,even whole degrees, on-line. A lot of them offer graduate courses and programs online. Some,even at the high-school level, are offering online degrees.LaMeres and Plumb (2014) found out that converting undergraduate digital circuits to onlinedelivery is as effective as in-classroom offerings. They even found the same result for anundergraduate digital systems laboratory using a remote lab approach. Reid (2006) in theElectrical and Computer Engineering Technology Department at IUPUI studied the conversionof two courses (Digital Fundamentals and C++ programming) has gradually changed twocourses from a traditional lecture / laboratory format to an online format. They found that studentsuccess was comparable to success in a traditional format
.). Classroom activities rangefrom simple and quick team-building exercises (e.g., building towers or bridges from notecardsor newsprint, etc.) that provide a low-stakes window into engineering principles and informalopportunities for students to interact all the way to more formal laboratory exercises withassigned teams and peer evaluations. The course culminates in a final open-ended team designproject to investigate the iterative nature of engineering design through a solar heating challengein which students present the struggles they faced and their resulting solutions orally. Together,these assignments and activities aim to enhance the skillsets highlighted by Landis and Peuker asimportant for students’ ultimate success as engineers.CHE 150 has
developing microprocessor based embedded systems students get hands-onexperience. Students form groups for team-projects; each group of students is encouraged to finda topic for their project. This approach is expected to motivate students to continue researchingin the related areas even after the semester ends. With the tests such as quiz, optional labs andevaluations (such as SPTE and ABET evaluations), students’ feedback are collected forassessment of the proposed approach. Based on the laboratory observations, the proposedapproach helps students involve more with the course materials and improve their academicperformance and helps in understanding the needs and standards of the industry. According tothe SPTE and ABET evaluation outcomes, the
of a real world problems. This includes an reflective thinking, ability to gain appreciation for solving a real world perspective, making connections, and problem and the connection and problem solving through a student communication required to accomplish reflection, modeled off of the survey and this. rubric of the CTLE.VI. Project SafetyRegardless of the work setting, industrial or laboratory, there are potential risks. Ensuring safework practices is of paramount importance. Operating companies place a strong emphasis onsafety by establishing procedures and methods to identify potential risks, developing andimplementing risk
industrial management, financial management, computer technology, and environmental technology, as well as leading seminars in the university’s general education program. Prior to academia, Mr. Hilgarth was employed as as engineer in the aerospace industry in laboratory and flight test development, facilities management, and as a manager in quality assurance. He has contributed papers on management, ground-test laboratory and flight test facilities, and ethics to several technical and professional organizations. In education, he has served as a consultant and curriculum developer to the Ohio Board of Higher Education and the Ohio Department of Education. He holds an M.S. in engineering management from the Missouri
Ohio State’s College of Dentistry and served as Director of Minority Student Recruitment and DENTPATH, a post baccalaureate program to prepare disadvantaged students for dental school.Dr. Wolfgang Windl, Ohio State University Wolfgang Windl is Professor and Graduate Studies Chair in the Departments of Materials Science and Engineering at The Ohio State University. Before joining OSU, he spent four years with Motorola, ending his tenure as Principal Staff Scientist in the Digital DNA Laboratories in Austin, TX. Previously, he held postdoctoral positions at Los Alamos National Laboratory and Arizona State University and received his diploma and doctoral degree in Physics from the University of Regensburg, Germany. His
Paper ID #29097A Partnership Model for Integrating Technical Communication Habitsthroughout Undergraduate Engineering CoursesDr. Kristine Horvat, University of New Haven Dr. Kristine Horvat earned a Bachelor’s degree in Chemical and Molecular Engineering and a Masters & PhD in Materials Science and Engineering from Stony Brook University. While in graduate school, she performed research at Brookhaven National Laboratory to investigate gas hydrates as an alternative energy source. Currently, Dr. Horvat is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of New Haven, where she teaches laboratory
. He is also involved in efforts to improve writing skills in engineering students.Prof. S. Lance Cooper, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign S. Lance Cooper is Professor and Associate Head for Graduate Programs in the Department of Physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He received his B.S. in Physics from the University of Virginia in 1982, his Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Illinois in 1988, and he was a postdoctoral research associate at AT&T Bell Laboratories from 1988-1990. Cooper’s research interests include optical spectroscopic studies of novel magnetic and superconducting materials at high pressures, high magnetic fields, and low temperatures
, China published the national pilotimplementation plan for the integration of industry and education, which requiresthe organic connection of education chain, talent chain, industrial chain, andinnovation chain, and the formation of an innovative mechanism for the integrationof industry and education in higher education.[21] In fact, the integration ofproduction and education is reflected in many mechanisms, such as the "university+ enterprise" double tutor system in the faculty construction mechanism; thepractice platform, practice base and laboratory of university-enterpriseco-construction in the practice training mechanism; the enterprise to provide somemodules such as courses in the resource sharing mechanism. However, theimplementation of
TAs fulfill the role ofsecondary instructor, supporting a course via laboratories, recitations, grading, and otherteaching activities. Whether faculty or TA, primary or secondary, instructors employ a range ofinstructional approaches to engage student learning and interact with students to develop rapport,answer questions, and further scaffold instruction. Although there remains some confusion inthe literature regarding terms, faculty support generally refers to teaching technique (bothteacher-centered and student-centered) while faculty interactions refer to more informalexchanges with students which include both curriculum and course-based interactions as well asconversations about career and other intellectual matters. In this paper, we
American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #31573 presentations, and his research has attracted more than $30M in external funding. He is a Fellow Mem- ber of the American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME), and Vice-Chairman of the American Meteorological Society Board on the Urban Environment. He was appointed in 2015 by the Mayor of the City as Member of the Climate Change Panel for the City of New York, and more recently as Senior Visiting Scientist of the Beijing Institute of Urban Meteorology and of Brookhaven National Laboratory. He was named in 2019 the
Colorado State University (Fort Collins, CO, USA) in 2018. There, she gained experience working as a graduate teaching assistant for computer aided engineering, biomedical engineering capstone design, and biomedical engineering introductory classes. She also served as a Grad- uate Teaching Fellow for the Walter Scott, Jr. College of Engineering during the 2016/2017 academic year. Nicole is currently an instructional post-doctoral fellow in the Transforming Engineering Education Laboratory within the Biomedical Engineering Department at the University of Michigan. Through this fellowship, she spent the 2019/2020 academic year teaching and assisting in curriculum development at Shantou University (Guangdong Province
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, which he completed in 2010. After concluding his PhD program, he joined the Physics Division at Los Alamos National Laboratory as a Postdoctoral Research Associate and later became a Research Scientist. At Los Alamos, Dr. Mejia-Alvarez conducted research in shock-driven instabilities for the experimental campaign on nuclear fusion of the DOE-National Nuclear Security Administration. In 2016, Dr. Mejia- Alvarez joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University, where he is currently the director of the Laboratory for the Physics of Living Tissue Under Severe Interactions and the Laboratory for Hydrodynamic Stability and Turbulent Flow. Dr. Mejia-Alvarez was the
(IBBME), University of Toronto. In addition to instruction, she has acted as the Associate Director, Undergraduate Programs at IBBME as well as the Associate Chair, Foundation Years in the Division of Engineering Science. Currently an Associate Professor, Teaching Stream, she serves as faculty supervisor for the Discovery program and is program co-director for the Igniting Youth Curiosity in STEM Program. Dawn was a 2017 Early Career Teaching Award recipient at U of T and was named the 2016 Wighton Fellow for excellence in development and teaching of laboratory-based courses in Canadian UG engineering programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Discovery
Chicago’s (UIC) College of Engineering in July of 2008. Prior to assuming his deanship, Professor Nelson was head of the UIC Department of Computer Science. In 1991, Professor Nelson founded UIC’s Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, which specializes in applied intelligence systems projects in fields such as transportation, mobile health, man- ufacturing, bioinformatics and e-mail spam countermeasures. Professor Nelson has published over 80 scientific peer reviewed papers and has been the principal investigator on over $40 million in research grants and contracts on issues of importance such as computer-enhanced transportation systems, man- ufacturing, design optimization and bioinformatics. These projects have
it due to its wide applications in the industry sectors.Fluid mechanics is usually taught as a 3-credit hour course with no laboratory embedded to it.Due to rising market demands, employers are seeking more than just the knowledge gainedthrough conventional lecturing in class. There has been raising interests in innovation, logicalthinking, complex problem solving in diverse setting environment, team work, andcommunication skills as well [1]. To meet these new market requirements in the new graduatesdirectly after college, new modernized teaching paradigms and technics are needed [2]. Suchtechniques could include lab activities, group discussions, small projects throughout the course,flipped teaching techniques or project based course where
astrong electric field to create thrust. The HET is used for many modern space applications, fromstation-keeping on small satellites to long-term travel to faraway asteroids.Electric propulsion, and specifically the HET, integrates many concepts that are fundamental in anundergraduate education such as electricity and magnetism (E&M), material properties, thermalanalysis, and laboratory experimentation. However, the HET is rarely studied below the graduatelevel. As such, we present a path of feasibility for an undergraduate electric propulsion projectbuilding a small, low-power HET, both as a novel vehicle for engaging with introductory physicsconcepts and as a case study of an advanced self-directed project at the undergraduate level.In this
University. Dr. Zapanta has served as a Visiting Assistant Professor of Engineering at Hope College in Holland, MI, an Adjunct Professor of Engineering at Austin Community College in Austin, TX, and an Assistant Professor of Surgery and Bioengineering at The Pennsylvania State University in Hershey, PA. He also worked for CarboMedics Inc. in Austin, TX, in the research and development of prosthetic heart valves. Dr. Zapanta’s primary teaching responsibilities are Biomedical Engineering Laboratory and Design. Ad- ditional teaching interests include medical device design education and professional issues in biomedical engineering. Dr. Zapanta’s research interests are in developing medical devices to treat cardiovascular
, with her B.A. in Education with an additional emphasis in English. In addition to being an avid sports fan, Kristine spends her free time with her dog and volunteering with her church, the Cary HOSTS program at Edward Cary Middle School, and the Presbyterian Children’s Home and Services.Dr. Kenneth Berry, Southern Methodist University Dr. Kenneth Berry is the Associate STEM Director at the Caruth Institute in the Lyle School of Engi- neering at Southern Methodist University (SMU). He has worked as an education specialist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory until he received his doctorate in Educational Technology in 2001. He then taught at the Michael D. Eisner School of Education at California State University at
Identifying Unmet Needs of US Veterans and their Healthcare TeamsAbstractThe U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and Veterans Affairs (VA) clinics and laboratories havethe combined mission to maintain the strength and readiness of the active military force whilemaximizing the long-term health for those who previously served. Active-duty Service Membersand Veterans represent a distinct culture with unique health-related needs that may stem frombattlefield experiences, common diseases (e.g., heart disease, diabetes), or a combination thereof.Unique needs may also exist within the broader care team, which includes physicians, nurses,therapists, scientists, engineers, support staff, and family members. To uncover these needs, wedeveloped a
Bioengineering (BIOE) program withno affiliation to a medical school. The BIOE program has three academic tracks:Biomechanics/Biomaterials, Biopharmaceutical Engineering, and Bioelectronics/Biophotonics.Students take common first-year courses (Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Calculus, ComputerProgramming); beginning in the second year, students take track-neutral BIOE courses(Fundamentals of Bioengineering, Engineering Physiology), additional science/math courses(Organic Chemistry, Genetics, Linear Methods) and courses related to the specific track. Coursesoften are augmented with laboratories; each BIOE student also has a defining track-specificlaboratory experience. However, a missing element in the curriculum is the purposeful translationof knowledge
Paper ID #31679Work in Progress: Quantifying Learning by Reflecting on Doing in anEngineering Design, Build and Test CourseMrs. Shan Peng, University of Oklahoma Shan Peng is a pursuing a MS in Data Science and Analytics at the University of Oklahoma. Shan is working with Professors Janet K. Allen and Farrokh Mistree in the Systems Realization Laboratory at OU. Her MS thesis is about design and development of a text mining program to facilitate instructors gain insight about students’ learning by analyzing their learning statements in engineering design, build and test courses. Shan is a winner of the ”2019 NSF/ASME
Laboratory Modules inBiomedical Engineering,” ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis IN,2005.
Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, Computer Games, and Pedagogy in e-Learning and Other Educational Experiences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2005.3. D. Laurillard, “Technology Enhanced Learning as a Tool for Pedagogical Innovation,” J. of Philosophy of Education, pp. 521-533, Jan 2009.4. A. M. Adams, “Pedagogical Underpinnings of Computer-Based Learning,” JAN, pp. 5-12, Mar 2004.5. D. Huffman, F. Goldberg, and M. Michlin, “Using Computers to Create Constructivist Learning Environments: Impact on Pedagogy and Achievement,” J. Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 151-168, 2003.6. C. Salzmann, D. Gillet, and Y. Piguet, “Massive Online Laboratories for MOOCs: A First edX Scalable
. Otherplans included graduate study in STEM fields, professional school (e.g. medicine or law), orother jobs not in engineering fields.Respondents were classified as feeling like they belong or feel like an engineer (Q13 of thesurvey) if they selected “Somewhat Agree”, “Agree”, or “Strongly Agree”. Most respondentsreported that they feel like they belong in the school (86%) and their major (84%), and theyfeel like an engineer (80%). Interestingly, 67% of respondents who agreed that they feel likean engineer indicated that the experience that made them feel that way occurred at their ownuniversity (i.e., UVA).Research-Experienced RespondentsExcluding capstones and course-structured laboratory projects, 39% of respondents (n = 303)have participated in
[1].Along with class time schedules packed with lectures, laboratories, and tutorials, there are asignificant number of course assignments that occur outside of class, such as team-basedprojects and experiential learning tasks [1]. Researchers have encouraged the incorporationof these constructivist approaches into engineering education [2], aiming to help studentsdevelop a wide range of abilities (such as complex-problem solving skills andinterdisciplinary thinking [3]). However, this increasing number of assignments stressesstudents [4], [5], negatively affecting their learning results [1], [6].To understand what students define as a demanding course, several researchers haveexplored the concepts of academic workload and course difficulty
over the shoulder of the student adjacent during the exam, or moresophisticatedly, by texting across the room, or by using the internet via cell phone to help withanswers. It has even been observed that students use their phones to take pictures of thequestions and/or answers to send to another student in the class or even to an individualoutside of the classroom who responds with a solution. In lab, cheating often occurs by copyingprevious labs, or duplicating someone else’s laboratory results or discussion. It may occur onhomework by copying someone else’s homework or working in a homework group whereothers do the work and the offender writes down the solutions without understanding. There isan easy criterion to judge cheating; if the
, CFD, rocket propulsion and automotive engineering. He was a U.S. Department of Energy Visiting Faculty Fellow at Sandia National Laboratories in 2012 and 2013. He has educated and trained many underrepre- sented minority and female students via various STEM programs including NSF-funded AMP (Alliance for Minority Participation) program.Hyung D. Bae , Howard University Dr. Hyung D. Bae received his B.S. M.S. degree in mechanical engineering of Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, in 2004 and 2006, respectively, and Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering of the University of Maryland in 2013. He was a Research Assistant of the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Maryland from 2013 to 2016. He
classroom and laboratory hours of math-intensivecurriculum aligned with practicing and strengthening engineering problem-solving skills. Thecoursework was taught by a university faculty member and doctoral student, and assisted bystudent teaching assistants. FYSE participants were given homework assignments, lab work,quizzes, exams, and an engineering-related group project with a final presentation. Upper-levelengineering undergraduate students were hired as residential tutors to assist students each weeknight, providing guidance and support on homework assignments and projects, in addition togeneral support in the students’ residence facility.In addition to the academic components, the FYSE program was designed to cultivatecommunity and a network
evident that civil engineeringstudents struggled significantly in the second-year courses of Statics and Mechanics of Materials.In 2015, the 2-credit hour CE 113 (Civil Engineering Analysis) course was developed in order toexpose first-year civil engineering students to more rigorous, computational-based content earlyin their academic careers in efforts to improve student understanding and performance in thesecond-year courses of Statics and Mechanics of Materials. The pre-requisite for the CE 113course is Precalculus. The class meets for two 75-minute lecture sessions with an additional 75-minute laboratory component each week. Although the contact time is high for a 2 credit-hourcourse, much of the class time has group problem solving exercises