require that capstone design projects actually be multidisciplinary.Although that would be desirable, it would be impracticable to make this a requirement. Thisserves the need for an interpretation that could apply to all projects.Direct assessment of this capability could be done by requiring students to include a section intheir capstone design report that lists engineering disciplines other than their own that they wouldinteract with, and what kinds of information would be exchanged. Specifically, they would haveto describe the information that they need from other disciplines, and what information wouldother disciplines need from them. A grade on that specific section of the report would then serveto provide data for assessment of this
projects and the ASCE student chapter. His research interests include engineering licensure policies, civil engineering curriculum development, and the use of innovative materials on concrete bridges. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Benefits of a Decade Dedicated to FE PreparationAbstractA decade ago the authors at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) reported on how the addition ofan engineering course dedicated to preparing students for the Civil Specific Fundamentals ofEngineering Exam (FE) enhanced the capstone experience [1]. Preliminary results indicated thatthe course, which did not specially teach to the FE exam but covered an array of topics, didimprove pass rates and
is a free tool application that isused to capture packets from network connections. By using the application, it is possible to capturethe packets from the device’s network connection to get the IP address of the device. Aftermanaging to capture some packets, one would need to look through them to find out if it came fromthe same location as the device is located at. Upon discovery of the IP address as you look it up,with certain IP address lookups sites, it would indicate if that were the address you are looking for.Once there is confirmation, the next process is set in the next phase of testing. ConclusionThe purpose of this collaborative senior capstone project was to provide safe and healthy
design specifications and a basic prototype that will be further developed in thesubsequent capstone design course.BME 400 – First-semester seniors improve on the initial prototype and complete theimplementation of their design in this course.BME 402 – Final-semester seniors test, evaluate, improve and produce final documentation oftheir device. In addition, all students complete an outreach requirement, typically by giving a talkin a K-12 classroom. Also all students write their project reports as technical papers in a formatappropriate to a target journal or conference.Every semester, three of these courses are taught (i.e., BME 200, 300 and 400 in the Fall or BME201, 301, and 402 in the Spring). A minimum of two faculty are assigned to each
Session 1311 INTERNET BASED LESSON AND TEST DELIVERY, AUTOMATIC GRADING AND RECORD KEEPING SYSTEM Omer Farook, Chandra R. Sekhar, Jai P. Agrawal, Ashfaq Ahmed and Michael Holtz Purdue University CalumetABSTRACTThe paper describes the “Internet Based Lesson and Test Delivery, Automatic Grading and RecordKeeping System”. This system is conceived and designed as part of the Senior Design Project ofElectrical Engineering Technology curriculum during a two-semester course offering. These twocourses are the capstone courses in Electrical Engineering Technology curriculum offered in 7th and8th semester. This
detailed analyses of 3 Trenchless construction of trenchless projects trenchless design and Technology utilizing horizontal directional drilling construction. (Mini, Midi, and Maxi), pipeline rehabilitation, microtunneling, pipe jacking, auger boring, and construction of temporary structures. 4 Topics in Heavy Underground construction is discussed Capstone course with 3 Construction in length. trenchless applications.THE CAPSTONE COURSE INCONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY Advances in trenchless
-spacerelationship visualization in 4D (3D+Schedule), time-space-cost relationship visualization in 5D(3D+Schedule+Cost), and Time-Space-Activity Conflict Detection using 4D Visualization inMulti-Storied Construction Project. In this paper, the author compiled his recent researchactivities in virtual construction visualization and animations that can be valuable coursecontents for graduate construction education and research. The author also believes that thesematerials can be valuable topics for senior capstone design courses for undergraduates inconstruction engineering and management.VR, 3-D animation and walkthrough: Haque7 has developed 3D models of steel, concrete andwood framed structures, and placed them in a virtual world using AutoCAD, 3ds MAX
sustainability, we highlightthe proposals of [7] and [20]. Authors of [7] developed an analytical sustainable design rubric toaid quantifying students’ abilities to incorporate sustainability into capstone design projects inthe civil and environmental engineering context. It aimed to capture not only the extent to whichstudents engage in sustainable design but also the influence of project sponsors and/or courseinstructors on sustainable design expectations. In [20] the above-mentioned rubric is reviewedand extended in order to broaden its applicability to engineering design projects outside of civiland environmental engineering. Nevertheless, the original and the reviewed rubrics only partiallycover the five sustainability dimensions discussed in the
, program and project management. LTC Raby teaches EV450 (Environmental Engineering for Community Development) and EV 481 (Water Resources Planning and Design).Mr. Erick Martinez, United States Military Academy Erick Martinez is a Captain in the United States Army and an Instructor in the Department of Geogra- phy and Environmental Engineering at the United States Military Academy. He is a 2007 graduate of the United States Military Academy with a B.S. in Environmental Engineering and recently graduated from the University of Florida with an M.E. in Environmental Engineering. He teaches Environmen- tal Engineering for Community Development, Environmental Science, and Environmental Engineering Technologies.Col
pandemic are useful even after the pandemic. Onlinepresentation, use of GitHub for software development, use of Google documents/directory, Googleform for team evaluation and peer evaluation are a few things that can be adopted after pandemic toimprove student learning. In this paper, successes and lessons learned will be shared regarding the useof Zoom in lectures, laboratories, and help sessions, homework and quizzes in Canvas, virtualpresentation for Mini-Maker Faire, feedback from students, and capstone projects.1. IntroductionOnline learning has been studied long before the pandemic [1,2,4,5,6,11,19,20,21,22,23]. In mid 90s, asthe internet increased its popularity, educators started to investigate the feasibility of online education[22]. In
engineering profession, and through this coursework, to learn frameworks for analysis: a policy or an economic framework, for example. These courses are also open to (and popular with) nonmajors, leading to interdisciplinary discussions and project teams. The curriculum builds to a unique capstone experience (e.g. Rossmann and Sanford Bernhardt, 2015).Engineering students at Lafayette College also take approximately one-third of theircourses outside STEM subjects, in the humanities, arts, and social sciences. Thesedistribution requirements introduce engineering students to alternate “ways of knowing,”comprising a liberal education. However, these requirements are not necessarilyintegrative; they may provide opportunities for
revival of SeniorInterdisciplinary Design and the development of an upper-level Integrated Design course. Thisis in addition to the traditional capstone Senior Design, where students spend 2 quartersdesigning and building a project for external sponsors. Our first year students need a foundationin design education to prepare them for these courses, where they are given responsibility todesign a product for a paying sponsor. In particular, ABET criteria c, e, and h should beaddressed before students enroll in a Senior Design class. These criteria state that studentsshould have: (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. (h) the
. The projects during the thirdor junior year will be specific to the electrical engineering systems concentration and willbe used by us to relay certain topics to the student. The year-long capstone project isintended to be multi-disciplinary on the other hand and will not be further considered inthis paper. The last semester of the column of electrical engineering systems courses isanother set of modules. We again use this both to match up topical coverage against thecapstone experience and additionally to provide some elective content to the students.Certain of these modules will be developed with an eye towards our two sisterconcentrations: mechanical engineering systems and civil engineering land development.Immediately to the right of the
dialogs withindustry-based participants, there are some useful outcomes for academic projects.However, we should first recognize four important differences. Student academicprojects (at least up to PhD level) are usually: 1. Undertaken by individuals or a small group. The participants do not have much variety or depth in the experience they bring to the project. 2. Short in duration. Even a capstone project is only equivalent to about a month of full-time energetic project work. That’s not long to learn practical techniques. 3. Not part of a continuous development scheme where one project depends on the timely delivery of results from another. 4. Learning-focused. That means that although a project may be funded by a
learning. Current trends in the field of technology indicate that team based projectsare increasingly more beneficial to the learning experience than individual ones. Becauseelectrical engineers often work as a member of a team in their profession, especially whenengineering processes interface with hardware and software processes, the department will pilotmulti-disciplinary, problem-oriented team projects. This approach will allow students fromdifferent programs and departments to work together on projects that simulate real workingenvironment scenarios. Group projects and assignments will be stressed throughout the program,which will culminate with a team senior project and a capstone design class.Assign industry/service problems to students
supplemental design evaluation was administered in paper form to biomedical engineeringseniors in the capstone design course at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, at the conclusionsof the Fall, Winter, and Spring 2007-2008 terms (IRB approved protocol #RHS0054). Duringthe Fall quarter, teams of biomedical engineering seniors selected projects with corporate clientsor individuals within the community, worked up at least three distinct design options, created andused merit and feasibility criteria to select one option, and completed a full design proposal forthat option. During the Winter quarter the teams built and tested their designs, and completedextensive design documentation. The completed projects were delivered to clients early in theSpring
Innovative Curriculum for Undergraduate Electrical and Computer Page 13.421.11Engineering Students.”References [1] M. Paulik and M. Krishnan, “A competition-motivated capstone design course: The result of a fifteen-year evolution,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67–75, February 2001. [2] F. C. Berry, P. S. DiPiazza, and S. L. Sauer, “The future of electrical and computer engineering education,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 467–476, Nov 2003. [3] J. S. Bruner, The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960. [4] W. M. Clark, D. DiBiasio, and A. G. Dixon, “Project-based
4341synergistically assisted students in seeing the big design picture and the nuances ofteamwork, leadership and management required in the two-semester senior design(CENG 4115/4315) by analyzing and discussing solutions to leadership issues seenduring the one credit hour CENG 4115 in the fall and public policy affecting engineeringprojects in Texas, business practices that could constrain their capstone project design aswell as how well they have been managing their personnel assets within their team duringCENG 4315 in the spring. Even though some public policy is being covered inenvironmental engineering, the in-depth coverage of public policy and administrationwithin CENG 4341 along with leadership, business practices, asset management andother
2006-833: HOW THE PRESENCE OF WOMEN AFFECTS THE PERFORMANCEOF DESIGN TEAMS IN A PREDOMINATELY MALE ENVIRONMENTRichard Bannerot, University of Houston Richard Bannerot is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Houston. His research interests are in the thermal sciences and in engineering design education. For the past fifteen years he has taught the required "Introduction to Design" course at the sophomore level and has been involved in the teaching of the department's capstone design course. He is a registered professional engineer in the State of Texas. Page 11.697.1
collaborative,mutually agreeable relationship that involves teaching, learning and building knowledge. Theirinteraction may be on a time from requiring basic skills to application of advanced, disciplinaryskills, as in a capstone experience. Students may observe, participate, teach, or offer a talent.Some of these opportunities may embody values orientation, such as practical and active learningfor engineering and different technical fields. Some students may interact in style, production orinstallation of a small project or be a part of an oversized project with business partners’ currentactivities, while others might have students support a method of growth, development, andvisioning around core issues. No matter what kind of engagement, the outcome
body motion, impact, fluid flow, and fluid-solidinteraction.Though certainly not all, a significant percentage of students who complete the required FEAcourse express a strong interest in a continuation course. In addition, the university's industrialpartners, both advisory committee members and Capstone Design Program sponsors, havecommunicated the desire for graduates to have additional competencies in simulation. Finally,students in the senior level Capstone Design course frequently have the opportunity to performadvanced simulation as part of their senior project. A recent example is a project sponsored bythe NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory that focused on their land-based 70m deep space antenna.They wanted to understand the phenomena
iscampus- or curriculum-based assessment. This paper does not address program educationalobjectives, which describe career and professional accomplishments of program alumni. Theformer usually requires different evaluation and assessment tools than the latter; although, someoverlap does exist. In addition, we will also refer to course objectives, which are not to beconfused with program educational objectives. Therefore, given this context and the imminent importance of using direct assessmentmethods, this paper provides a review of direct assessment measures. These methods include,but are not limited to, instructor end-of-course assessments, use of targeted assignments(assigned problems, exam questions, projects), capstone examinations
Industrial and Management Engineering from Montana State University.Penny Knoll, Montana State University Professor Knoll was in the commercial design-build sector of construction in Phoenix, Arizona, from 1987 to 1999 and owned her own design-build construction firm for eight years before retiring the firm to take the full time position at Montana State University in 2000. She is the program coordinator for the Construction Engineering Technology (CET) program as well as the graduate program, Master of Construction Engineering Managment. These programs are housed in the Department of Civil Engineering. Professor Knoll teaches the CET capstone course, CET 408, Construction Project Management
Paper ID #9519Integration of Prerequisite Resource Materials in a Structural Design of Foun-dations Course Using PencastsDr. Jeffrey A. Laman, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Professor of structural engineering teaching capstone design, design of steel structures, bridge engineer- ing, analysis, structural design of foundations, and analysis. Research areas – engineering education, bridge behavior, progressive collapse.Ms. Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Mary Lynn Brannon is the Instructional Support Specialist at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering
undergraduate and graduate students, even the processes of soliciting, administering,and managing industry projects that reinforce academic topics in engineering, technology,manufacturing, project management, lean, financial literacy, and six sigma1,4-11. Additionaltopics that are reinforced include professionalism (through interaction with industry), teamwork,and leadership12. These projects are also assessed as student work to meet the student learningoutcomes13. The results presented in one paper that reviewed student capstone projects indicatedthat first cost (initial cost) is the most significant metric, followed by annual worth, and payback(simple) within the students’ analysis of their engineering design. Of these top three engineeringeconomy
”occupations and projects. As engineering educators, we would like each student to be proficientin all aspects of the subject matter and be prepared to work in the rapidly changing world ofengineering and industry. Rather than focusing on a specialized task role in the team such as“Construction Expert,” each team member should multi-task, performing all tasks necessary tocomplete the team project and learn all the engineering content.Study MethodUsing a qualitative methodology (focus groups), six intact teams from selected courses (e.g.,first-year students taking the Introduction to Engineering course (ENES 100) and seniorscompleting their senior capstone experience) were interviewed. This methodology was chosenbecause the aim was to solicit a
education Figure 4. Student Rusty Welborn, Page 12.1310.7environment, and can be recognized in the faculty reward tested the mechanical properties ofsystem. die-cast aluminum.Figure 5. Students David Brown, David Kleinholter and Jimmy Sandusky provide a regionalaluminum sheet manufacturer with a design as their senior capstone design experience.Team projects serving as a capstone design experience, where students
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Engineering Education 3the classes along with a feel for creativity, curiosity, and camaraderie without confrontation. Itwas also deemed necessary that the essential features of teamwork -- cooperation andcoordination -- must be learned early in order to be successful team players on future real worldengineering teams. This finally led to the so called ‘Footstone Project’ concept2. The idea wasdistinct from the ‘capstone’ design projects in that it was simply a tool to be used at the veryoutset of a program of study to help set a stage for the teaching and learning process as it pertainsto the courses of
elements were not as important as their location, which can easily beedited and updated using Revit.Figure 5. Revit architectural project as base for structural skeleton: left, brochure plan; right, 3Dview (used courtesy of Sean Eubanks, Woodhill Studios, Inc.).Third VersionThe latest version of the class involves removing the structural engineering component (andRevit), focusing solely on land development projects. This decision reflects current enrollmentnumbers in the department between the areas of emphasis (General, Structures, andTransportation). Some changes were made at the request of the capstone design instructors(CVEN 400: Design Problems in Civil Engineering). They voiced concerns that team projectsprevented students from maximizing
them to be closely involved as a project mentor.There is no shortage of students looking for meaningful, challenging projects. All accreditedundergraduate programs of engineering and computer science require a capstone designexperience. ABET criteria states: “Students must be prepared for engineering practice through acurriculum culminating in a major design experience based on the knowledge and skills acquiredin earlier course work and incorporating appropriate engineering standards and multiple realisticconstraints.”1 The criterion also provides a list of student outcomes commonly referred to as 3(a)to 3(k). Many of these student outcomes may be practiced by students participating in an FSBSproject. Potential student outcomes include:• “an