as the participants apply them: optimism in persisting,systems thinking in combining many materials that each have different effects on the sound,ethics as they share materials, communication as they pitch their solutions, collaboration as theywork on a team to develop a solution to the problem, and creativity as they use materials thatthey have likely never used for the purpose at hand before. The engineering practices are allused, as outlined in the links to standards above. Finally, the facilitators will outline theconnections to electrical engineering, materials engineering and mechanical engineering.Diversity. This year is the American Society for Engineering Education’s “Year of Action on
leadership roles. Through the program’s rigorous academic and extra-curricular requirements, I have found that these graduates have an exceptional work ethic, take initiatives, and strive for excellence much more than typical college graduate (James Hefti – ATS Vice President of Human Resources).” Page 19.14.5 4 5Brazilian Junior Enterprise Movement The Brazilian Junior Enterprises Movement is a movement formed by
Context 0.41 4.7 Leading Engineering Endeavors 0.62 4.4 Designing 0.74 2.1 Analytical Reasoning and Problem Solving 0.62 2.3 System Thinking 0.45 4.3 Conceiving, System Engineering and Management 0.61 3.2 Communication 0.44 2.5 Ethics, Equity and Other Responsibilities
project as an empirical example.Part I: Initiating and fostering international relationshipsAchieving success in initiating cross-cultural international collaborations, especially withdeveloping nations, requires an alternative kind and of commitment different from taking on asimilar endeavor in one’s own culture. To be successful researchers must make a decision to goto another country personally, and ultimately to be truly successful at building criticalrelationships they must go a step further, that of total immersion in another culture. We can readbooks about a country or culture, however, it is another matter to experience and learn to managedifferences in cultural norms, customs, food and the way food is eaten, greetings, ethics andvalues
collaboratively in multidisciplinary and multicultural work environments. Recognize and understand global, environmental, social, and ethical contexts of their work. Progress to an advanced degree and certificate programs and be committed to lifelong learning to enhance their careers and provide flexibility in responding to changing social and technical environments.The degree offers students the choice to select an option that fits their interests andregional aspirations. All three options in the degree offer multiple years of design coursesculminating in a two semester senior capstone project, allowing students to complete aresearch project from conception through prototyping. The three options presentlyoffered in
technology growth along that path to disrupt the other market holders. This will not bea surprise to most of the established educational market holders, as most are tracking MOOCsclosely and as mentioned above many have placed heavy investments in their development. Thiswill insure they are key players in the MOOC generation of educators. As the cost of educationincreases and employers are forced to screen new employees more on experience, work ethic andpersonality matches, those involved will continue to see MOOCs taking more and more of theeducational market place, possibly finding their place as a disruptive technology. Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11, 2015 Villanova UniversityVI. Bibliography1. Hagwood
Education, 2015 2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conferencestudents. Many academic programs also provide some form of preparatory training programs andorientations for new faculty, even though these vary in quality, content and duration6,9 . Thesetraining programs range from half-day pre-semester workshops to year-long courses on teachingand may cover topics ranging from course design, creating syllabi, classroom managementpractices, active learning techniques lecture preparation, teaching ethically, student assessment,and course evaluation6. Apart from this, there are other training programs that are organized forthe training of engineering professors, and notable among these programs are: The ASCE ExCEEd
design criteria andformulating appropriate design solutions. The open-ended design/ build projects must include a designcomponent in each of the following civil engineering sub-disciplines: Geotechnical Engineering Structural Engineering Civil/ Site Engineering Environmental EngineeringAdditional topics covered include value engineering, cost, safety, construction feasibility, constructionscheduling, engineering ethics, and a wide range of engineering design elements.The course format is one – one hour lecture and two three-hour studio/ labs per week. The total creditsassigned to this course are four. Multiple faculty advisors each with specific expertise in the abovementions
301The skillsets chosen for an engineer are those that are clearly identified by all stakeholders in theeducation of such engineers. The stakeholders include not only the students themselves, but thefuture employers, the professors and the university community, and the society as a whole. Thisis true especially for state universities that are partially supported by the public tax and industrysupport.A complete set of blended skillsets are as follows: • Understanding Case Formats • Quantitative Skills • Oral and Written Communication Skills • Critical Thinking • Creativity • Problem Solving • Ethical Decision Making • Information Literacy • Team Working Skills • Self-Direction • Leadership
expression,communication skills, technical skills, self-confidence building, computation skills, engineeringfundamentals, organizational skills, leadership skills, planning skills, professional ethics, andengineering judgment. Even though the main intent of a Capstone design course is to provide theskills and attributes mentioned above to senior engineering students, majority of the students donot demonstrate these skills in their Capstone design courses. It is the authors’ strong beliefs thatexperiential learning model should be incorporated much earlier in an engineering curriculum inorder for the students to experience engineering design process and design skills, supported bythe recent findings by Conger et al.8. According to Kolb6, “Learning
4.25 0.19 I understand how scientists work on real problems. 4.00 4.06 0.06 I understand that scientific assertions require supporting 4.69 4.56 -0.13 evidence. I have the ability to analyze data and other information. 4.56 4.56 0.00 I understand science. 4.44 4.44 0.00 I have learned about ethical conduct in my field. 4.25 4.44 0.19 I have learned laboratory techniques. 4.00 4.13 0.13 I have an ability to read and
. Page 26.1716.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015IntroductionHow to Understand Engineering Life PathwaysEngineering is increasingly understood as a lifelong learning pathway rather than an event thathappens only in a university setting. The National Academy of Engineering’s the Engineer of2020 identifies lifelong learning, practical ingenuity, analytic skills, business management,creativity, cognitive flexibility, ethics, leadership, professionalism, and communication as theknowledge and skills that will be valuable for engineers in the future. These skills can be learnedboth within, and outside of, traditional engineering education. In order to understand howengineering education manifests during
Affairs, the Living and Learning Community enabled students to experience a more educationally enriched community. These communities focused on a Residential Curriculum that guides the student toward competencies in global critical thinking and reasoning skills, social and civic responsibility, character, ethics, and communication. Data shows that structured activities, such as faculty interactions and LLC participation facilitate an easier academic transition for students20, 21. The university created the Technology and Innovation Learning Community in 2012. Students in the Technology and Innovation Living and Learning Community lived on the same floor of their dormitory, and benefited from the friendship and support of being
helping the students better understand the discipline. This will allow students to make an informed decision early in their career whether to continue to pursue a Mechanical Engineering degree or switch to another major. • Professional Skills and Attitudes: Give students skills necessary to succeed in the program and as professional engineers. This includes developing teamwork skills, fostering good study habits, developing a growth mindset with regards to education, and ethically fulfilling their professional obligations of service to humanity. • Design Methodology: Students learn how to approach open-ended engineering design problems with a structured design process and to communicate their ideas
, methods, tools, etc.), sustainability, ethics, team management, andtechnical communication (both oral and written), while incorporating elements of engineering scienceand analysis. Students apply design instruction in the context of two projects during the six-coursesequence—a cornerstone project spanning the fall and spring semesters of the sophomore year, and acapstone project spanning the junior and senior academic years.The curriculum of our non-discipline specific engineering program, shown graphically in Figure 1,combines a campus-wide, liberal arts general educational core with courses in math, science,engineering design, engineering science, business, systems analysis, and sustainability3,4. Individualskills taught developmentally through
because it allowed me to see others work ethic and allowed me to gain knowledge about a field I was not very familiar with. I was able to see how the alignment of lesson plans and activities can be very time consuming and the use of frameworks allow for the writer to systematically formulate a creative, and well put together lesson.” (Participant 9)The Trainees came to several conclusions about strategies to best manage group work in aprofessional setting in order to meet timeline deliverables and expectations. First, they noted theimportance of responsive communication in whatever medium the team decides works best.Second, the Trainees realized that differing perspectives, even if they require discussion, oftenlead to achieving
Environmentalengineering by Fall in spite of her FoK in mechanics. She was extremely frustrated with the step-by-step formulaic process that her teacher taught in statics as it removed all creativity and desirefor understanding of the physical phenomena. Realizing that most of her 18-yr old classmates areaccustomed to this process and “just listen and do it” [her tone of voice actually hints that theydo this uncritically], in contrast, she says: “I actually stop and wonder if this is the right thingthat I should be doing [amazing sense of ethical responsibility towards her knowledge] or if thisprocess is actually going to teach me what the professor wants to teach me [amazing sense ofmeta-cognition].” Realizing that her critical reflection takes more time and
based on evidence for both science and engineering6.However, not much has been said about the differences in arguments between the two domains.One of the differences that has been explored is the purpose of argumentation in each of thesefields; whereas scientists use arguments for evaluating and explaining natural phenomena,engineers use arguments for finding the best solution for a problem with a given set of Page 26.1460.3constraints. One of the few examples of research in engineering education was a study of collegestudents who engaged in realistic ethical problems in engineering; the researchers found thatthese students were able to
achieving their set goals; they also need to prioritize the scheduled activities, introduce changes if need be, solicit advice and assistance with the consent of the instructor, and maintain effective working relationships among the members. Instructors also should monitor group progress, give feedback on how well each group is doing, report each group’s progress to the class as a whole, and insure adherence to accepted standards of: ethics, social responsibility, and safety.Success in implementing cooperative learning is attributable, in large measure, to: properplanning, efforts, dedication, and foresight of the instructor. Experience definitely is a majorfactor. A proper start for instructors
II.1 The ability to adapt to cultural norms in a professional arena and act appropriately II.2 The ability to make ethical and socially responsible decisions in the context of a culture divergent form my own. II. 3 The ability to analyze problems from a different cultural frame of reference II.4 The ability to communicate professionally in a culturally appropriate manner12 Global Cultural III.1 The ability to practice social and cultural responsibility, e.g. resource sustainability III.2 Proficiency in a second language III.3 The ability to
learning objectives. Also, designemphasis (cognitive objective) and proficiency with 3D-printing processes (skill learningobjective) are reflected in ABET General Criterion 3, Student Outcomes23 (c) “an ability todesign a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability” and (k) “an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice.” In addition, physical models that provide tactile, visual, andmanipulative feedback to learners have been implemented successfully in general education for along time.The 3D-printing lab includes nine inexpensive 3D
Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these
it would need to meet the rigors of course designaccording to ABET accreditation guidelines1. The key guidelines that the project would focus onwould be specifically: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (g) an ability to communicate effectively The second factor considered, which is more relevant at this juncture, was the decision that thisproject aligns more closely around a service
. (2014). Evaluation of Potential Fair Trade Standards for an Ethical 3-D Printing Filament. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(5), 1-12. Doi: 10.5539/jsd.v7n5p124. Snyder, R. M. (2014). An overview of the past, present, and future of 3D printing technology with an emphasis on the present. Association Supporting Computer Users in Education “Our Second Quarter Century of Resource Sharing”, 93-99. Page 26.696.18
system performance” The advancement of technology in terms of functionality and interconnectivity has a profound effect on humantechnology interaction. The effect is a broad and concerns operators, maintainers or users. Human factors engineering seeks to achieve improved levels of effectiveness, safety and ease of performance. The design of such complex system interaction requires human factors professionals operate across disciplinary boundaries to collaborate with other engineers at many levels, including understanding user needs in early product development stages and developing test settings to study user performance. The major topics covered in the course are the design process, prototyping, engineering ethics, human computer
constraintssuch as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability,and sustainability ”. The topic of sustainability has become part of corporate strategy, consumerchoice processes, university initiatives, engineering, and technology programs within thebusiness discipline7-11. We are moving toward more sustainable business practices and education, Page 26.716.3as a direct result of an increasing awareness of the significant green manufacturing, covering abroad spectrum, from development of green technology products, implementation of advancedmanufacturing and production technologies, and introduction of energy
statement, futureworkshop offerings may consider other research methods that allow for the expression of ones’self in other forms, such as photo collections or elicitation, and multimedia presentations. Future Page 26.742.10work may also consider the applications of a student’s sense of self to other interdisciplinaryareas and engineering domains such as ethical behaviour, teamwork and collaboration,leadership, creativity, and problem solving.One opportunity for this research may be to partner with academic support units, faculties, anddepartments across campus, such as career services, student affairs, learning commons, exchangeand experiential
). Page 26.748.12Qualitatively, however, the students who participated in the 2014 semester-long class haveshown significant additional benefits. First, a number of professors in the Valparaiso UniversityCollege of Engineering have noticed improvements in attitude and work ethic among thestudents taking the class. Second, these students have bonded as friends based upon this longershared experience. Finally, they have taken on an almost evangelical approach to campaigningfor the continuation of the semester-long version of Creativity and Innovation in the EngineeringDesign Process. These sentiments come through in a number of the comments made by thestudents in the course evaluation (see Table 3).Table 3. Student feedback on semester-long course