. Cohen, R., “On the Cost of Virtual Private Networks,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 8(6), pp. 775-784, Dec. 2000.3. Success Stories: Virtual PC for Student Training. Connectix Website: http://www.connectix.com/success/vpc5w_vernon.html4. Liu, S., Marti., W., and Zhao, W., “Virtual Networking Lab(VNL): Its Concepts and Implementation,” ASEE Annual Conf. Proc., Albuquerque, MN, June, 2001.5. Fabrega, L., Massaguer, J., Jove, T., and Merida, D.A, “Virtual Network Laboratory for Learning IP Networking,” in Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, June 2002.6. Stockman, M., “Creating Remotely Accessible Virtual Networks on a Single
Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science,Engineering and Technology Development. (September, 2000). Land of Plenty: Diversity asAmerica’s Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering and Technology. National ScienceFoundation, Arlington, VA.Acknowledgement of SupportThis work was supported primarily by the Engineering Research Centers Program of theNational Science Foundation under NSF Award Number 0313747. Any Opinions, findings andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation.Biographical InformationNOAH SALZMANNoah Salzman is a M.Ed. candidate in the School of Education at the University of Massachusetts
Designing an Evolving System-on-Chip (SoC) Laboratory Justin S. Davis Mississippi State UniversityAbstractIn the digital age, information is very easily accessible. This creates many problems forthe traditional classroom which uses the same exam questions and lab assignments fromone semester to the next. Instead of fighting the flow of information (which industry hasfound to be exceptionally hard), the learning environment must adapt to not only toleratethis, but use it to further educate. We have redesigned our digital systems design courseto incorporate these changes.In traditional digital systems design, silicon chips from different manufacturers arebrought
understanding of appropriate technology. 6. Expose students to developing creative, innovative solutions to engineering problems: Limited materials, time and equipment and appropriate technology considerations require the students to develop creative and innovative solutions to the problem(s) during their service-learning internship. 7. Enhance the ability of students to function effectively on engineering and interdisciplinary teams: Preparatory workshops, especially the cultural immersion workshops, include team-based activities. Participants in the cultural immersion workshops are from a variety of majors and engineering disciplines. In most service- placements, the students work on projects that involve
about 10 kN was used for this test. A minimumof three tests are carried out for each test. The speed of the penetrator is 0.2 mm/s, but the speedis reduced to lower the limit in order to more accurately determine the end point. The preferredmethod for determining is by the drop-in load on the specimen. In general this indicates the onsetof necking in the dome. Since the size of the test specimen in the present case is very small,sufficient care is taken to determine the end point. Comparison of ball punch deformation testresults shows compliance with the specification of biomaterials regarding formabilitycharacteristics.3.4 Determining the inclusion content by automatic image analysis8 (ASTM E1245-2000)TWO measurements are performed for
High Attrition Rates Among Science andEngineering Undergraduate Majors". Ethonography and Assessment Bureau of Sociological Research, Universityof Colorado, Boulder, (83-95).[5] Tinto, V., 1993, “Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition”, Second Edition,University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.[6] Touton, S., McDonald, C., Monte, A., Hein, G., June, 2004 “Engineers Need Mentors Too!” Proceedings of the2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society ofEngineering Education, Salt Lake City, Utah.AMY E. MONTE – Amy E. Monte is a lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at MichiganTechnological University. She received her BS and MS in
, http://www.ncrel.org/ tandl /build2.htm.5. Jones, S (2001), 'Collaboration - a threat to academic autonomy', Proceedings ASCILITE Conference, Meeting at the Crossroads, Melbourne http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/nov03/jones2.htm.6. ABET (2003) “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: Effective for evaluations during the 2002-2003 accreditation cycle.” (Jan. 16, 2003).7. Koehn, E. (2001) “Assessment of Communications and Collaborative Learning in Civil Engineering Education.” Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. And Pract., ASCE, 127(4), 160-165.8. Splitt, F. G. (2003) “The Challenge to Change: On Realizing the New Paradigm for Engineering Education.” J. Engrg. Educ., ASEE, 92(2), 181-187.9. Wankat, P
economists frequently treat all GLDs as OI, but there are situations in whichthe GLD becomes a capital gain or loss (CGL). If a firm is a corporation, then the error intro-duced by treating a GLD as OI will be seen to be either non-existent or minimal, but this mightnot be the case for engineering firms operating as sole proprietorships, Sub-chapter S corpora-tions, limited liability corporations, or partnerships. These organizations are called pass-throughentities since their revenues and expenses and gains and losses are passed through to the ownersor partners who pay taxes on them as individuals. Computing the tax effect of GLDs requires determining the type of asset disposed, theholding period of the asset, the character of the GLD, and
along with the calculated fuel consumption rates andcalculated developed engine power. Developed engine power was calculated using the set speedand the set torque values. As seen from the power calculations, the maximum calculated 28 hp isnot close to the engine’s rated power of at least 100 hp. Since there were severe vibrationTABLE 1. The Recorded Data and The Calculated Fuel Consumption Rates and PowerEngine Torque Mea. Fuel Measured Fuel DevelopedSpeed, rpm Ft-lb Volume, ml Time, s Consumption Power, hp ml/min1000 20 50 65.5 45.80
andcalculated developed engine power. Developed engine power was calculated using the set speedand the set torque values. As seen from the power calculations, the maximum calculated 28 hp isnot close to the engine’s rated power of at least 100 hp. Since there were severe vibrationTABLE 1. The Recorded Data and The Calculated Fuel Consumption Rates and PowerEngine Torque Mea. Fuel Measured Fuel DevelopedSpeed, rpm Ft-lb Volume, ml Time, s Consumption Power, hp ml/min1000 20 50 65.5 45.80 3.811000 40 50
Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education3. Green, L.W. and Bonollo, E. “Understanding design methodology as a basis for its teaching”. Proceedings of 4th UICEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, 7-10 Feb. 2001.4. Banky, G.P. and Wong, K.K. “Engaging engineering students for active learning: structuring a project subject for first year engineering students. Proceedings of 14th Annual AAEE Conference, 29 Sept.-1 Oct. 2003.5. Cao, Z; Kwong, K and Senini, S. “Teaching control system design via hybrid teaching modes.” Proceedings of 12th Australasian Conference on Engineering Education. 7th Australasian women in engineering forum. 26-28 Sept. 2001.6. Karri, V., Bullen, F and Rossmanek, P. “Design
2004-995 Engineering Ethics – A Collaboration between Engineering and Philosophy JoAnn S. Lighty, Margaret P. Battin, Angela R. Harris, Gordon B. Mower University of Utah, College of Engineering/ College of Humanities, Department of PhilosophyAbstractThe College of Engineering at the University of Utah has recently initiated a Center forEngineering Leadership, born out of a recently-awarded grant from the Hewlett Foundation,CLEAR (Communication, Leadership, Ethics, and Research). The Center’s goals are toincorporate communication skills, team building, and
, J.N., Durrant, S. O., Terry, R.E., “Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, 82, 2, pg. 70-77, 1983. 20. Felder, Richard. “Reaching the Second Tier: Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education,” Journal of College Science Teaching, May 1993, pg. 286-290. 21. Stone, R., and McAdams, D. “The Touchy-Feely Side of Engineering Education: Bringing Hands-on Experiences to the Classroom,” 35th American Society for Engineering Education Midwest Section Conference Proceedings, Omaha, Nebraska, April 2000. 22. Felder, Richard, Silverman, L. “Learning and Teaching Styles In Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering
5 10 10 8 5 10 8.3 Function files 10 8 10 10 10 10 9 10 9.6 Formatting iomanip 8 2 5 5.0 - fprintf 6 ~ 10 10 10 9 2 9.5 7.8 - cout, printf 6 10 10 10 10 9 3 10 8.3 Random #'s
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Accessed December 23, 2004. < http://www.abet.org >.5. Noddings, N. Gender and Curriculum. In Jackson, P.W. (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Curriculum. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1992.6. Matyas, M. L. and Malcolm, S. Investing in Human Potential: Science and Engineering at the Crossroads. Washington, DC: American Association for Advancement of Science, 1991.7. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A. and Page, R. N. Curriculum Differentiation: Opportunities, Outcomes, and Meanings. In Jackson, P.W. (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Curriculum. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1992.Biographical InformationJACQUELYN F. SULLIVAN is a founding co-director of the Integrated
://www.fit.edu/[15] http://www.msoe.edu/[16] http://www.msstate.edu/[17] http://www.rit.edu/[18] http://www.uta.edu/[19] Naur, P., and Randell, B., (1969). Software Engineering: A Report on a Conference Sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, NATO.[20] Notkin, D., Gorlick, M., & Shaw, M. (May 2000) An Assessment of Software Engineering Body of Knowledge Efforts.[21] The Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula - IEEE Computer Society and Association for Computing Machinery. (August 23, 2004). Software Engineering 2004. http://sites.computer.org/ccse/SE2004Volume.pdf[22] Thomas, B. B., Duggins, S. L. (July 2002) "The Internationalization of Software Engineering Education" 2002 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Montreal
Disconnect Complete Disconnect Complete s 0405 0400 0100 13 0405 0400 0100 13 eThe next command was the Write Connection Accept Timeout, which told the module themaximum amount of time to wait for a connection accept response from the host. Associatedwith this was the Write Page Timeout, which defined the maximum time the local device willwait
Criteria for Evaluating Engineering Programs, 2005-6, ABET, Baltimore, Md. 11/01/04 6 Frank G. Splitt, McCormick Faculty Fellow, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, email correspondence 11/23/04 7 C.F. Mason, On the Economics of Eco-Labeling, University of Wyoming, 2002 8 R. Sedjo and S. Swallow, Eco-Labeling and the Price Premium, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., 1999 9 Paul Anastas and Julie Zimmerman, Design through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering, Environmental Science and Technology, March 1, 2003, p. 95, American Chemical Society.Mr. Gregg is
, and the National Science Foundation.References1. Felder, R.M. and R. Brent. Learning by Doing. In Chemical Engineering Education, Volume 37 No. 4, 2003, pp 282–283.2. Bertini, R.L. and M. Lasky. Frontier Project Evaluation of Video Recognition Travel Time System (Draft). Portland State University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Portland, OR, 2004.3. Bertini, R.L. and S. Tantiyanugulchai. Transit Buses as Traffic Probes: Empirical Evaluation Using Geo- Location Data. In Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003. (In Press).BiographiesROBERT L. BERTINIDr. Robert L. Bertini is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental
for Research on Learningand Teaching at the University Of Michigan for valuable advice and conducting the midtermstudent feedback session. The authors would also like to thank the EECS Dept. Chair Prof. DavidMunson for his encouragement of this project.Bibliography1 http://www.engin.umich.edu/dept/cheme/people/montgomery.html2 Wankat, P. C. and Oreovicz, F. S., Teaching Engineering, available online at https://engineering.purdue.edu/ ChE/News_and_Events/Publications/teaching_engineering/index.html.3 http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html4 R.M. Felder and L.K. Silverman, J. Engr. Education, 78(7), 674 (1988).5 http://jas.eng.buffalo.edu
International SUN Conference on Teaching andLearning: “Cooperative, Collaborative, and Team-Based Learning,” University of Texas at El Paso, Session #50,March 5 – 6, 2004.8. Corwin, S., and Chase, J., Peer Instruction for Student Engagement, NSF # 0229652, May 01, 2003.Astin, A. W., "The Measured Effects of Higher Education," Annals of the American Academy of Political andSocial Science, Vol. 404, pp. 1-20, 1972.9. Bohrson, W.A., Kurtz, M.J., Piacsek, A.W., Glasby, S.P., and Gellenbeck, E.M., In Answer to a NationalChallenge: A Pilot Program to Increase Participation in Science, Technology, and Mathematics [STEM] Fields,NSF # 0230395, January 01, 2003
& Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”[3] Foertsch, J.A., Alexander, B.B., and Penberthy, D.L. (1997). Evaluation of the UW-Madison’s SummerUndergraduate Research Programs, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsion-Madison, LEAD Center.[4] May, G.S. (1997) An Evaluation of the Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program at the GeorgiaInstitute of Technology, Proceedings of the Frontiers In Engineering Conference, Pittsburg, PA.[5] Alexander, B.B., Foertsch, J.A., Daffinrud, S. and Tapia, R. (1998). The Spend a Summer with a Scientist (SaS)Program at Rice University: A Study of Program Outcomes and Essential Elements, 1991-1997, Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin-Madison
Academic Achievement of Engineering Students”, Journal of Engineering Education, v. 86, n. 2. 1997, pp125-132.[3] Bradley, W. L., and S. Bradley, “Increasing Retention by Incorporating Time Management and Study Skills into A Freshman Engineering Course," Proc. of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conf. and Expo., Salt Lake City, UT.[4] Blowers, P., “A Course in Freshman Survival Skills,” Proc. of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conf. and Expo., Montréal, Quebec, Canada.[5] Carter, R. L., M. Hoit, and T. Anderson, “Factors Influencing Freshmen Retention in Engineering Programs,” Proc. of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conf. and Expo., Nashville, TN.[6] Minitab User’s Guide 2: Data Analysis and Quality Tools, Minitab, Inc, 2003.Biographical InformationRICK T. OLSON is an
commitments,yet she was retained in the University as a part-time student. Interestingly, hercircumstances have changed and she is currently a CSEMS recipient for the 2004-2005academic year, meaning she has been able to return to her studies on a full-time basis.Goal 2’s objective to decrease the average time to degree completion for CSEM studentsalso compares favorably within the Herff College of Engineering, and The University ofMemphis total student body as well. Seven (7) of the initial twenty-five (25) recipientsgraduated within the first year of the program, and nine (9) graduated within the secondyear of the program.Program data revealed that Goal 3 was met as the 2002-2004 CSEMS graduates reflect ahigher percentage of underrepresented
meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.20 Hong, N.S., Jonassen, D.H., & McGee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (1), 6-33. Page 10.598.10 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference& Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education
in theirlearning contract. This brings finally to the nature of the use of project method, which is in contrast toexaminations. In a nutshell, one of the most appropriate teaching and learning methods forstudents’ all-round development is group project-based learning. Page 10.699.12 “Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society of Engineering Education”Bibliography1. Nightingale, P., TeWiata, I., Toohey, S., Hughes, C., Ryan, G. & Magin, D. (1995). A resource for improving the practice of assessment in
advisor also guides the summer work. During the senior year, Robotics Academy work becomes more regular and morespecialized. The team(s) meet once a week to assign responsibilities and report on theirprogress during the previous week. These team meetings are organized and run by theRobotics Academy graduate student coordinator. The role of the graduate studentcoordinator is to help answer basic questions, coordinate meetings, and keep track of thematerial procurement and budget related tasks. The graduate student coordinator alsomakes sure that the team keeps on schedule to hit major deadlines, but the team membersthemselves handle most time management. The final product of Robotics Academy projects has two components: a robot anda
, ACSA Inc, Washington DC, Pp 268- 271.BERMUDEZ J, KING K (1998). “Media Interaction and Design Process: Establishing a Knowledge Base”, Eds Seebohm T, Van Wyk S, Digital Design Studios: Do Computers Make a Difference? Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture Conference Proceedings. Pp. 6-25.CHENG N (1999). “Playing with Digital Media: Enlivening Computer Graphics Teaching”. ACADIA 99 Proceedings, University of Utah. Pp 96-109.CRAMER N AND GUINEY A (2000). “The computer school: in only six years, Columbia University's grand experiment in digital design has launched a movement”, Architecture Sept 2000, Vol 89, No 9. Pp.94-107CUFF D (2001). “Digital Pedagogy
presented in this paper.References 1. Flanders, J. R., “ How much of the content in mathematics textbooks is new?” Arithmetic Teacher, 35,18- 23, 1987. Page 7.688.9 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education 2. Schmidt, W.; McKnight, C.; and Raizen, S., A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of U.S. Science and Mathematics Education, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, 1997. 3. National Science and Technology Council. “Ensuring a Strong U.S. Scientific
and similarity ratings of some potato chipcomponents, J. Food Sci., 23(12), 1972, pp. 1435 - 1444.12. Welty, J.R., Wicks, C.E., Wilson, R.E., and G. Rorrer, Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat, and Mass Transfer,4th Ed., J. Wiley & Sons, NY, 2001.13. Yamada, T., Thermal properties of potato, Nippon Nogei Kagaku Kaishi, 44(12), 1970, pp. 587 - 590.14. Tomkins, R.G., Mapson, L.W., and R.J. L. Allen, Drying of vegetables. III. Storage of dried vegetables, J. Soc.Chem. Ind. (1944), 63, pp. 225 - 231.15. Sahin, S. and S.K. Sastry, Heat transfer during frying of potato slices, Food Sci. Technol., 32(1), 1970, pp. 19 -24.J.L. SMARTJim Smart is Assistant Professor of Chemical and Materials Engineering with the University of Kentucky. Hereceived his BS