can provide answers to theresearch question: How to create practical and accessible engineering education for the Industry4.0 workforce?This study aims to conceptualize and develop a robotics laboratory for students to answer a seriesof questions: how does a robot recognize an object and place it at the desired location; to whatextent can robotics help with real-world problems; and what kind of skillsets do we need forWorkforce 4.0? Throughout this study, we will employ a desktop-size educational robot platformthat can be endowed with wireless communication and computer vision capabilities.3. Methods3.1. ContextThis study is currently in the plan and design stage and represents a work in progress at a largeprivate university located in the
evaluation, research, and plans related to disseminating results of our project.BackgroundIdentity influences who people think they are, what they think they can do and be, and where andwith whom they think they belong [5] - [8]. People’s identity shapes the experiences theyembrace, and reciprocally, those experiences shape their identities [9] - [11]. People behaveconsistently with their identities [12], [13], choosing behaviors with meanings that match theirself-conceptions [14], [15]. When people identify with an esteemed group, they feel better aboutthemselves and, in turn, feel better about the group [16], [17]. If people strongly identify with agroup, they are steadfast, defending the group, staying in the group, and supporting the group[18
. To inform the DBR approach, qualitative and quantitativedata are being collected from faculty, students, staff, and administration throughout theimplementation of the educational model to inform its revisions and document the institutionalchanges as well as workarounds necessary for its success.The DBR plan began with the initial implementation of the model in 2021, whereas data werecollected, analyzed, and used to redesign the model to be implemented in the next academic year.This iterative process has included identifying and addressing barriers to success andunderstanding how the educational experiences can help students to make connections amongideas and actions to synthesize and transfer learning toward innovation achievement. Then
provide I- O & HR services and third-party grant evaluation. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Two-Year College and External Project Manager: An Innovative Partnership for Implementing a Federal Grant ProjectAbstractThe objective of this paper is to share a case study of a rural community college who partneredwith an external project manager to implement a large grant project. The project was funded by athree-year federal grant, with a budget over half a million dollars. The external projectmanagement partnership, though not planned in the original project proposal
the project described in this work.In a previously developed pilot project, groups were asked to design a renewable energyportfolio and a natural gas power plant using the Rankine cycle to meet our university’s energyand power demands, and were required to recommend and justify one of their two designs to theuniversity’s Board of Trustees (i.e., their customer) [8]. The intent was to spark the students’curiosity about our modern sources of energy, to encourage them to make connections betweentheory and a realistic application, and for them to create value for a meaningful customer byrequiring them to argue in favor of one energy plan, considering stakeholders, costs, andenvironmental effects. The eight EM student outcomes chosen from
remote high-value and high-engagementfaculty development workshop.BackgroundDue to the pandemic sweeping the nation, the safety of holding a face-to-face ExCEEd TeachingWorkshop was in question. Until summer 2020, the ETW had been offered at least at one location aroundthe country, with the purpose of providing a 6-day hands-on experience to engineering educatorsinterested in improving their teaching abilities. The ETW has directly impacted faculty and indirectlystudents across the country and around the world for over 20 years. The high contact between theinstructional staff and ETW participants, the intense active learning environment, and collaborativelearning experiences between ETW participants, required ASCE to develop a plan to deliver
) for a process of their choosing (100 pts)Spreadsheet Three homework assignments n/aoperations involving data analysis and creating(5 lessons) visuals (200 pts)CAD Recreate a dining facility floorplan and 2) Present the floorplan & furniture plan(9 lessons) develop a furniture plan with seating to the military commander operating the capacity based (100 pts) dining facility (50 pts)BIM Design a home and produce Revit 3) In the role of an A&E, present the(9 lessons) model with a minimum of 3 bedrooms home design to a local home builder and and 2 bathrooms with a maximum of describe why
responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5 An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives 6 An ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions 7 An ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategiesA Solid Foundation for Implementation of Senior Design ProjectsIn 2012, the authors (who have
Scripps Induction to FAU Research (see above) 2002-2004 Interim Research Director, College of Education, Florida Atlantic University. Develop and initiate a plan to mentor faculty for research development and acquisition of external support for research. 1996-2003 Executive Director, Region V Area Center for Educational Enhancement (ACEE), Florida Department of Education, Region V Area Center for Educational Enhancement (ACEE); Funded project - 6 years in duration- budget $7,100,000; Regional coordinator of the Postsecondary Mathematics, Science and Technology Group; served as Principal Investigator (1989-96) Eisenhower Title II grant programs. Florida Department of Education Advisory Committee for NSF/Statewide Systemic
instruction–making activelearning even more important in remote instruction.Not every learning objective is best tackled with a full class period of active learning. Using avariety of instructional methods will help the students to succeed in different learning modes [13]and increase their learning flexibility [14] [15] which will benefit them in the classroom and intheir careers. Without denying all the benefits of active learning, students also need to becomecapable listeners, note takers, and questioners if they want to successfully participate in projectproposals, planning sessions, and public meetings as engineers.Whether using passive or active instructional methods, motivation matters. Deci and Ryan [16],Cavanagh [17], and Eccles and Wigfield
with SLPs ortheir patients. Even though the design of instrumentation and technologies in service ofclinicians and patients clearly aligns with the skills of engineers, spontaneous collaborationbetween these two fields does not often occur. Therefore, there is an opportunity to increasecollaboration between SLPs and engineers to identify unmet needs in clinical practice andincrease research collaborations between these groups. This opportunity motivated the design ofour REU. Our site has completed two summer iterations in 2019 and 2021, with our program atits approximate midpoint and a final iteration planned for summer 2022. At this programmidpoint, survey and focus group feedback from participants has been collected to evaluatestudent
elementary and middle school children (2005-2009) • Supervised 30+ design/research projects involving 83+ undergraduate students • Hosted numerous outreach programs for 2000+ pre-college students • Combustion Institute KSA Country Chap- ter founding member • Supervised three annual teams of international design exchange students from France conducting research/design at U of Iowa and Industry • Served as industry liaison between U. of Iowa and HNI Corporation for nine years • Served as a member of industry advisory board for Col- lege of Engineering at the U. of Iowa representing HNI • Reviewer for Energy and Sustainability Journal since 2010 • Developed and implemented three strategic plans to earn KSA national, ABET and
resources needed for positive and long-lasting COIL implementations here. In addition, we offer a plan to implement a short-term COIL-based project in a chemical engineering course with faculty participants from the US and ElSalvador. Any engineering educators planning to implement COIL activities can use thesesuggestions. Ultimately, this low-cost pedagogy could significantly aid in promoting cultural,technical, and global competence in engineering students in the next post-pandemic years.A. Introduction and BackgroundA.1 What is COIL? An introduction to the reviewCollaborative Online International Learning (COIL) aims to connect students and faculty indiscussions, teaching, or collaborative learning projects with higher education
institutional support departments to design instructionalstrategies that facilitate the transformation from information discovery through to knowledgecreation. Following this paradigm, we expect that graduates from geospatial literacy programswill have gained significant technical skills and insight on understanding imagery, geospatialanalytics, patterns and distributions of natural resources, boundary law doctrines, landdevelopment, and urban planning and be empowered to comment on social structures andinstitutional behaviors that infringe on the principles of DEI. This study contributes to theliterature on education by seeking to understand factors on engineering pedagogy that supportsDEI-informed learning outcomes for the GTCM.1
Paper ID #35794An Effective Way of Teaching Electrical and Computer EngineeringCapstone Senior Design Courses for Underrepresented StudentsMr. Vewiser J Turner Jr P.E., Prairie View A&M University Summary I am a retired Executive from ExxonMobil with 35 years of service at this Corporation. Dur- ing my tenure with ExxonMobil, I have had a number of engineering, planning, business development, project, and operational assignments. I have extensive leadership experience, strategy development knowl- edge, and ability deliver superior results. I have been accountable for thousands of employees and millions of dollars as a
notinitially established until October 1, 2015 and not officially recognized as ASCE’s ninthtechnical institute until 2017. The purpose of this newest ASCE institute is to offer professionals,in both utility and pipelines engineering and the surveying and geomatics communities, a meansto collectively improve the profession by providing products and services (e.g., technicalactivities, conferences, and the development of internationally recognized standards) that enableexcellence in engineering, planning, design, construction, operation, and asset management[9],[10]. Additionally, the surveying and geomatics professionals are trying to bring attention tothe amount of surveying engineering that a civil engineer can do as a professional engineerwithout
-Infused Future Proof Talents” [8]. Thus, effective and sustainabletransformation starts with training and instilling positive values among educators whileensuring an institutional ecosystem to promote quality engineering education for excellence inthe 21st century. Educators are the frontlines and critical resources for higher education institutions (HEI)towards delivering quality education to their nations. Today’s educators are needed to be moreresponsible in better preparing graduates for the 21st century, which requires them to solveproblems using technology and apply higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) to solve complexproblems. Therefore, educator readiness is a significant factor in meeting 21st-centurychallenges. Planning talents
opportunity to return to the project all said maintainability or moreuser-oriented features would be added. Requirements in hackathons were often only verbal, or toassist with future integrations between sub-teams. Diagramming was rarely used, except in thecase of participant Frankie, who now uses simplified diagramming to create a plan of action forhe and his team if they have an idea for a hackathon project upon arrival. It appeared that theparticipants had a toolset of software processes to leverage at any given time but chose how andto what extent to use those tools depending on the project and the expectations of the project thatthey were working on.Discussion and ImplicationsAdaptive ExpertiseAccording to Schwartz et al. (2005), an adaptive
Technologies/Technicians 16 Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and 38 moreExhibit 2. 1990 CIP Code Entries [4]14. Engineering 14.30. Engineering/Industrial Management. 14.3001 Engineering/Industrial Management. An instructional program that describes the application of engineering principles to the planning and operational management of enterprises and organizations, including budgeting, costing, quality control, efficient resource allocation and utilization, product production and distribution, human resource management, systems and plant maintenance, scheduling, storage and security, organization planning, acquisitions, and logistics.Exhibit 3. 2000 CIP Code
with specialization in Construction Management. His research focus is in the area of contract administration on heavy civil projects. His teaching areas include 1. introduction to the built environment and construction management, 2. construction materials and methods, 3. construction equipment, 4. building construction cost estimating, 5. heavy civil construction cost estimating, 6. project planning, scheduling, and control, 7. temporary structures, and 8. contract changes and claims. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comConfiguration and Use of Lightboard System in Online Environment: Lessons Learned
acrossthe country and around the world. Unfortunately, these historical and often treasured campusstructures can inadvertently serve to degrade a feeling of “belongedness” in members ofhistorically marginalized and under-represented groups.[1, 2] In fact, this degradedbelongedness in groups is often directly contradicted by the welcoming aspects of theuniversity’s recruiting materials (carefully staged with a quota appropriate number of women,African-Americans, Latinx, etc.) and the objectives of many university strategic plans. Whattools do we have in academia to examine these issues and find appropriate responses? To respond to the above issues (and many others), institutions of higher learning areseeking options to address these issues
].”ProcessThe current equity-centered effort at the University of Michigan’s College of Engineering (CoE)began coalescing during a 5-year DEI strategic plan, which was launched in 2015. During thesummer of 2020, however, the experiences of the “double” pandemic [24] accentuated theurgency of implementing the plan. As a result, the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education(ADUE) formed a committee to plan, socialize, iterate, and execute on a race and ethnicityprogram for CoE undergraduate students. The committee members included students, faculty,staff and administrative leaders from the CoE with a variety of identities (white, black, brown,male, and female) and expertise (engineering, social justice, pedagogy, and instructional design).Some of the
center, and the CAPS PI. Scholars must meet Mentor+ advisor individually atleast twice per semester to talk about their educational, personal and professional progress. Uponrequests, frequency can increase. In every term, each scholar met a Mentor+ advisor more thanonce, the CAPS PI, and/or their academic advisors. Mentor+ mentors conducted their individualmeetings based on the guideline given through the training session. Scholars also met theprofessional advisor and the PI to review and plan their academic work, extra-curricularactivities, fellowship opportunities, and discuss multi-tasking and time management. Onaverage, each scholar had 4 contact points (for mentor and advisement only). This is significantlyhigher than the average number of
College o One of 116 California community colleges and an HSI (over 30% of students are Latinx) with an enrollment of approximately 10,000 students per year in credit- granting programs at its main campus near San Luis Obispo city and campuses in Northern and Southern San Luis Obispo County. Unlike Allan Hancock College, Cuesta College has historically served a large percentage of students (50%) outside of its service area. However, as noted in its 2011-16 master plan, this is shifting due to changing educational needs/populations in the county. o San Luis Obispo County is 3,616 square miles, with a 2020 estimated population of 282,424 that is 22.9% Latinx [20]. Within San Luis
: Yes/No),” followed by an ordinal scale question – “if yes, what is yourlevel of awareness of the process for innovation commercialization in your university?(Responds: low, average, high). They were also asked if they are planning to commercializeinnovations from their current research work, key challenges to IC, and whether IC should beincluded in the engineering curriculum at the graduate level. In the Appendix A, we present the14 main questions and their sub-questions with their multiple answers.Data Collection and AnalysisThe survey was developed and distributed through the google form online survey tool link. Itwas initially distributed to over 30 engineering graduate students, however, fifteen (15) studentsresponded fully to the survey
collaboratives participating in the NSF INCLUDES Aspire Alliance.As illustrated below, there are six well-established regional collaboratives and three others incollaborative planning stages. Each regional collaborative has a number of participatinguniversities and community colleges. All of these collaboratives are coordinated at the nationallevel through the ASPIRE Alliance [21]. The regional collaboratives benefit from nationalpartners, including CIRTL (Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning),NISOD (National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development), AMATYC (AmericanMathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges), and 2YC3 (Two-Year College ChemistryConsortium).Figure 2. Regional collaboratives participating in the
factors that are involved in the early development and production of a STEM professional. She has managed, created and implemented successful STEM intervention programs for over 20 years. She was awarded the Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and Engineering Mentoring, sponsored through The White House. She is currently the Director of the Penn State Millennium Scholars Program and Associate Research Professor of Engineering.Tonya L. PeeplesTonya L. Peeples is the Penn State College of Engineering Associate Dean for Equity and Inclusion and a Professor ofChemical Engineering. As Associate Dean, she leads college of engineering equity action planning, continuously workingto create a welcoming and inclusive
Education and Future Professoriate. (i) ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE: Miguel Andrés was Project Manager of PREINGESA where he has directed construction projects in the development of urban infrastructure for urbanizations such as earthworks, drinking water works, sewerage, underground electrical cables and fiber optics, roads, aqueducts, water reservoirs, housing construction, among others. He was also a Project Management Associate for a Habitat For Humanity housing project in the USA. (ii) RESEARCH: Miguel Andrés' research focuses on (1) decision-making for the design and construction of infrastructure projects, (2) the planning of sustainable, smart and resilient cities, and (3) the development of engineers who not only
individuals from CEOpositions down to warehouse/operations managers. Common technologies identified in theseindustries included but not limited to, barcoding through Radio Frequency (RF) handlers,Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Robotic Process Automation (RPA), followed by the use ofmachine learning and artificial intelligence for process automations.According to the previous related works, we will explore our factual interview data on addressingchallenges faced by warehouses’ managers and employees with regard to using future automationand designing training and educational programs that will address both technical and professionalskills of these workforce of the future.Introduction Industrial revolutions can bring recession, policy and
/Construction (AEC) education shall be at theforefront of preparing future workforces with advanced knowledge about sustainable andresilient designs. Given that, traditional defense structures alone can hardly protect thevulnerable communities, particularly against flood disasters, there is a pressing need to exploreadaptive and innovative solutions and embrace them in AEC education. Safe-to-Fail is such aresilient design strategy that anticipates failures during infrastructure systems planning, thusaccommodating innovative strategies and reducing the impact of natural disasters. Therefore, thisresearch advocates incorporating the resilient Safe-to-Fail concept in the AEC curricula tocultivate infrastructure resilience knowledge among the future