, where he has been teaching Construction Graphics/Quantity Take-Off, CAD & BIM Tools for Construction, Building Construction Systems, Building Construction Estimating, Heavy/Highway Construction Estimating, Construction Planning, and Construction Project Management. Dr. Lee’s main research areas include Construction Informatics and Visual Analytics; Building Information Modeling (BIM), Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Construc- tion Management; and Interactive Educational Games and Simulations. E-mail: leen@ccsu.edu. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Team Building for Collaborative Learning Environment in Construction
IME Elect (END XXX) 3 Prod Plan. and Control IME 483 (END 421) 3 Integr. Eng. Design IME 490 (END 492) 3 Plantwide Process Control IME 476 3 Eng. Ethics & Prof. PHIL323 (ITB 217E) 3 Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Interdisciplinary Studies IS XXX 3 3 TOTAL 15 18The number of credit hours taken at SIUE is 67 and the number of credit hours taken at ITU is 76,making the total 143. Although this number is well above the SIUE’s requirements, it is the
on the relationship between these constructs being the same amongst male and femalestudents. Page 26.732.4InstrumentationA quantitative survey was used to explore differences in construction education-domain levelself-efficacy and motivation among construction management students. The following constructsfrom Elliott’s6 Construction Training Attitudes and Intentions Scale (CTAIS) were utilized fordata collection: planned training behavior (PTB), construction training self-efficacy (CTSE), andtraining motivation attitudes (TMA). The CTAIS identifies characteristics intended to contributeto attrition and performance in construction training
, [and] collaborative learning.”1 Faculty at FloridaGulf Coast University (FGCU) set out to improve their gateway course to the engineeringcurriculum, a one-credit hour course common across three of the four programs within the U. A.Whitaker College of Engineering, being mindful not only of including identified high impacteducational practices, but also incorporating the University’s upcoming 5-year QualityEnhancement Plan (QEP), which focuses on “improving student learning in relation to Writing,Critical Thinking, and Information Literacy.”b The result of these efforts is a course with anemphasis on the development of information literacy, teamwork, and communication skills,focusing on engineering innovations related to the Grand Challenges
the Judging-Perceiving domain. This effect was independent of the effect of exam grade on peer evaluationscore. Those with a preference for Judging (characterized by a planned and organized approachand a preference to make a decision and move on) were found to receive peer evaluation scores1.07% higher on average (p = 0.001) than those with a preference for Perceiving (characterizedby flexibility, spontaneity, and holding off making a decision in order to collect moreinformation).Table 3: Examination of influence of exam grades, gender, and MBTI domains on peerevaluation score. Peer Evaluation Score (2006-2013) Slope of peer
Taiwan’s. The students will also go on cultural field trips. These trips willimmerse the students in Taiwanese culture.Overall, there were 70 students from the United States, Taiwan, China, and the Philippines.Students from SJSU, Beijing Institute of Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, MapúaInstitute of Technology, Republic of China (ROC) Air Force Academy, and CYCU were mixedinto ten groups which collaborated on business projects. The students were split into teams andhad three weeks to come up with a business plan to present to the judges by the end of theprogram. Unless there was a field trip, the students had class on Monday through Friday from 8-12pm, a lunch break, and then lab from 2-5pm. Needless to say, the SJSU students spent a
with advisors and mentors, and provided brainstorming andsupport to help negotiate these relationships.Evaluation MethodologyAssessment and evaluation were an integral part of this project from its initial conception. Thebudget for this project proposed, and was funded, with an explicit eye for evaluation and anexperienced educator was hired to plan, execute, and evaluate the program. Approval for Page 26.825.5research with human subjects was obtained from the University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB), and participants were provided with an informed consent form and had the option toparticipate in the discussion series with—or without
introduce our students to our instructional design module: the H-O-H DesignChallenge. This smaller-scale, less-intense design exercise combines elements of design crea-tivity, decision making, engineering and cost assessments, project planning, and technical (oral)communication. A habitat-like structure is to be designed by arranging a variety of hexagonalprisms - differing in weight and functional characteristics - upon a site map of hexagonal spaces.The overall goal is to design a buoyant structure that is aesthetically appealing, cost competitiveand functionally sound, with adequate anchorage. Our H-O-H (or H2O, for short) designexercise was modeled after the ‘Delta Design’ project of MIT3, with appropriate adaptations tothe marine
scores of Concept Inventory, which is a test of multiple choiceson specific course related concepts. The change of students’ learning dispositions wasmeasured in terms of their learning motivation and learning skills by using the self-reportMotivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) developed by Printrich et al23.Students’ learning experience and satisfaction with the presented scaffoldings was measured byusing self-report surveys. Students’ participation in those self-report surveys was voluntary.The implementation and data collection plan was reviewed and approved by the IRB atauthors’ institution.Data analysis and its results In pre-test, 140 sets of valid surveys were collected from all five courses, in which 37 setswere in
in the pilot study, to refine potentialresearch design improve ● -We planned our word choice in the pre-interview questions for future interviewsthe fit between reality guide and interview prompts carefully so as not to -We implemented a pass system comprised of levelsand the theory generated? restrict or influence participants’ testimonies of reading transcripts, skimming transcripts, writing ● -We utilized meta-questions (asking for structured memos, listening to recorded interviews participants’ opinions and thoughts on answering and memoing, peer debriefing over memos and the questions
co-op / internship experience does havea positive impact on the aerospace engineering students where students who do co-op or internare roughly three times more likely to say that they plan on entering the aerospace engineeringfield. This somewhat begs the question of whether those co-op students are more likely to saythat they are going into the aerospace field because they have secured a job with the companythat they had the co-op or internship experience with. Additional data provided in the AerospaceStudent Attitudes Survey reveals that of the co-op/intern students, only 41.7% of those studentsaccepted jobs at the companies with which they had had a co-op/internship experience. Thebalance, 58.3% of the respondents, accepted jobs at
lab called SCARE—the Springfield Center for Acuity Research and Experimentation. The researchers have removed Rio’s brain. They plan to run experiments on the brain and then destroy it. Rio, who is still receiving radio transmissions from his brain, manages to break out of SCARE and find Sadina. Together, the two of them decide to track down the mysterious Dr. Ecks, an engineer who does research on brains and artificial intelligence. But Dr. Ecks has disappeared, and her mansion has been ransacked. Can Rio and Sadina search the mansion and find the clues they need to get a new brain for Rio? The graphic novel ends when Sadina asks the learner to take over the adventure and explore the
Strategic Plan indicates that the United States needs make STEMeducation a priority. To achieve that goal, the Department of Education has committed $4.3billion to encourage states to develop “comprehensive strategies to improve achievement andprovide rigorous curricula in STEM subjects; partner with local STEM institutions, businesses,and museums; and broaden participation of women and girls and other groups underrepresentedin STEM fields.” The report also cites the need make a “concerted and inclusive effort to ensurethat the STEM workforce is equipped with the skills and training needed to excel” so that theUnited States can maintain its historical preeminence in the STEM fields. 1
bachelor level in public universities does not have an external advisory council, so thispractice is highly recommended for programs that envision an international accreditation. Page 26.574.4The Program Committee is integrated by the program coordinator, the head of the MaterialsEngineering Division and three full time faculty members of the program, this collegiate bodywork as a team and plans and monitors all the academic aspects of the program, this team isresponsible for the outcomes and competencies assessment processes and collect and analyze allthe necessary materials. The Program Advisory Council was created, among other reasons, inorder to
the development of students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 148, 95-103. doi: 10.1002/ir[19] Trenor, J. M., Yu, S. L., Waight, C. L., Zerda, K. S., & Sha, T. (2008). The relations of ethnicity to female engineering students' educational experiences and college and career plans in an ethnically diverse learning environment. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 449-465.[20] Johnson, A. (2007). Graduating underrepresented African American, Latino, and American Indian students in science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 13, 1-21.[21] Tsui, L. (2007). Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature. The
perhaps would plan to raise herchildren. Jocelyn’s SR development will be very interesting to follow, seeing if her futurefamilial concerns continue to be strong influences, or if other collegial experiences alsocontribute. Her expected Peace Corps experience after college, that she did discuss in the secondyear, will likely be life-changing.Sarah was characterized as a Type 2 student at the end of year 1 since she saw engineering as thebest way to improve society overall. In the first year interview, Sarah, a civil engineeringstudent at TU, described early on that she wanted to help people: “So I really want to…go andhelp people in South America to like, better themselves. So I’m working on it, that’s really mygoal.” She planned to use her
included a new wingdesign (to again incorporate the aluminum vs. composites tradeoff) and a test plan forverification and validation of their design. Students were divided into four teams and each Page 26.1100.5provided their own conceptual design proposal. The advisory board, acting as the customer, thenselected their preferred choice which the entire cohort of students would then develop further andtest. In addition to Boeing, Stratasys, an additive manufacturing company, provided engineeringand part support as the students designed their test articles. Test articles included a scaledfuselage, two newly-designed wings, and interchangeable
engineeringdegree programs of 155.7. The GE+ program plans to seek accreditation under ABET’s generalengineering program criteria.BackgroundIn the 2005 publication, Educating the Engineer of 2020, the National Academy of Engineeringrecommended that undergraduate engineering programs introduce interdisciplinary learning and“more vigorously exploit the flexibility inherent in the outcomes-based accreditation approach toexperiment with novel approaches for baccalaureate education.”1 The American Society ofMechanical Engineers (ASME) Vision 2030 Task Force echoed this recommendation and named“increased curricular flexibility” as one of seven recommended actions intended to strengthenundergraduate mechanical engineering education.2 Developmentally, infusing
for Engineering Education, 2015 The Influence of Out-of-school High School Experiences on Engineering Identities and Career ChoiceAbstractStudents’ engineering career choices are not well understood. There are a variety of factors,including irrational ones, which affect students’ ultimate career decisions. Among them, out-of-school experiences in high school can impact their career interests and decisions. We examineddifferences in incoming engineering students’ high school extracurricular experiences, and howthose experiences influenced current and future selves, as well as career plans. The data for thiswork come from a national survey, distributed in Fall 2013, of 15,847 students from 27 differentinstitutions
potential funding sources (government agencies, foundations,industries, etc.) and, perhaps, identification of some colleagues at that university (inside andoutside of the engineering college) with whom they may overlap – perhaps with an eye towardsestablishing a center down the road. This research interest document can often be dozens ofpages as the applicant tries to impress the search committee not only with their accomplishmentsto date, but their “rain-making” plans for the future.The teaching interest/philosophy statement, on the other hand, does not often receive the samelevel of detail by the applicant for a variety of reasons (they don’t know educational literatureexists, they don’t know how to properly prepare a meaningful teaching
tenstudents participated in the pilot (in the future we plan to hold the information sessions earlier sothat students can plan accordingly).During the first class, students were introduced to the overarching theme of the SUCCEEd Page 26.1385.10program, which consisted of a hypothetical remodeling project of a small single familyresidence. Features of the project included the installation of an air conditioning (AC) unit on theroof, and the subsequent removal of an exterior wall to open up access to the yard. As much aspossible, competencies learned in the Statics course were integrated to the other courses. Forexample, as students worked on free
Paper ID #12600Starter or Joiner, Market or Socially-Oriented: Predicting Career Choiceamong Undergraduate Engineering and Business StudentsMr. Florian Michael Lintl, Stanford University Florian is studying Environmental Planning and Ecological Engineering at the Technical University of Munich (TUM). His majors are Sustainable City Development, Renewable Energy, International Land Use Planning and Environmental Economics. He is also participant in the Entrepreneurial Qualification Program ”Manage&More”. This is a program of the Center for Innovation and Business Creation at the TU Munich (”UnternehmerTUM”) which
includes group design - build projects incorporating planning, management, and documentation. Page 26.262.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Assessment of Inverted Classroom Success Based on Felder’s Index of Learning StylesAbstractInverting the classroom is a pedagogical practice that has recently gained significant popularity.With the increase in its use, it is essential to understand the impacts of the practice and students’experiences in this type of classroom. This pedagogical structure was implemented in a first-yearengineering course
digitizeddata, and plan the flow of information through newly designed systems. This paper providesdetails on course content division, textbook selection, lecture and lab adjustments, studentreaction and other lessons learned, for the benefit of those who wish to try this approach.I. IntroductionA course on electric circuits has long been one of the core courses in a traditional engineeringcurriculum, providing a basic foundation for students specializing in a variety of disciplines. Atypical first semester engineering course on electric circuits such as Circuit Analysis emphasizeslinear, discrete elements such as the voltage and/or current source, resistor (R), capacitor (C) andinductor (L), focusing on how to find simplified equivalent circuit
change, disruptive/transformative innovation, development studies, strategic planning, and public policy. Mahmoud has authored/co-authored 50+ peer-reviewed published papers in well-reputed international conferences and journals, in addition to 25+ institutional/curricular frameworks and internal reports. Mahmoud has attained a number of research funding grants from the UK, Malaysia, and Qatar, and won a number of awards and scholarships during his studies and professional career. After finishing his Doctorate, Mahmoud worked as a researcher at Loughborough University, UK. In Fall 2011, he moved to Qatar University (QU), Qatar, as a faculty member with the Dean’s Office, College of Engineering. In Fall 2012, Mahmoud
notable migration of e+’s direct-matriculation students out of theprogram and into discipline-specific engineering programs to three distinct shared studentmotivations: 1) students who developed a new or greater passion for a more traditional,discipline-based engineering program; 2) students who strategized acceptance to the CEASthrough the (not enrollment-limited) e+ program with the intention of transferring later to amajor they perceived as enrollment-limited; and 3) students who inadvertently arrived to the e+program thinking that it was the engineering college’s “open-option” major.Perhaps not surprisingly, the program advisor noted that many first-year students did not arrivewith a curricular plan for themselves and were slow to select
ofthe academic literacy skills identified in the Screening and the Diagnostic. CommunicationInstructors who work with the two first-year courses were made aware of the students whoscored in Band 1 and given access to their diagnostic results in order to better inform theirinteractions with the students on their written assignments. These are only preliminary responsesto the screening and diagnostic process. Currently, plans are being made to address thechallenges of earlier and more efficient communication of the diagnostic results to both studentsand instructors. Plans are also being made to more efficiently collaborate with students throughstrategy sessions and their course assignments.At Queens University the 24 students whose diagnostic
- Test setup for analog PI controller using analog discovery board. Figure 14 - Command (C1) and tachometer output (C2) for analog PI controller.IV. Lessons LearnedThe authors have successfully used the analog discovery board in their courses as a supplementto traditional bench lab equipment, or in some cases to allow for lab-like exercises in lecture onlycourses. Like any other teaching method, careful planning can maximize effectiveness of theAnalog Discovery usage in the classroom. For in-class experiments and demonstrations, timeallocation could range from 5-10 minutes in length or up to an entire lecture session, dependingon the complexity of the experiment and how well the experiment can be utilized as a vehicle forstudying a given
’ perception of how much they learneddramatically shifted towards the above average and well above average categories after theimplementation of the 3D technology project. Another set of questions in which the majority of the students agree on their perceivedlearning is shown in Figure 6 for the first year and Figure 8 for year two. In this set of questions theagreement of the students was higher than 60% and lower than 70% for year one and between 80%and 82.6% for year two. Here we can see that the 3D technology project had a high impact in theareas of time management, engineering career awareness and planning, research methods andtechniques, critical thinking concepts, and unit systems and conversions. From previous research wehave confirmed
to identify the effectiveness of the TIED UPframework. If found effective, the script will be shared with the instructors of the same course inother universities. The instructors from other schools can enrich this script with their expertise.We plan the implementation of the framework in multiple universities as well.Acknowledgements:Support for this work is provided by the National Science Foundation Award No. DUE 1504692.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Theauthors would also like to acknowledge the support from Dr. Vinu Unnikrishnan from Universityof Alabama and Dr. Eric Hamilton from