. While this course uses active learning approaches and team projects, the scope of theircontents distinguish them from similar courses that seek to achieve improved graduation andretention rates. For instance, in this course, soft skills such as technical writing, use of Excel,developing an individual academic plan of study, cooperative education, internships, culturaldiversity, quality, safety, and ethics are covered. Basic technical skills covered include math,mechanical, electrical, and computer engineering technology. The rationale for this course is toexpose students to these subjects and topics before they enroll in core engineering technologycourses such as applied statics.Assessment of learning:While the author plans to conduct this
alsoeducated about careers that require this skill set and were introduced to a programminglanguage called “Processing”. We observed that students showed increased enthusiasmtowards CS. In addition, we noticed that the group activity component of the classesencouraged sociability and idea synthesis among peers. This CS community outreachprogram motivated us to extend the effort to teach science concepts using the Processinglanguage. This may potentially promote sociability, creativity, and empowerment inSTEM among middle school students. Specifically, we plan to use the Processingprogramming language to facilitate learning of biological and chemical concepts, sincesuch concepts can be difficult for students to visualize from a textbook. This
theirassignment but are encouraged to explore and ask questions. Students are tasked to complete theprogram so the user can draw with at least 5 different paintbrush sizes (either square or circular)in 5 different colors. Students then draw any school appropriate picture and submit their codeand drawing as the assignment. Examples from four different students from last semester areshown in the collage below: Figure 2: Collection of student images drawn from their own Microsoft Paint Clone program written in C++ and MATLAB. Speed Gait This lab activity is different from the others in that students don’t explicitly write code;instead they
design has been used by the research teams to enhance other laboratory courses inmechanical engineering [1]. Duis et al. used a similar approach to modify laboratory curriculumin chemistry [3]. The technique has been used more widely in traditional classrooms [4]–[7]. Inthis project we used backward design to build student skills in professional development andtechnical areas. We used a list of learning outcomes developed by Kuh [8] that employersconsider essential, specifically: Self-direction, timeliness, cogent writing, critical thinking,adaptability, quantitative reasoning, social responsibility, teamwork and collaboration.Active learning is a pedagogical method to engage students more directly in learning, typicallyusing small groups and
editorial boards for 7 interna- tional journals, and served as the Chair and Co-Chair for 12 international conferences. For recognition of my research activities, I have been invited to a number of international conferences as Invited Speaker, chaired panel discussions and numerous international conference sessions. I have served on more than 200 international conference program committees. Furthermore, I have published number of articles in peer- reviewed international journals and conferences. I am also an active member of ACM, ASEE, ASEE/PSW and CSAB.Dr. Abdulbaset Abdulaziz Gaddah A.G., University of Umm Al-Qura Dr. Abdulbaset Gaddah is currently an assistant professor in Computer Science at the University of Umm
daily Homework-12% assignments (short Free response Attendance- 3%(2003-2005) quizzes, assigned Final Exam- 25%Calculus 5th Edition problems, short(Stewart 2002) writing assignments, No additional problem passing conditions presentations, or projects)SCALE-UP (2006-2013)The SCALE-UP (student centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs)instructional model was implemented in Fall 2006. This method encourages active learning andminimizes lecture time in the classroom. Beichner et al. (2007
. Students presented their final designs in writing and orally before a panel whichincluded faculty members and Accuride engineers. They were evaluated on final weight, style,presentation, and analysis, with the latter making up the bulk of the score.The project provided several opportunities for students to connect directly with real world designissues in a way that wouldn’t have been possible without the industry partnership. For one, studentsfelt the pressure of competition to achieve the lightest wheel, just as Accuride must keep pace withindustry competitors to maintain or grow their market share. In addition, they were held account-able for weaknesses in their analysis process. For example, the industry panel quickly identifiedsharp corners
Camp Assistant Director for two years. In addition, he taught students in the camp as well as assisting with teacher professional development. His honors include the Lechner Scholarship and the College of Education Graduate Strategic Support Scholarship. As a graduate student, he distin- guished himself through his extensive publications on STEM teaching and learning and has participated in the writing of several grant proposals. He presented his research at several educational research con- ferences including AERA, NCTM, and SERA as well as having papers in proceedings of FIE and AAEE in engineering education. He earned several publications including journal articles, book chapters, and conference proceedings. He
location in theMiddle East, students at TAMUQ are required to complete identical coursework as their peers onthe main campus, including courses on American politics and American history. The student bodyis comprised of students from around the world, but primarily students come to TAMUQ from theArab Gulf region and Asia. TAMUQ offers Bachelor of Science degrees in chemical, electrical,mechanical and petroleum engineering. The university maintains an enrollment of around 550students, of which 58% are male and 41% are female [4]. Nearly all of the students at TAMUQspeak English as their second or third language. The faculty of the university is as diverse as thestudents, with faculty from the United States of America, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Greece
assessment of these learning outcomes asreported through the Student Assessment of their Learning Gains Instrument within engineeringtechnology programs capstone courses.Introduction There is a driving need for accountability and quality measurement in the highereducation system within the United States. As a result, universities and programs look towardsaccreditation, third party peer review systems ensuring the quality and holding educatorsaccountable. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) is the group thatprovides accreditation to engineering, engineering technology, and other engineering relatedprograms throughout institutions in the United States. Aft (2002) describes basic steps of the ABET accreditation
of hands-on experimentallearning within the classroom supported by use of the AD-Board as well as more real-worldexamples. Instructor demonstration of use, both in how to use the tool and in exemplifyingdiscussions of real world problems increased from “occasionally” to “often”. Similarly,independent use in class increased from “occasionally” to “occasionally/often” as didcooperative work with 2 or more peers (a change from “occasionally” to “often”). Work with onepeer in the classroom remained at “most of the time”. Use of ADB as a support to autonomouslearning, either as a required effort via homework or as a volunteer effort, remained the same forindependent use; student reported only “rare” or “occasional” out-of-class use by
mechanics researcher in Paris, France before returning to MIT as Assistant Director of Admissions. Currently Dr. Wendell works as a Senior Lecturer in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering teaching design, manufacturing, and instrumentation.Dr. Andrea S. Walsh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Andrea Walsh is a historical sociologist who specializes in the fields of women’s and gender studies, rhetoric and communication and visual media. She teaches at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the programs in Women’s and Gender Studies and Writing and Comparative Media Studies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Getting to Gender Parity in a Top-Tier
an Engineering for Humanity Certificate and (at the time of this writing) a nearly ap-proved University-wide Sustainability Certificate. Similar to UA, UB represents the stand-alone coursemethod. Sustainable engineering faculty housed in CEE have developed and taught four stand-alonesustainable engineering undergraduate courses since 2008, including CEE 1209 Life Cycle Assess-ment (LCA) Methods and Tools, CEE 1210 Engineering and Sustainable Development (ESD), CEE1217 Green Building Design and Construction (GB), and CEE 1218 Design for the Environment (DFE). Students in CEE are required to take one of these four stand-alone courses that address sustain-ability and grand challenges in depth. CEE 1209 introduces students to LCA, including
variety of sustainability assessments, ranging from indirect todirect measures of student learning, are available but a comprehensive review of the field isneeded to make the assessments more accessible and implementable by educators from acrossengineering disciplines.A systematic review of ASEE conference proceedings was conducted to identify and discuss thequality of available methods for assessing student knowledge of and interest in sustainability.First, a search of the ASEE PEER database for the terms “sustainability + assessment” yielded1001 results. Records with relevance indexes above 1.0 were screened based on their abstractsand appraised by their full texts according to four inclusion criteria: (1) The study was publishedduring 2011 to
two experienced Freeform instructors was video recorded over the course of the Spring2016 semester and subsequently analyzed with respect to instructor actions. Continuous videocoding analysis was used to capture how much time these two instructors dedicated to variousinstructional activities such as assessments, traditional lecturing, demonstrations, and writing notesor examples in real-time. The analysis provides a clearer picture of how and when these twoveteran instructors employed active, blended, and collaborative approaches in their classrooms.The implications of the analysis are two-fold. First, we strive to improve Freeform instruction atour institution by providing instructors with an opportunity to reflect on their
different from many other invention competitions in that teamwork isstrongly encouraged and the teacher is a vital part of facilitating the process. When studentsparticipate in the InVenture Challenge, they do not work alone at home; rather, they arecollaborating with up to two other student peers and their teacher is guiding them through anengineering design process. As a result, the InVenture Challenge is inclusive and diverse—abouthalf of K-12 participants are female and nearly 40% are underrepresented minorities.The contributions of this paper are two-fold. First, a model is provided for a K-12 innovationprogram housed at a university that is aimed at empowering underrepresented groups in STEMdisciplines by looking further down the pipeline
has a Ph. D. in Materials Engineering (1998) and Graduate Diploma in Computer Science (1999) from Uni- versity of Wollongong, Australia and holds Bachelor of Engineering (Metallurgical Engineering) degree from Pune University, India (1985). He has worked as a post-doctoral fellow at Carnegie Mellon Uni- versity, Pittsburgh (2001 – 2003) and BHP Institute for Steel Processing and Products, Australia (1998 – 2001). Dr. Manohar held the position of Chief Materials Scientist at Modern Industries, Pittsburgh (2003 – 2004) and Assistant Manager (Metallurgy Group), Engineering Research Center, Telco, India (1985 – 1993). He has published over 55 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences including a 2007 Best
. This could beachieved by showing graders how the grades they assign align with their peer graders (in termsof average and distribution), which tends to influence more extreme graders to become moremoderate25. Alternatively, calibration rounds can be used to establish complex formulas to adjustfor different tendencies4.MethodsContext and data collection. This study investigated grading in the second of a two-semester,first-year engineering course sequence that is required for all engineering undergraduates at alarge Midwestern university. The course employs standards-based grading using a set of 19major learning objectives, each with a set of minor learning outcomes, collectively accountingfor 88 total learning outcomes.The course was offered
U.S. and several countries. More than 75 authored or co-authored peer-reviewed publications, 100 conference papers and project reports, and several software packages and databases have been produced from this research. Dr. Burian’s enthusiasm for student learning has led to numerous teaching awards and the creation of new pedagogical approaches directed toward multi-institution collaborative learning. He has also sought to advance teaching effectiveness of engineering educators by serving as mentor at the American Society of Civil Engineers ExCEEd Teaching Workshop and as the developer of a vari- ety of teaching and curriculum development workshops, including the recent Wasatch Experience at the University of
-known higher education administrator, fund raiser, educator, and researcher with co-authorship of 11 peer-reviewed research journal articles, 15 refereed research conference articles, and 17 refereed pedagogical conference articles. As a PI or Co-PI, Traum has attracted over $800 K in funding for research, education, and entrepreneurial ventures from multi- ple sources including NSF, NASA, ASHRAE, the Texas State Energy Conservation Office, and several industry sponsors. Most recently as Associate Professor and Director of Engineering Programs at Philadelphia University, Dr. Traum led the Mechanical Engineering Program through a successful ABET interim visit resulting in no deficiencies, weaknesses, or concerns
, and Computer Science at the University of California,Berkeley.A substantial amount of research over many years has examined undergraduate student retentionand why students leave STEM majors.12-17 Challenges that prevent minority students’ persistencein STEM education include: lack of role models, inequitable academic preparation, lack of astudent peer group, and inadequate advising.18-21 For minority students or first generation collegestudents in the physical sciences at the nation’s research institutions, the lack of role models andinadequate advising are particularly problematic since few faculty members are of an URM.21Minority students, often the only URM in their department, are generally isolated and not likelyto seek out advice or
versus global). Along each of these dimensions, students are categorized as having amild, moderate, or strong preference in each of these four learning style scales.This study takes place in a mid-size, public university in the western United States. The samplefor this study includes mechanical engineering undergraduate students across four sections of arequired programming course in MATLAB, taught by the same instructor. These students wereprovided the Index of Learning Styles at the beginning of the semester. Students wereadministered a weekly quiz to assess their ability to write code, but construction of thisassessment varies by section to favor different preferences of one of the four Felder-Solomanlearning style dimensions. Performance on
tends to focus more on knowledge acquisition9. It has been shown thatproject-oriented courses increase retention rates10-12, intellectual development13, and increase notonly students’ technical and design knowledge, but also their technical writing and researchskills14. In addition, project-oriented courses expose students to the broader context of engineeringdesign, and students learn best when experiencing the entirety of the content area through real-lifeexamples and working with and learning from their peers6, 15-17.Project-oriented learning and capstone design courses allow for the concurrent teaching of designthrough application and teamwork skills, which are needed for future professional success3,4,18,19.This teaches students the
designed to assist students with self-efficacy beliefs and personal goals.At this University all engineering and computer science students take an introduction toengineering course that covers the engineering process, teamwork, communication skills, thedifferent branches of engineering, ethics, and co-curricular and extracurricular opportunities.Section sizes are ~30 students, so students can build community with peers and their professor.The professor of the Introduction to Engineering course is the academic advisor for his/her set ofstudents. Students declare or confirm their major by the end of the first semester. Resources tohelp students choose a major include laboratories, advisor meetings, student panels, a semester-long team project
in Biomedical Engineering from Tulane University in 2005 and her MS and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin in 2007 and 2010, respectively. Her interests include biomechanics of human movement, musculoskeletal modeling and simulation, and engineering education.Dr. Kevin Patrick Hallinan, University of Dayton Dr. Hallinan is a Professor and former Chair of the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Univer- sity of Dayton. As Chair in 2008, he established a Master’s Program in Renewable in Clean Energy, which now has 55 students from 20 nations. His research interests, which have led to over 105 peer-reviewed pa- pers and over $4M in research funding, have been diverse
. Recognition itemsincluded “my advisor sees me as an engineer,” and “my peers view me as an engineer.” Onepossible reason for this finding is that graduate students may not view the opinions of faculty andpeers as related. Another potential reason is that they do not need to rely as much on theirperceptions of the opinions of others. Unlike undergraduates, graduate students may have otheraccomplishments or validations that serve as recognition, including engineering bachelor’s ormaster’s degrees, full-time work experience, or licenses. Recognition items may need to bemodified and added in order to consider graduate students’ unique acknowledgements such asobtaining a bachelor’s degree in engineering or being a co-author on a published peer
topic of student success andretention at the undergraduate level, and it has been found that in addition to prior demonstrationof academic success (e.g., high school GPA, SAT scores, and other academic achievements), amain factor in determining student success at the college level was student motivation.9In an effort to enhance student motivation, some engineering schools have made changes to theirprogram’s digital and physical infrastructure to keep up with the rapidly evolving technologiesand learning styles of the modern engineering student. For example, New Mexico StateUniversity (NMSU) has implemented a new first year program at their institution, with a focuson PBL, flipped classroom instruction, and peer mentoring.10 Programs such as
where you’re just like, ‘book work. Here you go. Write it down.’ This actually revved up my mind and made me want to work harder in math and science to make sure it all works.One 8th grade student described how the hands-on STEM-ID course aligned particularly wellwith her learning style: It's hands on and you don't have to sit at a desk all day and do computer work. It actually gives you a chance to experience things. You get to learn up close. I'm a visual learner. I learn from what I see and what I can touch and play around with and it helps me function very well to know that I can do my hands-on work.Finally, as detailed further below, in describing their favorite aspects of the course, manystudents
partnership with the Kern Family Foundation in 2007. That firstgrant supported implementation of the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN)initiative. Subsequent grants from the Kern Family Foundation have supported intrapreneurshipdevelopment and intercollegiate entrepreneurship opportunities, faculty training to attain the goalof including EML into at least half of the engineering classes in the College, and creation of anEngineering Entrepreneurship minor that can be attained during the school year or through asingle summer-intensive program.The training workshops for faculty at Villanova University are held each summer.Approximately eight faculty members from all four departments participate each year. At thetime of writing about 1/3 of
explained how receiving sucha grade triggers a probationary status on the student’s record by the Graduate School. And thenshe gave the faculty member what he really needed – the knowledge of what was a “typical”grade distribution for a graduate course, in his department. That is, she gave him a copy of thegrade distributions of other faculty in the department, in writing, for him to reflect on. Theassistant professor did a really good job of listening. He did not launch into explanations of whythe students had earned a grade of C, or act defensively – he listened. (Tactic 3), and did not takethe fact that the associate dean had called a meeting as a personal affront to his judgment (Tactic7: Do not take negotiations personally – emotions do not