of us. (Mohr p.xxvii-iii)The book presents tools and concepts to support women to share their ideas, their voices, andtake actions that align with their aspirations and life’s purpose. It is important to note thatMohr’s definition of ‘playing big’ is not about traditional ideas like wealth generation, prestige,or power. Instead, it is about taking bold, unencumbered strides toward work that is meaningfulto the individual.Book club objectives and organizationOne of the goals of the book club was to carve out time for participants to reflect on their pastexperiences and uncover what playing big means to them. Undergraduate engineering andcomputer science students’ schedules tend to be fast paced and packed with curricular, co-curricular, and
specific EM student outcomes was performed on the submitted groupwork from a section of the class taught in spring 2020. Rubrics with four performance levels for eachstudent outcome were created. A majority of the groups were proficient or exemplary in six of the EMstudent outcomes assessed, and all of the groups were proficient or exemplary in two. Additionally,the project was qualitatively assessed using student feedback and instructor reflections. Preliminaryresults indicate the project successfully met the stated PBL and EML goals. Future work will befocused on individualizing the EM assessment process and developing a baseline for comparison todetermine the effectiveness of the project at meeting the stated skillset-based course
is a shifting phenomenon across era andregion, intersecting with race, ethnicity, religion, age, and other identities. This socialnature is important to underscore as no single chromosomal, hormonal, orpsychological factor has been found to be a direct determinant in one’s genderidentity or expression. Psychological research finds that humans haveconceptualizations and expressions of gender which are fluid and unmappable tofixed biological binary, even for cisgender subjects [4]. Instead, the “human brainmosaic” represents fluidity and multiplicity across all humans [5]. Investigatinggender in engineering should reflect this nuanced complexity. Studying genderbecomes almost academically dishonest when it is reduced to a binary variable
million in funded research, from NSF, DARPA, Google, Microsoft, and others. Hammond holds a Ph.D. in Computer Science and FTO (Finance Technology Option) from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and four degrees from Columbia University: an M.S in Anthropology, an M.S. in Computer Science, a B.A. in Mathematics, and a B.S. in Applied Mathematics and Physics. Hammond advised 17 UG theses, 29 MS theses, and 10 Ph.D. dissertations. Hammond is the 2020 recipient of the TEES Faculty Fellows Award and the 2011 recipient of the Charles H. Barclay, Jr. ’45 Faculty Fellow Award. Hammond has been featured on the Discovery Channel and other news sources. Hammond is dedicated to diversity and equity, which is reflected in
. Initialstudent feedback from this ongoing project, collected via reflections and anonymous surveys,indicate that this is a fruitful approach which clearly enhances student engagement andperceptions of the engineering field. In addition, lessons learned from this work is leading todevelopment of a lecture/workshop in values and humanitarian engineering to be presented in theauthor’s NSF-supported Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site inNanotechnology for Health, Energy and the Environment.Background:Kevin Passano, in his excellent text “Humanitarian Engineering: Creating Technologies thatHelp People”[1], defines humanitarian engineering as just that – creating technologies that helppeople. He also defines it as “creating technology to
. While mostcreativity frameworks involve divergent thinking (concept generation), convergent thinking(iterating a prototype), as well as openness to idea exploration, and reflection, in practice andunder constraints most engineering projects focus disproportionately on the first two of these four.Useful interventions might find ways to increase students’ “openness to idea exploration” and“reflection” about design.Studies have shown that students’ creativity increases when risk taking is supported in theclassroom (Daly [65] again, citing others). Increasing incentives for students to take risks andexplore ideas, and providing an environment in which they feel safe doing so, could disrupt the“lockstep” “death march” and enhance creativity and free
arts toevoke and provoke different ways of knowing in the researcher but also in the audience as they reflect on their ownexperiences in relationship to the research interpretations [60]. Arts-based research methods emerged as a branch ofWestern qualitative research theories and practices [66] that occur along a continuum of art-science, which providesflexibility for using creative practices in the research design, content generation, analysis, and/or interpretation. Ichose these inductive and generative creative practices to produce knowledge that mirrors the processes that Nail[61] and CRM [5] describe. Arts-based methods can be used in tandem with traditional qualitative and quantitativepractices or alone [60], which in my work-in-progress
recognizedin the AEC industry. It has the capacity to scan existing spatial conditions and generate densepoint-cloud models. They include ground topography, rock formations, landscapes, forest canopiesand the built environment in general.T-LiDAR scanning devices emit narrow laser beams/pulses that hit, and capture reflected lightintensity, spatial coordinates (x, y, z) and color coordinates (read, green, blue) from distant points.That is, seven quantities are captured per hit point. The laser-based scanners were firstcommercially available in the mid-1990s and they evolved considerably in the last 25 years.Today, modern rotating T-LiDAR scanners may capture one million points per second within a1000-meter range with 5mm accuracy. LiDAR applications
Education from 2005 to 2016. Their “working definition considers interdisciplinaryinteractions as attempts to address real-world cases and problems by integrating heterogeneousknowledge bases and knowledge-making practices, whether these are gathered under theinstitutional cover of a discipline or not” and was adapted from (Krohn 2010). In the literaturethey reviewed, “the reported success factors include taking a system approach, employingreal-world problems as exemplars and tasks, involving reflective dialogue, and aspects ofinfrastructure and collaboration. Reported challenges address institutional barriers, complexity,and acquiring adequate levels of support.” The authors go on to report that “motivation behindinterdisciplinary education … is
has already been offered to undergraduate students once with successful results. Thestudents were able to remotely access the experiments, perform the experiments and collect data.The successful result of such quantum experiments is also reflected in a course survey, presentedin this paper, even though the quantum mechanics topics offered in this course are unfamiliar toengineering students and hence more challenging. The paper reports, and aims to promote, theintegration of selected quantum technology topics with the mechatronics course for trainingengineering students in this rapidly growing area. 1. Introduction The rapid advances in quantum technologies demand for skilled engineering workforce tosupport the progress. The integration
education, the pro- fessional formation of engineers, the role of empathy and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces.Amy Ingalls, University of Georgia Amy Ingalls is an instructional designer with the University of Georgia Office of Online Learning. She holds a Master of Education in Instructional Design and an Education Specialist in Library Media. Amy American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #32550has extensive experience developing, designing, and supporting impactful online courses at
student experiences.Structured reflections, interdisciplinary assignments, and reworked assessment criteria inviteparticipants to make elements of HC explicit, thereby providing spaces and times for criticalengagement, while extracurricular activities fulfill a complementary role by leveraging HC tocultivate more broad-based engineering skills that are not part of formal curricula. Notably, 3 5publications specifically articulated how the surfacing of HC could enable broader curricularreform, including one that discussed the possibility of emphasizing ethics as a core engineeringcompetency. We address the significance of this approach to HC in more
volume of researchon games and learning in the past 15 years has grown along with related theoretical frameworks,methods, and areas of study 6 7 8 . In engineering education, there are a variety of game-basedapproaches for teaching and learning with generally positive results 9 , although there is a need formore transparency in design and more rigorous methodological techniques 10 .This growth in gaming research is also reflected at the American Society for EngineeringEducation (ASEE) annual conference proceedings, expanding from 12 papers during the2001-2005 conferences to 73 papers during 2016-2020, a six fold increase over 20 years. Byexamining the evolution of gaming trends over time, the results can be used to inform the ASEEcommunity of
in basic humanneeds. Additionally, it is important to implement these innovations through social entrepreneurship andleadership efforts for achieving the desired societal impact. To apply the above principles effectively,students (especially the Gen-Z students) need to have a skill set in understanding the role of engineeringinnovations in a globalized society with an attitude of leadership to serve society [16], which was themotivation behind this class. Selected successful social innovations across the world were studiedthrough the lens of fundamental science and engineering along with the societal impact. At the sametime, students also reflected on how the innovators applied/integrated leadership skills/approacheswith social
and prototyping • EP3: Planning and interpreting experiments • EP4: Identifying knowledge gaps and obtaining information from disparate sources • EP5: Planning for technical failureEP1 captures the team aspect of engineering, which includes both the need for coordinatingteamwork and the need for effective communication across a team for a successful designoutcome. The inclusion of disparate knowledge is highlighted in the literature. For example,Trevelyan found that the most crucial skill reflected in high performing engineers is coordinatingmultiple competencies to accomplish a goal [3]. EP2 highlights an aspect of problem solving thatgoes beyond the application of domain knowledge to include creativity, analysis, and evaluation.This skill
predominantly focused on White, male students who make up the majority of undergraduate engineering majors in the U.S. In 2018, 78.1% of engineering bachelor degrees were received by males, and 61.5% by White [17]. To fill the gap in the literature, we seek to include minority and underrepresented student experiences to expand the aggregated definitions for student success. These aggregated definitions of student success establish the desired outcome for scholars, administration, and presumably students, yet overlook what success means to students.4. Reflections of Success – Student Perspectives: While the above definitions may be useful as an aggregate measure for a large number of students, they do not capture the views
course had five significant assignments: one for Word,three for Excel (basics operations, pivot tables, and regression), and one for PowerPoint. Each was dueapproximately every three weeks. There were three (3) quizzes (Syllabus, Statistics, and Regression). Inthe Word module, students were asked to format a document. A video from the previous instructorgoing about this formatting task was offered to students as a guide. For the problem-solving component,they were asked to reflect on their professional development path, find job postings interesting forthem, and write their resume and cover letters that they could use to apply for each of these jobpostings. If students needed to learn Word for these tasks, they were suggested to complete a
prototyping, such as 3D printing.First-year engineering programs that include maker/tinker spaces and 3D printers for rapidprototyping can increase persistence within engineering programs, as well as within universities10.Additionally, as the trend of more students coming into first year programs with previousengineering design experience continues4, students will increasingly begin college with the skillsto tackle prototyping and may desire the greater challenge posed by open ended projects.Three recent studies, in particular, involved the use of open-ended toy design and are highlightedin this work4,11,12. Bitetti and Danahy11, of Tufts University, wanted to examine the change in firstyear engineering students’ reflections around success in
institute of Technology. Sriram received a B.E degree in Computer Science and Engineering from the University of Madras and M.S and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science from Indiana University. During his time at Rose-Hulman, Sriram has served as a consultant in Hadoop and NoSQL systems and has helped a variety of clients in the Media, Insurance, and Telecommunication sectors. In addition to his industrial consulting activities, Sriram maintains an active research profile in data science and education research that has led to over 30 publications or presentations. At Rose-Hulman, Sriram has focused on incorporat- ing reflection, and problem based learning activities in the Software Engineering curriculum. Sriram has
espouse differentvalues reflected in their respective cultures [38] [39]. For example, where academic goalsemphasize student learning and development, industry goals are often driven by profitability,productivity, and benefits to the broader organization. Many students thus graduate withuncertainty about what working in an engineering organization is like [40]. Some mightextrapolate from real-world jobs, internships, or co-ops [41] [42], but not all students have accessto these opportunities, especially if they come from minoritized groups or have less social andcultural capital [43] [44]. Further, engineering education has been criticized for perpetuating a“culture of disengagement” [24] that privileges objectivity and, in the process
societyrequires us to think seriously about preparing workers for a novel and uncertain future guided bysoftware and algorithms (Stevens, Johri & O’Connor, 2014). Specifically, how do we prepare thefuture workforce to be consistently reflective so that their actions enable a better future withminimal or/and no harm? In other words, how do we help students develop an ethical mindset?We believe that it is within their academic training that future technologists can be best preparedto develop an ethical mindset and can be equipped to respond to the challenging decisions theywill have to make when they enter the workforce. The university is a critical site for this trainingbecause future workers will have little time to gain ethical training on the job
video can be used to facilitate self-reflection and training,just as athletes and coaches watch videos of themselves [2, 10]. Wearing masks obviouslycomplicates interaction over Swivl, though this can be mitigated by the increased salience of thevisual cues that remain: eye contact, facial expression, gesture. Additionally, some faculty canopt to wear face shields while teaching.Prompting self-reflection, the same reasons that make the Swivl so effective can also make ituncomfortable to use. Studies report an increased self-awareness and self-consciousness on thepart of instructors who rewatch their lecture captures [2, 6]. At the same time, teachersacknowledge that Swivl lecture capture has prompted important changes to the way they teach
virtual internship intervention and technology, described in detail byJames, Humez and Laufenburg [12], leverages a purpose built technology platform to supportemployer partner feedback [15], structure student's reflection and metacognition [16], [17], andprovides educators with real-time learning analytics to support students and employer partnerswhen required [18], [12].To better address the needs of non-traditional and traditionally underserved minority students,the research team developed a set of design principles that attend to these students' particularneeds. The design principles include: • The ability of a student to participate in the intervention without leaving existing full- time work • The ability to complete work
transitioned tohybrid in-person / remote learning approaches to prevent further outbreaks on campuses. WhileCOVID-19 has been devastating, we propose that the pandemic also presents anunprecedented opportunity to reflect, reassess, and ‘bounce forward’ to become more efficient,effective, and resilient. The National Academy of Sciences’ definition of resilience has spurred atheory of resilience that centers on four successive stages surrounding a disruptive event, suchas COVID-19: (1) plan and prepare, (2) absorb, (3) recover, and (4) adapt. In this paper wepropose a framework that environmental programs can employ to ‘adapt’ (stage 4) and ‘bounceforward’ to a more resilient modus operandi long-term. The framework first identifies eachactivity a
into the school curriculum necessitates changes in policyincluding addressing significant issues around infrastructure, and providing teachers the resourcesthat develop a cogent understanding of computational thinking as well as relevant and appropriateexemplars of age appropriate cases [6]. Such focus would promote core concepts essential toeffective computational thinking development such as designing solutions to problems throughabstraction, automation, algorithmic thinking, data collection and data analysis; implementingdesigns; testing and debugging; modeling, running simulations, conducting systems analysis;reflecting on processes and communicating ideas; recognizing abstraction and moving betweenlevels; innovation, exploration and
, which is developed after reviewing 191 journal articles published between 1995 and 2008on the topic, change strategies can be mapped into one of four categories: disseminating pedagogy;developing reflective teachers; enacting policy; and developing a shared vision. The categorization byHenderson et al. (2010, 2011) is consistent with other efforts to categorize theories of change (e.g.,Amundsen & Wilson, 2012) and has been utilized by Borrego & Henderson (2014) to identify ways toincrease the use of evidence-based teaching in engineering education. Most importantly, the frameworkhighlights the efforts of faculty as agents for change in all four categories. However, while the severaltheories are provided as suggestions for change
Stanford University. She has been involved in several major engineering education initia- tives including the NSF-funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education, National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter), and the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engi- neering Education. Helen holds an undergraduate degree in communication from UCLA and a PhD in communication with a minor in psychology from Stanford University. Her current research and schol- arship focus on engineering and entrepreneurship education; the pedagogy of portfolios and reflective practice in higher education; and redesigning how learning is recorded and recognized.Prof. George Toye, Stanford University Ph.D., P.E., is
themes into the following dimensions ofcivic responsibility: personal and professional, virtue and obligation, and non-maleficence andbeneficence. We close by connecting these findings to frameworks used to study other forms ofresponsibility in engineering education.IntroductionCivic responsibility reflects individual responsiveness and engagement with community needs.Thus, civic responsibility aligns with the mission of many universities to graduate engagedcitizens. For example, the mission statement of the Association of American Colleges &University is “to advance the vitality and public standing of liberal education by making qualityand equity the foundations for excellence in undergraduate education in service to democracy”[1]. Many
research and foster discovery in science and engineering [6]. Consequently, the originalCyberAmbassadors curriculum incorporates activities, examples and exercises that are centeredin the context of exploratory research. This type of research is generally found in academicsettings, such as research universities and non-profit institutions, as well as in government-funded laboratories. Designing the curriculum to reflect the language and positions common tothese settings (e.g., investigator, research group, graduate student, postdoc) is an important partof the constructivist and sociocultural pedagogy embraced by the CyberAmbassadors project[7]–[9]. In this approach, learning takes place most effectively in contexts that are familiar andrelevant
integrity, communitybuilding and course engagement. The overall course grades should be distributed among shortquizzes, weekly reflections, course projects and group assignments instead of depending solelyon exams to effectively eliminate plagiarism and cheating in an online course. Chances ofcheating and plagiarism in online courses can also be reduced by utilizing availabletechnological tools such as quiz randomization and originality checking. Other concernsregarding students’ interaction and engagement can also be addressed with a proper coursedesign. The sense of community in an online course can be promoted through group projects,utilization of discussion board, and the continuous communication between instructor andstudents via email, new