stakeholdersand students’ investment of time in their extracurricular Maker activities. Pines, et al. suggestthat establishing maker curriculum in addition to the traditional curriculum has allowed for thedevelopment of broader skillsets which cover knowledge beyond engineering, includingteamwork, creativity, innovation, collaboration, critical thinking, project management, andsystems engineering. These skills are highly valued in the technical workforce but not alwayspracticed or developed in formal education settings.Oplinger et al.’s “Making and Engineering: Understanding Similarities and Differences” [6]covers a general survey which shows that both making and engineering are perceived to beactive, project developing fields. Stronger correlations are
cultural landscape in engineering education. J Eng Educ. 2010;69(1):5-22.3. Myer M, Marx S. Engineering Dropouts : A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering. J Eng Educ. 2014;103(4):525-548.4. Gregory S. African American Female Engineering Students’ Persistence in Stereotype- Theatening Environments: A Critical Race Theory Perspective. 2015.5. Ohland M, Brawner C, Camacho M, Layton R, Long R, Lord S, Wasburn M. Race, gender, and measures of success in engineering education. J Eng Educ. 2011;100(2):225- 252.6. Espinoza A. The College Experiences of First-Generation College Latino Students in Engineering. J Latin/Latin Am Stud. 2013;5(2):71-84.7. McLoughlin L. Spotlighting
Proposal Submission and Funding Outcomes Data for Cohort 1, 2, 3, and 4.Table 2Proposal Submission and Funding Outcomes Data Cohort Colleges #1 #2 #3 #4 # Project Succes (2013) (2014) (2015) (2016) Colleges s Rate Colleges Selected for 20 20 21 20 81 Project Cohort Cohort Colleges that 18 18 18 16 70 70/81, Submitted NSF-ATE 86.4% Proposals Cohort Colleges that 14 16 17 16 63 63/70, Submitted to Small
, 1998; Bolger et al., 2012; Weinberg, 2017a;2017b; 2019). In Bolger et al.’s study, children predicted and explained the motion of pegboardlinkages (Figure 1). Lehrer and Schauble interviewed second- and fifth-grade students, withinengineering tasks, to assess their reasoning about the mechanics of gears. In both of thesestudies, the majority of participants did not engage in mechanistic explanations.Figure 1. Example of a system of pegboard linkages. In Weinberg (2017a; 2017b; 2019), participants predicted and explained the motion ofpegboard linkages represented on an assessment. Most children’s mechanistic reasoning wasfragmented, displaying few of the mechanistic elements necessary to describe lever motion.First, most did not seem to
Office of the CTO); Harish Krishnaswamy(EE, Columbia); Shivendra Panwar, Sundeep Rangan (ECE, NYU); Ivan Seskar, DipankarRaychaudhuri (WINLAB, Rutgers)We thank the teachers who participated in the program during the summers of 2018 and 2019 fortheir contributions to the development of the COSMOS Educational Toolkit.We thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.References 1. COSMOS, “Cloud enhanced open software defined mobile wireless testbed for city-scale deployment,” https://cosmos-lab.org/ 2. D. Raychaudhuri, I. Seskar, G. Zussman, T. Korakis, D. Kilper, T. Chen, J. Kolodziejski, M. Sherman, Z. Kostic, X. Gu, H. Krishnaswamy, S. Maheshwari, P. Skrimponis, and C. Gutterman, “Challenge: COSMOS: A
of Higher Education, vol. 81, no. 4, 2010. [0022- 1546]. Available: https://tandfonline.com. [Accessed Oct. 10, 2019].[9] C. Interiano-Shiverdecker, J. H. Lim, P. T. Tkacik, and J. L. Dahlberg, “From the barracks: A multi-dimensional model of student veterans’ cultural transition,” The Journal of Military and Government Counseling, vol. 7, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://mgcaonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2]019/11/JMGC-Vol-7-Is-3.pdf. [Accessed Sept. 15, 2019].[10] B. J. Novoselich, J. C. Bruhl, M. Scheidt, C. N. Willis, and M. S. Sheppard, “ASEE support to student veterans: Results of a 2018 leadership roundtable,” Paper presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019. [Online
“softness” ofhumanities into the “hard core” engineering practice. My daily practice is that of being “another”– that uncomfortable state of continuous non-belonging: in a space replete with battlefieldanalogies and metaphors, I am a healer, a joy seeker, and an advocate.The analysis below uses color font to indicate which author (Vanasupa (V), Schlemer (S), orZastavker (Z)) is writing. We also preserve the students’ voice by using their chosenpseudonyms. ISIM refers to the course, Introduction to Sensing, Instrumentation andMeasurement.Reflective analysis of student responsesV: In terms of the focus group responses, I guess it wasn’t surprising to me that the visual layoutwas the first thing that students noticed. What was a bit surprising was the
., vol. 2, no. 1, Mar. 2010.[4] J. Lucena, J. Schneider, and J. A. Leydens, Engineering and Sustainable Community Development. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool, 2010.[5] Does America Need More Innovators? .[6] C. Struckmann, “A postcolonial feminist critique of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: A South African application,” Agenda, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 12–24, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1080/10130950.2018.1433362.[7] D. Moyo and N. Ferguson, Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa. Macmillan, 2010.[8] B. E. Goldstein, Collaborative Resilience: Moving Through Crisis to Opportunity. MIT Press, 2012.[9] N. R. Council, D. on E. and L. Studies, B. on E. S. and Resources, G. S. Committee, and C
persona of-fers a metaphor for understanding impact. How is a persona different from a stereotype? Willa stereotype inform a persona? Applying the similarities and differences of a persona and astereotype has concrete classroom use with potential for amplifying understanding of inter-personal perceptions. The gendered findings in the study indicate there is a relational qualityto interpersonal perceptions of gender. Therefore, who and how we pay attention to others isimportant. The attention that is given to women and men in the classroom, women and menon internships, and women and men in male-dominated work environments is worthwhile.References[1] Lee, H., Choi, J., and Kim, S. “Does gender diversity help teams manage status conflict?An
data, whichespecially allowed the recognition of both explicit and implicit nuances, resulting in moremeaningful findings.Preliminary analysis led to a focused coding process as patterns started to emerge. Both themore data oriented initial coding as well as the conceptualizing focused coding happened inparallel for much of the overall coding process. Focused coding was the first conceptual stepin the data analysis where significant or frequent first order codes are used to group andexplain larger sets of data. All of the codes remaining after the initial and focused coding,were then further thematically analyzed in a format inspired by Gioia et al.’s data structure[38]. The resulting data structure is presented below, in Figure 1.3 Creating
competency standards for higher education," 2000. [Online]. Available: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework[4] Association of College & Research Libraries, "Framework for information literacy for higher education," 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework[5] S. J. Behrens, "A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy," College & Research Libraries, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 309-322, 1994, doi: 10.5860/crl_55_04_309.[6] American Library Association, "Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final report," 1989. [Online]. Available: http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential[7] M. M. England
design cycle, focusing on both hardware and software, to createbetter solutions for healthcare. He researched hardware components to measure someform/function of the body requiring training. Moreover, he investigated software components toenable interactive visualization of real-time data of body form/function, much like a video gamefor encouraging users to make progress in their training. After conducting research on conditions,such as heart disease and stroke, and examining the treatments, i.e. exercises, he picked onemeasurement that can be used to assess the patient’s progress with an exercise and determine whichsensor(s) could appropriately measure it. Next, he developed a hardware prototype (see Figure 8)and addressed data visualization
: The health benefits of narrative. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(10), 1243-1254.5 Rude, S., Gortner, E. M., & Pennebaker, J. (2004). Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students. Cognition & Emotion, 18(8), 1121-1133.6 Wang, C. C., & Geale, S. K. (2015). The power of story: narrative inquiry as a methodology in nursing research. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2(2), 195- 198.7 Remenyi, D. (2005). Tell me a Story–A way to Knowledge. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology, 3(2), 133-140.8 Paulos J, 1999, Once Upon a Number – The Hidden Mathematical Logic of Stories, Allen Lane Press, The Penguin Press, London.9 Kelchtermans, G
legos to interest high school students and improve k12 stem education," Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003. 33rd Annual , vol.2, no., pp. F3A_6- F3A_10, 5-8, 2003.18. B. Barker and J.Ansorge, "Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment, Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39(3), 229–243, 2007.19. Nourbakhsh, I., Crowley, K., Bhave, A., hamner, E., Hsium, T., Perez-Bergquist, A., Richards, S., & Wilkinson, K., "The robotic autonomy mobile robots course: Robot design, curriculum design, and educational assessment", Autonomous Robots, 18(1), 103–127, 2005.20. Beer, R. D., Chiel, h. J., & Drushel, R., "Using robotics to teach science and engineering
of framing an engineering problem as being composed of discretesystems, the Circle Way recognizes that the parts are not only interacting, but that the boundariesbetween them are shifting, arbitrary, and often far from clear. The Circle Way challengesparticipants to shift their orientation from a collection of individuals to a co-creating community.For instance, consider a technical project team: one typical approach would be to break down theproject into the electrical, mechanical, and software (etc.) engineering sub-projects, assign eachto the student(s) of that major, and integrate the completed parts into the whole system at thevery end. If instead students used the Circle Way approach to discuss and share ideas about thewhole project
work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate ResearchFellowship Program under Grant No. 1651272. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesAmbrose, S. A. (2010). How learning works : seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Ammar, S., & Wright, R. (1999). Experiential learning activities in Operations Management. International Transactions in Operational Research, 6(2), 183.Anfara, V. A., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public. Educational
12.2 Student CreativityA survey was designed and implemented before and after the course to measure the impact ofcourse participation on students’ self-perception of their creative tendencies. We utilized twoexisting surveys: the Reisman Diagnostic Creativity Assessment (RDCA) [10] and theInnovative Behavior Scales (IBS) [11]. We chose two instruments, as while the RDCA coveredmost of the course objectives, an inspection of Reisman et al. [10] indicated that the surveyconstructs had questionable reliability in prior use. Therefore, our team refined this instrumentand its constructs prior to data collection. In contrast, our team had utilized Dyer et al.’s (2008)instrument in the past, with results that had excellent reliability. Notably, the
Biomolecular Engineering. Common across all teams is a minimumtimeframe of three to five years. Teams typically become integral parts of faculty researchprograms, continually evolving with the team advisor’s research.3. The program is curricular and all participating students are graded (A-F; not P/F, S/U). VIPis not an extra- or co-curricular activity. It is a sequence of courses whose credits count towardsstudents' degree requirements, and letter grading holds students accountable for their work. Inmany ways, feedback and grading in VIP is like an evaluation in the workplace. Work isevaluated, guidance is given, and students have the opportunity to improve. The curricularstructure and the philosophy that all students can benefit from the experience
inengineering activities situated in academic makerspaces. We found it critical to combinethe existing frameworks [13, 19] because its combination and adaptions allows us toinvestigate engineering identity development within makerspaces. Adapting only one orthe other would not allow us to account for either the social factors that are present incommunities of practice or different factors that are known to influence engineeringidentity development. Taken together, we are able to investigate one, situated within theother. Figure 1 may help clarify our adaptation. Intent of this PaperIn this paper, we extend Stevens et al.’s [13] findings by investigating how participationin an immersive design challenge situated within
each evaluation question.Table 2. Evaluation Questions Aligned to Data Sources Evaluation Questions Data Sources Project Observations Focus Content S-STEM Documents Groups Assessment Survey and Artifacts & Interviews 1. Did program staff create and X X X implement a high quality, engaging research methods course and summer research experience? 2. To what extent did participation
theirresearch, as evidenced in Respondent 3’s wording, “Believing in an idea and bringing it to life.” Finally, we asked participants to tell us what they would like us to change about thecontest if we to run it again. Two of the respondents gave us no feedback and one wrote “Notsure.” However, two of the respondents gave us helpful advice. Respondent 3 indicated that weneeded to provide more opportunities to find teammates. While the contest was open to bothindividuals and teams, in a semester-long project which requires research, a well-organized teamhas an advantage over an individual. Moreover, learning to work effectively within a team onproject management is an important skill for engineering students to learn. Respondent 5 wantedmore
psychographic measures developed in this study reveal nuances in student values ofsustainability and global citizenship, highlighting the importance of constant revision ofeducators’ understandings of student understanding in order to graduate informed and dedicatedstudents who will engage in, design for, and implement sustainability in their future careers.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for theirsupport of this work under the TUES program (grant number DUE-1245464). Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s)and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography 1. Beane, T.P., &
donated to K-12 schools, or educationalcenters, in both nations. STEM tools are hands-on, interactive products that convey educationalphenomena associated with STEM fields, and that properly align with age and grade appropriatetopic(s). Since 2009, UAH CDC teams have produced numerous STEM tools that have beendonated to K-12 schools and science centers. Examples of the previously designed STEM toolsare shown in Fig. 1.Figure 1. UAH capstone design class STEM tools-clockwise from top left: dyslexic braindisplay, fatigue and beam bending apparatus, pulley system, velocity/motion tracks, mechanicaland solar energy race track (photos courtesy of C. Carmen)MethodologyAt the start of the international partnership, UAH and CPUT CDC instructors aimed to
, community,or other source, contextual listening has a broader meaning. It refers to A multidimensional, integrated understanding of the listening process wherein listening facilitates meaning making, enhances human potential, and helps foster community-supported change. In this form of listening, information such as cost, weight, technical specs, desirable functions, and timeline acquires meaning only when the context of the person(s) making the requirements (their history, political agendas, desires, forms of knowledge, etc.) is fully understood [19, p. 125].Although students in IFCS did not engage with an actual community, the posing of the tankproblem underscored the value of listening to a community to