Design is typically used to describe large systems with complex interactions Page 12.536.9between components, and the standard curriculum approach does not lend itself to tackling suchbig projects in one class. In Model-Based Design, highly simplified models of the subsystems aredeveloped and the subsystems are connected together to form a more complicated overallsystem. Once the input/output characteristics of the subsystems are finalized, different engineerscan work independently at different levels on the model. Some engineers can work at thesubsystem level and develop accurate models of the subsystem while other engineers can work atthe top
not been mentored by engineers. For example, astudent might have participated in Odyssey of the Mind, a national, project-based competitionwhere students apply math and science to build various projects according to specific criteria.While such an activity is “engineering-like,” when it was not specifically mentored by anengineer, we did not consider it engineering exposure. Similarly if a student had extensiveexperience programming or building computers but was self-taught, without the benefit ofhaving received any formal, discipline-based computer science, we considered this lowengineering exposure.Grace entered Coleman with low exposure to engineering. She enjoyed her math andphysics classes in high school, and during her senior year, she
to develop trust within the competitive environment ofengineering.9 Additionally, students report that these relationships directly contribute to aricher understanding of subject material, as well as the attainment of satisfactory grades. …create that network of friends in your cohort, to help each other, because it’s so useful and it’s so nice to be able to have a student in your class that you can trust. And it’s so nice to find people that you know are on the same pages as you, you can trust to work with, and you know are going to be reliable and dependable in doing projects and whatnot. (female, IE, upper division) …it’s really a good idea to make friends in your classes so you can bounce ideas
degree towhich positive reinforcement in the form of reassurance was present in all of the sessions coded.The level of positive reinforcement in these sessions is most likely less than what occurs in atypical engineering classroom, where typical feedback for a homework set or final project maybe mostly about what the student did incorrectly rather than what was good about the work. Wespeculate that because this was a peer environment, in which all of the participants wereapproximately at the same level, participants were tactful and reassuring about the feedback theygave because they knew that they would be receiving feedback from their peers about their workand hoped at some gut level that their work would be received respectfully. Therefore
committees, the New England Association of Schools and Colleges accreditation team, membership on Day Kimball Hospital’s Ethics and Institutional Review Board, membership on the advisory board for the Women’s Adult Correctional Facility in Rhode Island, and service on the national Committee on Qualifications for Phi Beta Kappa, as well as service as the past President of the Beta Chapter of Phi Beta Kappa of Rhode Island. She has received funding at the national level through the Department of Energy to work on ethical issues related to the Human Genome Project, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the National Science Foundation, the Hewlett Foundation, the American Bar
a particulartheme of inquiry, as well as the Senior Capstone project.”2 The freshmen inquiry course onDesign & Society is one of nine themes offered.In Fall 2002, SJSU began their MUSE program for incoming freshmen. MUSE was designed tobridge the gap from high school to college. MUSE includes academic seminars on a variety ofsubjects that help the freshmen students gain skills that are necessary to academic success. Inaddition, all MUSE classes are certified in one of SJSU’s General Education areas. Therefore,students taking the MUSE seminars receive three units of General Education credit. Theseminars qualify in one of the following areas: B1 (physical science), B2 (life science), C1(arts), C2 (letters), D1 (human behavior), or E
Spectrum of Active Learning Activities in Engineering Mechanics Keywords: Active learning, hands-on activities, learning styles, Myers-BriggsAbstractThe introduction of active learning exercises into a traditional lecture has been shown to improvestudent learning. Hands-on learning opportunities in labs and projects provide a primaryapproach in the active learning toolbox. This paper presents a series of innovative hands-onactive learning activities for mechanics of materials topics. These activities are based on aMethodology for Developing Hands-on Active Learning Activities, a systematic approach forefficient and effective activity development, and were robustly evaluated at three institutions ofhigher learning. These
at a nearby university, Beyond Blackboards incorporates engineering design method andthe National Academy of Engineering (NAE) 21st Century Grand Challenges to immerse upperelementary and middle school students in design-based learning. During afterschool “InnovationClubs” throughout the 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 academic year and a summer camp followingeach year, middle school students worked in teams to design, build, and program robots usingLEGO® MINDSTORMS® NXT robotics kits and the NXT-G programming environment. Teamspresented the functionality of their final design, and contextualized their project by describing areal world application they researched for their robot that may help to solve one of the 14 NAE21st Century Grand Challenges
University Brian Frank is an associate professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering, where he has taught courses in electronics and wireless systems. He is the DuPont Canada Chair in Engineering Education Research and Development, and the Director of Program Development in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science where he works on engineering curriculum development, program assessment, and developing educational technology. He is a co-founder of the Canadian Engineering Education Association and is currently coordinating the Engineering Graduate Attribute Development Project, working with National Council of Deans of Engineering and Applied Science and the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board, to develop
day. Teachers participating in the on-school-site academy, as part of theNSF funded research project, were expected to deliver “what is technology”, “what isengineering” activities, introduction to EDP, and the four EiE lessons contained in a single EiEunit during the school year.B. ParticipantsParticipants of this study are teachers either who attended the Summer Academy offered by theINSPIRE at Purdue University (National group) or the on-site Summer Academy held in a largeschool district located in South Central United States (On-site group) from 2008 to 2011. The Page 23.838.52008 to 2010 National group were volunteers from across the U.S
. Page 23.89.7 For this next interview, our focus is on learning more about “who you are” and the experiences that have shaped the way you think, act, and see yourself in the world and in relation to others. To do this effectively we will use pictures, that you own or collect from another source, that represent something important to you. These pictures may be in any form – self-portraits, graphic images, computer generated images, pictures of friends, family, homes, co-workers, projects, favorite places, etc. There are no right or wrong pictures. The pictures we will ask you to provide for this next interview will be held confidential and viewed only by the researchers of this study. The pictures will be used solely for the
provide access to and support learning of complexity.Prof. David F. Radcliffe, Purdue University, West LafayetteJi Hyun Yu, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ji Hyun Yu is a Ph.D candidate in learning design and technology at Purdue University. She has been involved in several projects, including Web 2.0-supported collaborative learning, engineering-related be- liefs (i.e. personal epistemology ontology), scientific collaboration in EER using bibliometric methods, and K-6 teacher competency modeling using a Delphi method.Sadia Nawaz, Purdue University, West Lafayette Sadia Nawaz graduated from Purdue University with master’s of science in electrical and computer en- gineering (MSECE). Her research interests include
). 2. identify and develop their personal leadership philosophy and approach using written self-reflection and peer assessment. 3. be able to work in teams and use creative problem-solving to develop a project for the purpose of creating positive and sustainable change. 4. be introduced to the concepts of leadership beyond their academic studies (whether professional or personal), including entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship.The primary course topics include: ≠ History of leadership theories ≠ Currently practiced leadership models (e.g., relational, shared, situational, etc.) ≠ Individual responsibility and ethics ≠ Diversity and globalization ≠ Team building, working in groups, and inclusive practices
education, design and selection of materials, general materials engineering, polymer science, and characterization of materials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering and K-12 engineering outreach. He worked on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing modules for Physics and Chemistry and also a course on Engineering Capstone Design. He has also co-developed a Page 15.1149.1 Materials Concept Inventory for assessing fundamental knowledge of students in introductory materials engineering classes. He is currently working on NSF projects
. Without a primary focus on generic capabilities, it is especially difficult to holdstudents to the expectation that as they advance in a laboratory program the quality of their workshould advance as well.Many interdisciplinary capstone design courses in engineering implicitly emphasize genericcapabilities. Generic capabilities such as teamwork, communication, critical thinking andmaturity, together with content-specific knowledge, are important to a design group’s success [3-4]. To facilitate this type of interdisciplinary learning environment, students from differentdepartments may be grouped to work on capstone design or laboratory projects [5-8]. Studentsmay also be required to work on projects or experiments requiring knowledge across
Society for Engineering EducationResearch Activity. As indicated earlier, the appropriate method for evaluating transportationresearch activity is not clear. Involvement in the UTCP and the annual meetings of the TRB wasused here, but there are other measures. These would include financial measures, such as theamount of research funding or the number of funded projects, as well as research products, suchas publications by and citations of the faculty. The number of transportation-themeddissertations and theses completed might also be a measure of the level of research.Faculty. Although Cottrell (4) addressed the number of full-time transportation faculty at eachinstitution, this paper did not attempt to summarize this statistic. In the research
focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. Page 24.426.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Development of Interactive Virtual Laboratories to Help Students Learn Difficult Concepts in ThermodynamicsAbstractIn this project, we explore the use of threshold concept theory as a
in the Department of Bioengineering. Her research interests include assessment of motivation, how motivation affects student learning, and student-centered active learning. She is also involved in projects that utilize Tablet PCs to enhance and assess learning, and in- corporating engineering into secondary science and math classrooms. Dr. Benson teaches introductory undergraduate engineering, biomechanics, and graduate engineering education courses. Her education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Bio- engineering from Clemson University. Page
promote a deeperconceptual understanding of integration with an interpretation of the sign and magnitude of theboundary work transfer using a P-v diagram.Examples of Assignments for Enhancement of Student Depth of KnowledgeIn teaching the first course in thermodynamics for many years, authors have learned that thereare certain areas that students struggle throughout semester. We routinely assign specialproblems or mini projects every semester to help students to overcome their struggle withunderstanding of fundamental concepts. (13,14) One area of student difficulties is the evaluation ofthermodynamic properties in the compressed liquid region. Almost all thermodynamic textbooksprovide compressed liquid thermodynamics property tables only for
integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Dr. Bill Jay Brooks, Oregon State University Bill Brooks is a postdoctoral scholar in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineer- ing at Oregon State University. His Ph.D used written explanations to
Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.Prof. Elizabeth C. Kisenwether, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Liz holds a B.S.E.E. from Penn State (1979), and M.S.E.E. degrees from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1981) and The Johns Hopkins University (1988). She worked in the defense industry for
and others), lists of subject related journals. Librarian's contact - LibGuide's space for the page's owner. Navigation help - gives directions about how to use the LibGuide. Related guides - Guides that offered additional information (subject guides, tutorial guides, etc.). Research ideas - lists of sources where students can find ideas for their projects. The catalog - the library's catalog and others such as WorldCat. Welcome - provides a welcome message to users.This classification scheme was applied to every single page, in this process, labels used forpresenting these materials, services and others, were collected. The labels in Table 1, 2, 11, and12 demonstrated a variety of terminology
.150,151Over time, students value these techniques124 and show growth of engineering maturity andepistemology,143 but tend to mirror the perceptions and values of their instructors.138,150Experiential reflection refers to instances in which students reflect on situations experienceddirectly, virtually, or vicariously, such as: games or simulations;144,151-153 problem based learning,project oriented learning, case studies, and combinations thereof;133,140,154,155 design basedlearning;132,156 service learning;141,157,158 internships;142 and development of programs andsoftware.159 Retrospectively analytical reflection seeks to determine relationships betweenpreviously obtained knowledge and experiences, including: creating diagrammaticrepresentations of
report an increasing writtencommunication workload over time.33 If supervised properly, Wheeler and McDonald reportthat writing allows students to develop and use critical thinking skills.34 While engineeringprograms typically incorporate ill-defined problems for capstone projects—another recognized Page 24.674.4tool for developing critical thinking, writing for reflection will also help develop skills forproblem identification, analysis, metacognition and the formation of value judgements.30,35Snyder & Snyder suggest essay questions rather than simple recall to encourage criticalthinking.25In addition to promoting the development of
Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the
engineering courseor interfering with an engineering faculty members’ priorities? That is the question we intend topose to our faculty as we develop the writing standards website and related resources.AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful for the funding we have received from the Engineering Research Centers Program of the National ScienceFoundation under Award Number EEC-9876363 (the VaNTH-ERC) to partially support this project and also for a WalterP. Murphy grant for undergraduate education from Northwestern University. We also wish to thank Dean StephenCarr of the McCormick School Administration for his generous support.References1. Merriam, B. S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
. Accuracy of the final compiled list was evaluated with a set of test subjects knownto have CAREER grants yet not be in traditional academic careers paths. As of 2003, thenumber of CAREER recipients in engineering related projects totals 548. Given the goals of thegrant, this population may be described as “low-risk” in that the likelihood of obtaining tenure isquite high.Searching for Current PositionSearching for current position information was time consuming and required many validationsteps. Google® was the primary web search engine used. When Google did not return usefulsearches we used a number of other strategies such as searching the PhD granting institution todetermine if the subject was still hosting a website and using Dogpile®, a meta