents’ research showed that a more quiet study space was desirable. Carpet padding wasincluded in the East Reading Room design, and limp mass, acoustic foam, and sound panelingfor both areas.Through this project, the Director of Public Services and the Engineering Librarian were able toserve as a client of engineering students. The students learned how important it was to meet theneeds of their client, which may not always be the most optimal or best option from anengineering standpoint. For instance, the students’ final design relocated the Research Help Deskto the back wall. When this was presented to the entire library staff, the students receivedcomments that the staff
observations2 , discussion questions, verbal protocols 3, and several multiple choice style instruments 4–6. Theefforts to develop effectuation as education have also included textbooks7 and instructionalmaterials available from the ‘Society for Effectual Action’8. While each of these pieces ofscholarship approaches effectuation education differently, they all provide an increasing body ofknowledge on which to teach effectuation. Most relevant to our work has been the ongoingdevelopment of the survey instruments which seek ways to quantify and measure effectualbehavior for research and teaching.However, the instruments and methods designed to measure effectuation are collectively limitedin two critical ways. First, they perpetuate a problem noted in
the James F. Lufkin Award for the best conference paper—on the intersections between professional communication research and social jus- tice—at the 2012 International Professional Communication Conference. In 2015, he won the Ronald S. Blicq Award for Distinction in Technical Communication Education from the Professional Communica- tion Society of the Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). His current research focuses on rendering visible and integrating the social justice dimensions inherent in three components of the engineering curriculum—in engineering sciences, engineering design, and humanities and social science courses. That research, conducted with co-author Juan C. Lucena, will
of Transportation Safety and Secu- rity. He also serves on the editorial board of the African Geographic Review and is an Associate Editor for the ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. He has authored or co-authored more than 150 technical articles, conferences papers, design manuals, and project reports on a range of transportation topics. Steven currently focuses his professional efforts on transportation is- sues in developing countries and cultivating international relationships to facilitate collaborative research, education and technology transfer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Betting on the Progress – Forging a
larger campuses or theory-based programs. • Emphasize the junior year as the start of a new curriculum and help all juniors to feel part of the same cohesive cohort. • Add distance courses to enable remote students to complete the curriculum Student Learning Outcomes for the Bachelor Degree Option Graduates of the Computer Systems Technology option will demonstrate: • An ability to identify and apply current technical concepts and practices in the core computer systems technologies of database management, web technology, computer programming, digital media, and network/system administration. • An ability to analyze, design, implement, test, and maintain complex computer