and work engineering through the following lenses: individually or in teams, planning, designing, fabricating, and testing in various group and individual projects.• Building - learn and practice the engineering design process through hands-on projects • You will have plenty of formal and informal learning opportunities about life and physical sciences as we• Leaders - develop and practice oral and written explore leadership, innovation, and the engineering communication skills to become prepared as future design process through hands-on activities within
Paper ID #40800View from the Kaleidoscope: Conceptualizing antiracist priorities forengineering as a collective across vantagesDr. Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University Brooke C. Coley, Ph.D. is Founding Executive Director of the Center for Research Advancing Racial Equity, Justice, and Sociotechnical Innovation Centered in Engineering (RARE JUSTICE)—an unprece- dented testbed for innovating and modeling antiracist and equitable engineering futures—and Assistant Professor of Engineering, both at Arizona State University. Across several national projects funded pri- marily by the National Science Foundation, Dr
• Promoting health and wellness activities across campus to all engineering students 20LGBTQIA+ resources were being left out of equitable access, but now they areincluded in student success discussions and wellness activities on campus 20Equitable Access• The Bandana Project (campus wide) – Campus workshops led by students – Ambassador and student group trainings – Visible green bandana for students to learn how to recognize and respond to signs of distress in their peers 21Lafene Health
-week immersive researchexperience that supported 10 students per summer and provided strategic professionaldevelopment to support research success and success in applying to and completing a graduatedegree. Here we summarize the outcomes from our three-year award. Each year we havepublished on different aspects of the project. Here we report outcomes of our objectives from allthree cohorts and discuss lessons learned and next steps. The REU SITE program objectiveswere to 1.) increase the number of historically underrepresented students pursing a MS or PhDand prepare them for success when applying and completing a graduate degree, 2.) provide anindependent scientific research experience in Biomechanics and Mechanobiology (BMMB), 3.)and develop
course is not a prerequisite for thecourse, there were several students who did not have familiarity with even basic programmingskills.Instructor’s lack of specific knowledge related to AI implementation. I have some basicexperience using ML/AI to perform clustering and characterization tasks on extracted features inlarge data sets and from image data. However, my fundamental knowledge of the topic is alsolimited, which hampers my ability to develop projects that are properly scoped and provide thestructure and explanation required for students’ intuitive development of code for performing AItasks.Limited computing power. Implementing AI based computer programs requires a large amountof computing power. Some campuses may already have a mechanism
. Oursection is called “Socially Engaged Design of Nuclear Energy Technologies.” In its first offeringin Fall 2023, the course had 38 students. Students from any engineering major can take thiscourse, meaning that some were nuclear-interested but many were planning to major in otherdisciplines. As is typical of many schools right now, we had a significant number of studentsinterested in computer science and engineering. But a wide range of engineering fields wererepresented in our course.All Introduction to Engineering courses in the College of Engineering are design-build-testcourses, as is ours. The project with which students in our course are tasked is the design of ahypothetical fusion energy facility in collaboration with community members from
(S-STEM) grant to increase engineering degree completion of low-income, high achievingundergraduate students. The project aims to increase engineering degree completion byimproving student engagement, boosting retention and academic performance, and enhancingstudent self-efficacy by providing useful programming, resources, and financial support (i.e.,scholarships). This work is part of a larger grant aimed at uncovering effective strategies tosupport low-income STEM students’ success at HBCUs. The next section will discuss thebackground of this work.Keywords: Historically black colleges/universities (HBCUs), learning environment,undergraduate, underrepresentationBackgroundA public historically black land-grant university in the southeastern
in this study. While the different disciplines ofengineering at the university differ slightly in application requirements and timelines, all Master’s studentsat are required to do research and write a Master’s paper or thesis (i.e., there is no coursework-only/non-thesis option.) All participants for this study recruited were part of the SSTEM, although participation inthis particular study was optional. IRB approval was obtained for the entire project and all data collection;the interviews collected and analyzed in this study are part of the broader engineering education researchplan in the funded SSTEM project. All 11 current SSTEM students were recruited for participation in thestudy; 6 students scheduled interviews in the timeframe for
resolve.Lecture formatIn the regular AME 308 classroom, the professor demonstrates design techniques in Siemens NXin real time using a projected screen while describing the step-by-step process. When introducingkey concepts, the professor uses slides to explain definitions and related ideas beforedemonstrating the practical software operations. This teaching approach is highly effective forhearing-abled students, as it allows them to learn the software through hands-on practice whiledeepening their understanding of the concepts.Figure 1: Lecture slides introducing Figure 2: AI generated preview for stu-tolerance on engineering drawing dents understanding toleranceHowever, for hearing-impaired students
Introduction to Engineering, bothfor college credit. They also participate in two 90-minute DEI workshops twice a week.Throughout the program, students receive mentoring from faculty members and peer mentors,and participate in team research projects on a variety of topics. In 2022, these topics includedacoustics, magnetic gears, environmental engineering, life-cycle analysis, and renewable plastics.The program culminates with the presentation of these team projects for the whole RAMPcommunity of peers, near-peer mentors, faculty members, and industry participants.4.0 Motivating Student Participation in DEI SessionsIncorporating DEI sessions into the RAMP program required careful consideration of how tomotivate students to participate, given research
Across the Curriculum. Dr. Zhu’s research interests include global and international engineering education, engineering ethics, engineering cultures, and ethics and policy of computing technologies and robotics.Xianghong WUDr. Ryan Thorpe ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Assessing the Effects of a Short-Term Global Engineering Ethics Course on theDevelopment of Engineering Students’ Moral Reasoning and Dispositions [Traditionalpaper – research/evidence-based, DEI/research methods]1 IntroductionThis paper describes a project to develop, deliver, and assess a short-term (one-week) course onglobal engineering ethics at Shandong University in the Summer of 2022. This project builds onprevious
: Validation With Science Majors and Nonscience Majors" [12]. The grouping ofquestions using an established and validated questionnaire helps to increase the internalconsistency of the questions on the assessment.Self-Efficacy Table II Self-Efficacy Questionnaire Items Question Questions # 3 I can help my friends who have difficulties in understanding science and technology matters 4 I have skills required for being successful in science and technology lesson 6 I can accomplish science and technology projects successfully 7 I believe that I will have high scores in science and technology examinations 9
the Journal of Engineering Education, and associate editor for IEEE Transactions on Education. Dr. Finelli studies the academic success of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), social justice attitudes in engineering, and faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Understanding How International Graduate Students in Engineering Fit into American Culture through the Lens of Gender Pronouns: A Pilot StudyAbstractInternational
experimentallaboratory experiences. During the pandemic teaching period, all the labs in the curriculumcontinued to be delivered remotely. When students were asked if the laboratory learningexperience was negatively impacted, 66% strongly or somehow agreed, while 14% strongly orsomehow disagreed, and 20% neither agreed nor disagreed. Only 18% strongly and somehowagreed that online laboratory teaching was more conducive to learning than in personinstruction, while 67% strongly or somehow disagreed, and 15% neither agreed nor disagreed.Thirty three percent of the respondents strongly or somehow agreed that their communicationwith team members in their lab course assignment or project improved when online, while 47%and 20% strongly or somehow disagreed, and
Paper ID #39309Getting to the Next Stop: Teaching Transportation Engineering through aMultilingual Board GameG. R. Marvez, Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Marvez is a PhD student in the joint STEM Education and Cognitive Sciences program at Tufts University interested in games, language, and controversial discussions. In past research projects, they have worked on the development of virtual simulations for teachers to practice leading controversial discussions. They are interested in ways to prepare teachers to facilitate controversial debates with students in STEM class- rooms, such as
acrossindividual faculty based on the type of assessment practices they choose to adopt in their courses.In addition to traditional formative and summative assessments, prior literature has identifiedother forms of assessment including standards-based, competency-based, mastery-based, andadaptive [1]. More recently, the practice of ungrading has become more prominent in thehumanities and social sciences and is slowly being adopted by engineering education. In coursesthat utilize ungrading, students are required to develop a portfolio of writing intensive or othertypes of projects in lieu of traditional assignments [2]. Students are expected to submit their workfor review, obtain feedback from the instructor, and implement that feedback over the course
College that they could use in interactions with students and parents duringthe summer programs.After the presentation, the participants were divided into groups for a role-play activity. Eachgroup was given a different scenario and given time to discuss it amongst themselves. They wereinstructed to choose actors and be prepared to present the scenario with possible solutions to therest of the group. The scenarios used were:Scenario 1:You are watching groups work on a project. You notice that in one group, there is one studentthat is not participating. She is standing on the edge of the space watching the three boys in hergroup build their design. What do you do?If you choose to talk to her, she tells you that her group is not listening to her
framework We approached the stories using an interpretive lens. Therefore, this work is grounded inpostmodernism as we represented stories beyond traditional norms of dissemination. We added somelayers to complete the narratives without changing the actual stories. Based on the experiences ofmarginalization common to Black students navigating engineering, this project is theoretically framed inCritical Race and Role Strain Theories. Critical Race Theory (CRT) provides a framework forchallenging the ways in which race and racism implicitly and explicitly impact social structures, practices,and discourses; it has also been used to understand the experiences of Black graduate students navigatingengineering environments (Crenshaw, 1991; Ladson
the department have adapted the use of formative andsummative assessments in Fall 2020. The courses and the assessments used in these courses areprovided below.The undergraduate course (part of the capstone experience) previously used a midterm exam, acourse quiz, final exam and a student project for assessment. This course was offered in Fall2020 in a combination of synchronous and asynchronous delivery methods. With the redesign toadapt to the online learning environment, weekly Canvas module quizzes were used as formativeassessments. Although, the formative assessments were low-stake quizzes, the formativeassessments enabled the instructor to assess student learning periodically, identify topics thatstudents struggled with, and address
Group.Prof. Vivian Genaro Motti, George Mason University Vivian Genaro Motti is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Information Sciences and Technology at George Mason University where she leads the Human-Centric Design Lab (HCD Lab). Her research focuses on Human Computer Interaction, Ubiquitous Computing, Wearable Health, and Usable Privacy. She is the principal investigator for a NIDILRR-funded project on assistive smartwatches for young adults in inclusive postsecondary education. Her research has been funded by NSF, TeachAccess, CCI, 4-VA, URSP. Before joining GMU, Dr. Motti was a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Human Centered Com- puting division in the School of Computing - Clemson University. During
for Innovation in Engineering Education. His research focuses on increasing diversity in STEM education and the STEM workforce. He has received multiple grants to run workforce development training programs as well as undergraduate research experience programs to train underrepresented minority and first-generation students. He is the Founding Director of NJIT’s Grand Challenges Scholars Program. He also has worked on several research projects, programs, and initiatives to help students bridge the gap between high school and college as well as to prepare students for the rigors of mathematics. He is also involved in various engineering education initiatives focusing on the integration of novel technologies into the
of training students in robotics, especially inmulticultural teams. These activities help students to develop communication and collaborationskills, which are critical for success in international competitions when working or competing withother teams. A variety of team-building activities, such as group projects, group discussions, andteam-building games, had been incorporated into the curriculum to help improve the teamdynamics and keep the students engaged and encouraged.Step 5: Providing Hands-On ExperienceHands-on experience is crucial for preparing students for international competitions in robotics.Educators provided students with opportunities to work on real-world projects by training them touse tools and technologies commonly used
Cao, University of California, IrvineAnna-Lena Dicke, University of California, Irvine Dr. Dicke is an Associate Project Scientist within the School of Education at the University of California, Irvine. In her research, she aims to understand how students’ motivation and interest in the STEM fields can be fostered to secure their educational persistence and long-term career success. Trying to bridge the gap between theory and practice, she is currently involved in an NSF-funded project aimed at fostering the persistence and retention of low-income engineering transfer students.Kameryn Denaro ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Work-In Progress: Guidelines on Developing Writing
implicit bias or a pattern of microaggresive tendenciestowards underrepresented groups within the company. In addition, students are presented withfurther scenario details possibly indicating that project task and professional developmentopportunities are distributed inequitably based on gender and race.Initial discussion within this exercise is team-based, and teams are asked to determine the degreeto which DEI issues appear to be present, what actions the Sam character might take based on thetechniques they have learned, and whether or not the comments Sam is hearing from hissupervisor warrant action at all since they occur outside of the physical workplace at lunch.Following role playing and subsequent discussion within this first scenario
women in engineering and has published numerous articles in ASEE conferences.Dr. Kimberly Stillmaker, P.E., California State University, Fresno Dr. Stillmaker is an Assistant Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at CSU, Fresno. She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in structural engineering. She attained her PhD in Civil Engineering at UC Davis. Her research interests includeDr. Lizabeth L. Thompson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been teaching for 22 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the
scientific knowledge through agrivoltaics engineering research while demonstrating thesocial value of improving PV performance for their local neighborhoods and region. Over time,this work affords historically minoritized groups the opportunity to leverage their richexperiences and cultural assets in a way that benefits all stakeholders. The 4th-2th grade Arizona educators who comprise the teacher members of the SPV Labparticipate in a six-week summer Research Experience for Teachers (RET) program. Workingwith university faculty and graduate students from engineering, education, and related fields,teachers learn about PV manufacturing, engage in engineering research projects (e.g., building,programming, and testing a monitoring device that
, industry-wide project which can helphumans to have a better quality of life. Sustainability in construction includes both design andmaterials. Recycling, reducing waste, minimizing negative and maximizing positive impacts arethe goals for sustainable design.Sustainable development education is the journey of sustainable life and work and deals withchanging environmental conditions [7]. On the other hand, education enables students to thinkand act independently and understand the application of knowledge. In recent years, manyprofessional organizations have agreed on the need to incorporate sustainability into engineeringeducation, and the need for sustainability engineering education has been widely recognized.Reflecting the concept of
result in extending their expected graduation time. The time spent in the previouslab may not be recoverable. Most of the participants in this study, except Jessica, who switchedin the first year of her graduate school, reported that they were impacted by the extension ingraduation time. David had one year left to graduate when he switched to a new research groupbecause of his advisor's retirement. Joining a new research group extended his researchobjectives and resulted in an additional year to graduation. According to David, "The direction of the project changed and it affected me because I was originally more focused on doing simulations. But then [the new advisor's] expectations of me changed. [The new advisor] expects me
resultsshowed higher student success with writing-intensive courses in developing critical writing skillsin a construction management course [2]. Challenges of developing writing skills amongundergraduate STEM curricula are addressed by Mayo and Wheaton [3] who state that writingassignments can be developed such that they assist students in connecting their technical work toreal-world applications. In their lesson plan, the students were expected to post their work on apublic platform encouraging students to produce quality work. Richards and Milanovicestablished partnerships with professional writing faculty, industry members and technicalcourse instructors to mentor senior design project students in effective writing through pairedteaching [4]. In a
a bachelor of science in Construction Engineering from American University in Cairo. Dr. ElZomor moved to FIU from State University of New York, where he was an Assistant Professor at the college of Environmental Science and Forestry. Mohamed’s work focuses on Sustainability of the Built Environment, Engineering Education, Construc- tion Engineering, Energy Efficiency Measures and Modeling, Project Management, and Infrastructure Resilience. Dr. ElZomor has extensive professional project management experience as well as a diverse cross-disciplinary academic knowledge. Mohamed, distinct expertise supports fostering interdisciplinary research in addition to embracing innovative pedagogical approaches in STEM