experimental platforms in chemistry laboratory education and its impact on experimental self-efficacy," INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, vol. 17, no. 1, 07/09/ 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00204-3.[10] D. May, L. T. Smith, and C. Gomillion, "Student motivation in virtual laboratories in bioengineering courses," in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2022: IEEE, pp. 1-5.[11] C.-H. Huang, "Using PLS-SEM Model to Explore the Influencing Factors of Learning Satisfaction in Blended Learning," Education Sciences, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 249, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/5/249.[12] I. D. Dunmoye, D. Moyaki, A. V. Oje, N. J. Hunsu
classattendance) [26]. When looking to combine a strengths-based language with individualreflection, a conversation-based strengths-based intervention showed students had high regardsfor their strengths and had higher levels of optimism and self-efficacy throughout the course[27]. Collectively, these programs emphasize the role of strengths-based languages in fostering athriving atmosphere for undergraduate students.Research into CliftonStrengths is also increasing in popularity. Specifically, researchers approveof using a cohesive assessment tool to provide students with a consistent language to discusstheir strengths and other traits. CliftonStrengths has been proven reliable through its evidence ofconsistency over time, where individuals tend to
responses oflow and high-level metacognitive engagement. The use of examples has been shown to influencestudents' motivation and self-efficacy and help students understand what the expected responseshould look like [57].To enhance students' overall level of metacognitive engagement in all dimensions, instructorsshould direct students to provide evidence for their claims [21], which also improves students’critical thinking skills [58]. For example, the student's response, “My approach was successful,”should be followed up with evidence stating why/why not.Instructors should also guide students to improve their level of engagement in specific elementsof each dimension. For the Planning dimension, instructors should familiarize students with
ormeasuring the impact in makerspace curriculum [16]. To address this gap, the University ofTexas, Arlington assembled an ad-hoc taskforce from various universities to develop a nationalstandard of maker-based competencies to enhance student learning outcomes to impactundergraduate students [17]. Among the taskforce was the University of Nevada, Reno. In 2017and 2019, the group received two National Leadership grants from the Institute of Museum andLibrary Services (IMLS).To form their framework, the grant team used the competencies-based education model, whichincludes the assessment of learning outcomes and learning that is personalized, measurable, andtransferable [16]. Ten maker competencies were developed, addressing various transferable
Knowledge Among U.S.‐Mexican Households,” Anthropology & Edu Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 313–335, Dec. 1992, doi: 10.1525/aeq.1992.23.4.05x1582v.[18] M. Volman and J. ’t Gilde, “The effects of using students’ funds of knowledge on educational outcomes in the social and personal domain,” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, vol. 28, p. 100472, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100472.[19] A. C. Barton and E. Tan, “Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space,” J Res Sci Teach, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 50–73, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1002/tea.20269.[20] D. Verdín, J. M. Smith, and J. Lucena, “Funds of Knowledge as Pre-College Experiences that Promote Minoritized Students’ Interest, Self-Efficacy Beliefs, and Choice of
University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and instructional support on engagement and motivation in the classroom while her engineering workplace research focuses on the role of relatedness, autonomy, and competence needs on persistence and fulfillment. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Hybrid Approach to Natural Language Processing for Analyzing Student Feedback about Faculty SupportAbstractShort-answer questions in surveys serve as a valuable educational tool, used for evaluatingstudent learning and exploring the perspectives of various stakeholders in educational research.However, it
-yearlearning environment. Enjoyment can play a critical role in the experiences that students have inthe classroom given that positive learning experiences can give rise to attributes such asconfidence and self-efficacy, necessary components to better persistence [14]. This study aims tounderstand student enjoyment of learning interventions, and its perceived relationship withlearning itself, to potentially leverage in future iterations of the course and curriculum.MethodsCourse InformationAn “Introduction to Engineering Technology” course has been undergoing development tobecome a FYET program [15]. The course traditionally was taught following Introduction toEngineering Technology 8th Edition [16] with information given as readings and lectures
do, and some of the supportive benefits offered by theUniversity. Mentor training will be guided by a series of evidence-based and student-centeredframework[34]:1. Mentor Selection: The near-peer mentors will complete an application process including apersonal statement expressing commitment to provide the students the necessary academic andmotivational support]. The selection process will include interviews using set criteria (e.g.,maturity level, enthusiasm toward the mentoring role, communication skills). The mentors willfunction as student ambassadors, will assist with recruitment, and participate in professionaldevelopment addressing ethics, professional obligations, and socio-psychological issues (e.g.,motivation, persistence, self
Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emergingchallenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal ofInformation Management, 57, 101994.[3] Prada, E.D., Mareque, M. and Pino-Juste, M., 2022. Teamwork skills in higher education: isuniversity training contributing to their mastery?. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 35.[4] Rockinson-Szapkiw, A.J., Sharpe, K. and Wendt, J., 2022. Promoting Self-Efficacy,Mentoring Competencies, and Persistence in STEM: A Case Study Evaluating Racial and EthnicMinority Women's Learning Experiences in a Virtual STEM Peer Mentor Training. Journal ofScience Education and Technology, 31(3), pp.386-402.[5] Diggs-Andrews, K.A., Mayer, D.G. and Riggs, B., 2021, June
as adriver of innovation and development in many professional fields [2]. Further, failure is deemedan essential building block for developing skills such as resiliency [3], persistence [4], creativity[5], and problem solving [6], as well as other noncognitive skills such as self-efficacy andindependence [7-8]. Specific to engineering, failure is viewed as a normative practice ofengineers, and a practice that should be experienced by young children within engineering designprojects [9-10]. As stated by Petroski [11], “One of the paradoxes of engineering is thatsuccesses don't teach you very much. A successful bridge teaches you that that bridge works.”Therefore, experiences with failure in engineering are touted for their ability to teach us
students had about the application of activelearning strategies in science courses for undergraduates. More than 250 students' writtenresponses provided a comprehensive understanding of the reasons behind their perceptions ofthese strategies' benefits or drawbacks for their learning process. According to the study, third-year students and female students saw in-class active learning strategies as crucial to enhancingtheir comprehension and interactions with peers and professors, while fourth and fifth-yearstudents were more likely to consider these strategies as a waste of lecture time. Self-efficacy,experience, and motivation are key constructs that active learning strategies are recognized toimprove among students [10]. Social and intellectual
positively impacted by hosting such events due to increased opportunities formentoring and networking, entrepreneurial achievement, and acting as community role models[3]. Organizers provide opportunities for students to gain real-world advice and increaseentrepreneurial self-efficacy by inviting entrepreneurs to their programs [3].In general, there is also a significant difference between running competitions and organizinginnovation contests within the public and private innovation sectors. The public sector addressessocietal challenges within government functions, while private sector innovation creates productsand ideas within private organizations [9]. In the public sector, various contests are integrated,ranging from hackathons and pitch
education use to identify at risk students include socio-economicbackground, gender, ethnicity, age, study habits, self-efficacy, academic interest, ACT/SAT scores,and GPA.6, 7, 8, 9 Higher education institutions often allocate a multitude of resources to assiststudents who struggle academically; either relying on academic probation standards or self-identification for identifying students who need these resources. Students report that lack of supportfor rigorous courses as one of the reasons they move out of STEM majors.7 Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX Copyright 2024, American Society for
. K., & Riccio, A.Promoting science, technology, and engineering self-efficacy and knowledgefor all with an autism inclusion maker program. Frontiers in Education, 5.2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00075.[Accessed January 23, 2021].[7] Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use forparticipatory needs assessment. Health education & behavior: the officialpublication of the Society for Public Health Education, 24(3), 369–387. 1997.[Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309. [AccessedMarch 18, 2021].[8] Kornblau, B.L. & Robertson, S.M. Special Issue on Occupational TherapyWith Neurodivergent People. American Journal of Occupational Therapy.75(3
provide students with opportunityto network and work on projects that can impact social change [5].Prior studies have shown that participating in extra-curriculars can increase student interest inSTEM careers and improve technical self-efficacy, particularly in women [8]. Despite this,representation of women in hackathons is still very low [5], resulting in this group missing outon professional development and employment opportunities [6]. Previous studies have found thathackathon environments can be unwelcoming and even hostile towards women [6] [7]. A surveyof women students who did not enjoy their past hackathon experience found that physicaldiscomfort, lack of technical skills (and limited opportunity to learn these skills during theevent
2023,shortly after they completed their respective interventions.SurveysTo understand the interventions’ impact on sense of belonging and engineering identity, programparticipants responded to a retrospective pre- and post-questionnaire that combined two validatedsurvey instruments: Godwin’s [9] engineering identity scale and Hanauer et al.’s [11] measure ofpersistence in the sciences (PITS). The PITS combines five other validated instruments thatmeasure project ownership-emotion, project ownership-content, science identity, self-efficacy,scientific community values, and networking on a five-factor scale. These variables have beenshown to predict psychological factors that influence students’ intent to stay in science andengineering
University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and instructional support on engagement and motivation in the classroom while her engineering workplace research focuses on the role of relatedness, autonomy, and competence needs on persistence and fulfillment.Sep Makhsous, University of Washington ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Comparative Analysis of Natural Language Processing Techniques for Analyzing Student Feedback about TA SupportAbstractThis paper advances the exploration of Natural Language Processing (NLP) for automatedcoding and analysis of short-answer, text-based data collected from
program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences,” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 175–191, May 2007, doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.[38] M. Hainselin, A. Aubry, and B. Bourdin, “Improving Teenagers’ Divergent Thinking With Improvisational Theater,” Front. Psychol., vol. 9, p. 1759, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01759.[39] J. A. Mourey, “Improv Comedy and Modern Marketing Education: Exploring Consequences for Divergent Thinking, Self-Efficacy, and Collaboration,” Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 134–148, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0273475318822087.[40] P. Felsman, S. Gunawardena, and C. M. Seifert, “Improv experience promotes divergent thinking, uncertainty tolerance, and affective well
learning," 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2016, pp. 137-142, doi: 10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856059.[19] E. F. Redish, “A Theoretical Framework for Physics Education Research: Modeling Student Thinking,” Paper presented at the International School of Physics, "Enrico Fermi", Course CLVI, Varenna, Italy, July 15-25, 2003.[20] Y. Jin, J. Sun, H. Ma and X. Wang, "The impact of different types of scaffolding in project-based learning on girls' computational thinking skills and self-efficacy," 2021 Tenth International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), Chongqing, China, 2021, pp. 362-366, doi: 10.1109/EITT53287.2021.00077.[21] A. Saparon, B. C
Paper ID #43282Students’ Use of The Engineering Design Process to Learn Science (Fundamental)Mr. Diallo Wallace, Purdue University Diallo Wallace is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University focusing on the benefits of integration of physics first and engineering curriculums for student self-efficacy in engineering. Diallo holds a Bachelor of Science in Electronics Engineering and a Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics from the University of Illinois. At the graduate level, he has attained a Master of Science in Astronautical Engineering from the Naval Postgraduate School and a Master of Project
specific practices of inclusive pedagogy that faculty might implement to fostergreater belonging in their classrooms.Faculty play an important part in students’ sense of belonging. Rainey et al. [30] found thatwomen “were less likely to feel a sense of belonging” when compared to men and that womenstudents broadly did not feel as though their instructors wanted them to succeed (our previousresearch [3] echoes some of these claims.) However, when faculty emphasized their availabilityand willingness to help students with questions and cultivated an atmosphere of mutual respect,all students experienced a greater sense of belonging [30].In a recent study of early career engineering students [31], students’ self-efficacy and belongingwere examined
report for this lab exercise was easy to S10: Lab report grading was reasonable. prepare by the deadline. Figure 12. Survey report of Category 2 statements. The number value above each bar indicates the actual count of students responded.Figure 13 shows the Likert distributions for statements S11–S16, which comprise Category 3. TheLikert distributions for the statements about learning self-efficacy are again strongly positive, with 12at least 55% indicating that they Agree or Strongly Agree with all statements. The mostdisagreement occurs for S16 about the lab exercise making the students excited to work withpumps, for which a sum of 16.5% of respondents Disagree or Strongly Disagree. In
-Pohl, “Self-efficacy and subjective task values in relation to choice, effort, persistence, and continuation in engineering: an Expectancy-value theory perspective,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 151–163, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2019.1659231. [6] J. P. Monat, T. F. Gannon, and M. Amissah, “The Case for Systems Thinking in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 50–88, May 2022, doi: 10.3991/ijep.v12i3.25035. [7] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, Jan
software simulators. Following the COVID-19 outbreak, the problem of incorporating online labs in theircurricula is faced by many engineering programs. Therefore, it is imperative to design such labsin the format that facilitates students’ success and self-efficacy. Students should have ampleability to interact with their peers and instructors, while being engaged in experiential learningwith sufficient hands-on learning experiences leading to a deeper understanding of engineeringconcepts. Well-designed online labs can also refresh students’ enthusiasm for engineering, aswell as increase the retention rate for engineering students [11]. The goal of the reported project was to develop high-impact online lab teaching practicesand to
graduate school, and I Am First program for first generation students. Inaddition, the BE-TEC program is extending or adapting successful evidence-based practicesfrom its Track 1 program. The planned support services and programs have been selected toincrease academic learning, completion, and career or graduate school placement, as well as toassist in soft-skills development which is so important for graduates such as communication,teamwork, self-efficacy, leadership, and knowledge integration.NSF BE-TEC Program AssessmentTo assess the outcome of our NSF BE-TEC program, a study has been started by the institution’sBusiness Intelligence and Research Services to compare the NSF BE-TEC students to twocontrol groups: UVU students
concise) [42],they recommended another scale that consisted of 36 items in four constructs - critical self-evaluation, learning self-efficacy, self-determination, and effective organization for learning[43]. The critics asserted that the recommended scale was more concise and highlightedtheoretical dimensions required for assessing SDL skills in medical students. The inconsistenciesof Guglielmino’s and other scales, as well as the cost implication of using some of them, servedas discouraging factors for their adoption in the current study.As illustrated, validity studies on SDL scales have often led to the creation of new scalesconsidered more consistent than the previous one. Other examples of SDL scales that emergedfrom the validity studies of
correlated with a higher likelihood of remaining in a STEM program. Riconscentediscusses how students with a robust STEM identity tend to have a clearer sense of purpose,motivation, and self-efficacy within their chosen field, making them more likely to persist(2013). Additionally, studies emphasize the importance of fostering a positive STEM identity,especially among underrepresented minority students, as it can counteract stereotypes and booststudents' resilience in the face of challenges (Cheryan et al. 2017).Belongingness is another critical aspect. Research finds that students who feel like they belong intheir STEM community are more likely to remain engaged and persist in their programs (Good etal. 2012). Similarly, Walton and Cohen (2007
Retention Model Based on Factors that Most Influence Student Success,” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 21, no. 1, Art. no. 1, May 2021, doi: 10.14434/josotl.v21i1.30273.[17] S.S. Whorton, "Academic self-efficacy, academic integration, social integration, and persistence among first-semester community college transfer students at a four-year institution" (Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University), 2009.[18] L. C. Freeman, "Social Network Analysis: Definition and History," Encyclopedia of Psychology, vol. 7., A. E. Kazdin, Ed., New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 350-351.[19] A. Erkan, "Effects of social capital on academic success: A narrative synthesis
extend existing theories of identity in general [14] and STEM identity inparticular [15] to explicate a “Communication Theory of STEM Identities” [4-5]. Thistheoretical model is multi-layered and foregrounds interactional and relational aspects of STEMidentities. Both formal peer mentoring and informal peer relationships between Scholars (andother STEM students) were key components to their developing STEM identities. At the sametime, this theoretical model also includes layers for individual traits (e.g., STEM self-efficacy)and social identities and theorizes “gaps” in STEM identities that may pose challenges to STEMstudent success.Individual OutcomesFor each campus, brief descriptions of findings related to the unique interventions each
focus of this paper, has experiencedsimilar outcomes. A notable uptick in graduation rates at CU occurred between 2009 and 2015,with six-year degree completions reaching 62.2%, yet recent years have witnessed plateaus inretention rates. Persistent disparities befall minoritized students [1], [2]. These stagnantcompletion rates occur in the face of substantial need for increased engineering talent, bothnationally and globally, to support fields including technology, security, transportation, andinfrastructure.The causes of student attrition from engineering are multifaceted and vary across demographics.A range of known issues includes an unwelcoming climate, conceptual difficulties in corecourses that hamper progress toward degree, lack of self