, Mechanical Properties of Materials Mechanical Properties of Materials/ Stress4 MM-4 26-Jan Transformation 27-Jan Audit or Pass/Fail5 MM-5 28-Jan Stress Transformation (Mohr ‘s Circle)6 MM-6 2-Feb Strain Transformation7 MM-7 4-Feb Strain Trans/ Thin Walled Pressure Vessels8 MM-8 9-Feb Working Session9 MM-9 11-Feb Exam 1, Fatigue10 MM-10 16-Feb Axial Deformation11 MM-11 18-Feb Axial Deformation/ Stress Concentrations12 MM-12 23-Feb Elastic Torsion13 MM-13 25-Feb Elastic/Inelastic Torsion14 MM-14 1-Mar
most classes and made the course exceptional. Getting to road trip up Hwy 101 with classmates and knowledgeable professors during beautiful weather was an experience I will not forget. I have a much greater appreciation for the history of Oregon bridges that really can't be conveyed in a typical classroom setting. In that sense, the idea of the class REALLY works.Table 2. Student responses regarding areas for improvement. Please identify area(s) where you think the course could be improved. I think the class could improve with more technical learning in the field. Dr. Riley used a model of an arch in the classroom portion to demonstrate the concept of horizontal thrust, and I think this type of demonstration in the field would help students
it’s something that requires a lot more, it’s just because maybe it requires a lot more time, it just, it’s a, it, you know, it becomes a bigger part of you than a major might for a non-engineering person. (Walt, University of Coleman, sophomore year) Eleanor: I think that engineering students are stressed. And they are, they have a lot of work to do they, I-, s-, [inaudible] myself and my roommate, like I’m a engineering student this last semester, this semester, and she’s a, a communications major, and she, I never see her do any work. And she’ll always ask me, “Why you have so much work to do?” She always see me, uh, do homework, sitting at the computer, and I always see her on the phone
students (instead of smaller teams, like many other CS courses have)MC Different teams working on different project ideas (as opposed to working on the same project)MC The project idea that your team developedMC The shared project space of your team (e.g., wiki pages, repositories, etc.)MC The official course website: announcements, course schedule (with slides and videos) resources, milestone submissionsFF Which portion(s) of the course website were most useful to you?MC The class mailing listMC Your team’s mailing list (or other electronic communication medium you used)MC Your team’s project scheduleMC Your team’s project specificationMC Your team’s architecture and design documentsMC Your team’s test
(s). ItSubmitted to 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (New Engineering Educators Division), June 24-27, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.is a common practice for the faculty in the US, to mention the text book page numbers thathave been covered for a specific class. Course end student evaluation: Course end student evaluation is also a part ofinternal quality assurance measures in the UK. These evaluation outcomes are notconsidered that seriously to assess the teaching quality. However, in the US, in theabsence of any other continuous monitoring mechanisms, student evaluation is a majorfactor towards measuring one’s teaching quality. Sometimes, these evaluations areidentified as one of the reasons for grade
!Nevertheless, this study shows that the essentials are nearly identical between the two institutions Page 13.313.15so neither of them has decided to substantially eliminate material from the shorter (3 hour)course.Simply going faster is clearly a bad idea; after all, the objective is learning, not teaching. An“expert” might be able to cover all of the essentials in a single lecture, especially if s/he hasauctioneer’s training, but this would not facilitate learning. There are, however, ways to gofaster while not significantly affecting student learning, as described below under“Recommendations”.Shifting the burden to the students should be considered
Representation: Theory, Applications, and MPEG-7 Standardization, Springer, 2003.20. S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 721–741, 1984.21. Stan Z. Li, Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis, Springer, 2001. Page 13.371.15Appendix A : Initial Course Syllabus UNC Charlotte Machine Vision Lab - ECGR3090/6090/8090 Syllabus http://www.visionlab.uncc.edu/index2.php?option=com_content&task=... ECGR3090/6090/8090 SYLLABUS Written by Andrew Willis
dailyclassroom who participated in an OST. Three teachers surveyed were directly involvedeither with an Energy Club, a Math Club or FAME. The Fellows surveyed were eitherfacilitators of their own Math Club(s) or assisted the two graduate Fellows in FAME orEnergy Club. This survey was designed to capture the perspective of each person filling Page 13.1235.10out the survey with respect to the student, the teacher, the school, the Fellow or thegraduate Fellow. For example, if a Fellow were filling out the survey, then they wouldthink about their students in the OST Club when answering the question, “Doesparticipation in the OST Club positively affect the students
Testing. The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential.Cambridge, UK: The Cambridge Press.20. Massachusetts, D.o.E. (2001). Massachusetts science and technology/engineering framework. Malden, MA:Massachusetts Department of Education.21. American Educational Researchers Association, American Psychological Association, and the National Councilon the Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological measurement.22. Urdan, Timothy C. (2001). Statistics in Plain English. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Publishers.23. Bordens, Kenneth and Abbott, Bruce. (2005). Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach. New York,NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.24. Miertschin, S., Goodson, C., Faulkenberry, L., Steward, B
Conference. Honolulu, HI.[5] Adams, J., Tashchian, A. & Shore, T.H. (1999). Frequency, recall and usefulness of undergraduateethics education. Teaching Business Ethics 3: 241-253.[6] Bekir, N., Cable, V., Hashimoto, I, & Katz, S. (2001). Teaching engineering ethics: A new approached. stProceedings of the 31 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, # 0-7803-6669-7/01. Reno, NV.[7] Muskavitch, K.M.T. (2005). Cases and goals for ethics education: Commentary on “connecting case-based ethics instruction with educational theory. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 431-434.[8] Rogers, T.B., Kniper, N.A., & Kirker, W.S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personalinformation. Journal of Personality and Social
and has given presentations at national and international conferences. She served as Section Coordinator for the Twin Cities Section (1988-1989) and has been a Vice President on the Board of Directors for the Eastern Division (1994), Measurement Science and Technology (1995 to 1997), Publications (2001), Operations (2002-2004) and now Learning & Development (2005-present) where she is involved in developing long term objectives in metrology Education and Training. She has received the following awards for her work in metrology • NCSLI Best Paper Award (co-author), Applied Category (2007)• Arthur S. Flemming Award (2004); • Algie Lance “Best Paper” Award (tied
; Exposition Copyright 2009, American Society for Engineering Education”and keep asking until you get an answer. The second is suggested by the NSPE and is known asthe “P-L-U-S” Framework. The individual should consider whether the action is consistent with:Policy/Regulations, Laws/Regulations, Universal societal/organizational values, andself/personal values.AssessmentTo demonstrate that students have a basic understanding of the importance of ethics, I usedseveral methods. At the end of the class session, I asked students to write down what were thetwo most important things they learned in the class. A number of students were surprised athow wide spread the misconduct was at Enron. Several noted that it involved financial
Labor by the National Center for O*NET Development.[5] www.transana.org[6] Committee on the Engineer of 2020, Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2005.[7] Educating Engineers: Designing for the future of the field. The Carneige Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching 2008.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award 0722221. Anyopinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF
Kuldip S. Rattan is a Professor of Electrical Engineering and Frederick A. White Distinguished Professor of Professional Service at Wright State University. He is a Co-PI on WSU's National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education. He conducts research in the area of electrical control systems, and is active in engineering education reform. He has been the recipient of the CECS Excellence in Teaching Award in both 1985 and 1992, and of the CECS Excellence in Service Award in 1991, 1996 and 2003.Michael Raymer, Wright State University Michael L. Raymer is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science & Engineering at Wright State University. He is a Co-PI on WSU's National
followingeducational objectives: 1. Design experiments to optimize the performance of a CVD reactor. o Identify key reactor inputs and determine relationship between input levels and achieved thin film uniformity. Select Select the Choose an response/ independent appropriate dependent variables/ experimental variable(s) factors design Draw Analyze the Perform the conclusions/ data using experiment inferences appropriate (collect data
is a coherent rigorous verbal framework specifying aconcept. A discussion of the conflicts between the infinities of everyday experience and formalinfinities based on axioms can be found in reference 12.The interesting conversations13 of a knowledgeable father with his six-year old son, Nic, providean insight on how a child's intuition builds an image of the concept of infinity. In the beginningof the conversations Nic imagines infinity as a very huge number, much bigger than 10, biggerthan a million, probably bigger than a "googol" (1 followed by a hundred 0's). Nic's infinity canbe operated on like any other number in arithmetic ("infinity" + "infinity" = "two infinity", andthere is "half infinity" as well). Nic also invents a number
any concepts from physics course that you can apply to the project?Questionnaire # Yes No Physics principles (questionnaire II) II 11 3 Resistance and voltage relation n=14 Flow of electricity Force = mass * acceleration Applied forces and how it affects the distance(s) and amount of work needed to accomplish the task. This was applied to the angle at which the ladder should be and the weight of the farmer applied upon the ladder.Note: Not all students responded for Questionnaire II.Table IIB show how an idea
engine torque by dividing the power by the engine speed in radians/s. Apply the proper unitconversions to express the torque in kN-m.5. Compute the fuel efficiency. The fuel efficiency is defined here as net power divided by the energy content of thefuel supplied. Using the mass of air (m) and specific work per cycle (w) computed above, the lower heating value ofthe fuel (LHV) and the air fuel ratio (AFmass) from the combustion calculation, the efficiency is given as ηfuel = (mairℜw)/(mfuelℜLHV) = (AFmass w)/(LHV)6. Repeat the steps above for complete combustion with 130% theoretical air.7. Repeat the steps above for combustion with 80% theoretical air. Assume that the products contain unburned fuel(5% of the
-surveys; however,participation in the survey is voluntary. Surveys are administered electronically and via email byUNC Charlotte under the direction of Dr. Audrey S. Rorrer. The pre-survey is provided duringthe first week of the program. The post-survey is provided during the last week of the program.Survey responses are collected and de-identified before being made available to the PI. The firstyear of the VisREU Site resulted in lackluster student participation—less than 4 studentscompleted surveys. Greater effort was made in 2015 to stress the importance of feedback. As aresult, 92% (11 out of 12) students completed pre-surveys, 67% (8 out of 12) completed post-surveys. The following sections present survey responses from 2015 VisREU Cohort
to FPGA • Understand the need for current limiting resistors for LEDs and calculate a proper value • Place a button, seven-segment display, or other device into a prototyping area, wire it to the programmable logic device, and successfully program the PLD to interface with the new component(s). With these teaching objectives, there were some specific objectives the board design had toachieve. These design objectives are listed below. • The board should be easy to solder • The board should be sufficiently low-cost to account for mistakes • The board should have a prototyping area The OwlBoard is based on a modified open source Numato Mimas board, which is men-tioned in Section 5.2. The OwlBoard