year, the averageenrollment in EDD over the past four years has been about 300 students. In addition to a largecommon lecture section, the students have labs and writing/speaking activities in smaller groupsof about 30 students. The “Exploring Engineering” course includes technical lectures,presentations from departmental representatives , and many hands-on activities.The objective of this paper is to summarize the results of surveys conducted over each of the pastfour years of the engineering majors. The s urveys were intended to gauge student opinions as towhy they selected their declared major. Surveys were administered in April of each year, in the
and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman & Co.Hatano, G., & Oura, Y. (2003). Commentary: Reconceptualizing School Learning Using Insight from Expertise Research. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 26–29.Inagaki, K., & Miyake, N. (2007). Perspectives on the Research History of Giyoo Hatano. Human Development, 50(1), 7–15.Martin, T., Rivale, S., & Diller, K. (2007). Comparison of student learning in challenge-based and traditional instruction in biomedical engineering. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 35(48), 1312–1323.Mosborg, S., Adams, R., Kim, R., Atman, C. J., Turns, J., & Cardella, M. (2005). Conceptions of the Engineering
between the two paper styles. quite daunting and took a ton of effort outside of class. However, it was definitely a worthwhile experience - something I would for sure do again.”Literature cited1. Linda Dynan, T. C. The Impact of Writing Assignments on Student Learning: Should Writing Assignments Be Structured or Unstructured? Computers in Higher Education Economics Review 8, 64–86 (2009).2. Guilford, W. H. Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Adv.Physiol Educ. 25, 167–175 (2001).3. Guilford, W. H. Experimental case studies to engage higher cognitive skills. Advan. Physiol. Edu. 33, 358–359 (2009).4. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. & Krathwohl, D. R. A taxonomy of educational
recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Svihla, V. Collaboration as a dimension of design innovation. CoDesign 6, 245-262 (2010).2. Lau, K., Beckman, S.L. & Agogino, A.M. Diversity in Design Teams: An Investigation of Learning Styles and their Impact on Team Performance and Innovation. International Journal of Engineering Education 28, 293-301 (2012).3. Wang, E.L. & Kleppe, J.A. How to assess the effectiveness of engineering programs in invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. in 2000 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Engineering Education Beyond the Millenium, June 18, 2000 - June 21, 2000 3113
, no statistically significantdifferences are found. However, the low overall utilization of the resource may be masking thepotentially significant difference between the two treatments seen in the high-access group.This investigation into homework solution format, as well as best-practices with regards toencouraging student use of the resource, will continue. Specifically, investigations are planned tostudy if providing students with a worked-out-homework solution (from a similar but notassigned problem) before the assignment is due is a more effective intervention than providingsolutions after the due date.Bibliographic Information[1] Steif, P. S., and Dantzler, J. A. (2005). “A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric
Page 23.837.9#0836041 and #1226325References1. Hattie, J, and Timperly, H., (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Res., 77 (1), 81–112.2. Schute, V. J., (2008) Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189.3. Streveler, R. A., Litzinger, T. A., Miller, R. L., & Steif, P. S. (2008). Learning conceptual knowledge in the engineering sciences: Overview and future research directions. J. of Engineering Education, 97(3), 279–294.4. Vygotsky, L. (1962) Thought and Language, T. E. Hanfmann & G. Vaka (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.5. Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D. & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. National Academy Press
Page 23.843.4understanding the appropriate conditions under which a fatigue model may be applied. Table 1. Results from tensile test of fatigue specimen material Published [8] Experimental Difference (%) E (ksi) 29,000 28,670 1.2% Su (psi) 70,300 92,000 24% Sy(psi) 60,200 77,000 18% %RA 40% 40% 0 1.E+05 Alternating Stress, S (psi) Experimental
://www.lego.com/3. Hoffmann, M., and Pfeifer, R., “The implications of embodiment for behavior and cognition: animal and robotic case studies”, The Implications of Embodiment: Cognition and Communication, in W. Tschacher & C. Bergomi, ed., Imprint Academic (2011).4. Mason, M. T., Rodriguez, A., Srinivasa, S. S., Vazquez, A. S., “Autonomous manipulation with a general- purpose simple hand”, The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 688-703. (2012).5. Brown, E., Rodenberg, N., Amend, J., Mozeika, A., Steltz, E., Zakin, M. R., Lipson, H. & Jaeger, H. M., "Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107, 18809– 14. (2010
trade-offs in the production of an artifact that bestsatisfies customer and other stakeholder preferences12”. Sustainable design only requires thatsustainability principles be incorporated into this complex decision-making process to promoteconsideration of and balance between the three sustainability pillars. Describing this innovativeapproach to design, Skerlos et.al.12 states that sustainable design “brings focus” to the design Page 23.408.2process, while McLennan13 says that sustainable design “expand[s] the definition of good designto include a wider set of issues”. Overall, designing for sustainability is not an alternative totraditional
Engineering from Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria. Her research interests in- clude alternative energy systems, sustainable infrastructure, and transportation systems management.Dr. Suzanna Long, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Suzanna Long is an assistant professor of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Missouri S&T and holds a Ph.D. and M.S. in Engineering Management, B.S. in Physics and in History (University of Missouri-Rolla) and an M.A. in History (University of Missouri-St. Louis). Her research focuses on sustainable infrastructure systems, including sustainability in global supply chains and trans- portation systems. She is a recognized expert in sociotechnical systems.Dr. Ean
that prepare graduates to attain theprogram educational objectives.” The criteria are typically met across a number of junior andsenior level courses. We use S/U/- (satisfactory/unsatisfactory/Not Available) notation toidentify whether a student met one or more of these criteria in a given course. An S roughlymaps to grades of C or better, but is not always a given. Thus, each faculty member shouldmanually record these letter grades for each of his/her course students in a given semester. Ourengineering curriculum typically offers 12 courses at junior and senior levels every semester, andhas typical enrollments of 18 per course. A typical student spends 6 or more semesters in ourprogram to satisfy the graduation requirements. We graduate 20 to
-a.s.go, ASET(AccFditation Bo.rd for Enginoo.tng.nd Tgchnology),thg primary accroditationorganizatlonfor poat secondaryengineeringand tochnobgtac5demtc uniE in tho UnitedStat s, ruvlaedit3 r€quiEmentsfor undergraduatop.ogram6lead-iigto a bacheto/s of sciencedegrceln engim€ring. The n€w standaratt,known as EC200O, ,equire liat studenb receivingthe B.S,dogreenundorstand the tmpactof engii€eringsolutionl in a gtobal,economrc, envinonmental! andtocietalcontoxl.,, ThefollowingquertionnaiEIs dtvidodinto fivesho secuons: A. You. collegoor univeEity's a$pon3e to tfte ABETstandarde B. Youaacademicuoit,sexpedence with onlinecouEes C. Your aGademlcunifs interult in ofiering edd[ionrl onlin6 course3to mo€tthe ABET
Engineering.Jyothsna Kavuturu, Jyothsna K. S., Department of English, St.Joseph’s College, Bangalore, secured a gold medal for the high- est aggregate marks in the Post Graduate English Literature Course at St.Joseph’s College (autonomous). K. S. has been working for the Department of English, St.Joseph’s College for almost two years now, teaching both undergraduate and Postgraduate courses in English. K. S. has published papers in intramu- ral and extramural publications, and presented papers at several conventions, conferences, and seminars. Page 23.199.1 c American Society for Engineering
i) solder (130 um, 1.01 mm).Images were acquired with a Zeiss EVO-50 scanning electron microscope. Page 23.258.10References: 1. Pelesko, J., Self Assembly: The Science of Things That Put Themselves Together, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2007. 2. Eaton, P. and West, P., Atomic Force Microscopy, Oxford University Press, 2010. 3. Whitesides, G. and Grzybowski, B. “Self-Assembly at All Scales”, Science, 2002, 295, 2418- 2421. 4. Palmer, L. and Stupp, S. “Molecular Self-Assembly into One-Dimensional Nanostructures”, Accounts of Chemical Research, 2008, 41, 1674-1684. 5. Park, S.; Lim, J. H.; Chung, S. W.; Mirkin
build out the network and to betterunderstand the social stratification caused by the introduction of the technology.References[1] United Nations Millennium Development Goals. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/.[2] A. R. Mickelson, Q. Lv, L. Shang, and S. R. Sterling. “A 2009 NapoNet video”. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7t71DDNOnY.[3] GTR|Grupo de Telecomunicaciones Rurales: Rural Telecommunications Group. http://gtr.telecom.pucp.edu.pe/.[4] Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru: The Catholic University of Peru. http://www.pucp.edu.pe/content/index.php.[5] Publicaciones|GTR: Publications. http://gtr.telecom.pucp.edu.pe/publicaciones.[6] R. Patra, S. Nedevschi, S. Surana, A. Sheth, L. Subramanian, E. Brewer. WiLDNet: Design and
indicate.6. References[Dav] Davidson, C., Hendrickson, C., Matthews, S., Bridges, M., Allen, D., Murphy, C.,Allenby, B., Chen, Y., Williams, E., Crittenden, J. and Austin, S., "The Center for SustainableEngineering: Workshops and the Electronic Library", Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, paper AC2009-524.[Del] Delfino, J., "Industrial Ecology and Sustainability: Deciphering Corporate EnvironmentalPolicies", Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, paper AC2009-2438.[Des] Desai, A. and Thomassian, J-C., "Curriculum Development on a "Sustainability" MajorUsing Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Techniques", Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, paper AC2009-2103.[Gau
THE GAUNTLET ScoringClimb Ramp • There are 4 “lines” – each line you pass in a positive vertical direction is 5 points. If you pass one line more than once, no additional points are givenIdentify Ball • If your robot can identify one blue ball to pass through 10 points. If your robot can identify 2 consecutive blue balls to pass through 20 points.Navigate Maze • If your robot successfully navigates the maze – 20 pointsStop at Edge • The style in which you robot stops at the edge is between 0-20 points. • If your robot falls over the edge – s=0; if your robot stops “short” or has an appendage over the edge – s=0.5; if your robot stops
experience (Doctoral dissertation, Drexel University).3. Minocha, S., & Sharp, H. (2004). Learner-Centered and Evaluation of Web-Based E-Learning Environments. The 7th HCI Educators Workshop: Effective Teaching and Training in HCI. Preston, United Kingdom.4. Ssemugabi, S., de Villiers, M.R. (2010). Effectiveness of heuristic evaluation in usability evaluation of e- learning applications in higher education. South African Computer Journal, 45, 26-39.5. Cook, D.A., & Dupras, D.M. (2004). A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning. JGIM, 19, 698-707.6. Hoyle, S., Bruton, K., Peres, S.C., & Gutierrez, T. (2012). Usability of an Interactive Educational Website for Statistics. Proceddings of the Human Factors and
particularly those deemed at-risk.Research QuestionsThis study consisted of two overarching research questions related to learner preferences in apost-secondary classroom. The primary research question was: What are the learningpreferences for college students taking a fundamental engineering design graphics courses? As afollow-up question to the primary question the investigators explored: Do students taking acollege engineering design course and categorized as “at-risk” have different learningpreferences than students categorized as “not at-risk?” The primary research question wasinvestigated and analyzed through frequency-based ordinal data pertaining to student learnerpreference(s). The second research question was evaluated through data analyzed
computerprogram. During the camp, students were asked to use either one or two objects (sprits) andinclude at least three stages for a short story. In general, students were able to use the buildingblocks for creating a game. Some students showed strong interests in control structures. Thepicture (Fig 6) showed a student demonstrating his game, which contains six balloons moving atrandomized path at a very fast speed. The player will score if (s)he can click on a balloon.After the first year, the camp enrollment was restricted to the middle school students only, with Page 23.993.9the understanding that they are the most receptive group of students who
, leadership, exit strategies. High Fidelity S. Frears, 2000 Life-work balance, creativity, leadership, exit strategies.Below are brief summaries of selected movies from Table 2, which may help to provide somedetails on the storyline and related entrepreneurial issues.Baby Boom: J.C. Wiatt (Diane Keaton) is a successful New York City businesswoman, and aworkaholic. Her life is thrown into a tailspin when she learns that she has inherited an infantfrom a distant relative who has passed away. Unable to keep up her demanding career with a Page 23.1029.5child at home, she moves
engineering colleges. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 64(2), 23-28.4. Strong, S., & Smith, R. (2001). Spatial visualization: Fundamentals and trends in engineering graphics. Journal of Industrial Technology, 18(1), 1-6.5. Adanez, G. P, & Velasco, A. D. (2002). Predicting academic success of engineering students in technical drawing from visualization test scores. Journal for Geometry and Graphics, 6(1), 99-109.6. Leopold, C., Gorska, R. A., & Sorby, S. A. (2001). International experiences in developing the spatial visualization abilities of engineering students. Journal for Geometry and Graphics, 5(1), 81-91.7. Guay, R. (1977). Purdue Spatial Visualization Test – Visualization of Rotations. W. Lafayette
;5000 <10,000 >30,000 <10,000 <5000 <5000 >30,000 <5000Instruction A&S Prof+ Prof+ Prof+ Balanced Prof Balanced Balanced Assoc-Program A&S A&S A&S iatesGraduate Single Single Doc/ Comp Single Postbac Prof./ Comp N/APrograms Doc Doc Prof Doc Doc Prof Doc DocUndergrad Full time Full Full time Full time Full time Full time Full time Full time
for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition. AC 2007-8. Honolulu, Hawaii.[4] Gleixner S., Ryaby P., Klaw E. “Service Learning in a Multi-Disciplinary Renewable EnergyEngineering Course,” Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition. AC 2011-2277. Vancouver, B.C., Canada. [5] Yildiz, F. “Design and Development of a Multiple Concept Educational Renewable EnergyMobile Mini-Lab for Experimental Studies,” International Journal of Engineering Research andInnovations (IJERI). Vol. 4:2, 2012.[6] Pecen, R., Humston, J., Yildiz, F. “Promoting STEM to Young Students by RenewableEnergy Applications,” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research (JSTEM). Vol:13:3, May-June 2012
outset of the summer, students’ were asked on the pre-experience survey to indicate thereason(s) they had chosen to apply to this summer research program. Students’ responses, indescending frequency, were as follows: 91%: it will enhance my resume 88%: to gain practical experience for a future career 79%: it was a paid position 75%: to develop a mentoring relationship with a faculty member 72%: it sounded interesting 71%: to help prepare me for graduate school 37%: a faculty/staff member approached me about the opportunityPractical, career-oriented goals topped students’ lists of reasons for participating in the summer
of listening to community members, and for instructionalpurposes offers numerous case studies and poses many reflection and discussion questions.Mihelcic et al.’s Field Guide to Environmental Engineering for Development Workers: Water,Sanitation, and Indoor Air similarly emphasizes community participation.9 Yet it is somewhatmore specifically scoped as an environmental engineering field guide, with extensive technicaldiscussion of appropriate technologies for water supply and treatment, latrine building,sanitation, etc. The design firm IDEO, on the other hand, has developed a Human CenteredDesign Toolkit, which is organized around processes, methods, and tools that can be used toidentify problems and design solutions for communities in need
of institutions each having common FYEPs. Having acommon FYEP means that, all engineering students take the same introductory engineeringcourse(s). Common FYEPs were chosen because they are not discipline specific which providescontinuity across institutions and because they tend to focus on common topics such asteamwork, communication, graphing, problem solving, etc.For this analysis, we draw on five semi-structured interviews, each from a different institution, toprovide a broad picture of GTAs’ views on teaching competence. While this is a small sample,we believe that the interviews chosen are a strong representation of the experiences of GTAs andtherefore our qualitative analysis yields rich, meaningful and impactful results. Before
Youth, United Nations Development Programs, http://undp.org.pk/undp-and-the-youth.html18. S. A. Raza & S. A. Naqvi, “Quality of Pakistani University Graduates As Perceived By Employers: Implications For Faculty Development, Journal of Quality and Technology Management, Volume VII, Issue I, June, 2011.19. Ian Waitz, “What’s next for engineering education? http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/eng-ed-waitz- macvicar.html , October 2011.20. Grand Challenges for Engineering, the National Academy of Engineering, Feb, 2008. www.grandchallengescholars.org21. Engineer of 2020, National Academy of Engineering, http://www.nae.edu/programs/education/activities10374/engineerof2020.aspx22. Luey Morell
. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.14. Resnick, M. (2006). Computer as paintbrush: technology, play, and the creative society. In Singer, D., Golikoff, R., and Hirsh-Pasek, K. (eds.), Play = Learning: How play motivates and enhances children's cognitive and social-emotional growth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.15. Edelson, D. C. & Reiser, B. J. (2006). Making authentic practices accessible to learners: Design challenges and strategies. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 335-354). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.16. Wellington, J. (1990). Formal and informal learning
to follow one pathway to a solution using previousknowledge. Prior to conducting their self-planned experiments, the experiment design isreviewed with instructors for immediate feedback and correction. The types of investigational Page 23.434.6questions explored at the sophomore-level promote the identification of dependent variable(s), anindependent variable, positive and negative controls, and sample size. Additionally, theinvestigational question laboratories are intentionally constructed such that the appropriate dataanalysis would be either a student t-test or a one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).Table 1 illustrates a three stage