are also interested in the environment in which they will be workingand relating stories from consulting jobs helps motivate them in class6, 11. Studentquestions about “real-world” experiences can lead to discussions that could relate toprofessionalism and ethics, liability, and other non-technical issues9. Industrialexperience and professional licensure is more important in undergraduate programs thanin graduate programs1. This stems from the fact that many graduate students aremigrating toward careers in academia and research, while the undergraduate counterpartsare most often going into field engineering positions upon graduation. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
and analysis, written communication, oral communicationThe holistic review meeting concludes with mutually setting one to three developmental goalsand one to three task goals for the semester. The developmental goals are intended to helpguide decision-making when opportunities inevitably arise, so that opportunities can beevaluated against current goals and the student feels comfortable and justified in saying “no”when appropriate.Sample items included: ● Maintains a professional academic CV ● Situates research within extant literature and contextual data ● Relates research agenda to issues of diversity, equity, social justice ● Carries out research that adheres to ethical human subjects research ● Establishes a clear and
conference proceedings, 29 non-refereed publications, and 27 non-refereed presentations. He is responsible for funds as PI or Co-PI from 52 separate proposals totaling almost $6,500,000. Courses taught include under- graduate finite elements, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and engineering economics and ethics, and graduate finite elements, numerical methods, thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, plasma fundamentals and gas dynamics.Dr. Carlo Salvinelli, University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Salvinelli is a Teaching Assistant Professor at the Mortenson Center in Global Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder where he teaches courses on humanitarian response and disaster manage- ment
Next Century attributes [8]. These students defined engineering asimproving the world, using math, science, and technology, and solving problems with theapplication of knowledge, whereas the Engineer of 2020 report defines an engineer as a goodcommunicator who is creative and ethical with the skills to work in global and multidisciplinaryteams. It goes on to discuss creativity as invention, innovation, and thinking outside the box.While communication skills to work in teams is paramount in importance, the report alsomentions the need to master the principles of business and management, along with theprinciples of leadership. Because of rapid changes in technology and the global market theEngineer of 2020 will require dynamism, agility
, diversity, inclusion, and equity in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, and leadership. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Full Paper: First-Year Computing Course with Multiple Computing Environments - Integrating Excel, Python and MATLABIntroductionComputers are a fundamental part of the engineering landscape. All engineering disciplines usecomputers and computing tools to model potential design solutions, collect and analyze data,create new parts through computer aided design and 3D printing and control a wide range ofmachinery. Computing and computer tools are a modern foundation for engineering education.Earlier studies have
, critical thinking, teamwork, and engineering ethics in order to inform and enhance student learning.Dr. Juan David Ortega-Alvarez, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University / Universidad EAFIT ´ Juan David Ortega Alvarez is a Collegiate Assistant Professor at Virginia Tech’s Engineering Education Department and a Visiting Professor at Universidad EAFIT (Medell´ın, Colombia). Juan holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University, an M.S. in Process Engineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven (Germany), anda B.S. in Process Engineering from EAFIT. Before his full- time appointment in academia, he served as the Engineering Director at a Colombian chemical company
towards the higher intellectual levels. The participants of this study are beingtracked longitudinally to better understand the correlation between academic standing and theirmental models. Data will be collected every year.AcknowledgementsThe research is supported by NSF Grant # 1832041.References[1] W. O. Perry. “Intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A Scheme,” NewYork: Holt, Rinehart and Wiston, 1970.[2] M. F. Belenky, B. M. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger, and J. M. Tarule. “Women's ways ofknowing: The development of self-voice and mind,” New York: Basic Books, 1986.[3] B. K. Hofer, and P. R. Pintrich. “The Development of Epistemological Theories: BeliefsAbout Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning,” Review of
the four interview themes. The students had burgeoningconceptions of engineering/engineers with traces of sociotechnical perspectives.ContextThe campus and department contexts for this course are highly supportive of this effort toreimagine engineering education. USD is an independent, private Catholic university committedto the formation of values, community involvement, and preparing leaders dedicated to ethicalconduct and compassionate service [34]. The integrated engineering (IntE) department works tohave all student engineering course experiences aligned with the sociotechnical paradigm, toeducate engineers who are prepared to ethically design for a sustainable future. IntE studentscomplete the university liberal arts core, a sequence of
? 4. Briefly describe your personal model for solving an open-ended problem. Technical 1. How do you feel about your progress in your technical competencies to this point in Competency the block? (b) 2. Which competency is going worst? Why? 1. What are three important aspects of interpersonal communication? 2. How might you work to minimize your own unconscious biases? 3. What are the essential elements of leadership? Professionalism (c) 4. In 2-3 paragraphs, describe your own personal mission statement with regards to making ethical decisions every day. 5. How do you see
given module to be paired withother technical problems in multiple engineering courses.Literature ReviewThe ABET definition of engineering design includes policy and regulations among possibledesign constraints. Among the student outcomes required by ABET are: “an ability to applyengineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of publichealth, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economicfactors” and “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineeringsituations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineeringsolutions in global, economic, environmental, and social contexts” [1]. Clearly, the
verysimilar to the class whiteboard. Table 1 shows the DFW rates during this semester. Thissemester, the university decided to convert the WU’s to W’s to negate the WU’s adverse impacton students’ GPAs. A student, who is enrolled on the census date, and does not officiallywithdraw from a course but fails to complete it, receives a WU. The NC stands for No Credit,and the students who failed, their grades automatically changed to NC. The students who got Dhad the option to petition for changing their grade to NC. Due to the challenging COVID-19related situations, the university administration believed that these would be the most ethical andcompassionate decisions. As can be seen, five students withdrew from the class eitherthemselves or by not showing
very extensive. Scholars at home and abroad have differentunderstanding of the meaning of artificial intelligence. According to Zhu(2017),Professor of computer science at UCLA, artificial intelligence can be summarized intosix main fields: computer vision, natural language understanding and communication,cognition and reasoning, robotics, game and ethics, and machine learning.[3] Inaddition, another scholar (Chen, 2018) pointed out that artificial intelligence is usuallydivided into three categories[4]: (1) special artificial intelligence, which focuses on theresearch of one or more special fields and functions. At present, it is in the stage ofrapid development and has achieved rich results, such as computer vision and speechrecognition. Most
in various roles including Faculty Director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program (2014-2017), Director of the Environmental Engineering program (2006-2010), and ABET Assessment Coordinator for the CEAE Department (2008-2018). Bielefeldt is active in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), serving on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee (2019-2022) and the Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee (2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social responsibility, sustainable
Students Bimal Nepal, Satish Bukkapatnam, Prabhakar Pagilla, and Manan K. Shah Texas A&M UniversityAbstractResearch Experience for Undergraduates (REU) programs have been credited for attracting andretaining students in science and engineering who otherwise may not have considered disciplinesin science and engineering as their career choices. In addition to core research activities, REUprograms generally provide multiple enrichment and professional development activities forparticipants. While the nature and the number of professional development activities vary fromone REU program to another, the most common activities include ethics and safety training,research and industry seminars, GRE workshops
3D Tomographic Optical Technique • 3D-Woven Polymer-Derived All-Oxide Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMCs) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Annual ConferenceBeyond the research, HYPER participants engage in a professional development series, industrytours, and computational software training. In addition, HYPER participants interact with the manyother undergraduate students conducting summer research at UCF, both through other NSF REUsand UCF-initiated programs. This critical mass of activity enables successful workshops ongraduate school preparation and research ethics, as well as social activities. The program takes and national approach to
. Example 2: An instrument question designed to test social impact understandingThe ethics of engineering and its impact on society are an important part of cognitivedevelopment and enculturation. While the distractors in Example 2 have degrees of correctness,the best answer is the life-saving advantage of automated technology to society.Implementation of Position-of-Stress SurveysThe second major research result from year two is the implementation of a quantitative three-question survey administered to students as they complete activities that are judged to bepositions of academic stress. The goal was identification of student cohorts that were gaining,losing, or remaining the same in confidence about major choice as they study
Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Grant.Vignesh Subbian (Assistant Professor) Vignesh Subbian is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Systems and Industrial Engineering, member of the BIO5 Institute, and a Distinguished Fellow of the Center for University Education Scholarship at the University of Arizona. His professional areas of interest include medical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and broadening participation and promoting servingness in engineering, biomedicine, and computing, particularly at land-grant and Hispanic Serving Institutions. Subbian’s educational research is focused on asset-based practices, ethics education, and formation of professional
literature on bridge coursesfor college-level to determine goals for engineering technology (see table 1).Table 1. Goals of reported engineering bridge courses. Ref. Paper Title Goals Freshman Introductory Academic success, leadership development, time [3] Engineering Seminar Course: management, the transition from high school/community Coupled with Bridge Program college to the university, and professional development. Equals Academic Success and Retention Model-Eliciting Activities Problem-solving, teamwork, problem-based learning, math- (MEAs) as a Bridge Between engineering connection, development of ethical
course of the semester.We also collected qualitative data by asking students about their experience. Along with ourresults, we share ideas for improving the project.Methods Our Civil and Environmental Engineering junior project course consists of studentsmajoring in Civil and Environmental Engineering. In Fall 2021, 26 students took the course. The course intends to provide opportunities for students to engage engineering challengesin real-world contexts. We intend for students to advance their design, communication, andteamwork skills through hands-on experiences. We also aim for students to improve theirunderstanding of the professional and ethical aspects of engineering projects. Every fall thecourse features three open-ended
certification bodies—typically nonprofit organizations, professional associations, industry/trade organizations, or businesses— based on an individual demonstrating, through an examination process, that she or he has acquired the knowledge, skills, and abilities required to perform a specific occupation or job. Depending on the certification body, they may be called industry or professional certifications. Although training may be provided, certifications are not tied to completion of a program of study as are certificates. They are time limited and may be renewed through a recertification process. In addition, some certifications can be revoked for a violation of a code of ethics (if applicable) or proven incompetence after
questioning techniques; accumulate knowledge with an eye towards long-termreflection; apply engineering principles to multiple open-ended problems; and use reflection andmetacognition as ways to promote technical knowledge transfer [14].Professional learning happens across multiple domains. Professional responsibility is modeledand practiced throughout as timeliness, respect, appropriate dress, appropriate language are allmade explicit with continuous feedback coming from faculty and staff. Teamwork skills areprovided in seminars and practiced in design teams. Multiple workshops per week address topicssuch as: inclusion, ethical action, leadership, reflection, management, happiness, life-workbalance, overcoming adversity, and communication. Each week
engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics. (ABET SO 1) Question 99: I have the ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specific needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, societal, environmental, and economic factors. (ABET SO 2) Question 100: I have the an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. (ABET SO 3) Question 101: I have the ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed
CU since 1996, serving in various roles including Faculty Director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program (2014-2017), Director of the Environmental Engineering program (2006-2010), and ABET Assessment Coordinator for the CEAE Department (2008-2018). Bielefeldt is active in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), serving on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee (2019-2022) and the Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee (2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social
injustice is a stepping stone for students to notice and be able todescribe their experiences and no longer be victims of the structures of higher education.ReferencesBaber, L. (2015). Considering the Interest-Convergence Dilemma in STEM Education. Review of Higher Education, 38(2), 251-270.Beeby, L. (2011). A Critique of Hermeneutical Injustice. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 111(3pt3), 479-486. Brennan, J., & Naidoo, R. (2008). Higher education and the achievement (and/or prevention) of equity and social justice. Higher Education, 56(3), 287-302. Fricker, M. (2007). Hermeneutical Injustice. In Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. chapter, Oxford University Press. Kant, J., His Horse Is Thunder
Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social responsibility, sustainable engineering, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is also a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education.Daniel Knight (Assessment Specialist) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Self-Assessment of Leadership Behaviors Over Time Among Students in A Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design CourseAbstractWith the changes in accreditation requirements, engineering programs are deciding how to
should research the ethical and professional responsibilities to enhance education inrenewable energy sources. Table 3 shows the contents and order of this course's topic andlaboratory for the last part. Table 3 Electrical Energy and Machines Topic and Laboratory Topic Rotating Magnetic Field-AC Induction Motor Equivalent Circuit of Induction Motor Laboratory 6: DC Motors- Shunt and Series Power Analysis and Speed-Torque of Induction Motor AC Synchronous Machines AC Synchronous Generators AC Synchronous Generators Parallel Operation: House Diagrams-Part 1 AC Synchronous Generators: House Diagrams-Part 2 AC Synchronous Generators: House Diagrams-Part 3 Laboratory 7: Operating
survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations,” New Dir. Institutional Res., vol. 141, pp. 5–20, 2009.[9] D. Simmons, Y. Ye, N. Hunsu, and O. Adesope, “Development of a survey to explore out- of-class engagement of engineering students,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 33, pp. 1213–1221, 2017.[10] C. Finelli et al., “An assessment of engineering students’ curricular and co‐curricular experiences and their ethical development,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 469–494, 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00058.x.[11] C. H. Passow, H. J., & Passow, “What competencies should undergraduate engineering programs emphasize? A systematic review,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 475
previoussection fit well within these frameworks and principles, as they are extremely complementary. Itis one of our hypotheses that this alignment is no mistake or coincidence. Rather, for the samereasons educational programs are transformative, CoPs also work to support collaborativelearning and authentic development effectively. Underlying both of these sets of influencers ordefining characteristics is a community culture that is open, equitable, inclusive, and supportive.A sense of belonging among all participants as well as ethic of responsibility to the communityare key motivating factors in keeping the community cohesive and successfully functioning as atransformative learning space. As such, the conditions that make all of these characteristics
, T., Dillon, H., Lulay, K., Eifler, K., and Hensler, Z. (2017). Design and implementation of an aspirational ethics laboratory course. Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, Paper ID# 17634, Columbus, OH. 6. Hotchkiss, R.H. (2001). Flow over a “killer” weir design project. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 127(12): 1022-1027.7. Chanson, H. (2004). Enhancing students’ motivation in the undergraduate teaching of hydraulic engineering: role of field works. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 130(4): 259-268.8. Brown, S., Easley, A., Montfort, D., Adam, J., Van Wie, B., Olusola, A., Poor, C., Tobin, C., Flatt, A
” is far more than a single event, program, or course. These includerecruitment and admissions efforts; new student orientation programs; welcome week activities,rituals, and traditions; first-year, summer, or common reading programs; first-year seminars;academic advising; academic support centers; supplemental instruction; undergraduate researchinitiatives; learning communities; service learning; and residence education initiatives.To meaningfully integrate what students already know, do and value, into the curricular and co-curricular programs, deliberate efforts are made to create a framework where we integrate thefollowing six principles of undergraduate learning: 1) critical thinking, 2) values and ethics, 3)core communication and