common final examproblems that were evaluated with a mastery-focused rubric.BackgroundThe SMART pedagogical method was developed at Michigan State University in 2016 [1]. Theacronym SMART stands for Supported Mastery Assessment using Repeated Testing. The goalof the SMART method is to address concerning trends in student understanding and performancein STEM courses, especially those that focus on problem-solving. The method was developed inresponse to growing indications that students were passing classes by achieving a level oflearning that is lower than what is expected for an engineering graduate. This lower level oflearning is often not discerned by current assessment methods. Preliminary investigationsdetermined that this trend was not due
address the COVID-19 pandemic,remote, distance, and virtual learning environment utilization has expanded significantly in thepast 3 years. With this shift comes concomitant consideration of retaining some or all of thesefeatures in instruction even as the need for these countermeasures recedes. While the COVID-19pandemic created a far more challenging educational environment, but also created anopportunity for scrutiny of virtual instruction practices. The terms “remote”, “distance”, and“virtual” carry a variety of interpretations [1]; here we use the term “virtual” and “remote”interchangeably to refer to student interactions with an online learning management system(LMS) and other web-based tools and we use the term “synchronous” to refer to
analysis requires at a minimum (1) capital cost or investment estimation, (2) operatingcost analysis, and (3) engineering econ analysis. In energy system the operating expense isgenerally dominated by the cost of fuel or analogous inputs, but other operating and maintenance(O&M) costs should be included. Estimating the energy-based component of the operating cost isprobably most familiar and comfortable for undergraduate students. Straightforward systemanalysis or simulation is adequate to support estimating the energy consumption. Usually, theintermediate result in popular mechanical engineering instructional topics is the energy efficiencyor other input/output ratio of the system, from which the annual consumption of fuel, electricity,or
the program. Here we report on the challenges during the preparation of, during and after the program; as well as feedback from students and the result of the assessment. The overall objective is to identify best practices towards making this program sustainable. 1. IntroductionInternational teamwork is increasingly becoming the norm rather than the exception. In the USalone, multinational companies (MNCs) hire around 26% of the workforce, 72% of those inmanufacturing, who will immediately become part of internationally diverse teams withmembers of different backgrounds and geographical locations[1]. An ASEE-hosted workshop of34 representatives from industry, four staffers and officials from the US intelligence community,and
explicitlyteach these skills, rather than relying on inconsistent learning experiences and processes.Background and ObjectivesMany engineering students often struggle with the entry-level courses in their discipline. Severalreasons have been cited for this struggle, including increasing topic complexity, complexproblem-solving methods compared to rote algorithms they utilized in previous classes, andlearning new discipline-related jargon [1]–[4]. In addition to these issues, engineering often doesnot explicitly teach the necessary skills and expectations for success [5]. This hidden curriculuminfluences the students’ learning environments and outcomes. Especially for systemicallyminoritized students (i.e., women, Black, Indigenous, Latina/o/x students
[1], [2].In Mechanics, students have to deal with theories and problems of motion and to apply combinedconcepts from math and physics. Topics include 2D and 3D vectors, moments, trusses, geometricaspects of bodies under motion (kinematics) and the effect of forces on motion (kinetics) forparticles and rigid bodies. Concepts such as static equilibrium, relative motion, the moment ofinertia, and rotation are difficult (if not impossible) to explain with a 2D image or verbalexplanation [3]. Often students describe their struggle as “I don’t know where to start” or “I readthe problem, but I did not get it” [4].Over the past five years, the David L. Hirschfeld Department of Engineering at Angelo StateUniversity has internally examined the DFW
programsAs the 21st century approached, Bordogna and Ernst claimed that the engineering educationparadigm shift needed to consider integration [1]. From a philosophical point of view, theauthors argued that the field of engineering education was prepared to shift from a disconnectedcurriculum to an integrated curriculum. A more integrated curriculum would help studentsappreciate the importance of complexity and reflect the disciplinary integration of theengineering profession [1]. From their perspective, integration meant holistic education, anunderstanding that all knowledge acquired was with an engineering purpose. From thisparadigm, first-year engineering (FYE) programs have been established as an essential part ofengineering education and have
year,cornerstone projects in the first year, and individual course projects in the style of project-basedlearning [1]–[3].Studies in design thinking have thus far focused on how much incorporating design thinkingincreases student outcomes [4]–[8], whether students’ design thinking increases after graduation[9], and which majors show the most increase in design thinking [10]. These studies answerquantitative questions like “how much does students’ design thinking increase” where designthinking is measured using an instrument based on characteristics of designers [11]. However,qualitative questions such as “what ways do students engage with the design process” arerelatively unexplored. In this area, researchers such as Adams et al [8] and
students willhave the opportunity to perform various hands-on experiments, learning the theory and practiceof an important membrane separation process.IntroductionSeparation is an important area in chemical engineering since its operations account for 50% to90% of a plant’s cost [1]. Also, separation is a subject that has become more relevant insustainable engineering [2]. Although traditional separation techniques are widely studied inchemical engineering, those techniques (such as distillation) have high operating costs. Newseparation technologies are being developed in part to reduce those large operating costs, such asmembrane separation. Membrane separation is a technique used to separate mixtures of liquidsor gasses. A membrane is a
student’s financial burden.Introduction Earning a professional engineering (PE) license is an important step many engineers taketo open career doors, protect the public, and provide credibility for their engineering skillsets. Inthe field of civil and environmental engineering (CEE) receiving professional licensure isespecially important as it often deals directly with the built environment and the public [1]. Oneof the first steps towards professional engineering licensure is passing the National Council ofExaminers for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam.After passing the FE exam, applicants must graduate from an ABET-accredited engineeringprogram, gain work experience, and pass the Principles and
– including instructional approaches and policies – is not student ready? The goal of our NSF-supported project, called “Eco-STEM,” is to establish a healthy STEM educational ecosystemthat allows all individuals within the ecosystem to thrive [1]. The context for our work on STEMeducational ecosystems is a Very High Hispanic Enrolling Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI) atCalifornia State University, Los Angeles, where the majority of our students are also low-incomeand first-generation college students [2]. Guided by an ecosystem paradigm [3], the project aimsto: 1) create a supportive and culturally responsive learning/working environment for bothstudents and faculty; 2) make teaching and learning rewarding and fulfilling experiences; and 3
to participate in more STEM related activities in the future.Introduction/BackgroundNowadays, more and more scientists, engineers and innovators are needed to succeed in theglobal competitive economy environment. As a result, this requires quality science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. International indicators report that US studentsexhibit a low level of performance in mathematics and science [1]. In addition, there has beenwitnessed a decrease in the number of graduates from STEM fields [1]. After noticing thischallenge, the whole STEM society has made great efforts to increase STEM-related activities,which have the potential to promote collaborative learning and inquiry as well as to contribute tothe
Producibility and Future Artifacts: Students Considering Manufacturing Lightsabers, Magic Wands, and Other Fantastical ProductsIntroductionEngineers often make great entrepreneurs. This is because they are to rapidly prototype anddesign products for any number of markets. Although most engineers have the aptitude todirectly influence the economy, they often need training with business ideas [1]. The idea of thetriple constraint is integral in the business and manufacturing worlds. This is the idea whereproduction can happen with the features of fast, good, or cheap (time, scope, cost); one isoptimized, the second constrained, the third left to be. A different but similar concept are thedesign ideas of feasibility
. INTRODUCTIONProject management is the use of specific knowledge, skills, tools and techniques to deliversomething of value to people. Examples of projects are the development of software for animproved business process, the construction of a building, the relief effort after a natural disaster,the expansion of sales into a new geographic market, etc. [1]. Projects are temporary efforts tocreate a value based unique product. Every project has a start and an end. A project has a team, aset budget, a timeline, and certain goals that the team needs to meet. The focus of projectmanagement is to effectively plan and organize a project and available resources. Projectmanagement also includes building a project team and effectively guiding it through all the
to determine thevariability of pedagogical approaches and the depth or breadth of information delivered acrosscourse content. The depth and breadth of information are expected to be identical regardless ofthe professor; however, the content seems to vary as widely as the pedagogical approach. Thesediscrepancies are what lead to the motivating question for this research project. Is it content thatcauses students to fail engineering mezzanine courses, or is the pedagogy?LiteratureBloom's Taxonomy was developed in 1956 by Benjamin Bloom to categorize educational goals.It was revised in 2001 to make the classification system more dynamic [1]. For this researchproject the original Bloom's Taxonomy was chosen because it has a longer history of use
Computing Education with a joint appointment in SUCCEED and the STEM Transformation Institute. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Understanding How Children on the Autism Spectrum Engage in Solution Optimization during a Design ActivityIntroductionPre-college engineering education is argued to play an important role in fostering informedcitizens who can navigate critical problems [1], by identifying problems in new ways, solving theproblems by troubleshooting while considering all aspects of the problems, making wisedecisions, and optimizing the situation during critical moments. These skills are
problem-solving approach that uses design thinkingtools to identify the unmet needs of a population in order to collaboratively and iterativelydevelop meaningful and innovative solutions [1]. Research studies continue to show thatengaging higher education students in HCD experiences can positively influence theirdevelopment of 21st century mindsets such as human-centeredness, metacognition, collaboration,communication, creativity, and experimentation [2]. These mindsets match what currentemployees seek in employers [3]. Consequently, many universities are supporting the integrationof human-centered design and design thinking in their courses as one way to prepare theirstudents to succeed in future workplaces [4]. For higher education
practice over a long period of time to develop both high-level conceptual proficiency in addition to “muscle memory” (see, e.g., [1], [2], for historicaldiscussions of student development of computational problem-solving skills).1 Unsurprisingly,there is considerable evidence that incremental, scaffolded exposure to programming conceptsenhances student learning outcomes [3], [4]. Computational engineering brings an additionalchallenge in that it requires not only proficiency with computer programming, but also conceptualadeptness with an underlying body of domain-specific knowledge. Past work (see, e.g., [5]) hasestablished that the opportunity to resubmit assignments in an undergraduate-level computingcourse improves student learning.Following in
Paper ID #38038Using Natural Language Processing to ExploreUndergraduate Students’ Perspectives of Social Class,Gender, and RaceUmair Shakir (Graduate Research Assistant) My academic background is a bachelor's and master's in civil engineering (University of Engineering Technology, Lahore, Pakistan), and Ph.D. (Engineering Education, VT, the USA, expected in Fall 2022). My ten years of professional experience range from NESPAK (5 years), to Dubai (1-years), and assistant professor (The University of Lahore-3 years). I am certified in Project Management Professional (PMP). During my Ph.D., I served as a graduate
teaching [1], and having a growth mindset in relation to theabilities of students [2]. However, research also shows that the local climate in a departmentcould cause students of color to be driven from STEM [3], or that a chilly climate could have adisproportionate impact on female students [4]. And while the focus of Diversity, Equity, andInclusion (DEI) efforts tends to be on women and under-represented minorities (URMs, definedas non-white, non-Asian), populations with representation at or above the demographics of thegeneral population (typically Asian and Jewish students) face their own challenges [5], [6].Additionally, part of supporting all students includes not alienating majority populations. In thispaper, we provide an update on recent
discussed what issues the committee members would like to addressand also what tools that members possessed that might be used to address issues. The committeehas now formed subcommittees, based on member interest, and have chosen to focus on threeissues: 1) Dude Walls, 2) non-gendered bathrooms, and 3) artwork. Further details on each ofthese issues and current approaches will be discussed. We also seek audience examples of otherissues that may fall under the charge of this committee and other approaches that have been triedor considered.Introduction and Motivation: We are all familiar with the standard surroundings of a university or college. The brickbuildings with the stairs leading up from quad, the murals painted in the union and the
mentorships. Black students need mentorswho are willing and equipped to be advocates and accomplices in their success.IntroductionHistorically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) have a long history of providingeducational opportunities to Black students [1]. There are just over 100 HBCUs operating today,a number representing half as many as previously existed. Cheyney University, which wasinitially named the African Institute then the Institute for Colored Youth, was established in 1837in Pennsylvania and is credited with being the first HBCU. However, Lincoln University,founded in 1854 under the name The Ashmun Institute, was the first designated to award collegedegrees [1]. Just two years later, Wilberforce University was founded with the
results in a deeper understanding of those engineering concepts throughthe lens of real-world collaboration and contexts.IntroductionEngineering is necessary for human survival and anyone who wants to be part of designing thatsurvival deserves to participate. Instructional designers must create content that allows forteaching the fundamentals of a discipline and leaves space for cultivating and discussing newideas. Underserved populations in engineering have been shown to stick with careers where theyfeel they have a social and global impact so incorporation of applications and examples intocurriculum is essential [1, 2]. The multimodal framework presented in this paper demonstrates away to emphasize the relationship between engineering and
, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) STEM PractitionersIntroduction Where are the gays in engineering? LGBTQ+ people have always existed, but ourvisibility in society has ebbed and flowed across civilizations. Our presence has not changed inthe U.S.’s recent history, but our visibility has increased over time [1]. Some pridefully exclaimtheir presence in English and Spanish: “I’m here, I’m queer, get over it!”; “¡Estoy aquí, soy de lacomunidad, y no vas a definir quién seré!” Employee Resource Groups (ERG’s) withincorporations, groups such as the National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Scientists andTechnical Professionals (NOGLSTP), Out in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (oSTEM), and Out for Undergrad (O4U
in the practice of engineering is recognized in the NationalAcademy of Engineering’s 2019 US Frontiers of Engineering Symposium report (2020): “Thepractice of engineering is continually changing. Engineers must be able not only to thrive in anenvironment of rapid technological change and globalization but also to work oninterdisciplinary teams. Today’s research is being done at the intersections of engineeringdisciplines, and successful researchers and practitioners must be aware of developments andchallenges in areas that may not be familiar to them” (p.v. Preface) [1].The National Academy of Public Administration report titled Science and Technology PolicyAssessment: A Congressional Directed Review (October 2019), conducted a study on the
therewere more than 700 Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) in the United States and their numbersare expected to grow in the coming decades [1].MSIs enroll diverse populations, and some may qualify for multiple MSI categories. However, insome instances, the student population of MSIs can be rather homogenous. In Puerto Rico andareas of Texas and California, some institutions have student populations that are 60 to 100percent Hispanic/LatinX [2]. For that reason, it is appropriate to ask what happens in situationswhere the “minorities” served by the institution are actually the majority of the studentpopulation? Furthermore, in these cases, what are the experiences like for other MMPs thatattend such institutions? Are matters of race/ethnicity
between the STEM and volleyball journeys of Black female college student-athletes?MethodsPositionality When engaging in critical research, scholars must examine and make visible theirstances, positioning, and possible intersections between their identities and those of thecommunities they are seeking to understand. With this in mind, the authors will briefly describetheir positionalities. Author 1 is a U.S. Black American who has earned engineering degrees. Shehas also coached and played volleyball through the high school level in schools serving student-athletes in lower-middle-class communities and wealthy upper-class communities. Similar to theparticipants, she benefited from scholarships. To avoid "speaking for the data,” Author 1
to mitigate the economic hardship associated with the cost ofattendance (COA) at the University of Puerto Rico Mayagüez Campus (UPRM). The main goalof PEARLS is to increase the retention and success of low-income, academically talented students(LIATS) in engineering programs at a Hispanic institution. Traditionally, at the college level,students from lower socioeconomic status have higher attrition levels, significantly lower retentionand persistence rates, and higher time to graduation rates.[1][2] The program’s indicator of long-term success (longitudinal data) includes persistence, time to graduation, on-time graduation,graduation rates, and successful insertion into graduate school or the engineering workforce. Toachieve this, we
through a platform such as CPI are further considered.IntroductionOver the past several decades, there has been exponential growth in both the capability ofcomputing as well as its influence in several fields 1 2 . This growth in computing has made it easierfor computers to do more and solidify their ubiquitous use. We see computing in healthcare beingused to speed up the development of drug discovery 3 4 , in the classroom and outside of theclassroom to teach students a wide range of skills 5 6 . Examples of this include the proliferation ofmassively open online courses (MOOCs). With the growing influence of computing, the field hasthe potential to be a an equalizing force if all members of society have an equal opportunity toparticipate in