graduates to fill these new jobs.There is currently a large gap in the number of K-12 level teachers available in the area of careerand technical education. One possible solution to this problem may come from a specificsegment of the workforce, veterans. This paper will provide an overview of different challengesthat many veterans are facing after joining career switcher programs for future teachers.IntroductionDigital transformation is leading to a shift in many current jobs. Cybersecurity has become partof any virtual job [1], which became quite clear during the Covid-19 pandemic. The pandemicalso led to more openings for cybersecurity professionals, as well as a huge growth of thatspecific industry sector since there was a large rise in the
Outreach Center (ROC): Mechanisms for Interdisciplinary CollaborationThe Research and Outreach Center (ROC) was established in 2010 by the SEMS Dean toconnect SEMS faculty and students with the region, the nation and the globe, demonstratediversity and interdisciplinary interests of all three departments with the school. ROC creates astimulating environment for faculty and staff to achieve their career goals and professionaldevelopment. Professional development of the faculty is achieved through researchconversations meetings (described more fully in the next section), summer research experiences,professional society training activities and technical/scientific conferences. From an institutionalstrategic point of view, the establishment of SEMS
years. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Exploring the Future of Engineering Education: Perspectives from a Workshop onArtificial Intelligence and the Future of STEM and SocietiesAbstractThe objective of this NSF funded workshop was to explore ways that artificial intelligence (AI)is transforming the jobs landscape and in turn, the knowledge portfolio and skills that educatorsshould be imparting on their students prior to graduation. To best address these issues,engineering researchers, policy advocates, and industry leaders were convened to discuss thefuture of STEM and societies in the age of AI. From an engineering education domain, workshopparticipants were made aware of fundamental
the adequacy of the case [21]. We were full participants in everyaspect of this faculty search and held distinct roles and perspectives (Sandekian as an ex-officiomember of the college committee acting as the advisor for process equity and logistics manager,Stamo as a lead member of the student team, and Lewis as the college-wide committee chair).These varying roles allowed us to access all key decision points and conversations that would nothave typically been open to an outside investigator. We have also provided thick, rich detailsregarding the process that occurred and what process changes we implemented from ourcollege’s prior faculty hiring process.Figure 1: Search Phases and ProcessFindingsFigure 1 was developed to help the reader
girls’ STEMengagement [15]. Several researchers have found that same-sex role models positivelyinfluence women’s decisions to work in traditionally male-dominated fields [15] [16] [17].Female faculties have been proposed to function as same-sex role models, which mayinoculate female students against the harmful impact of stereotypes impugning their ability incomputer science and engineering [15]. Female faculties’ identity as an educator impact onnext-generational gender equality development [15]. Scholars suggest that more studiesshould provide insights into hidden barriers to female faculty career development in computerscience and engineering [15][18].Identity Negotiation: A Position Theory LensIdentity recognition and acceptance support
Paper ID #17925First Generation Students’ Engineering BelongingnessMr. Hank Boone, University of Nevada, Reno Hank Boone is an Academic Success Coach at Nevada State College and a recent graduate from the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on First Generation engineering college students’ engineering identity, belongingness, and how they perceive their college experience. He also worked under his advisor on a project looking at non-normative engineering students and how they may have differing paths to success. His education includes a B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Nevada
it is more useful than a thesis because it's an intensely applied process.” Preparation for Insights into how the project prepares students for real-world engineering challenges, Professional Life enhancing future career skills by providing experiences that mirror professional (9) scenarios and decision-making. - “I was able to delve into a project that I hadn't evaluated before, which helped me improve my skills as a future engineer.” Skills Descriptions of personal development in critical thinking and decision-making, Development (3) highlighting the enhancement of collaborative skills and the ability to analyze problems from multiple angles for
Scientists, American Indian Science and Engineering Society, and the Alliance/Merck Ciencia Hispanic Scholars Program. She has presented workshops on graduate school admissions, ”The Success Equation,” STEM initiatives, and PhD Completion in Panama, Mexico, Ecuador, Colombia, Puerto Rico, and schools across the United States. Tull is on the board of advisors for the PNW-COSMOS Alliance to increase the number of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) students who complete STEM graduate programs, and is a speaker on ”GRADLab” tour with the National GEM Consortium, giving talks across the US each Saturday morning during the Fall. Tull researched speech technology as former member of the faculty at the University of
Camp) which was supported by the University of Wisconsin-Stout STEPS program5. The initial offering of the STEPS Camp at the University of St. Thomas(UST) was driven by the desire to educate, motivate, and inspire young girls about the STEMdisciplines. For the first fifteen years of the camp, students were resided on campus and attendedclasses which culminated in model plane building. By 2014 the program's goals no longeraligned with reports which highlighted race, gender, and income disparities in STEM.Recognizing this, members of the engineering faculty determined that a camp that does notreflect the target demographic of students in its staff nor accommodate for low-income families,was an ineffective way to reach students falling on the
WFU Engineering inaugural graduating class had about 50% of engineeringstudents participate in study abroad experiences at locations like Chile, Australia, Italy,Denmark, Spain, Germany, England, etc. This is just one example of how student feedback andengineering education research informed curricular decisions and informed advisingstructures, practices, and policies.Beyond academic advising, career advising is an important aspect to Educating the WholeEngineer and Educating the Whole Student towards degree completion and professional success.When WFU Engineering launched in 2017, the WFU Office of Personal and CareerDevelopment (OPCD) was also undergoing growth and development under new leadership. Theonly OPCD staff that had experience
Engineering Education at Purdue University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring Teamwork Experiences in Collaborative Undergraduate Research (REU) Programs through Tuckman's Group Development TheoryAbstractBackground: Undergraduate Research Programs (URPs) provide students with opportunities toengage in authentic research experiences under the mentorship of faculty members. URPs areincreasingly recognized as an important component of undergraduate education, as they can helpstudents develop critical thinking skills, research skills, and teamwork skills. A notable initiativein this regard is the Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) funded by the NationalScience Foundation (NSF) which
Group, MIT TechnologyReview 35 Innovators under 35 (China) and American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) GulfSouthwest (GSW) Outstanding Young Faculty Award. An Iterative Design Approach in Biomedical Engineering Student Group ProjectsAbstractThe engineering design process allows students to establish a step-by-step approach to solvingreal-world problems. This study explores the practical application of iterative design in aBiomedical Engineering course at The University of Texas at Austin. The innovations we haveproposed for the design process involve starting with the analysis of a current technology describedin a scientific article and improving the technology through multiple iterations using
this masculine perspective underlies the hierarchy in how categories and sub-categories of faculty work are weighted in promotion, tenure, and salary decisions. For example,more “pure” scholarship is given more status and rewards: theory over application, quantitativeover qualitative, publishing over presenting, academic audiences over public audiences. Inaddition, work associated with students is devalued, and service to national organizations,conferences, or journals carries more weight than university or community service [17].Ultimately, Park argues for redefining and assessing scholarship as a way for universities tovalue women and fairly evaluate their contributions.Regardless of the values inherent in promotion systems, studies show
services?This paper reports on an evidence-based practice in a mid-sized engineering school within alarge East Coast public, four-year university. This partnership responds to students who needdifferent kinds of support and expertise as they confront both personal and academic challengesduring the engineering studies. The initiative is composed of a unique collaboration betweenacademic personnel [mainly the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs (ADUP), but alsoincluding rank and file faculty] and an Engineering Associate Dean of Students (EADoS)holding a PhD in Higher Education. The EADoS was embedded in the engineering school,physically collocated with the engineering undergraduate office, and served only engineeringstudents (as compared to
for Sustainable Energy and Power Systems (CenSEPS) and a member of the Sus- tainable Engineering and Ecological Design Program at UCSC. He is recipient of numerous awards including a Sloan Foundation Faculty Fellowship, the Burton Medal from the Microscopy Society of America, an Alexander von Humboldt Senior Scientist Award, the Rank Prize in Optoelectronics and the Distinguished Scientist Award from the Microscopy Society of America. He is a Fellow of the AAAS and the MSA. He has been elected to the executive board of the Engineering Research Council of the American Society of Engineering Education and is series co-editor of ”Advances in Microscopy and Microanalysis” published by Cambridge University Press. He is
worldviewoptions.18 In addition, encouraging students to make connections between engineering andhuman spirituality is seen to be an important aspect of a whole-person education.19 AlthoughORU is a Christian institution, students are encouraged to wrestle with these issues and come totheir own conclusions based on the evidence from all pertinent fields of study.In conducting these 250 seminars, churches and schools are contacted by project team membersto explore their openness to the idea of a presentation on science and faith. A description of theseminar is provided, and many groups accept and appreciate our offer to serve them in this way.A convenient date is set and the standard presentation is modified based on the interests and ageof the audience
the final draft stage.Despite these shortcomings, the members of the FLC agree that other goals of convening an FLC[1] were fulfilled. We certainly created a stronger sense of community among interdisciplinaryfaculty members, and all advanced our knowledge of the scholarship of teaching and learning inthe process. Additionally, several other project ideas and collaborations grew out of this FLC thatinclude subsets of members as well as other faculty, so the positive results of this effort are notlimited in duration to the initial FLC.Our suggestions for others attempting to define a similar FLC include clarifying the goals of theFLC early in the process, incorporating the 10 qualities necessary for community in FLCs, andincorporating most or
career progressed, and frequently stated that thistrait is necessary for a successful career in engineering, but is not always an attribute that womendisplay. The sections that follow outline the findings of the study, including both the key factorsof support that helped women to be successful in academic engineering programs (ResearchQuestion 1) and the challenges that women frequently faced and overcame in their career(Research Question 2). The Challenge of Balancing Work and Family Demands: Making Tradeoffs Women at all three campuses described balancing work and family as one of the mostchallenging aspects of their careers in engineering. Female faculty members explained that theyhad to make significant tradeoffs to have children
tends to focus almostexclusively on distinctive professional responsibilities – that is to say, ethical issues that arecommonly presented by the immediate practice of the work typical of each. For undergraduates,this is professional ethics in an industrial or consulting context.1 For graduate students, whosetraining is preparation for a career in research, this is typically research ethics, implicitly in anacademic context.2 Thus, both construe the responsibilities of the engineer relatively narrowly.In particular, the concerns of each taper dramatically as the borders of the immediate work siteare crossed. While some focus is of course necessary and appropriate, the present narrowness hasarguably become unhealthily myopic, particularly
engineering helped guide their engineering interests anddecision to pursue engineering as a major. The triangulation of the faculty participants’ datasupported these findings as all five faculty participants reported strong self-efficacy beliefs inmathematics and science prior to college.Choice Theme III: Engineering ExpectationsThe eleven student participants reflected on similar beliefs regarding their outcome expectationsrelated to obtaining an engineering degree. The common thread among their beliefs was how anengineering degree could provide them with career opportunities that would allow them toachieve their personal, social, and career goals. This illustrated the central role outcomeexpectations play in regulating and influencing an
workplace adjustment for engineers and the corresponding influence on job satisfaction and intentions to persist. Rohini’s other interests include faculty development and engineering pathways of graduating engineers.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering
in academic environments. Moreover, Roma currently holds managerial roles and leads Extreme Building, Road, and Bridge Construction PLC, contributing to construction projects in the Shashemene district of Ethiopia.Demitu Geda, Bule Hora University Demitu Geda is a graduate of Waliata Sodo University with a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering and holds a Master’s degree in the same field from Bule Hora University. Currently, Demitu is a faculty member, instructing electrical and computer engineering courses at Bule Hora University in Ethiopia. Her research enhances accessibility, quality, and equity in engineering education, ensuring inclusivity for all students irrespective of gender, religion
Paper ID #12323AdvanceRIT Connect Grants: Driving Momentum for Disruptive Change forWomen STEM FacultyProf. Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology Professor Sharon Mason is an Associate Professor in the Department of Information Sciences and Tech- nology at RIT where she has served on the faculty since 1997. Sharon has been involved in computing security education at RIT since its inception. She is a PI of for the Department of Defense (DoD) In- formation Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP) awards to RIT. These scholarships enable students to study and do research in graduate programs in security
for students to develop thesame fundamental skills that they currently learn, but to see how these skills can be applied toproblems and situations that don’t appear in traditional textbooks. By placing the technicalconcepts in new contexts, students will learn to critically evaluate the impact of their work innew ways, and they will graduate with a better understanding of their potential to useengineering to create change. For industrial engineers and systems engineering (ISyE) majors,this presents an opportunity to include examples of ISyE outside of traditional manufacturing,supply chain, or healthcare settings to show how the field can to address broader societalproblems.In Fall 2017, this changemaking content was introduced to ISYE 340
Universities, Hispanic Serving Institutions, and Tribal Colleges and Universities. His efforts transformed the way the National Science Foundation both solicited the premier Graduate Research Fellowship Program, which led to comprehen- sive changes in other federal STEM fellowships. In his role at Mason, Carr supports the faculty with search committee parameters to help ensure that the George Mason faculty better represents the diverse Mason student body, he supports the Office of the Dean and the associate deans in their efforts to develop and enhance an equitable and just campus climate within the College of Engineering and Computing, and he supports the larger campus community goals by helping to challenge the status
has come from all colleges at the institution, although participation has not beenproportional to the number of faculty in each college. Colleges with overt and regularendorsement from the leadership of DEIS efforts have had the greatest level of participation.Colleges and disciplines with historic resistance to DEIS concepts demonstrated the lowestparticipation rates.The survey was designed by internal evaluators on the project and refined by an externalevaluator as well as graduate students on the project to measure perceptions of support forindividuals hailing from minoritized groups (gender, race/ethnicity). The survey also asks aboutperceptions of the extent to which inequities existed on Michigan Tech’s campus with regard tocampus
handbook and guidelines were intended to be resources for developing a healthy mentor-mentee relationship.Epic FailThe third initiative of the program is an event called Epic Fail. Epic Fail is an open microphoneevent where faculty members and students share their personal stories of failure, to dispelimposter syndrome. Having an open microphone structure with no main speaker, Epic Fail isconsidered a unique event, separate from the speaker series. This event has a goal tocommunicate that “Fail” stands for First Attempt in Learning and that failure is part ofengineering. In fact, everyone fails, even the best in any field. It is important to emphasize that itis not only okay to fail but also a valuable way to improve by identifying ways to perform
to the activity, Aluminum Careers diversity of engineering careers available for Aluminum Foil Foil Boats. them to explore and the processes associated Boats with earning an engineering degree. 4 Learning Styles Introduce and discuss different student Building Activity: Introduce students to the activity, Straw learning styles, emphasizing the importance Straw Towers Towers. of customizing one's learning according to personal preferences 5 Industry Guest An invited guest speaker from industry, Ethics Complete the
with a specialization in electrical engineering from Roger Williams University. Her research interests include developing professional skills for engineering students and understanding mathematics barriers that exist within engineering.Ms. Katherine Drinkwater, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Katie Drinkwater is a recent graduate of Duke University with a Bachelor’s in Mechanical Engineering. She is excited to begin working towards her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in the Fall. Her interest in Engineering Education began through a project where she helped to design a makerspace inside a shipping container. Since then, she has explored design and engineering education through
factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Di- vision Apprentice Faculty Grant. She has also been recognized for the synergy of research and teaching as an invited participant of the 2016 National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Ed- ucation Symposium and 2016 New Faculty