undergraduate and graduate levels. His tremendous re- search experience in manufacturing includes environmentally conscious manufacturing, Internet based robotics, and Web based quality. In the past years, he has been involved in sustainable manufacturing for maximizing energy and material recovery while minimizing environmental impact. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Interdisciplinary Senior Design Project to Develop a Teaching Tool: Extruder Tutor Plastic InjectionMolding MachineIn recent years there has been a big push to get students into the STEM fields. However, what seems to be lackingin this academic push is the hands on side of it. Engineering simply just isn’t about equations, but
who have continued on to graduate school. We are interestedin exploring the long-term impacts of our undergraduate research and scholarship program on theparticipants' academic and career paths after graduation. The SPECTRA program is approaching the end of its funding, and we hope to use theinsights from our research to inform the design of a new transfer program. Our previous studieshighlight what students find valuable when they are in the midst of their SPECTRAparticipation, and we hope that additional research on the graduated participants will reveal whataspects of the program the participants believe have best supported them in achieving their careergoals and what aspects could be improved. If we better understand the
research focuses on student engagement and equity considerations in Computer-Aided Design (CAD) software education. She previously worked as Project Coordinator for the Engineering Collaboration for Online and Remote Education (E-CORE/CIEL Project), a national Canadian initiative to support instructors in shifting to remote instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic.Dr. Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto Alison Olechowski is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering and the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice. She completed her PhD at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). ©American Society for
epistemic matter, faculty agency, and researcher identity.Daniel Patrick Mountain I have a background in chemical engineering, getting my Bachelor's in 2021 in this area. I am currently pursuing my Master's in Chemical Engineering, as well as an Engineering Education Graduate Certificate. I have done past research in engineering education, working with how the COVID-19 pandemic affected engineering students. My current research looks at how perceptions of engineering affect pre-service teachers' self-efficacy at teaching engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comDevelopment of a Hybrid Community of Practice Course
relationship is different [7]. A healthy ecosystem, in our framework, is one inwhich everyone is valued and supported according to their own individual needs. These needsare greatly impacted by systems of social oppression, which disproportionately affect ourstudents. We also recognize that these systems of oppression are active within the universityitself, and even within our own classrooms. To build STEM educational systems that prioritizeequity and justice, we require the development of the critical consciousness [see 8] necessary forfaculty to begin to understand how systems of oppression are reproduced, albeit oftenunintentionally, within their own classrooms. To this end, the Eco-STEM project has developedCommunities of Practice for faculty and
Model for Academic Performance in Engineering StudentsAbstractThis research article proposes developing a predictive model to identify, at an early stage,students at risk of low academic performance. Academic performance is a critical indicator inhigher education, essential for student and professional success, and has been extensivelystudied due to its impact on retention and timely graduation. Socio-demographic factors suchas socioeconomic status, family environment, work responsibilities, study habits, financialsupport, and psychological factors have been shown to influence student performance andattrition rates significantly. While progress has been made using linear regression models,recent years have seen the incorporation of advanced
. Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009.9. U.S. Department of Education. The Condition of Education. Washington, D.C.; 2001. nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001072.pdf.10. Shulman L. The Signature Pedagogies of the Professions of Law , Medicine , Engineering , and the Clergy : Potential Lessons for the Education of Teachers. 2005.11. Quartaroli MT. Qualitative data analysis. In: Lapan SD, Quartaroli MT, eds. Research Essentials: An Introduction to Designs and Practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.12. Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education; 2012.13
professionals in the U.K. have been required to explicitly consider thesafety of construction workers in their designs since 1994, and PtD is now required throughoutthe European Union1, in Singapore, South Africa and Australia.14 The recognition of the valueof PtD and the diffusion of PtD practices has been much slower (due to factors that willdiscussed shortly), but there are signs the concept is gaining recognition among researchers,project owners,31 32 and design professionals.12 16 21 The Occupational Safety and HealthAdministration’s (OSHA) Construction Alliance Roundtable has had a working group thatfocuses on designing for construction safety since 2005 while the National Institute forOccupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has had a significant
to gain inspiration for a future design oras an initial step in revising a prior design for improvement. However, in construction, site andcode constraints make this practice less common, although it can be argued that constructionrenovation projects must fully research and document the existing design before proposingchanges to it. Nonetheless, terminology can become an obstacle in a multidisciplinary setting.Another difference between sectors is in how design methods are applied. At a high level,construction projects tend to be very similar, i.e. in the design of a building, foundations, floors,walls and roofs are all present. However, at a detailed level, construction projects all essentiallyunique, owing to differences in local soil
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Successful Academic Partnership in the Development of an International Construction Practices CourseAbstractThe challenge of working effectively with multicultural teams will continue to grow inimportance. Students graduating from engineering and construction management programs needto be functional in this global environment. To address this need, this paper discusses asuccessful partnership among several international universities to develop a constructionpractices course designed to prepare engineers for the global workforce. The course specificallyfocuses on sharing global construction engineering and management practices and includespartnerships primarily with
wives. All those withyoung children do.”The idea that academic life often assumes that a faculty member has a stay-at-home spousefrequently surfaced in the comments. “I am competing with men who have wives that stay athome. They can work late any night they want without consequence. I have to schedule latenights way in advance, or skip them altogether.” Similarly, “My lack of participation at nightevents or weekend events (recruiting, professional dinners) has been noted….I do not think thisis unique to my university, but an indication that the academic culture still revolves around malenorms and practices.” Several respondents noted that this was a concern for both members of adual-career couple, not just women. However, it impacts women
collection of best practices for retaining faculty across all ranks. In this paper, preliminary findings from search data, and interviews with department chairs and search committees about their experiences utilizing the recruitment toolkit are presented. The paper focuses on the impact that the recruitment toolkit has had on university searches, reviews the elements of the companion retention toolkit and explores implications for future uses of both on other campuses.IntroductionGiven the changing demographics of the nation, the need to diversify the faculty is wellunderstood by academic administrators.[1, 2] How to recruit and retain a diverse faculty,however, is still an issue struggled with on many college and
acourse as “designed to help students practice writing, give them opportunities to use writing as atool for learning, and to introduce them to the writing conventions and practices of particularfields or disciplines.” The purpose of WI courses is to provide a course in which students willget hands-on experience in writing for their own discipline. For the most part, this takes place ina typical disciplinary course, but one that makes a special emphasis on writing. Such WI-coursesmust provide practice with ▪ Research ▪ Drafting ▪ Writing Process ▪ Disciplinary Conventions ▪ Revision ▪ ReflectionHowever, in recognition of the
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Making Learning Whole: Toward the Development of An Instrument Operationalizing Perkins’ ModelAbstract The push for stronger links between engineering education research and practice requiresthat taking a more scholarly approach to teaching became the norm instead of the exceptionacross all engineering education. This paper seeks to make the case that there is a lack of toolsavailable for achieving some of the goals of the field, such as the one aforementioned, andpresents findings from a set of research activities designed to help address this need. Morespecifically, this work in progress paper describes the early stages of a study that uses
biosensorrequire the cooperation of professors and graduate students in biology, chemistry, computerscience, electrical and computer engineering, and mathematics.To mirror the practice of this interdisciplinary research students participating in this study werechallenged to design and test “sensing” related problems of their choice. For example, teams made up of math, anatomy/physiology, and engineering and technology students designed bicycle helmets fitted with sensors to test impact absorption and collect data related to helmet materials and design
significance of team culture and inclusivity within design teamsunderscores the pivotal role they play in the optimal functioning of engineering teams [2].Moreover, there is a growing body of evidence emphasizing the positive impact of diversity onteam performance and student learning outcomes [3]. To provide a more comprehensiveunderstanding of these implications for engineering educators, it is useful to delve deeper intothe specific ways in which diversity and inclusion contribute to the enhanced effectiveness ofengineering teams. Exploring concrete examples, case studies, or empirical data that highlightthe tangible benefits of diverse perspectives and inclusive practices within engineering contextswould serve to fortify the argument and elucidate
By what means did you get your job?The semi-structured interviews lasted approximately 30 minutes and were conducted via onlinemeetings, phone calls, or face-to-face meetings to ensure that the participants felt comfortablewhile sharing their experiences. Interviews began with a brief introduction to the study’spurpose, followed by open-ended questions designed to capture participants' insights. Tomaintain confidentiality, no recordings were made, and responses were documented solelythrough researcher notes. Participants were informed of their right to withdraw at any time, andall data was handled securely, with only nicknames and contact emails retained for follow-up.The sample interview questions include: Can you recall a specific moment
day.One major goal of the mechanical engineering program is to identify best practices throughassessment of the courses and program. Another goal of the faculty is to ensure the studentshave a positive experience in each course. STEM disciplines are traditionally taught bydisseminating information and content, making them particularly fit for lecture [5], but in thecase of this course, the instructors wanted to gage the students’ opinions regarding the evolvingopen-ended lab approach and evaluate how it impacted their learning. To assess these goals,students complete course evaluations after every semester, which assess for trends andopportunities to improve the course. These surveys include an institution-level survey to revealstudent
been implemented. In the remainder of this paper,we will compare and contrast these two project paradigms and examine their impact on studentlearning. The project structure described in the left-hand column is that used in BiologicalProcess Engineering. The structure described on the right-hand side is that used in teachingBiological Responses to Environmental Stimuli.The Motivations and Benefits for the Project StructuresA major motivation for the structure of our projects is to, within the confines of an academicsetting, provide design experiences and develop skills that are directly applicable to our studentsneeds after graduation. Career choices for Biological Resources Engineering graduates are asdiverse as the program. Our graduates have
, 9Course Organization and StructureWhether the course is one semester or two will significantly impact how the course isorganized, the content that can be covered, and the scope of the design project.According to a recent survey conducted by John Wiley based on a response from 50departments, US chemical engineering departments are split down the middle – half teachone design course, and half teach a two-semester design sequence.10Instructors have several challenges related to the structure and organization of the course.Departments who teach one design course must be very selective and choose whichcontent is most important for its graduates. Design projects for a one-semester offeringmight be best structured as multiple smaller problems that
includes experiences as both a middle school and high school science teacher, teaching science at elementary through graduate level, developing formative as- sessment instruments, teaching undergraduate and graduate courses in science and science education, working with high-risk youth in alternative education centers, working in science museums, designing and facilitating online courses, multimedia curriculum development, and leading and researching profes- sional learning for educators. The Association for the Education of Teachers of Science (AETS) honored Dr. Spiegel for his efforts in teacher education with the Innovation in Teaching Science Teachers award (1997). Dr. Spiegel’s current efforts focus on
Engineering. In the past, she has taught at Johns Hopkins University in Bal- timore, MD and at Penn State University in Scranton, PA. Before joining academia, she worked for over 15 years in many reputed consulting firms such as Weidlinger Associates, BA&C, and WBCM in MA, NJ, and MD respectively. Her work experience included analysis, design, and construction supervision of buildings, bridges, and other structures.Dr. Maria Chrysochoou, University of Connecticut Maria Chrysochoou is a Professor and Head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Connecticut. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Peer Observation Practice to Enhance
-Champaign I am currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research team at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I work with a group of wonderful and talented people at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates our practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and informal learning environments. My Research focuses on studying students’ collaborative problem solving processes and the role of the teacher in facilitating these processes in STEM classrooms.Nicholas Robert PozzaDr. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a Teaching Assistant Professor
, Iowa State University Dr. Yilmaz is an Associate Professor of Industrial Design. She teaches design studios and lecture courses on developing creativity and research skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of differ- ent factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different universities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site Director
Paper ID #37430A Balancing Act: Elementary Teachers and their StudentsBalancing Trade-offs in Engineering Design Projects(Fundamental)Matthew Johnson (Assistant Professor) Matt Johnson is an Associate Professor of Science Education with the Center for Science and the Schools (CSATS). In this role, he collaborates with scientists and engineers to propose and facilitate teacher professional development opportunities for K-12 STEM teachers, often as broader impacts components of research grants. He is also PI of an NSF grant focused on learning how rural teachers learn about engineering through participation in
partial strategy or in addition totraditional curriculum in engineering courses17-20.Projects are universally the ‘modus operandi’ of engineering practice. Projects are typically acomponent of engineering design courses, which are usually separate from engineering scienceand are more likely though not all at the upper level. As examples of research on project work,Dym et al21 present project-based learning as the favored model for teaching design, while Franket al22 present a freshman year introductory engineering course based on project work. PBL andproject work share some similarities such as being multi-disciplinary, collaborative, and self-directed, but the two approaches differ slightly in their focus and method of implementation24. InPBL
theMS degree in Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (1983). He is aformer editor of the RESNA journal Assistive Technology (1992-1998).DAVID RINGHOLZDavid Ringholz, MID, is the Coordinator for Design Development at The Center for Universal Design (CUD) and aResearch Assistant Professor in the School of Design at NCSU. He graduated with honors with a BA in DesignStudies with a concentration in Universal Design from SUNY Buffalo. He joined the center after receiving a Masterof Industrial Design degree from NCSU in 1997. His research interests focus on meeting user needs through newproduct design
atheoretical question as well as a practical question. It is an important part of the mission of theCenter for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE) to provide research-basedevidence as part of the foundation for change in engineering education as well as a thoroughexploration of models and best practices for change.In this brief article we provide a (1) brief review of change literature, especially in highereducation; (2) a summary of selected models of change; and (3) a case study of one approach tochange at CAEE.Exploring Change ModelsThe purpose of this section is to explore the quantity and variety of change models available asresources for engineering educators. Change models have been developed in disciplines asdiverse as philosophy
the following themes: Black women have multiple identities that impact their experience in engineering. Some of Black women’s identities are accepted in academic and professional spaces; others are not. Recognizing the intersectionality of STEM, gender, and race identity. Preliminary strategies for cultivating environments where Black women’s multiple identities are equally accepted, including cultural capital.Next, the presenters will facilitate small group discussions of best practices to improve outcomesin the academic and professional lives of Black women in STEM and other marginalizedcommunities. There will be a special emphasis on developing an authentic understanding of
camp and the HSTA summerinstitute were introduced on the WVU Tech campus offering an additional 100 students asummer STEM experience.This paper will focus on a tenure-track faculty’s perspective on the designing and developmentof STEM summer camps for both K-12 students and teachers. The paper will discuss fundingopportunities that faculty can pursue if they are interested in funding summer or other outreachprograms. These pursuits of funding opportunities should be counted towards tenure-trackfaculty’s scholarship/research requirements as it directly approaches a solution to a problem thatmany universities face. Challenges of hosting camps include increased time to service orientedactivities, finding and hiring student mentors, camp