project, NSF EFRI-Barriers, Under- standing, Integration – Life cycle Development (BUILD). She has worked in the sustainable engineering arena since 2004. As the assistant director of education outreach in the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation, Pitt’s center for green design, she translates research to community outreach programs and develops sustainable engineering programs for K-12 education.Prof. Amy E. Landis, Arizona State University Dr. Landis recently joined ASU in January 2012 as an Associate Professor in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment. She began her career as an Assistant Professor at the University of Pittsburgh, after having obtained her PhD in 2007 from the
following this career path, a working relationship with constructionprofessionals is often a daily reality. Likewise, in the state government sector, the proportion ofcivil engineers is dwarfed by an array of non-engineering professions. However, constructionprofessionals again represent a significant proportion of these industry occupations (6.3%).From this data, it can be seen that the civil engineering profession in general is exceedinglydiverse, and as such, these percentages may not necessarily represent the actual day–to-dayinteractions of any given engineer. However, considering these industry trends, some broadconclusions can be drawn regarding the career of a civil engineer and the appropriate level ofDCP participation in a typical
to the bottom of the page,changes the number to show “All,” and clicks the Update button. Once he can see all of theinstruments in ASSESS related to Professional Skills, the evaluator sorts the results by reliabilityby clicking on the Reliability column heading. The evaluator can now see six instruments thathave more reliability information than the other 25. Four of the six instruments also have morevalidity information. Since the evaluator is interested in finding an instrument with soundpsychometric properties, he decides to first read through the summary descriptions of the fourinstruments that have more information for both reliability and validity (the Career Decision-Making System-Revised, Level 1; the CATME; the Creative Engineering
policing tended to be Problem Solvers. Ausburn and Brown (2006)studied career and technical education students and found that most were Engagers.28 To datethere have not been any studies to determine the ATLAS-defined learning strategy preferences ofengineers, the occupational group of interest here.Verbal-Visual PreferenceA major dimension of cognitive style is the verbalizer-visualizer dimension.29,30 Unfortunately,there is no consensus on terminology for this dimension as it has been called a cognitive style, alearning style, and a learning preference.31 “Visualizers tend to think more concretely, useimagery, and personalize information. While learning they prefer graphs, diagrams, or picturesadded to text-based material. Verbalizers prefer to
Cavenett is a Senior Lecturer and Director of Professional Practice (Engineering) at the School of Engineering at Deakin University. Prior to joining Deakin University in 2007 his 20 year career was based in industry. His career includes a number of significant achievements both in Australia and inter- nationally, particularly involving the design and implementation of leading edge telecommunications and IT technologies. Simon has extensive experience internationally; having worked professionally based the United States for over 11 years prior to returning to Australia to join Deakin University.Ms. Eloise Gordon, Deakin UniversityDr. Matthew Joordens, Deakin University Matthew A. Joordens (Member -IEEE, Fellow - The
, aviation, safety, and human factors. Professionals21 representing public and private sector transportation organizations are invited as speakers to22 these summer camps to discuss career opportunities (9–12). These programs are hands-on, and23 students gain real-life experience working with faculty. Aelong and Aelong (12) described the24 programs delivered in Delaware and Vermont and evaluated the students’ attitudes about the Page 24.1402.525 programs both quantitatively and qualitatively. Both of the programs were described as a26 resounding success based on the participant responses. In some instances, undergraduate
Page 24.1404.8 Figure 3: Percentage of returning students for each workshop as a function of time.had attended one or more workshops since the program’s inception. Two of the participants weretransfer students who had limited exposure to the topics taught in their respective workshops.The need for supplemental instruction is recognized. One transfer student indicated, “I need tolearn MATLAB for courses next semester and basically throughout [my college career] so that gapis there. The school I used to go to did not teach it [MATLAB].” Another student expressed theneed for supplemental instruction from a different perspective: I learned MATLAB in my freshman course called Engineering 101: Introduction to Computer
Societyof Manufacturing Engineers; The Mechanics of Carbon Nanotubes by ASME; Engineering TinyNano World by Allegro Productions; Nanoparticles and Mega-fears: Debating the Risks ofNanotechnology by La Compagnie des Taxi-brousse; Nanotechnology by DiscoveryCommunication; and Upgrade Me, and From Micro to Nano by Films Media Group.Guest Lectures will be organized, bringing experts in the field into the course modules. Guestspeakers may include project investigators, senior personnel, NAC members, and invited guests.A major observation by Hispanic leaders on how Hispanics will succeed in STEM careers is thatthey need more Hispanic role models in the STEM fields52. Many people related to the projectrepresent minority groups, such as Dr. Fazarro
Professor at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. He has his Bachelor of Science from the United States Military Academy (1994), and his Master of Science (2003), Degree of Engineer (2003), and Ph.D. (2011) from Stanford University all in Mechanical Engineering. He has authored/co-authored papers in Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, and Heat Transfer, along with Engineering Education.Lt. Col. Bruce Floersheim, U.S. Military Academy Lieutenant Colonel Bruce Floersheim graduated as an Engineer officer from the United States Military Academy in 1989. He has served in the U.S. Army in the United States, Turkey, Bosnia, Germany and Iraq during a career spanning over 24 years. He holds a PhD in Mechanical
Engineering from the University of Illinois, and a Doctorate from the University of Texas at Austin. After receiving her PhD, she spent two years as a post-doctoral researcher at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Her academic career began in 1994 when she became an Assistant Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In 1999, she accepted a position in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Virginia Tech where she was promoted to Professor in 2003 and was recognized as the William S. Cross Professor of Mechanical Engineering in 2005. In 2006, she was appointed and continues to hold the position of Head of the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University
Paper ID #9982Student Perceptions of Project Mentoring: What Practices and BehaviorsMatter?Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com
Engineering Education (ASEE) since 1995; and has served in leadership roles and on committees for the Division since that time, as well as for the K-12 Outreach Division. He has also served in various leadership roles in disciplines related to Career and Technical Education. Dr. Clark is recognized as a Distinguished Technology Educator by the International Technology Engineering Education Association. He currently consults to a variety of businesses, educational agencies and organizations.Dr. Vincent William DeLuca, North Carolina State University V. William DeLuca, Ed.D. Dr. DeLuca taught middle school, high school, undergraduate and graduate level technology education in his 30 year career as a teacher and researcher
students in power generation careers. Students that find careers in coal powerwill be able to directly benefit from this, while students who focus in alternative power careers,for example solar, will gain a sufficient understanding of coal power to perform comparativeanalyses and engineer alternative forms of power such that they can integrate with, andeventually replace, coal use.Coal power educationCurrent educational shortcomings Although coal is an old and seemingly established form of power generation, there is stilla need for new graduates with technical skills applicable to coal power. For the past severalyears, power education in general has been lacking5, and most of the momentum in new powereducation has been in alternative power
wasadministered to industry hiring professionals to determine what factors they believed woulddetermine student success in the industry. This survey contained nine multiple choice questionsand five open response questions. Participants in the survey were selected during theconsecutive spring 2012 and fall 2012 semesters at a university program offering an accreditedfour year construction program which did not require internship participation as a necessary partof curriculum fulfillment. The participants served as the main hiring source for these students.They attended career fairs, submitted job opportunities to the department for posting on thestudent list serve, spoke to students on campus during class sessions about their work, and heldinformal meet
exploring andimplementing that vision. Leadership also involves the development of an understanding of thecomplexities that face us as both American and global citizens. Through the ELPS program, wefocus more intentionally on the development of a leadership plan. Students are encouraged towork with their ELPS faculty mentor to develop a plan to advance themselves in variousleadership skills. We have supported this development using self-assessment with the MBTI(Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) questionnaire with followed by workshops with Career Centerpersonnel, sharing of opportunities both on and off-campus with students and encouraging themto participate, one-on-one connections, and mentoring to help students assess and develop theirskills.One of
UNCLASSIFIED Summary ARL Open Campus Establishes a new world-class R&D and education campus for the Army Leverages Army resources for greater mission benefit Improves ARL performance by onsite R&D collaborations with More opportunity for technology advancement and transfer of research knowledge Pursues Army education and outreach goals Provides workforce development opportunities for high-tech careers Increases public involvement and understanding of defense science technology and exploration ARL ALC Future DevelopmentUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED BackupUNCLASSIFIED
experience for outstanding rising 11th and 12thgraders in Guilford County, North Carolina. This program provides students with hands onresearch experiences in university laboratories working alongside University faculty andprincipal investigators on cutting edge research. As such this particular experience has beenmost impactful for students with a strong interest in a STEM career. The BEI, held on the campus of NC A&T is a weeklong day camp for rising high schoolseniors, juniors, and sophomores. This program is especially unique due to the level ofcollaboration between two universities (NC A&T and the University of Pittsburgh) and thePittsburgh Tissue Engineering Initiative (PTEI). The concept for the BEI as applied at NC A&Twas
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Virginia and the Associate Dean of Research and Graduate Programs. A native Virginian, she received her Ph.D. from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1992 working in the area of heat transfer in diesel engine cylinder heads. She then served as a Visiting Scholar and a Visiting Lecturer at the Uni- versity of California at Berkeley from 1993-1994, where she developed her interests in microscale heat transfer and aerogels while working in the laboratory of Chang-Lin Tien. In 1994 Pam joined the Mechan- ical and Aerospace Engineering Department at UVA where she received a National Science Foundation CAREER award in 1995, was promoted to Professor in 2004, was named
to 4.6 from pre- to post-event) and gain more confidence to chooseengineering as a career (3.1 to 3.8 from pre- to post-event) when using a Likert scale (1 – 5 with1 being completely disagree and 5 being complete agree).Additionally, anecdotal data from all programs support that hands-on design activities engagestudent interest. Many participants stay in contact with activity mentors they meet during theseprograms and are further influenced to keep engineering on the forefront of their choices forcollege. Specifically, many parents and participants comment about a new interest in BME.Summary and conclusionsIncorporating the design process into outreach activities increases participant’s self-explorationof the problem and stimulates minds
the profession such as “the lack of women inSTEM [Trina]”. Some stemmed from a desire to be a boundary spanner, contributing “tothe wide-boundary but nonetheless relevant body of knowledge in the engineering-education-entrepreneurial [community] [Michael]”.Two motivations students observed across the faculty was a passion for engineeringeducation research, and a willingness to be a trailblazer, comfortable with taking a non- Page 24.31.11traditional career path. As Molly notes, “I saw that the successful faculty (all) had onecommon link – their passion in EER [engineering education research].” This was bothinspiring and contributed to students
have been identified as being in a transitional phase of life between children andadults. This variation has increased recently as an increasing number of non-traditional studentsenter academia as a result of delayed college enrollment, second career adults, and militaryveteran undergraduates.This study explores student motivation and intellectual development by addressing researchquestions: How do adult learning (andragogical) characteristics of students in first-year designcourses compare to those in senior design? and What is the relationship between andragogicalcharacteristics and design learning? These questions will be answered through a survey ofstudent andragogical characteristics composed of several pre-developed and
been so engageddeveloping products and they have presented their work to small and large audiences such as theuniversity innovation festival that is a family and industry oriented event.Based on the author’s experiences in teaching, researching, supervising and collaborating withD/HoH students, some success stories were selected to build the framework to presentmodifications to be incorporated in courses, university infrastructure, personal mentorship andopportunities that help D/HoH succeed and build the skills for a fruitful career in differentengineering disciplines. Through the enhancement for the D/HoH students, all other hearingstudents will also benefit from it
determine that the themes fit within the context as a circularvalidation of the process.Researcher position As a cadet myself years ago during the cold war, and then during two militaryassignments as a faculty member at the Air Force Academy, I have experienced first-hand thearray of engagement opportunities USAFA has to offer. I have been a provider of cadetprofessional and academic development and also a recipient. I also spent a 26-year career in theAir Force, so I have a thorough grounding in the culture of the Air Force and the Air ForceAcademy. Though I have this background, it was important for me not to impose mypreconceived notions on the current generation of cadets. As I observed activities and interviewsubjects, I was careful not
A.S.E.T/B.S.E.T Plan of Study (Supply[5]. This issue is further complicated by the fact that food and Chain Source: ISO 22006)foodstuff production and manufacturing is becoming increasingly complex and is requiring moretechnically skilled employees [6]. The U.S. Department of Labor’s Career Guide to Industries, 2008-09Edition, Food Manufacturing, stated: “Fierce competition has led food manufacturing plants to invest in technologically advanced machinery to become more productive. The new machines have been applied to tasks as varied as packaging, inspection, and inventory control, but the processing of animal products remains a labor-intensive activity that is resistant to automation efforts. As a result
education. On the other side,academia moves more in a direction of research and has a career path based on primarilyresearch criteria and with less recognition of experience from working life 1, 2.The purpose of this paper is to identify faculty approaches to industry connections andworking life issues in engineering education. The research questions are: a) What are facultyattitudes towards working life issues and their integration into the curriculum? and b) Whatactivities related to working life do faculty members introduce to the curriculum?These research questions are based on the assumption that faculty attitudes and curricularactivities related to working life are important factors in engineering education if we want toensure that students
, introductory biology, ecology and environmental studies, evolution, evolutionary medicine, and research practices in science.Dr. Richard A House, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Richard House is Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received a B.A. from Illinois Wesleyan University and M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of California, Irvine. In addition to engineering communication and pedagogy, he has scholarly interests in sustainability and Shakespeare.Dr. Steve Chenoweth, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Steve Chenoweth is Associate Professor of Computer Science and Software Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Previously he had a career in software development, at NCR Corp
interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design;writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Her teaching emphasizes the roles ofengineers as communicators and educators, the foundations and evolution of the engineering educationdiscipline, assessment methods, and evaluating communication in engineering. Page 24.637.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Game-Aided Pedagogy to Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes and Engagement in Transportation EngineeringI
, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; Page 24.286.1 writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e- portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Her teaching emphasizes the roles of engineers as communicators and educators, the foundations and evolution of the engineering education discipline, assessment methods, and evaluating communication in engineering. c American
the issue of creating good communicators out ofengineers who are educated in traditional technical courses. Vast numbers of articles and bookshave suggested ways to ensure that at least the outward look of a writer's effort conforms toacceptable norms. Classes are required, papers are assigned, some comments are voiced; but inso many cases the retention of communication skill is not assured and does not become anintegral part of the engineer's existence. Engineers need to understand the bond between theirtechnical knowledge and their communication skills. This bond must be accomplished in themost efficient amount of time so that it creates a lasting awareness of technical communicationand its importance in every engineer's career. This is
Tecnology Education Page 24.789.1 Frank Z. Cox is the Program Manager of the National Resource Center for Materials Technology Edu- cation funded by the National Science Foundation’s Advanced Technological Education Program and is housed at Edmonds Community College in Lynnwood, WA. Frank has over 20 years of experience in Career and Technical Education, including a wide variety of technician education and training programs c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #9091for