penalty costs and material costs should be able to bereduced through the selection of better shapes to meet the requirements. These costs areunacceptable to the CEO and s(he) wants to know how much the costs can be lowered withoutdecreasing the load capacity or deflection as more than three inches movement would benoticeable. That is, s(he) wants a lower cost, but equal or superior product performance. This iswhat is required to be competitive in the globalization environment.The computer model gave the following values for the cost items and the differences werecaused by the extra digits carried in the computer calculations. Material Cost Processing Cost Penalty Cost Total Cost Steel 453.60
classroom, and consulted with professional engineersboth on campus and off campus to determine the most attractive project elements and developdesign recommendations. Consultation with the senior members of the Cheyenne Tribe onavailable, cost-effective and maintainable technologies led to the tribe¹s selection of the finaltechnologies for which funding would be sought. The engineering Clinic team developed atechnical guide for the implementation of a commercial fish production facility utilizing waterreuse technology that local natural resources that could produce 100,000 pounds of fish annually.This process was fruitful not only for the tribe, but also for the students. They were able to learnfirsthand how project design and selection is far more
Engineering Technology, for their administrative support.References1. A. P. Boyle, D. N. Bryon, & C. R. C. Paul, Computer-based learning and assessment: A palaeontological case study with outcomes and implications, Computers and Geosciences, 23 (5), 573-580 (1997).2. T. K. Grose, Can distance education be unlocked, PRISM, April, 19-23 (2003).3. L. S. Chumbley, C. P. Hargrave, K. Constant, B. Hand, T. Andre, and E. A. Thompson, Project ExCEL: Web-based scanning electron microscopy for K -12 education, Journal of Engineering Education, April, 203-210 (2002).4. A. K. Kamrani and S. M. Salhieh, Product design for modularity, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, ISBN 0-7923-8554-3 (2000).5. R. Safaric, D. W
visas arefilled up by the qualified engineers and technologists from Indian subcontinent countries. For thelast several years the US Government had no choice but to keep on increasing working visas forimporting engineers and technologists from overseas to deal with the severe shortage. In 1995,65000 visas were granted while that amount has been increased to 215000 by the year 1999.Even though that number has come back to 65000 again, clearly we are relaying on foreign-bornengineers4.If passed, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, S’2611, would allow high skill foreignborn computer and engineering workers to admit into the United States in the next one, two, five,and ten years. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects an increase of 125% in
is apparent that instructional goals for students to be lifelong learnersequipped with science literacy, information fluency and communication skill are met bystudents learning experiences.The cross-curricular endeavors have amplified teaching effectiveness of each unit andhave strengthened the collegial communication. The collaborators have learned fromeach other’s reflections to make the assignment a meaningful learning experience notonly for students but also for themselves. With respect and understanding for eachother’s role in student learning, the collaborators demonstrate their ability to engage inlifelong learning and foster students to be lifelong learners.1 Elmborg J.; Hook S. Ed. Centers for Learning: Writing Centers and Libraries
group must research and collect relevant information regarding their mass transfer unit process. The choice of dimensions, materials and mode of construction and operation is entirely up to each group however, smaller apparatus is preferred as it is easier to modify and operate. In addition, each group must choose an appropriate compound(s) that would be involved in mass transfer and used for testing the mass transfer unit. The selected compounds must have low toxicity and must be readily available. In addition, it should be possible to adequately monitor the specific contaminant in the School of Engineering laboratories or other laboratories on the Campus.”The first attempt at inclusion of these laboratories
content. The workshop also allows engineering and education faculty to collaborativelywork on training the teachers. This is a more realistic way of teacher preparation than havingengineering educators offer such workshops alone. Page 12.1388.10References:[1] Connant, J.B. (1959) The American High School, McGraw-Hill, New York.[2] http://www.nsf.gov[3] http://www.engineeringk12.org/Engineering in the K-12 Classroom.pdf[4] Jahan, K., Marchese, A. J., Hesketh, R. P., Slater, C. S, Schmalzel, J. L., Chandrupatla, T. R. and Dusseau, R. A. (1997), “The Rowan Engineering Program : Preparing Students for the Future Job Market”, Proceedings of the
AC 2007-1066: COMMUNITY SERVICE PROJECTS AS INTEGRATEDUNDERGRADUATE LEARNING EXPERIENCESThomas Nicholas, University of North Carolina-Charlotte Thomas Nicholas II is currently a Faculty Associate in Civil Engineering Technology at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He has received a B. S. in Civil Engineering Technology degree from Fairmont State and a B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from West Virginia University. Mr. Nicholas’ scholarly activities have included funded projects in transportation and structural engineering for West Virginia Department of Transportation. Mr. Nicholas was employed as a Structural Engineer and Project Manager for the West Virginia Department of
America, September 1991. 94-104.2. Kahn, J.M., Katz, R.H., Pister, K.S.J. (1999). Next century Challenges: Mobile Networking for “Smart Dust” Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom)3. Pister K. S. J., Kahn J. M., and Boser B. E. (1999). Smart dust: Wireless networks of millimeter-scale sensor nodes. In 1999 UCB Electronics Research Laboratory Research Summary4. IEEE 802 Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks, IEEE Computer Society, 2003.5. ZigBee Specification v1.0, ZigBee Alliance, December 14th, 2004.6. Tanenbaum, A. S., Gamage, C., & Crispo, B. (2006
-oriented methodology in constructing engineering and businessapplications has grown exponentially since the early 90’s. In the object-orientedmethodology, the software design focuses on objects instead of functions and functionaldecompositions. An object is introduced as a discrete entity, containing its data andfunctions. The main aspects of the object-oriented methodology includes encapsulation,inheritance and polymorphism [3]. Encapsulation refers to wrapping object attributes andbehaviors in an enclosed entity, inheritance deals with object reuse, and polymorphismconcerns with object having access to a behavior where the knowledge to the access isknown at runtime.Objects encapsulate the related attributes (data or member data) and behaviors
content. The workshop also allows engineering and education faculty to collaborativelywork on training the teachers. This is a more realistic way of teacher preparation than havingengineering educators offer such workshops alone. Page 12.620.10References:[1] Connant, J.B. (1959) The American High School, McGraw-Hill, New York.[2] http://www.nsf.gov[3] http://www.engineeringk12.org/Engineering in the K-12 Classroom.pdf[4] Jahan, K., Marchese, A. J., Hesketh, R. P., Slater, C. S, Schmalzel, J. L., Chandrupatla, T. R. and Dusseau, R. A. (1997), “The Rowan Engineering Program : Preparing Students for the Future Job Market”, Proceedings of the
persistence, goal setting, andresilience. The persistence factors highlighted in this study include students’ motivation andcommitment to their educational goals4.MotivationStudents are motivated to enter and complete engineering programs by a myriad of sources.Parents, teachers, mentors, and even other students provide the kind of guidance and supportneeded to complete an engineering degree program5. Some students require a great deal ofsupport from teachers and mentors, while others persist on limited support or under their ownvolition. In this study, students that are motivated out of “a true sense of choice, a sense offeeling free in doing what [s/he] has chosen to do” are considered dogged6.An important aspect of motivation is found in the
., Leigh-Mack, P., Davy, B., and Wheatland, J., (2004), “Research experience program for undergraduates in a Historically Black College and University.” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Mervis, J. (1998), “Wanted: A better Way to boost number of minority Ph.D.s”, Science, 281, 1268-1270.4. NSF LSAMP Program: http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/hrd/amp.asp5. Jiang, X., Sarin, S., and Williams, M. (2005), “Assessment of NC-LSAMP project: A longitudinal Study”, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR.6. Williams, M., Watson, J., Jiang, X., and Sarin, S., “Preliminary Results of the NC-LSAMP project
this test were surprisingly accurate, considering the simplicity of the setup.Deflection values agreed with the calculated values to within 1 or 2 mm. It should be noted thatthe students did not find this exercise to be completely straight-forward. Because of the nodenumbering scheme, several made mistakes in assembling the system stiffness matrix or applyingthe boundary conditions. However, these errors provided an opportunity for teaching theimportance of checking the reasonableness of the solution. One common error involved placingthe terms of spring 4’s stiffness matrix in the wrong locations in the system matrix (as if spring 4connected nodes 3 and 4 rather than nodes 4 and 5). In this case, the calculated displacement fornode 5 was zero
, L. Baker-Ward, E. Dietz, and P. Mohr, (1993) "A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention I. Success and Failure in the Introductory Course," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 15-21, 1993.House, J., (2000). “Academic Background and Self-Beliefs as Predictors of Student Grade Performance in Science, Engineering and Mathematics," International Journal of Instructional Media, vol. 27, pp. 207-220, 2000.Immekus, J., S. Maller, P.K. Imbrie, N. Wu, P. McDermott, (2005). Work In Progress: An Analysis of Students’ Academic Success and Persistence Using Pre-College Factors” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 2005.Jagacinski, C. and LeBold, W., (1981). “A Comparison of Men and Women
two faculty conducted the study.NASA took the lead in identifying desired capabilities and performance attributes thatwould significantly enhance range capability. The study was funded by MIST and NASAEight Doppler radars with different capabilities and characteristics from three companieswere considered in this study8. Doppler radar capabilities considered were: CW Dopplerradars (The continuous wave (CW) Doppler radar has typical low operation andmaintenance cost), available at X-, C-, and S-bands, Velocity only, Full angle trackingand Direct ranging. The Doppler radars can interface to range data networks throughmost range data formats and have Doppler radar hardware/software upgrades with PCbased and PowerPC architectures. In addition, the
writing the curriculum, 4) professional development for thestaff, and 5) outside support provided for identifying engineering concepts to include in thecurriculum. Page 12.937.7We believe the integration of elementary engineering elements with the language arts curriculummutually reinforce each other and increase student motivation resulting in higher studentachievement.BibliographyBear, D.R., M. Invernizzi, S. Templeton & F. Johnston. Words Their Way. Linda Ashe Montgomery(ed). New Jersey:Jeffery W. Johnston (2004).Burghart, D.M. & M. Hacker. New York State Curriculum for Advanced Technological Education (2003).Ellery, V. Creating
with appropriate projects and deliverables. We lookforward to reporting on the results of our revised service-learning seminar.BibliographyDuffy, J., Tsang, E., Lord, S., Service-Learning in Engineering: What, Why, and How?Proceedings of the 2000 Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education.Meadows, L., Jarema, S., An Evaluation of the Impact of a Service-learning Project in a RequiredFirst-Year Engineering Course. Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Conference of American Societyfor Engineering Education.Oakes, W., Duffy, J., Jacobius, W., Linos, P., Lord, S., Schultz, W., Smith, A. Service-Learningin Engineering. Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2002.Thompson, M., Oakes, W., Using Service-Learning
mission of OIS advances two objectives of the Strategic Plan: to “[e]nrich student academicexperiences by means of…International and multicultural perspectives” and to “[s]erve as anintellectual and cultural resource for the extended local community [by promoting] to thecommunity academic, cultural, intellectual, and professional programs and service”.The guiding philosophy of the OIS always has been one of immersion. It is not enough forstudents merely to be in a foreign country, participating in what John Dewey derisively called the“spectator theory of knowledge.” They must be engaged with the “Other,” actively andexperientially learning about the culture in which they are studying. The mission of theUniversity, therefore, is an important
. Partial results are presented in the paper and more results will beavailable during presentation in the conference . Page 12.661.6 Figure 1 Observing sites used for wind speed data Page 12.661.7Figure 2. Percentage of time the required wind speed (at least 5 km/hr) availableWind turbines are designed to produce electrical energy as economically as possible.Wind turbines are generally designed to yield maximum output at wind speeds around 15m/s. (i.e. 30 knots or 33 mph). As discussed above, the wind speed has to exceed some cutin wind speed to produce
. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 2000.6. Shulman, L. S. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14,1986.7. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review,57, 1-22.8. Barkel B and Woolf P., Process Control: A Relevant Approach. Proc ASEE, Chicago, IL, 2006.9. Hamilton S, Brunell L, Tamm G and Arnas O. Peer Review in Engineering Courses as a Learning Tool ProcASEE, Chicago, IL, 2006. Page 12.1485.11
style than a single self rating. Social style researchers have found self-assessments of style todiffer from peer assessments half of the time. [7] Social styles assessments were developed inindustry settings during the 1960’s, and the current peer-assessed format has demonstratedacceptable internal consistency, reliability and evidence of construct validity. [13]Social Style Training in a First-Year Engineering Projects CourseFor the present study, social style training was conducted in the University of Colorado at Page 12.708.4Boulder’s First-Year Engineering Projects (FYEP) course, a large, multi-section, team-based,engineering design
semiconductor manufacturers.CAN is the basis of several sensor buses such as Devicenet, CANopen, J1939, and SmartDistributed System.CAN uses a twisted pair cable to communicate up to 40m at speeds 1Mbit/s without repeaters,and up to 1 km at 20 kbps speed. It can support up to 40 devices. CAN uses CSMA busarbitration. The CAN protocol, which corresponds to the data link and physical layers in theISO/OSI reference model [1], meets the real-time requirements of automotive applications.CAN data packets are 8 bytes long and use 11-bit packet identifier. A second version of CANcan support 29 bit identifier.Each CAN data frame consists of seven different bit fields shown in Figure 1. A data framebegins with the start-of-frame (SOF) bit. It is followed by an
With Emotional Intelligence, Daniel Goleman, Bantam Books, 2000, ISBN:0-553- 37858-9 Page 12.889.10 10. The Goal, Eliyahu M. Goldratt & Jeff Cox, The North River Press 11. Critical Chain, Eliyahu M. Goldratt, The North River Press, 1997, ISBN: 0-88427-153-6 12. Lean Thinking, James P. Womack and Daniel T. Jones, The Free Press, 2003, ISBN: 0-7432- 4927-5 13. Strategy Maps, Robert S. Kaplan, David P. Norton, HBS Press, 2004, ISBN: 1-59139-134-2 14. Sanghi, S & Jones, M. (2006). Driving Excellence: How the Aggregate System Turned Microchip Technology from a Failing Company to a Market Leader, page
, as Bruner arguesthere is a serious lack of emphasis on the process between the stimulus (S) and the Page 12.203.11behaviour (B) in the behaviourist paradigm 17.On examination of the research data, it is evident that the experimental group engaged ina more effective learning experience and demonstrated significantly higher performanceson the acquisition of knowledge, transformation, and manipulation of information, andapplication and demonstration of understanding.References 1. Pink, Daniel. (2005) A whole new mind: How to thrive in the new conceptual age, New York, River head Books. 2. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality
Kerns, Bradley University Dan Kerns hold BS and MS degrees in Speech Communication from Indisna State University and a PhD in Radio and Television Communication from Norther Illinois University. He has been a speech coach for the IMET Department's capstone design course for the past 17 yers. Page 12.888.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Industry Based Capstone Design Projects: You Can’t Sell the Solution If You Can’t CommunicateAbstractIndustry-based capstone design projects have been used by Industrial Engineering departmentssince the 1960’s. The format for the project
distribution in non-prismatic beams and comparison of their Strength to Weight Ratio with the prismatic beams,2. To create an opportunity for collaborative research and design efforts between undergraduate Page 12.385.2 engineering student(s) and faculty, Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2007, American Society for Engineering Education3. To design and produce a cost-effective, reproducible apparatus with outstanding features.4. To incorporate (optional) use of ANSYS for comparison of the measured and calculated results,5. To make all
numerous prerequisite courses identifyareas of weakness and develop ways to eliminate them as they strive to prepare their students toachieve excellence in all 17 Program Outcomes. In essence, using embedded indicators as adirect assessment of student learning can feed into the assessment of an entire engineeringprogram, as discussed in “A Technique for Program-Wide Direct Assessment of StudentPerformance”.7Bibliography1. Meyer, K., Morris, M., Estes, A., Ressler, S., “How to Kill Two Birds with One Stone-Assigning Grades and Assessing Program Goals at the Same Time,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, American Society for Engineering Education, June 2005.2. Keith, B., LeBoeuf, J., Meese, M
do? Page 12.284.9APPENDIX C : A sample of how grading was administered. STUDENT # X THE CRITICAL THINKING RUBRIC RUBRIC COURTESY OF W. S. U. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY PULLMAN, WA. 99164. LIKERT SCALE WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION : 5 4 3 2 1 UNDECIDED STR. AGREE AGREE DISAGREE
AC 2007-63: ACCELERATED DUAL GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMSRonald Kane, New Jersey Institute of Technology Ronald S. Kane is Dean of Graduate Studies and Assistant Vice President for Academic Affairs at New Jersey Institute of Technology. Before that he had been Dean of Graduate Studies, Research, and Continuing Professional Education and Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology and before that served as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair at Manhattan College. He has industrial experience in the energy and aerospace industries and worked for a number of years on nuclear safety and alternative energy systems, with focus on modeling and evaluation of thermal/fluid