Paper ID #19305Systematically Integrating Liberal Education in a Transdisciplinary DesignStudio EnvironmentDr. Marisa Exter, Purdue University Marisa Exter is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the College of Education at Purdue University. Dr. Exter’s research aims to provide recommendations to improve or enhance university-level design and technology programs (such as Instructional Design, Computer Science, and Engineering). Some of her previous research has focused on software designers’ formal and non-formal educational experiences and use of precedent materials, and experienced instructional
senior year, encountered mostly non-open-ended problems, with predominantly pre-defined, closed-form solution sets. Even more challenging for the industrial engineering population is thatthey tend to crave order, processes, lists, and procedures, either by self-selection into the major or throughinculcation. Once they arrive at capstone, they are commissioned to solve problems that don’t have anexplicit algorithm, list, or established process to solve them.Due to the real-world nature of senior capstone, in effect the students receive a blank sheet of paper,hearing “go figure out what the problem is –and solve it”. In addition to this, there are some sponsorswho may not respond very quickly, or change their minds, or receive the initial data and
., & Potvin, G. (2010, 2013). GSE/RES:Sustainability topics as a route to female recruitment in engineering (#1036617). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1036617Klotz, L., Potvin, G., Godwin, A., Cribbs, J., Hazari, Z., & Barclay, N. (2014). Sustainability as a Route to Broadening Participation in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20034Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401Krogstad, J. (2015, February 27). Hispanics more
Paper ID #20026The Whole as the Sum of More Than the Parts: Developing Qualitative As-sessment Tools to Track the Contribution of the Humanities and Social Sci-ences to an Engineering CurriculumDr. Caitlin Donahue Wylie, University of Virginia Caitlin Wylie is an assistant professor of Science, Technology and Society in the University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science.Dr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the
Paper ID #19152Work in Progress: A Delphi Study to Investigate the Value of Board Gamesto Teach Teamwork SkillsDr. Kevin Ray Hadley, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Hadley received his BS in Chemical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines and his PhD in Chemical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. At Vanderbilt, he also completed their teaching certificate program and was the first participant to publish the results of his project in a national peer-reviewed journal, Chemical Engineering Education. Afterwards, Dr. Hadley completed a postdoctoral study at NASA. IN 2012, he joined the faculty at South
– that becomes the hunt for möjligheterfor us as engineering educators.Works Cited1. Sfard, A. On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One. Educ. Res. 27, 4–13 (1998).2. Frezza, S. T. A knowledge basis for engineering design. Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE 2015–Febru, (2015).3. Eris, O. Effective Inquiry for Innovative Engineering Design. (Kluwer, 2004).4. Chi, M. T. H. in Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (eds. Ward, T. B. & Smith, S. M.) 209–234 (American Psychological Association, 1997).5. Robinson, K. Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative. (Wiley Capstone, 2011).6. Amabile, T. M. Creativity in Context: Update to the social
Paper ID #18091Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes and ABET Accreditation: A Pi-lot Study of Fourth-Year Engineering Students using Longitudinal ConceptMapsDr. Sean Ferguson, University of Virginia Sean Ferguson is a Lecturer in the Department of Engineering and Society at UVA since 2014. He specializes in sustainable technology and policy making from a background in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, working on energy and environmental policy in New York State, and a former life in cellular biology.Dr. Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant
Paper ID #18643Managing Interdisciplinary Senior Design with Nuclear ApplicationsDr. Tristan Utschig, Kennesaw State University Dr. Tristan T. Utschig is Associate Director for Learning Sciences in the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) and is Associate Professor of Nuclear Engineering at Kennesaw State University. Formerly, he was Assistant Director for CETL and the Office of Assessment at Georgia Tech, and prior that was a tenured Associate Professor of Engineering Physics at Lewis-Clark State College. Dr. Utschig consults with faculty across the university about bringing scholarly teaching and
Paper ID #18789Self Authorship and Reflective Practice in an Innovation MinorChris Gewirtz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Chris Gewirtz is PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests start with how culture, history and identity influence assumptions made by engineers in their practice, and how to change assumptions to form innovative and socially conscious engineers. He is particularly interested in humanitarian engineering, where American engineering assumptions tend to fall apart or reproduce injustice.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
Paper ID #18713Implementing a Single Holistic Rubric to Address Both Communication andTechnical Criteria in a First Year Design-Build-Test-Communicate ClassDr. Stephanie Sheffield, University of Michigan Dr. Sheffield is a Lecturer in Technical Communication in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan.Dr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She enjoys serving as a ”communication coach” to students throughout the curriculum, and she’s especially excited to work with first year and senior students, as well as
; Roy, R. (2007). An introduction to capturing and understanding the cognitive behaviour of design engineers. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(4), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820600963412Coltheart, M. (2001). Assumptions and methods in cognitive neuropsychology. The Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology: What Deficits Reveal about the Human Mind, 3–21.Cross, N. (2001). Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. In Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education (pp. 79–103). Elsevier.Crozier, S., Sirigu, A., Lehéricy, S., van de Moortele, P. F., Pillon, B., Grafman, J., … LeBihan, D. (1999). Distinct prefrontal activations in processing
Paper ID #19293Characterizing Students’ Micro-Iterations Strategies through Data-LoggedDesign ActionsDr. Corey T. Schimpf, The Concord Consoritum Corey Schimpf is a Learning Analytics Scientist at the non-for-profit Concord Consortium, which de- velops technology and curriculum for STEM learning in K-12. One avenue of his work focuses on the development and analysis of learning analytics that model students’ cognitive states or strategies from fine-grained computer-logged data from students participating in open-ended technology-centered science and engineering projects. In another avenue of his work he develops assistive
, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R., (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington D.C.17. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.18. Bailey, R. (2007). Effects of Industrial Experience and Coursework During Sophomore and Junior Years on Student Learning of Engineering Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 662-667.19. Blair, B., Millea, M. M., & Hammer, J. (Oct 2004). The Impact of Cooperative Education on Academic Performance and Compensation of Engineering Majors. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(4), 333-338.20. Nilson, L. (2010). Teaching at
Industrial Revolution, Crown Business Publisher.21. Higher Education Makerspace Initiative, accessed at https://hemi.mit.edu/ on January 11, 201722. Makershare, as accessed at https://makershare.mit.edu/ on January 11, 201723. Dougherty, D. (2016), Free to Make: How the Maker Movement is Changing Our Schools, Our Jobs, and Our Minds, North Atlantic Books.24. Forest, C., Hashemi Farzaneh, H., Weinmann, J., and Lindemann, U. (2016, June), Quantitative Survey and Analysis of Five Maker Spaces at Large, Research-Oriented Universities, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.25. Wilczynski, V. (2015, June), Academic Makerspaces and Engineering Design, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington.26
California, Berkeley, and at the University of Minnesota. He currently is the Administrative Director for the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Minnesota, where he has taken a keen interest in the role of student groups in engineering education and implemented and manages the Exceed Lab, an interdisciplinary makerspace for students to design and build engineering projects. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Creating Meaningful Experiences Through Extracurricular Project-Based Experiential LearningAbstractEducators, employers, and students all understand the value of both taking part in extracurricularactivities and the
Paper ID #19289Work in Progress: Assessing Motivation in Capstone Design CoursesDr. Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University Dr. Peter Rogers is a Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education The Ohio State University. He joined the university in October 2008 bringing with him 35 years of industrial experience. His career includes senior leadership roles in engineering, sales, and manufacturing developing products using multidisciplinary teams to convert customer needs to commercially viable products and services. Rogers co-led the development of an ABET-approved year-long Capstone design experience
Paper ID #18507Examining the Effect of a Paradigm-Relatedness Problem-Framing Tool onIdea GenerationAmy E. Rechkemmer, University of Michigan Amy Rechkemmer is a junior student of Computer Science Engineering at the University of Michigan.Maya Z. Makhlouf, University of Michigan Maya Makhlouf is a sophomore student of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan.Jennifer M. Wenger, University of Michigan Jennifer Wenger is a senior student of Industrial and Operations Engineering at the University of Michi- gan.Eli M. Silk, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Eli Silk is an Assistant Professor of
11 | P a g e 12 Conclusion & Significance of Study One of the persistent instructional challenges teachers working with ELLs face is theirmeaningful integration into learning activities [31]. This study explored the extent to which acombination of activities developed with the learning and developmental needs of earlyelementary ELLs in mind. We integrated routines for academic conversations into hands-onliteracy and engineering-centered inquiry activities. The analysis revealed significant results withlow to moderate effect sizes. These results provide preliminary evidence of the impact of
, paving the way for the design of effective scaffolds and resources forhelping teachers overcome challenges that they might face, while facilitating students’productive engagement with engineering design and science concepts. This study focusesspecifically on the intersections of technological, pedagogical and content knowledge to facilitatea deeper understanding of how these interact in the context of the engineering design process.Based on Mishra and Koehler’s (2006) definition of these intersections and keeping the researchcontext in mind, in this paper, Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) is the knowledge ofpedagogy that is applicable to the teaching of specific content related to efficient energygeneration and use. It is operationalized as
Paper ID #19011Development of learning modules for sustainable life cycle product design: aconstructionist approachMd Tarique Hasan Khan, Wayne State University Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Wayne State UniversityMr. Kamyar Raoufi, Oregon State UniversityDr. Kijung Park, Iowa State Univerisity Kijung Park is a postdoctoral research associate in Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at Iowa State University. He earned Ph.D. in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Penn State. His research interests include network science applications to product family evolution, modeling
Paper ID #18156Method for a Low Cost Hydrokinetic Test Platform: An Open Source WaterFlumeRyan Curtis Darfler, California State University, Maritime University Ryan Darfler is currently a senior in Mechanical Engineering at California State University, Maritime Academy. His expected graduation date is August 2017. His research interests are in the testing and development of renewable energy platforms, with emphasis in the fluid dynamics aspects. In addition to his interest in fluid mechanics, he has experience as a fluid controls engineer.Dr. William W. Tsai, California State University, Maritime Academy Dr. William W. Tsai is
feasibility of their design ideas [73]. Others present interpreted vignettes ofclassroom activity and detail methods such as interaction analysis [74] or ethnography [75]. Forinstance, in such research conducted in an elementary school, we see how students are able toidentify and frame engineering problems in their own school that affect the students, and alsothat even young students can make predictions and plan testing of their prototypes when they aredesigning with contexts they understand in mind [76]. And in research conducted using a gamein which girls role-played as mechanical engineers, the girls developed engineering skills andknowledge, and these were particularly supported by having a client and reflecting on progress ina notebook [10
. Those criteria were updated and can be found in full in the article, “Best STEMBooks” (NSTA, 2017). Best STEM Books need to address one STEM field, and must invite“STEM-like thinking.” Much of this thinking overlaps with habits of mind and practices withinengineering design. The best STEM trade books invite STEM-like thinking by:• Modeling real-world innovation • Addressing connections between STEM• Embracing real-world design, invention disciplines and innovation • Exploring Engineering Habits of Mind• Connecting with authentic experiences o Systems thinking• Showing assimilation of new ideas o Creativity• Illustrating
advancedimaging/video functions. 3.3. User Interface The suit has integrated many fancy interfacing devices for the user to customize the controlof various functions. This also serves the experiential learning purpose for students to getexposed to different technologies. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2017 ASEE Conference 3.3.1. Mind Control A bio-sensing device Neurosky [8] headset from Mindware is selected for the function ofmind control of the suit. The headset is embedded in the helmet. It can sense the brainwaves tomeasure the levels of concentration, then wirelessly transfers the result to the central controllerthrough BlueSmirf [9] the
relationship and interplay among the three members of the sub-team, and with this goal in mind, I decided to conduct a focus group rather than individualinterviews (Procedural Validation, Process Reliability). This follow-up focus group serves as akey data source for one chapter of my dissertation. I would have the thick, rich descriptions ofthese three students’ cross-disciplinary development without this additional data source(Procedural Validation, Communicative Validation).ConclusionThroughout this audit trail, I have shared my real, raw process of conducting a qualitativedissertation study in engineering education. I have included challenges I faced, set backs I had toovercome, and decision points that emerged while I was entrenched
Paper ID #19791Experiences of Pre-College Teachers Working with Undergraduate Engineer-ing Students with ADHD in Research LaboratoriesMs. Catherine Clark Hain, Mansfield Public Schools Catherine Hain is a fourth-grade teacher at Anne E. Vinton Elementary School in Mansfield, Connecticut. She received her Bachelor of Arts in French, summa cum laude, from the University of Connecticut in 1993. She earned her teaching certificate from Eastern Connecticut State University. Ms. Hain worked for eight years at Natchaug Elementary School where she taught Kindergarten and Enrichment until taking a position in Mansfield in 2006
Paper ID #18707EEGRC Poster: Improving Pre-service Elementary Teachers’ Nature of En-gineering Views with the Use of EV3 RoboticsMr. Erdogan Kaya, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Erdogan Kaya is a PhD student in science education at University of Nevada, Las Vegas. He is work- ing as a graduate assistant and teaching science methods courses. Prior to beginning the PhD program, he received his MS degree in computer science and engineering. He coached robotics teams and was awarded several grants that promote Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). He has been volunteering in many education outreach programs
learn with the real world situation. One of the students mentioned “Before we startedthis class I was not exited for it. I even did not know what it is about. I thought GeotechnicalEngineering course is similar or another level of Geospatial Technology course. However, whenthe semester started we went to the construction site. From that visit the whole idea aboutGeotechnical Engineering changed. It was very interesting in my opinion. Also, meetingexperienced engineers changed all my thoughts about Civil Engineering. They are very preciseand careful in everything. I am being very honest and in my opinion, the site visit was very usefuland changed a lot in my mind”. The site visit really helped to connect theory with practice asanother student
thesolution. The active dimension of design is more relevant to modern engineering, as innovativeprojects mean nothing if they cannot be successfully implemented and sustained. The Engineerof 2020 [4] will however, need to have some traits of the adaptive expert.McKenna [16] characterizes the adaptive expert with engineering design in mind, and Figure 2below shows how she defines the dimensions of design thinking in relation to these experts, andthe characteristics of design processes used by experts of those dimensions. Figure 2: Adaptive expertise as a balance between two dimensions for learning and assessment: Efficiency and innovation. [16]Within this optimal adaptability corridor, or adaptive dimension, innovation and
Paper ID #17643How to Shape Attitudes toward STEM Careers: The Search for the most Im-pactful Extracurricular Clubs (RTP)Dr. Fethiye Ozis, Northern Arizona University Fethiye has been working in CECMEE at Northern Arizona University since 2014. She has received her Ph.D. in environmental engineering from University of Southern California in 2005. Her doctorate work focused on modeling of bio filters for air pollution control. After graduation, she has been involved in K-12 STEM institutions both as a teacher and administrator. Her research interests include biotechnology for environmental issues, engineering education