series in a way to provideoptimal mathematics placement and support for students, increased their graduation rate inengineering. A study of graduation rates at nine southeastern universities by Borrego, Padilla,Zhang, Ohland, and Anderson (2005), found that one’s gender is also predictive of successfulcompletion of an engineering degree, where females left engineering at higher rates than males.More recently, Zahorian, Elmore, and Temkin (2013) examined factors that influenced students’selection of engineering major. They found class lectures, labs and projects in required ExploringEngineering and Engineering Design courses intended to expose the students to all options ofengineering major were less significant factors in major selection than
advancement of undergraduate education through the development of innovative active learning methods.Dr. David V.P. Sanchez, University of Pittsburgh David Sanchez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and the Assistant Director for the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation. He directs the Sustainable Design Labs that is currently focused on fusing sustainability principles and design thinking to address the Water and Energy grand challenges in the natural and built environment. Current projects include: Renewable electrode materials for Microbial Fuel Cells and the Electro-Fenton process, Recirculating Aquaponic Systems, Environmental Quality wireless sensor networks, and
education.AcknowledgementsWe gratefully acknowledge support by a grant from the National Science Foundation under contract DRL‐12487, and encouragement from our program manager, Dr. Edith Gummer. Texas Tech University IRB number for this project is 504973.References[1] National Research Council (2008). Early Childhood Assessment: Why, What, and How? Committee on Developmental Outcomes and Assessments for Young Children, Catherine12 | P a g e 13 E. Snow and Susan B. Van Hemel, (Eds.). Board on Children, Youth and Families, Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National
the students on the aeronautics track. In thechemical engineering course, homework is 10% of final grade and a series of 5 exams make up65% of the grade. The rest of student grade consists of laboratory assignments (5%), classengagement (5%), and a final project (15%). The chemical engineering course is a core courserequired for all students in the chemical engineering program, and taken strictly in the fall of thethird year as a co-requisite to physical chemistry and a pre-requisite to unit operations.In both courses, gaining proficiency with specific applications of the software used (GMAT forthe aerospace engineering course, and HYSYS for the chemical engineering course) are historiclearning objectives. As previously mentioned, these
Abilitycultural differences and being able to 4.11 (0.905) 0.513conduct cross-cultural cooperationBeing able to organize and lead a team to 4.39 (0.849) 0.719expand the work Leadership andManaging one or more projects 4.38 (0.835) 0.749 Decision-Makingeffectively AbilityBeing able to make effective decisions in 4.41 (0.819) 0.661engineering and managementBeing equipped with good verbal ability 4.40 (0.825
officer 14%Dept Committee 9%Dean/Administrator 7%College Committee 4%University Administrator 2%External Entity 2%University Committee 0%Faculty members were selected by 93% of respondents. However, this response option is vague.For example, it could mean that they were solely responsible for approving a project proposed bystudents, or the faculty approval could be one step of a larger process. Faculty members werethe only approver indicated by 25 of 56 (45%) institutions. This implies no formal approvalprocess, yet it doesn’t rule out that they could be filing decisions with the department. This rateis 42% for doctoral
Paper ID #25506Student Perceptions of Interpersonal Skills Intertwined in an EngineeringClassroomMiss Carmen Angelica Carrion, Georgia Institute of Technology Doctoral studies in Science Education. Specifically in informal settings and through the application of problem based and project based learning.Prof. Joseph M. LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology Joe Le Doux is the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Learning and Experience in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. Dr. Le Doux’s research interests in engineering education focus on problem-solving, diagrammatic reasoning, and on
in large-scale engineering classes have turned to using only onlinehomework-based systems such as Pearson’s Mastering, Wiley Plus, and/or McGraw Hill’sConnect to assess student learning. These systems provide content, grading and assessment ofstudent work, and feedback to students while solving problems. Previous research has shownthat students’ value both online and handwritten homework. Even students who disliked onlinehomework found it to be at least somewhat helpful. The current project investigates ifperformance on higher stake (e.g., more heavily weighted in overall grade) activities is betterthan on lower stake activities in a Dynamics class and a General Physics I class. In our researchonline homework, handwritten homework, and exams
mechanism for ensuring course consistency was the course andsubordinate lesson objectives, as approved by the department program director. In all cases, theseobjectives were not altered, either to increase or reduce content.Using lesson objectives as the guiding parameter, lesson restructuring followed a generallyconsistent pattern. First, any lessons under the 40 class format that were “drop periods” (used toprovide students with compensatory time) were eliminated from the schedule. Additionally,lessons used as working group sessions for larger projects and laboratories were rolled intoadjacent lessons that presented new material. It should be noted that this action reduced workinggroup session time from 55 minutes to a shortened period as allowed
in Journal of Educational Psychology, Contemporary Educational Psychology and Journal of Experimental Education, among other venues. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The influence of modeling on science self-efficacy among middle school students (evidence based practice paper: teaching approaches)Abstract Engineering lacks a presence in the k-12 classroom except through project or designbased curriculum, which is primarily used to teach science concepts. Educators often recommendincluding instructional strategies that create opportunities to increase a students’ self-efficacy toimprove student achievement in science
initially started the survey. After the surveys werecompleted and the responses were reviewed, the researcher noticed that several participants hadeither failed to identify their major or were in a non-engineering major. There were twenty-fourparticipants in twelve non-engineering majors that were deleted including project management,agricultural science, and criminal justice. There were seventeen participants who were deletedbecause they did not identify any major. This brought the number of participants down from 416to 375 for statistical analysis.The participants attended high school in twenty-four states, as well as, in foreign countries. Outof the respondents, 70.65% of the participants completed high school in Virginia. Sixty-sevenpercent of
location on the ambiguity spectrum.The National Science Foundation (NSF) has funded a three-year project to study this importantintellectual development of students in a typical STEM curriculum. Cross-sectional andlongitudinal studies of STEM students as well as non-STEM students at a Historically BlackCollege are being conducted to measure the influence of the current curriculum in context of theconstructs of tolerance of ambiguity, intellectual mental models, and STEM identity.This work-in-progress paper shares some preliminary results of the baseline data that has beencollected during the first year of the NSF-funded project.MethodThe participants of this within-subject and between-group quasi-experimental study are studentsof a Historically
design [25]. Table 1 outlines a list of validated creativityassessments and identifies them as measures of creative person, process or product.Attributes of assessment toolsThe intent of this project is not to judge assessment metrics, recognizing that differentapplications require different attributes and outcomes of assessment metrics. Instead, the intent isto provide guidelines for engineering educators and researchers interested in creativity forselecting appropriate metrics to be used in classrooms and research studies based on metricattributes. but rather to compile a These metrics are examined for applicability to science andengineering, ease of administration and completion, expertise required to score, cost toadminister, and time
the best fit to our students. Learning aspecific RTOS has the benefit of being able to utilize it immediately for projects. Nonetheless,the fast development and updates on the area of RTOS may cause the knowledge learned fromone specific RTOS outdated in some time and not applicable to another RTOS.Traditionally, teaching and learning RTOS are implemented in the following ways. First, weteach the students the design principles of RTOS and show them a ready-to use commercialRTOS. We call this a “top-down” approach. The benefit is that students will be able toimmediately deploy that specific RTOS [1]. However, without a thorough understanding of whyand how tasks are created and managed by the RTOS, students lack the skill set to pick up a
median full-time equivalent enrollment(approximately 2800 engineering undergraduates), our new policy and strategy lines up withsimilar institutions in their report (non-mandatory placement, department creation of test). Ourinstitution is unusual in that applied mathematics including calculus is taught within theengineering school and not by the university’s mathematics department. Therefore, ourplacement test can focus on those concepts and skills that are most needed by engineeringstudents.This paper reports on the development and implementation of a calculus placement test strategyfor engineering students as well as the results obtained and further plans.ObjectivesOur project was to create and deliver a placement test system that would
. Moreover, wewould like to thank the Physics Department and the Mathematics Department ofTecnologico de Monterrey and, especially, the Physics Education Research and InnovationGroup for all the support received throughout this project. Finally, we would like to recognizethe Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences for the resources andsupport given throughout this project.References[1] N. Chomsky, Language and Mind, 3rd edition. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge UniversityPress, 2006.[2] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes,Revised ed. edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.[3] A. Dominguez, I. Hernandez-Armenta, y J. de la G. Becerra, “Towards a Full
) for the Academy for Excellence in Engineering Education (AE3) at UIUC. At the national level, she served as the Executive Director of the biomedical engineering honor society, Alpha Eta Mu Beta (2011-2017) and is an ABET evaluator (2018-present).Ms. Angela Wolters, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Director, Women in EngineeringDr. Brian S. Woodard, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Woodard received his Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign in 2011. His Aerospace research interests currently focus on the effects of icing on the aero- dynamics of swept-wing aircraft. In engineering education, he is also interested in project-based learning and
University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. David Whittinghill is an Associate Professor of Computer Graphics Technology and Computer and Information Technology. Dr. Whittinghill’s research focuses on gaming, simulation and computer pro- gramming education and how these technologies can more effectively address outstanding issues in health, education, and society. Dr. Whittinghill leads projects in pediatric physical therapy, sustainable energy simulation, Chinese language learning, virtual reality, and games as a tool for improving educational out- comes. Dr. Whittinghill is the director of the Games Innovation Laboratory (www.gamesinnovation.org). c American Society for
Toler, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Mardigon Toler is a student of Computer Science and Mathematics at West Virginia University Institute of Technology, finishing a bachelor’s degree in both fields in spring 2019. His interests include digital audio, digital signal processing, and distributed and parallel computing. His past projects have included applications of AI to real-time music accompaniment as well as real-time software-based audio synthesis using Fourier transforms. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Investigating Communication Patterns for Distributed Fast Fourier TransformsIntroduction Fast
Development” focuses on engineering incontext in the developing world– i.e., developing solutions with respect to political, social,environmental, and economic factors, instead of just engineering ones. A water treatment systemfor a remote village may be highly effective, but if it cannot be operated or maintained by thepeople whom it is supposed to help, it is of no real use. In the same way, latrines that generatebiogas for people to use as cooking fuel may sound like a good idea, but if they are equippedonly with western-style toilets they may not be culturally acceptable and the whole project willfail. Through these two small examples, one can see how a geographer and an engineer cancreate a better solution by working together than they can
multiple wireless sensors. Wi-Fi for connectionbetween wireless node and Raspberry Pi and client-server communication for data transfer fromwireless node to Raspberry Pi were used in their project. Raspberry Pi application was extendedto home automation and Rao and Uma built the home automation system using Raspberry Pi [4].Raspberry Pi is located between router and home IoT devices to provide the updated data andremote control through Internet. Another application is surveillance system. Prasad and et. al.used it to collect and store the data from surveillance cameras and updated data can be seen at thesmartphone through cellular network [5]. In education, Raspberry Pi is mostly used to teachprogramming who cannot afford a high-end computer. It
: Analysis and Design of Systems in Motion, Wiley, 2010. 9. D.R. Woods, Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from PBL, Watertown, ON, 1994. 10. D. Pfahl, O. Laitenberger, G. Ruhe, J. Dorsch, and T. Krivobokova, “Evaluating the learning effectiveness of using simulations in software project management education: results from a twice replicated experiment.”, Information and Software Technology, Vol 46, pp. 127-147, 2004. 11. M.M.Waldrop, “The Science of Teaching Science”, Nature, Vol. 523, pp 272-274, 2015.Appendix 1Table 1: Rubric to measure student engagement (Total number of students two sectionscombined = 63. OEP stands for open-ended problems) How often have you done each of the following in Never 1 to 2 3 to 5
the reporting of havinga close relative in the field. As the National Academy of Engineering asserts, engineering is not avery public facing discipline for the most part [2] and so while it is understandable that themajority of student who select engineering as a major may not fully understand all that theprofession entails, the researchers thought that having a relationship with an engineer might be amitigating factor in perceptions of the profession.Additionally, these results differed from the findings in Besterfield-Sacre, Moreno, Shuman, &Atman [3] that skill perceptions differed by gender. The current research did not reveal any suchdisparity in how females and males view engineering skills.LimitationsThis project was initiated in
Paper ID #24860Power and Channel Aware Routing in Wireless Mobile Ad Hoc NetworksDr. Merlinda Drini, Queensborough Community College of the City University of New York Dr. Merlinda Drini joined the Queensborough Community College in September 2011 and currently holds an Associate Professor position in the Engineering Technology department. She earned her Ph.D. in Elec- trical Engineering, June 2009, from The Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York. She is a recipient of the awards in mentoring various students on undergraduate research projects. Her research areas are computer networking
management and project management in the MS&T.Dr. Elizabeth A. Cudney, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Elizabeth Cudney is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Management and Systems Engineer- ing Department at Missouri University of Science and Technology. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering from North Carolina State University, Master of Engineering in Mechanical Engineering and MBA from the University of Hartford, and doctorate in Engineering Management from the University of Missouri – Rolla. In 2018, Dr. Cudney received the ASQ Crosby Medal for her book on Design for Six Sigma. Dr. Cudney received the 2018 IISE Fellow Award. She also received the 2017 Yoshio Kondo Academic
) environmentwith facilitated graphical user interfaces.MethodologyIn the beginning of this study, the students are asked to fill a survey that reflects their attitudetoward following sustainability rules, and how far are they willing to contribute to upholdingsuch rules, and finally, how do they feel about advocating it to their acquaintances. The surveywas given, initially, to the students in the beginning of the semester without any introductions tosustainability; then, was given again in the end of the project with different phrasing seeking toobtain genuine and open answers. The two implemented survey questioners are appended in theend of this report (Appendix A). The preliminary stages introduced the students to the successfulproblem-solving
Paper ID #25836Relevance of Immediate Feedback in an Introduction to Programming CourseDr. Raquel Landa, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM) Part-time teacher at Tec de Monterrey since 1999, with a Ph.D. in Education, a Master in Information Technology Management and a Major in Electronic Systems. Currently involved in Innovation projects related to engineering and programming courses. ˜ Tecnol´ogico de MonterreyYolanda Martinez-Trevino, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Relevance of Immediate Feedback in the Introduction to Programming
lectures, homework, projects, and laboratory activities. However, inevery engineering discipline the curriculum is growing, and there seems to be so much thatneeds to be covered. Classes are packed with material and assignments and do notnecessarily have the creative overlap to promote synergy of the material and understanding.Our research question is whether student autonomy (even if it is partial for selected parts of theclass) and engagement of inquiry-based approach would be more beneficial for students andwould help facilitate the journey of an engaged student with a connected knowledge base.Would an inquiry-based approach, with providing students’ autonomy to create their connectedknowledge and an ability to create their story and path of
Information Systems (MIS) from the department of Business Administration at the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at the Hashemite University, in Zarqa, Jordan, in 2007. His research interest are focused on Engineering management and systems engineering applica- tions in healthcare, manufacturing, operations management, business, and other industries, modeling and simulation of complex systems, distributed networked operations, and Engineering Education.Dr. John C. Kilburn Jr, Texas A&M International University John C. Kilburn Jr. is Associate Vice President for Research and Sponsored Projects and Professor of Sociology at Texas A&M International University. He has been awarded grant funds from the NSF
control to optimize operations. Other research interests include the Deming System of Profound Knowledge (SoPK), developing continuous improvement programs as well as sustainable management systems based on ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and other international standards. He has over 25 years of experience in the quality management field as a quality engineer, corporate quality manager, consultant and trainer. His experience is extensive in quality management systems as wells as Lean and Six Sigma methods. In addition, he coached and mentored Green & Black Belts on process improvement projects in the manufacturing and service industries. Dr. Shraim is a Certified Quality Engineer (CQE) & a Certified Six Sigma Black