Paper ID #23310Supporting Student Learning Through Peer-led Course Support InitiativesJenai Kelley Brown, Clemson University Jenai Kelley Brown has a background in college life coaching as well as career counseling. Before com- ing to Clemson University, she was a Senior College Life Coach at Florida State University working primarily with first generation college students. Jenai is currently the Assistant Coordinator for Tutor- ing in Clemson’s Academic Success Center where she trains and manages approximately 60 tutors each semester. While her roles in Higher Education have changed, her primary goal has remained to help
microaggressions. While the term “microagression” is somewhat a misnomer in thatthe consequences of these aggressions are far from small in terms of detriment to career andwell-being, they are made to seem small in the sense that their affects are often invalidated bythose who do not recognize their harmful nature [19]. However, the language of Canon 8explicitly states that these types of experiences must be dealt with as a matter of civil engineeringpractice, and as a result, it creates a space for issues that otherwise would not have beenaddressed.ASCE ReactionFollowing the passage of Canon 8, people gave feedback in on different channels ofcommunication. On an ASCE page announcing the passage, comments ranged from supportiveto critical. One supportive
conventionally feminine appearances are perceived as lesslikely to be competent or suited for STEM careers due to the male gendering of STEM [23].This, in some respects, imposes a perception of gender non-conformity for many women whootherwise would not identify as gender non-conforming within engineering. In the face of thesegender dynamics there are professional organizations, student clubs, summer camps, andwomen-specific spaces which are avenues for forming support structures and mentorship forwomen in engineering. As mentioned prior, this has been critiqued as further entrenching thenotion that we live within a binary gender system in which women have an inherent ‘lack’ whichneeds to be assisted [6]. The experiences and statistics of women in
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Effect of Teacher Professional Development on Implementing Engineering in Elementary SchoolsAbstractIncreased attention on the implementation of engineering education into elementary schoolclassrooms aims to start preparing students early for potential engineering careers. In order toefficiently and effectively add engineering concepts to the curriculum, appropriate developmentand facilitation of engineering design challenges is required. Therefore, professionaldevelopment programs are necessary to educate teachers about engineering and how toadequately teach it. This paper explores the effects of an engineering professional developmentprogram for
academic career at Carnegie Mellon Uni- versity, Boston University, Olin College, and Northeastern University he has been the recipient of the first Whitaker Young Investigator Award from the BMES, a Searle Scholar Award, and an Early Career Development Award from the NSF as well as a three-time recipient of the Omega Chi Epsilon Outstand- ing Faculty Award from the Northeastern Student Affiliate of AIChE. He also has led industrial R&D teams at Organogenesis Inc. and Polymerix Corporation developing tissue-engineered medical products and drug- generating biodegradable polymers, respectively, and has co-founded Automated Cell, Inc. In addition to being an inventor on 11 issued US patents, he has published the
. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research in- terests include diversity & inclusion, students’ persistence, advising and mentoring, engineering career pathways, and school-to-work transition of new engineers. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. Prior to beginning his doctoral studies, Hassan worked for five years at General Electric where he graduated from their Edison Engineering Development Program (EEDP) and then worked as a gas turbine fleet management engineer. In addition to his technical role, Hassan supported the recruiting, interview, and selection process of the
Paper ID #25012Civil Engineering Program Criteria: A Snapshot of How Programs Meet theCriteriaDr. Scott R. Hamilton, York College of Pennsylvania Scott Hamilton is the Coordinator for the new Civil Engineering Program at York College of Pennsylvania. He is a registered Professional Engineer and has both a MS and PhD in civil engineering and a Masters in engineering management from Stanford University and a BS from the United States Military Academy, West Point. He is a retired US Army Corps of Engineers officer who has had assignments in the US, Germany, Korea, and Afghanistan. During his military career he spent over
of the goals of thegrant, which we refer to as our focus on the digital electronics metaphor of fan-in, fan-out. Fan-in relates to the diversification of not only the students who enter the program, but also how theyhave been prepared to engage in engineering education (i.e. methods of teaching and learning tobe successful in engineering). Fan-out relates to the diversification of careers pursued by studentsgraduating from the degree program. In order to increase this order of complexity, the inter-module must be re-designed. Historically, for example, many of our students work forgovernment defense contractors upon completion of their degree. In building a foundation for thework of the grant, we have learned that the field of computer and
which students discussed changes in their knowledge of sustainability,energy conservation, smart grids and/or renewable energy as a result of the course. Studentsalso discussed the perceived applicability of the course to their future careers or courseworkand their perspectives towards the active learning used during class. Structured observationdata depicting the nature of the in-class time will also be presented.Lastly, observations including a summary of what was successful versus not as successful arepresented. This “lessons learned” summary will include a plan to explore conversion to a“flipped” style course for the summer of 2019.IntroductionA course in power distribution engineering and smart grids is a unique and innovative approachto
having a small friend group who I knew I could go to with questions throughout the semester. I felt more comfortable navigating campus, as well as talking to professors and other professional persons on the campus.While most of the respondents indicated that participation in the program had a positive impact on theirtransition to the university, several students indicated that they felt that they did not derive much benefitfrom participating in the programs. One participant indicated that they were not able to maintain therelationships that they developed during the program, because they were at a different point in theiracademic career than most of their peers. This person wrote: There was only one friendship that lasted. The
Engineering (EE) from the Virginia Military Institute, Master’s Degree in EE from the George Washington University, and Ph.D. from the University of Louisville in Computer Engineering. He is also a graduate of the Signal Officer Basic Course, Signal Captain’s Career Course, and the Army Command and General Staff College. At West Point, LTC Lowrance also serves as a senior researcher in the Robotics Research Center. He has led multiple research projects related to robotics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. His research has led to over 25 peer-reviewed journal and conference papers, several of which have won best paper awards.Major Eric M. Sturzinger, United States Military Academy MAJ Eric Sturzinger is a
disparities and despite a variety of national and programmatic changes aimed atimproving outcomes for unrepresented groups, only marginal success has been achieved in thelast decade [1, 2]. The notable absence of low-SES students majoring in engineeringdisciplines has resulted in a profession that lacks the representation and diversity of the actualUS population and significantly impacts the career potential of low-SES students in theengineering fields [1]. Engineering faculty frequently recognize the problem, but often lackthe formal training in instructional best practices necessary to help underrepresented studentsto persist and succeed in their courses. Instead faculty often revert to teaching the way theywere taught, employing the long-venerated
, potential differences with tenure-line faculty, and challenges that are specific toinstructional faculty, as well as the role of faculty development on career pathways andpromotion. The research should also consider multiple institutional contexts, as this studyfocused on faculty at HSIs. In addition, the findings of this study highlighted a need to examineinstructional faculty members’ perceptions and use of resources, beyond on-campus workshops.Finally, the interest by the instructional faculty in engaging further with engineering educationresearch suggests an opportunity to examine their development of educational theory andresearch knowledge.The results illustrated that only instructional faculty had multiple dominant teachingperspectives
education and pedagogical innovations that aid in providing equal opportunities to students from all backgrounds.Dr. Alicia Betsinger, Dartmouth CollegeMs. Holly Wilkinson P.E., Dartmouth College Holly Wilkinson is Assistant Dean of Academic and Student Affairs at the Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth. She previously served as Director of Career Services at Thayer School, Director of Re- cruitment at Colorado School of Mines, and Director of Engineering Admissions at Norwich University. She holds a Master of Business Administration from Norwich University and a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from Union College.Mr. Ray Helm, Dartmouth CollegeDr. Yanmin Zhang, Dartmouth CollegePritish Ponaka, Dartmouth
24.2%In addition, all students who indicated a willingness to be interviewed were contacted, and fourinterviews were conducted. Interview questions asked them about choosing to major inengineering, their current career plans, their plans to use their engineering skills in volunteering,the main things they took from the class, how (if at all) it changed their thinking, how they thinkabout ethics, and if they thought the skills and information from their general education courseswould be useful in their careers.Survey data was analyzed to see if survey responses in any areas changed significantly betweenthe pre- and post-surveys using paired sample t-tests. Results were also analyzed, usingindependent sample t-tests, to see if groups of students
Hart Center for Engineering Leadership has a dual mandateMethodist for career development and college-wide leadership development.University (2010) SMU embeds its learning in first and final year design courses, and offers assessments to every single incoming freshman.Rice University The Rice Center for Engineering Leadership (RCEL) offers a(2010) certificate in engineering leadership that is a combination of coursework, experiential labs, an internship and a final presentation. RCEL experimenting with a course on leadership coaching in partnership with the business school and in the process of developing a professional master’s degree in
and can contribute, you are Come with skills immediately in.” “You have to be assertive… that is how we see who is Assert yourself Integration really interested and who is just hanging around.” “When different people come together there is a Insert yourself sorting. If you can’t hang with the group, you don’t stick around.” “40+ hours per week is fine; the experience launches Give us your all careers.” Ethos of Commitment
the activities students participated in involved social interaction. Toincrease the quality of data in this vector mini-classes that involved everyday interpersonalinteraction were not included. Going to an event with friends or learning from peers and mentorswas considered everyday interaction, and was thus excluded. Activities in this category includereading books, participating in career fairs, participating in diversity and leadership training, andseeing plays. Participating in these activities pushes students to have a deeper understanding ofthe world and their peers and how to interact with them than everyday interactions.Managing EmotionsManaging emotions involved activities that were specifically structured to give students tools
members expressed apressing need for students to be exposed to business planning, financial statements and financialratio analysis with special emphasis on understanding how engineering project decisions impactcompany financial statements1.Shortly after the initial work was carried out to incorporate changes in the engineering economycourse to address the key concerns of the advisory boards, the Penn State University Presidentcalled upon faculty members to put special emphasis on developing business skills in allstudents. The university president called upon the faculty to “Invent Penn State: Let’s turndiscoveries into a great economy, together.”2 The president put forth a $30 million investmentin economic development and student career success
GeographicInformation Systems (GIS). The proposed framework helps realize the ultimate goal of nurturingGIS/Geo-Informatics students with advanced geospatial skills while contributing to enhancedcritical thinking and problem solving skills due to the interactive delivery of modules. The‘interactive’ nature of the framework allows the transition from conventional methods that arepassive and uni-directional to active learning through involvement driven by the event-responsemechanism. As a result, GIS academic programs can give advanced state-of-the-art training totheir students, thereby increasing their graduation rates, employability, and overall career success.This paper delineates some of the common examples employed in geospatial education andelaborates with
Bachelor of Engineering in Aerospace Engineering from the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology and his PhD from the Queensland University of Technology. He started his pro- fessional career in 1995 as a project engineer at Roaduser Research International, and following his PhD joined the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) in the Autonomous Systems Laboratory. At CSIRO he held various roles including Principal Research Scientist, project leader and the Robotics Systems and Marine Robotics team leader before moving to QUT in 2013. A strong advocate of robotic systems in civilian applications, Dr Dunbabin is involved in a number of initia- tives aimed at promoting, educating and
educators, we not only need to convey information, but must alsoprovide students with different learning styles and diverse backgrounds the means to develop theskills required for a broad range of career paths, from teaching and research to design, industryand production.8 Three of the most important abilities for engineers — logical reasoning, critical thinking, andproblem solving — are some of the toughest to teach. In addition to these abilities, developing acommand of electromagnetics requires the ability to visualize and manipulate fields and vectorsin three dimensions, making this subject one of the most difficult to teach within the field ofengineering.9 Usually, individuals who are highly educated in the subject, such as instructors,have
lead, in turn,to an increased number of students who will pursue careers in engineering or other STEM fields.One means to accomplish this is through the National Science Foundation’s ResearchExperiences for Teachers (RET) program5, which seeks to develop collaborative relationshipsbetween pre-service and in-service K12 STEM teachers, community college faculty and theengineering research community, with the goal of allowing STEM teachers to translateuniversity-gained knowledge and research experiences into their classrooms. This paper reportson an ongoing (2014-2016) RET project at the University of South Florida (USF).Our approach to developing a high quality RET professional development experience for STEMteachers is based on our beliefs that
designed to consist of four sections. The traditional PBL teachingstrategies are utilized with some expansion in key areas that we felt were missing in the long termgoals of most summer STEAM programs, specifically, making the connection to a job, career,major, or field of study. Based on this thinking, a learning block is composed of the followingsections as can be seen below:Learning blocks are then strung together to create a much more dynamic program for a week longsetting such as the one seen below:The order of a learning block is important. The first portion is specifically tailored to give realworld careers, jobs, majors, fields of study that engage the learner upfront. These examplesdemonstrate what concepts we are about to teach and how
, students are asked to relate theirsimulation leadership experiences to more domain-specific problems that they might encounterin their future careers. This paper will present three simulation scenarios that the group has testedand will share the experiences encountered by participating students as well as the faculty andstaff organizers.IntroductionTraditional undergraduate engineering programs offer students little in the way of leadershiptraining. They also offer students little exposure to complex real-world problems. Yet, thegeneral expectation is that one day our students will be able to lead the way in solving complexproblems.At Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, we seek out ways to provide our students withexposure to real world problems
$1000 of increased aid is positively correlated with probability of retention andgraduation.6Instead of time spent working to help pay for school, students would be able to redirect their timetowards studying and participating in co-curricular activities. The sizeable scholarship andcontinued support through their college career would make a very attractive recruitment tool.Many admitted URMs were choosing not to enroll at Cal Poly because other schools are able tooffer large scholarships, and several internal reports have recommended scholarships.7RecruitmentTargeting students who could best benefit from PEEPSThe NSF S-STEM scholarships are intended for academically talented, financially needystudents, and PEEPS has been designed to be offered
track” engineering student will take) and EngineeringProblem Solving I (the first engineering class a freshmen student will take). However, highschool GPA was a better predictor in both cases. Of the variables commonly available in studentrecords systems, we conclude that both ACT math score and high school GPA should beconsidered when predicting performance in Pre-Calculus and Engineering Problem Solving, aseach adds considerable explanation of variance.IntroductionMultiple criteria are used to decide which math class an engineering student needs to take at thebeginning of their college career. Some universities use a placement exam or a combination of aplacement exam and student data (for example, high school GPA or number of high school
academically advised by a faculty member. STEM career exploration and research support: lab tours, faculty presentations, and interactions with local STEM professionals from industry Cohort building activities (Houston/Rice acculturation).Details on Curriculum: Chemistry, Physics and CalculusAll concepts covered in the summer residential program are topics in the first two semesters ofChemistry, Physics and Calculus. Both foundational and conceptually difficult topics areselected for the summer. Topics are covered at the same rate in the summer (e.g., 3 hrs onReaction Stoichiometry) as in the fall (e.g., 3 hrs on Reaction Stoichiometry). Curriculum is alsoselected that helps students learn and master solving complex word problems. RESP
excellence in research and teaching with awards from organizations such as the American Medical Informatics Association, the American Society for Engineering Education, the American Cancer Society, and the Society for Women’s Health Research. She is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and a Senior Member of both the IEEE and the SPIE.Stephanie Ruth Young M.Ed., The University of Texas - Austin Stephanie Young is a doctoral student in educational psychology at the University of Texas at Austin. Her research focuses on educational pathways to STEM careers, underrepresented minorities and females in STEM, and psychosocial influences on STEM learning. In her time at the University of
unknown at the time of graduation.7,8 Thisdistribution is typical of many BME undergraduate programs, including the one at ourinstitution.At the Master’s level, students come from diverse training, including research and industry, andbackgrounds including sciences, mathematics, and several fields of engineering. Many areseeking to redefine their career direction, and most Master’s students are seeking employment inindustry after graduation. An informal survey conducted as an introduction to this courserevealed that 11 out of 12 students’ goals were to work in industry or at a start-up company upongraduation.As a result of these differences, instructors must consider different instructional styles dependingon their audience. Traditionally, the