5.00±0.00 4.00±0.00environmental policy and regulations* Rank (5-Strongly Agree; 1-Strongly Disagree) Page 26.678.12Student rankings from the Likert scale and comments from both the survey and post-questionnaire highlight key outcomes addressed following completion of the capstone designcourse and outcomes that could have been addressed with more detail, better preparing them fortheir pending careers. Faculty ranking of outcomes reflects what they perceived was discussedand addressed during the capstone design course not necessarily the time allocated orthoroughness of how the outcomes were addressed throughout the course. Practicing
linking the formal course content to assignments and assessments that directlyrelate to the to the students’ future professional lives (e.g., real-world problems, “decision- Page 26.967.8making). Each of the course topics is covered with a similar combination of reading questions,class activities, reflection opportunities, and a closely-linked summative assessment in the formof a “concept exam” that serves as a part of the actual learning process. The various assessmentcategories allow more frequent, more appropriate assessments that are organized to link closelywith the key concepts. As the semester progresses, the similarity in the coverage of
she was not sure that the influence was positive, telling the teamthat on her last visit to Llacamate she noted that now that the community had electricity, whichwas made available in part by the team’s assistance erecting solar panels, many communitymembers were preferring to watch television rather than play their daily games of soccer. Thosestudents who had not travelled on the latest trip were shocked in disbelief. As the discussioncontinued, the students reflected on their indirect influence on the community and wondered as ateam how they could avoid that kind of “damage,” as they called it. Throughout the session, thestudents became aware in instances like this one of their team’s role in the project. One student’scomment summarized the
little notice of Robert Runté’s view that it is a waste of time worryingabout the external validation of being a professional. Teachers are, he says “knowledge workers…and as such we have a responsibility to both ourselves and our public to become reflectivepractitioners. As reflective practitioners we can reassert, first our ability, and then our right, toassume responsibility for the educational enterprise” which in today’s practice is to beprofessional 5. Some might respond that that is what professional teachers do, or should do. Itfollows that persons’ who enter higher education as educators have the same obligations.5 Runté begins by noting the principle that suggests that people who go on strike cannot be professional. Yet teachershave
Figure 3 was used by the researcher togive an example for each expression of leadership. The researcher then determined from theinterviews when a Maker expressed one of the leadership roles.In their Making, this person:___ 1. Listens to the problems of team members/subordinates. (Mentor)___ 2. Reviews and/or reflects upon project achievements. (Monitor)___ 3. Influences decisions made at higher levels. (Broker)___ 4. Does problem solving in creative, clever ways. (Innovator)___ 5. Clearly defines areas of responsibility for team members/subordinates. (Director)___ 6. Displays a wholehearted commitment to the job/project. (Producer)___ 7. Facilitates consensus building in work-group sessions. (Facilitator)___ 8. Protects continuity in day-to-day
empower students to: 1) explore the diverse historical and philosophical traditions that have shaped the contemporary Western world, 2) read and discuss fundamental texts from those traditions, situating the texts in their appropriate intellectual contexts, and 3) develop your ability to critically and comparatively reflect on religious and philosophical issues, in dialogue with others both past and present.Because of its unique place in our general education core, the Changing Views course offersdistinctive challenges for physics faculty. The typical curriculum in this course overlaps manyfields of specialization including (but not limited to): history, philosophy, astronomy,astrophysics, theology, cosmology, and physics
) Page 26.1500.5would set an output voltage of 5V at the digital pin 9, while the same command with LOW instead of HIGH Will setthat digital pin to 0V.2 [] Indicate actions or gesturesOne could argue that instead of tinkering, Hazel and Silver should have systematically parsed thecode to make sense of it right from the start; they would have had better task success and betterlearned Arduino programming through that process. We contend this notion. Hazel’s and Silver’sactivities reflect a recognition of the variety of resources at their disposal and a systematic walkthrough the resources to try and achieve their goal. At each stage, they expanded the scope oftheir investigation: first, getting feedback from manipulating the specific system
. Additionally, Tinto argues that the first year of college, indeed the first semester, is critical to students being incorporated into the college campus, aswell as their eventual persistence through to graduation. Retention programs, therefore, are mostsuccessful when they utilize informal faculty-student contact in order to integrate students intothe academic and social life of the college5.Some studies have examined the effect of precollege characteristics, parental socialization andcollege experiences to determine their relationship with female STEM major persistence.In a study by Espinosa, the experiences of 1,250 women of color and 891 Caucasian womenattending 135 colleges nationwide were collected via a reflecting survey of their four years
science [16, 17] but found that they focus on principles and conceptsthat reflect the deep understanding of expert computer scientists [9]. The need remains to bettercharacterize the computational competencies as applied in the context of the engineering practice. A major effort during CPACE II —and the subject of this paper—is to determine students’computational skills and capabilities while solving engineering problems. The guiding researchquestion is: what are the features that broadly characterize the knowledge, skills and behaviorsassociated with computational competencies for undergraduate engineering students? A major challenge emerged during our initial analyses of student artifacts using the CPACEcomputational competencies framework
red will work alongside the Transportation group in CEE/SOS 598, the five teams highlighted in green will work alongside the Environment group in CEE/SOS 598, and the five teams highlighted in orange will work alongside the Social/Institutions group in CEE/SOS 598.Second Implementation: Spring 2015In the second implementation, overall project themes better reflect one another to promotevertical integration between the two courses. The vertical integration process is shown in Figure3 below. ! CON$252$ ! Responsibili+es
, human made systems reflect the functioning of multiplecomponents that are enhanced together to accomplish the same goal. A great example of anatural SoS is the human ‘machine’. The human machine is composed of multiple single systemsthat operate together to give multiple capabilities to the human body, such as cognition,communication, movement, and evolution. In engineering, single or traditional systems that formpart of an SoS are made to be a piece of a solution to solve a multilevel necessity. These singlesystems are designed and developed based on a well-structured problem with fixed boundaries[3] ; therefore, they emerge with a clear, capable, implicit, and limited set of goals. In addition,their design is based on the integration of
review the literature onnumerous interrelated components which comprise the greater, more comprehensive nature ofthe discussion. The methodology of this study, therefore, is qualitative in nature and through aliterature review of the applicable components comprising the premise of the discussion topic.Below reflects the activity time-line for the many interrelated activities of this paper. Time-Phased Activities Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20Determine the Components of the Discussion TopicResearch each ComponentDetermine Parallel LogicDetermine Intersecting Logic of ComponentsComprise the Argument Figure 1 – Time-Phased Activities of Employed MethodologyHow Business WorksAt
Kolb's four-partexperiential learning framework. “Knowledge construction has four main phases according toKolb’s experiential learning theory (1984) including simulation, reflection, abstraction, andexperimentation”4 (pg. 283). According to Dhulla, Kolb’s ELT “The learning process oftenbegins with a person carrying out an action and seeing the effects of the action; the second step isto understand the effects of the action. The third step is to understand the action, and the last stepis to modify the action given a new situation”19 (p. 111). We then linked these steps to thecomponents of the course under investigation, as seen in Figure 1.According to Kolb17, “immediate or Concrete Experiences are the basis for observations andReflections. These
.4Approaches used to facilitate transfer of learning include the use of reflective writings,contextualization of learning experiences, and application of learning to real life.4 To make transferof learning explicit to students, instructors advise students to take courses in the appropriatesequence, emphasize in each course the material transferable to other courses, model transfer byinviting guest lecturers, develop students’ metacognitive skills, and reinforce concepts by usingthem often and in different contexts. However, regardless of the strategies used, transfer of learningdoes not occur automatically. Curriculum and course design should emphasize the connectionbetween courses to stimulate transfer.The primary strategy used at our institution to
Topics (learning objective) First half of semester Second half of semester Expectations Class Management (3,4) Introductions (1) Personal Development (3,5) Keys to Success (3) Diversity (7) Pre-Calculus, Trigonometry (3,4) Well-being (5,6) Engineering Profession (2) Design Project Planning (7) Learning and Teaching Styles (5) Teamwork (7) Career Fair (2,6) Design Project (7,8) Professors and Other Resources (6) Reflection Paper (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) Advising (3,6)The course began by providing supplemental instruction for
Page 26.238.7assessment model tests students’ level of motivation based upon five recommended componentsthat an instructor should consider when designing instruction: eMpowerment, Usefulness,Success, Interest, and Caring. The assessment instruments are modified by changing thequestions to reflect the student’s use of OWLS according to the recommendations by Jones14 inorder to test specifically how use of the OWLS by engineering students impacts their motivationlevels. The questions based on the MUSIC model are being used in the spring 2015 assessments. Quantitative data and analysis (discussed later in the Data Analysis section) results instatistics that provide insights and answers to the research questions in this study. However
and thermocouples. [4] Step four involved the crux of the experiment. Some instructions for how they wereto use the data acquisition software were provided along with instructions for how to run theexperiment. The students were then asked to evaluate the results of their experiment by solvingfor certain variables using the data they collected and then answering the challenge questionposed to them at the start. Many of their results included graphs that they could both see in realtime and examine after the data was taken to assist them in understanding what was physicallyhappening. [5] Step five was for reflection and included questions asking about the concepts thatwere stressed during the workshop and was intended to gauge what
) Platinumcertified academic building, shown in Fig. (1)a, as a context to explore applications of the theorystudents’ learn. Another goal is to provide opportunities for hands-on experimentation withsystems that reflect professional practice. To achieve these goals, the ME151 course wasredesigned to incorporate a significant laboratory component. 7 These laboratory sessions exposestudents to practical applications of process control using two educational rigs from FeedbackInstruments. A level-flow rig allows students to control the flow of water or the level of a tank,while a temperature rig, shown in Fig. 1(b), allows students to control temperature by actuatingservo valves that regulate primary and secondary flows through a heat exchanger. Using bothrigs
that they can use again and again on future projects. She also helps students answer these questions when she teaches some of these methods to engineering, design, business, and law students. Her courses use active storytelling and self-reflective observation as one form to help graduate students and leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a project- from the early, inspirational stages to prototyping, to prototyping some more - and to delivery. Barbara likes to paint pictures.Mr. Ateeq Junaid Suria, Mechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA Ateeq Suria is currently a fifth year Ph.D. candidate in the Mechanical Engineering program at Stanford University located in Stanford, CA. He is
experience,conceptualize, perceive, and understand various aspects of, and phenomena in, the world aroundthem.” Experiences and phenomena are perceived differently by each individual, sophenomenography seeks to describe the “collective human experience of phenomenaholistically” 29. Based in variation theory, phenomenographic studies result in the keycomponents that comprise the variation under investigation 25,30,31. These categories ofdescription “contain a variety of conceptions and thus indicate that there are differences in theways a phenomenon is understood” 32 and may be depicted as a taxonomy or hierarchy ofunderstanding. The categories of description do not represent the individual responses fromparticipants, but instead collectively reflect
Schuster1). Precollege characteristics - like high school grade pointaverages - as well as university entrance exams have, in general, turned out to be usefulpredictors of student retention.A prior investigation of the drop-out probability at the engineering department of ouruniversity (Andreeva-Moschen2) clearly showed that the university entry scores can be usedto identify groups of students at higher risk of failure. It also turned out that the probabilitydistribution for student drop-out depends on the type of high school the students graduatedfrom, namely secondary colleges of engineering or traditional high schools. Interestingly, theuniversity entry score distribution does not reflect any differences in this respect, which might
collaborative learning since student teams wererequired to make a presentation at each institution; therefore, teammates had to help teach acrossinstitutions to cover the content of the projects not taught in their respective courses. Studentperformance was assessed based on the quality of each deliverable, instructor reflection, anopinion survey, and a post-course assessment of student learning. The authors conclude the paperwith a discussion of the perceived benefits of the CICL approach and provide suggestions forfuture implementation.IntroductionEducators have been grappling with the challenges of integrating sustainability concepts andskills into engineering education1,2. Many reasons for the lack of progress have been offered,including
, terrorism, armedconflicts, climate change, epidemics, unemployment, world economy globalization, religion-based conflicts, human migration. Scientists, politicians and social activists are activelydiscussing the so called “global challenges” on the daily agenda of the United Nations, the clubs.All the road mapping documents of G20 member states design the future projects with a strongemphasis on the global risks and instabilities. The world scale problems are also reflected at theregional scale. Almost all the major challenges can be grouped into the following categories:• Healthcare and quality of life – human lifespan, environment deterioration, especially in thecities, early mortality, poverty and corruption;• Safety – a threat of war
leading scientific applications;62.90% claim they should be able to connect scientific theories with engineering technologies cleverly;56.45% argue they should be able to integrate innovative factors in the engineering science fieldsystematically; besides, 3.23% suppose outstanding engineers shall have the management and cultureconstruction capability.Chart 2 special quality that should be strengthened Page 19.38.63. Creative ability(1) The creative ability is mainly reflected in the sense of achievement in scientific research. To realize engineering application and obtain benefits is the major source of sense of achievement for
turned in throughout the semester for instructor feedback prior to submission of entire written report and oral group presentation. 2) Response Papers were 1-page reports answering prompted questions based on readings of scientific reviews and primary scientific literature, popular science literature, videos, or podcasts on the topics of bioengineering. These assignments were used to assess Course Goal II. a. Students were exposed to other points of view on bioengineering outside of those presented by guest lecturers. They wrote weekly papers reflecting on how these topics can affect them and society. b. The materials were provided asynchronously via the
, and accessing and using anotherpersons’ account or electronic identify without explicit permission.Implementation PlanThe plan for providing students with instruction in this area would be to have them work ingroups and do role playing with developed scenarios. Students would do a table top exercise,with different students playing different roles from the scenario. Afterwards the students woulddiscuss and reflect as a group. The groups would then share out information from theirdiscussion and reflections with the whole class. This would allow for a whole class discussion Page 26.1759.7after allowing the students some time to process it in
reflects the rapid growing IT industry and Page 26.1764.2covers a wide spectrum. The new program's laboratory is under continuous update to enhancestudent's hands-on experience with cutting-edge equipment. Similar to the curriculum design, thelaboratory development benefits significantly from industry help and donation.This paper presents the curriculum and laboratory upgrade. The paper is organized as follows.Firstly, the role of industry is introduced. Then based on the feedback from industry, the updatedNIT curriculum is presented, followed by the upgraded NIT laboratory. Finally, the paperconcludes with the future work.Collaboration With
hinge and a cable, withan external load applied. Set 2 is focused on the analysis of a truss with simple supports and givenexternal loads. Within each set, the questions progress in procedural order and/or level ofabstraction and complexity. After answering each question, and before proceeding to the nextquestion, participants are shown a standard accepted answer. This process (1) enables participantsto proceed to the next question even if they make a crucial error that would otherwise impede theirprogress, and (2) provides an opportunity for participants to offer a reflection on how their answerscompared to the accepted answer.The questions are divided into two types. Questions 1a, 1b, 1d, 2a, 2b, and 2c test basic mechanicsskills (henceforth
professional development was not sufficient to change the nature of their teachingpractice. So the majority of participants, in practice, had not actually progressed into a trueadoption of innovation9, possibly because of opportunity to collaborate and create a communityto support their burgeoning knowledge and attitudes of learner-centered practice. Drilling down to engineering, in a recent study by McKenna et al., engineering facultyworked in collaboration with learning scientists to develop student-centered conceptual changeinstructional methods. They determined the extent to which engineering faculty felt they werechanging their pedagogy toward student-centered learning and found that the greater the extentof collaborative reflection
lasers and their applications inmanufacturing. The emphasis on lasers is reflected in the program name and in the programcurriculum. Lasers are presented in the introductory photonics course, taught in depth in theLaser Fundamentals and Laser Systems courses, and are also heavily featured in the PhotonicsApplications course. The Optics and Photonics Laboratory supports this emphasis by includingseveral types of lasers: HeNe, carbon dioxide, fiber, diode, Nd:YAG and Argon ion. Test andmeasurement equipment include detectors, power and energy meters, beam profilers,spectrometers, and high speed oscilloscopes. Miscellaneous optical components, opticalbreadboards and tables, and various laser safety glasses complete the equipment list