Creativity Demonstrate creativity and capability in problem solving.8 Psychomotor Select, modify, operate equipment.9 Safety Recognize and deal with safety and environmental issues.10 Communication Communicate effectively about laboratory work.11 Teamwork Work effectively in teams.12 Ethics in Lab Behave with highest ethical standards.13 Sensory Awareness Formulate conclusions from information gathered through human interaction.As can be seen from Table 1 above, a virtual lab in which students never touch a breadboard,resistor, or battery is not realistic. A virtual laboratory environment could not be considered asuitable replacement since it
, records, transfers, and manages the information and its sources. Outcomes include that the student: (d) Records pertinent information for future reference by downloading, printing, emailing, or manual notation• Standard Four: The information literate student understands the economic, ethical, legal, and social issues surrounding the use of information and its technologies and either as an individual or as a member of a group, uses information effectively, ethically, and legally to accomplish a specific purpose. ! Performance Indicator 3: The information literate student: Acknowledges the use of information sources in communicating the product or performance. Outcomes include that
Page 22.272.2fit within societal, ethical, and cultural contexts. Interestingly, analogous discussions are takingplace in humanities disciplines, such as philosophy, where applied philosophy is in some circlesconsidered essential for making the discipline more relevant. Historically, arguments aboutenvironmental ethics within philosophy have narrowly focused on how best to think about“nature” in order to protect it: should it be viewed as a set of resources to be utilized for human-centered ends or does nature have some “intrinsic value” apart from how it can be utilized byhumans. But the increasingly shrill, narrow and pedantic tone of these arguments has only servedto alienate philosophers from those actually working in the field
and/or questions solves the problem 2. Pose hypothesis 2. Communicate with “customer” 3. Explain, compare, and present findings 3. Explain, compare, and present findings 4. Consider ethical and broader impacts 4. Consider ethical and broader impactsTeacher Implementation of Innovation There are multiple potential influences on teachers’ effective implementation of theinnovative practices associated with teaching scientific inquiry and engineering design. Becausemost K-5 teachers have received minimal education and preparation in STEM16 there is reason toanticipate they need significant assistance to orient their instructional
shared asset not as we predicted through the contiguousresearch, but in another way that is invaluable to establishing and nurturing the internationalresearch collaboration that we seek. We now see that the 2010 CURE cohort served as teachersor trainers for the PKU PIs and mentors. We believe that the first CURE cohort laid thefoundation for those to follow by demonstrating how undergraduates can be integrated into thework and work space, what undergraduates are capable of doing, how much experience andknowledge they bring to the work. One student described how her work ethic andaccomplishment influenced her PI and members of her lab: I had so much confidence during my presentation, I was proud of all my work I accomplished and the
well as retention and diversity concerns within engineering education and engineering as a profession.Brock E. Barry, U.S. Military Academy Dr. Barry is an assistant professor and course director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engi- neering at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. He predominately teaches in the area of engineer- ing mechanics. His current areas of research include professional ethics, economic factors influencing engineering education, identity development, and non-verbal communication. Dr. Barry is a licensed professional engineer with multiple years of consulting experience.Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame Kerry L. Meyers is an Associate Professional Faculty member in the
to group participants[29].Co-op work term reports from IEEQ participants fulfill a written requirement of the IEEQprogram and are submitted to the program director upon completion of the work term. Theydescribe the nature of the work carried out and are also a reflective account from the student’sperspective of how the term fulfilled their professional and personal goals. Four of the sixparticipants submitted co-op reports for our analysis. This study complied with the university’sethics review process ensuring respondents’ anonymity, confidentiality and opportunity towithdraw without penalty, and was approved by the university’s human ethics committee. Eachparticipant in the research group has been assigned a pseudonym. For the purposes of
; Page 22.763.2 an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; and an ability to communicate effectively. Professional awareness skills the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental and societal context; a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning; and a knowledge of contemporary issues.In the Besterfield-Sacre and McGourty study they ask two important questions: (1) Can suchprofessional skills be taught? (2) Can they be assessed? In this paper we address the issue ofassessing student growth in the ability to communicate effectively orally in the context of theundergraduate course Global Systems.Purpose
. The knowledge and skills associated with project administration include: a. understanding project delivery processes; b. applying principles of construction law and ethics; c. understanding contractor licensing requirements and procedures; d. understanding lien and labor laws as applied to construction; e. identifying appropriate construction codes and regulations; f. developing quality control programs and plans; Page 22.818.6 g. performing economic analyses and developing cash flow projections; and h. managing risks on a construction project.IV. The knowledge and skills associated with contract documents
teacher!” Recognizing that one’s degree of knowledge of a subject has no relationship to their understanding of pedagogy or their ability to apply it, over the past 12 years, Dr. Shull has maintained an active focus on sound pedagogy as related to engineering education. These efforts have been divided into understanding pedagogical theory and the pragmatic application into the classroom. His primary areas of focus are the ethics of caring, self- determination, and the connection of life skills to improved student learning. He has authored numerous publications in the field of pedagogy and the technical area of NDE including the popular textbook entitled Nondestructive Evaluation: Theory, Technique, and Applications
thestudents have a hands-on experience with the concepts covered in lecture. EE 302 is broken into two main components. The first component is a survey ofimportant aspects for the Professional Engineer. The topics covered include the following: Different focus areas in electrical and computer engineering Page 22.852.2 Problem solving and the Engineering Design Process Ethical behavior of engineers Responsibilities of the engineer to society Skills for continuing education and independent studyThese topics are covered primarily by a series of short reports completed throughout thesemester. The second component focuses on
energy andresource limits provides the impetus behind at least five of the National Academy ofEngineering’s Grand Challenges1. Bolstering students’ understanding of what constitutessustainability is therefore an important aspect of an engineering education and can contribute toABET outcomes c (an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needswithin realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health andsafety, manufacturability, and sustainability) and h (the broad education necessary to understandthe impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context)2.The importance of sustainability in environmental engineering decision making has
programs in the 21st century. The reporthighlighted the importance of engineering students‟ soft skills in the highly competitive and fastchanging global world. These soft skills − also called professional skills 2 − includecommunication, teamwork, leadership, entrepreneurship, ethics, and so on. The report discusseda variety of approaches to providing students a broader engineering educational experience, forexample, dropping some of the existing traditional engineering curriculum (e.g., Fouriertransforms) in favor of material related to soft skills 1.Among highly desirable soft skill sets, entrepreneurship has received increasing attention inrecent years in the engineering education community due to its significant role in engineeringinnovation
practices and experiences in researchmethods. Unique to this distance-learning course is the incorporation of team-based activelearning activities in every lecture. In this active learning course, students learn quantitativeresearch methods by practicing the set of procedures in class. Students are expected toincorporate their research topics as examples throughout the class. Topics in research methodsinclude: defining research problems, conducting a literature review, qualitative and quantitativedata analysis, developing experimental designs, survey design, visual presentation of results,research ethics, and the process of writing a peer-reviewed journal article. The course culminatesin students’ research proposal.This paper discusses the lessons
AC 2011-450: UNDERSTANDING YOUR STUDENTS’ NONVERBAL COM-MUNICATION: A PRIMER FOR THE NEW ENGINEERING EDUCATORBrock E. Barry, U.S. Military Academy Dr. Barry is an assistant professor and course director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engi- neering at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. He predominately teaches in the area of engineer- ing mechanics. His current areas of research include professional ethics, economic factors influencing engineering education, identity development, and non-verbal communication. Dr. Barry is a licensed professional engineer with multiple years of consulting experience.MAJ Jonathan Bodenhamer, United States Military Academy, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineer-ing
. In additionthe ARCE students are immediately engaged on the project since they need to understand thebuildings existing strengths and weaknesses.Grading - With multiple faculty and students with different department grading cultures, thecourse requires the creation of a transparent and equitable grading system. Individual professorswith varied backgrounds have differing expectations and needs within the course. Students bringdiverse capabilities and work ethics to the course. Unlike other courses that utilize teams, in thiscourse each student brings a unique expertise to the team. If a single member is not performing,it is not likely that the rest of the team will not be able to “cover” for that member. A simple toadminister yet fair grading
, communication, and theassessment of skills. A fully customizable training tool assists in the training of standardizedpatient actors. In addition, the software allows for 1) controlled access, 2) live & archivedviewing with blinded “grading” & “scoring” of items and the ability to generate more than 50reports.Types of standardized patient (SP) encounters include a) clinical skills, b) ethical dilemmas, and c)communication (such as communicating bad news). Participants who utilize the SP labs forformative and summative experiences include 1) multidiscipline academic programs(undergraduate/graduate nursing, physician assistant, physical therapy, women’s health, radiologytechnology, couples and family therapy, creative arts therapy, and behavioral
assessment 16. Theeffectiveness of the software implementation had been previously validated by an action-research study 17. This study showed instructors considered the software enhanced studentengagement and learning, while students described OASIS as easy to use and helpful inimproving skills and understanding. Given this positive evidence, it was decided to providehigh-school students with their own version of OASIS (School OASIS), the dual aims beingto improve the physics skills of incoming engineering students and to promote theUniversity‟s engineering courses. Additionally, since appropriate ethical requirements havebeen met, the wealth of data collected by School OASIS can be used in judging student-intake quality and for educational
22.1337.3 This paper focuses on Step 9 which enhances experiential learning and student growthvia a formal reflection process which must be structured, with objectives, critical thinking,sharing and learning. It may be done throughout the project or before, during, and aftercompletion of project. It may be conducted in the classroom, at the worksite or at the finalcelebration or presentation. It may involve students, teachers, sponsoring agencies, and recipientsof project deliverables. Reflection assists in connecting and crystallizing real world servicelearning experiences.Reflection John Dewey3, the early 20th century progressive educator, published, supported andpromoted reflection in education and ethics as a perpetual process by
students can usethe tools. During these sessions, students must apply concepts learned in lectures, use complexlaboratory equipment to build experiments, develop hardware debugging skills.According to4, there are 13 fundamental objectives of Engineering Instructional Laboratories,that students should understand or acquire skills in: (1) Instrumentation; (2) Models; (3) Page 22.1590.3Experiment; (4) Data Analysis; (5) Design; (6) Learning from Failure; (7) Creativity; (8)Psychomotor; (9) Safety; (10) Communication; (11) Team work; (12) Ethics in the Laboratory;(13) Sensory Awareness. In the current laboratory setting and approach there are
anonymity encouragesincreased participation by quieter, less confident students. The entire class can be polled quicklyso the lecturer knows whether to review the material again or continue on. Students canparticipate easily without risk of being embarrassed in front of their peers by a wrong answer.This is particularly true for students that may be less willing to speak publicly because English isa second language. The anonymity of responses also encourages more candid answers toquestions involving ethical quandaries. Regularly polling the class about problems encouragesstudents to remain engaged. If students see that a significant portion of the class reached thesame wrong conclusion about a particular question it may reassure them that they are
AC 2011-516: USING A SERIES OF ADVERTISING VIDEOS TO ILLUS-TRATE SOLID MECHANICS AND MATERIAL-RELATED DESIGN IS-SUES IN THE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CURRICULUMJason K Durfee, Eastern Washington University Professor DURFEE received his BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. He holds a Professional Engineer certification. Prior to teaching at Eastern Washington Uni- versity he was a military pilot, an engineering instructor at West Point and an airline pilot. His interests include aerospace, aviation, professional ethics and piano technology. Page 22.1604.1
AgricultureHealth/water supply/sanitation Consumption and production patterns Protection of wildlifeHousing Waste management BiodiversityWelfare and quality of life Transportation Sustainable forest managementCultural Heritage Mining Global climate change/sea level risePoverty/Income distribution Economic structure & development Sustainable use of natural resourcesCrime Trade Sustainable tourismPopulation Productivity Land use changeSocial and ethical valuesAccess to
problems, design solutions using theirunderstanding, consider the ethical implications of their designs, and interact with the customerthrough verbal and written communication means. Two of these assignments are discussed inthis paper: the design of a force transducer for medical rehabilitation, discussed in detail, and thedesign of an accelerometer based impact measurement system for a package delivery company.Load Cell Transducer MEA ExerciseIn this MEA, teams of two or three students are assigned to work as engineering consultants forthe owner of a fictitious company, “Rehab-o-Rama”, which manufactures physical rehabilitationequipment. The students are given a memorandum from the owner, requesting that the studentsdesign a class of load cell
engineers use in professional practice15. Professional Development – Student development in ethics, etiquette, interviewing, presentations, “dress for success”, and interpersonal skills is an integral part of the EPD sequence. Graduates of the program frequently refer to the positive impact the professional development activities had on their experiences as interns and ultimately in the careers. Citizen Development – Students learn that engineers are servants to society through presentations, reading activities, and a minimum of 70 of hours of community service that they complete while at Itasca. Examples of the activities include road-side clean- ups, recreational trail maintenance, local
communicateeffectively‖[11].What engineers need to experience and know, in addition to ―hard‖ knowledge, is ―process-oriented skills and awareness-oriented skills‖ [1]. Process-oriented skills include―communication, teamwork, and the ability to recognize and resolve ethical dilemmas‖ [1].These skills are powerful when combined with awareness skills involving ―understanding theimpact of global and social factors, knowledge of contemporary issues, and the ability to dolifelong learning‖ [1]. But what are the most effective ways of incorporating process andawareness-oriented practices into engineering curricula already crowded with necessary science,math, and disciplinary courses? How can engineering schools, which must ensure that theirstudents graduate with
. Pirsig’s examples include ego, anxiety, boredom, impatience, and aninability to re-evaluate facts that might seem unimportant. Dealing with hang-ups can be assimple as taking a break from the problem for a while. How can you avoid losing your gumption about publishing a paper, in a collaborativeenvironment like a large research group? Here are some points to watch out for. 1. Agree on authorship – Who will be an author? a) Agree on roles in writing, and define who will prepare materials such as figures and tables, and who will write the different text sections. Be clear on the roles of each author in the paper, and ensure that the ethical expectation that each author must make a substantial
straightforwardproblems; 4. Analysis- solving complex problems, developing process models and simulations,troubleshooting equipment and system problems; 5. Synthesis- designing experiments, devices,processes, and products; 6. Evaluation- choosing from among alternatives and justifying thechoice, optimizing processes, making judgments about the environmental impact of engineeringdecision, resolving ethical dilemmas. Levels 1-3 are commonly referred to lower-level skills andLevels 4-6 are considered to be higher level skills. It is through the use of games that instructioninto the higher levels is possible as they present the students with continuous change, reflectionon decision making, strategy, and other key components of the higher-levels. Thus, gamingpresents
. Prins, R., “A Team-Based Design Competition For Freshman Engineering Students That Emphasizes Sustainable Design”, AC 2009-445, in Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009. 11. Ochs, J., Getzler-Linn, L., Huyck, M., Schaffer, S., Raber, M., “Assessing Team Work And Ethical Awareness In Interpersonal Undergraduate Teams and Entrepreneurial Student Start-Ups: report #1”, AC 2009-1735, in Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009. 12. Larkin, T., “Peer Review From A Student Perspective”, AC 2009-1689, in Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009. 13. Morse, A., “Application of The Exceed Teaching Model To
engineeringeducator to act in the several different cultural environments, which mobility has imposed as afact of life for researchers and teachers at graduation level. Not to mention the necessary newcompetencies of educators such as: evaluation management; development competencies;communication skills; teamwork; ethics and intercultural competencies07.Summarizing the knowledge in engineering is important however nowadays it is not enoughbecause of the changes in the educational system and the new kind of student that requiredifferent approaches concerning to teaching. So it became imperative to be prepared for this neweducational community, where the teachers are the guiders in the new path that is now theaccomplishment of the formation of engineers.5. The