: Measured ABET Outcomes Outcome 1: An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering. Outcome 2: An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. Outcome 3: An ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs. Outcome 4: An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams. Outcome 5: An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. Outcome 6: An understanding of professional and ethical responsibilities. Outcome 7: An ability to communicate effectively. Outcome 8: The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. Outcome 9: Recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long
interest, personality, and work ethic ofstudents from the past semester’s first offering of the Renewable Energy course. TheExperimental Mechanics course allows for student self-selected teams of three; therefore the Page 25.153.4remaining two team members were left to the students to decide upon after a basic projectabstract was provided. Once the team formed, a meeting with the team and faculty advisor wasarranged to discuss project background, available equipment, and desired outcome. Referencesincluding a fuel cell technical background website8 as well as a current news link discussing fuelcells for future home electrical power generation9
goes unnoticed. Every ‘thing’,including machine parts, consumer products, architecture, any artifact that involves solid or fluid mechanics,has undergone some sort of design process. Good design encompass many aspects, from simple functionality(will it do the job) to structural integrity, manufacturability, cost, material selection, history, environmentalimpact, sustainability, aesthetics, ergonomics, ethics and safety. Design is central to engineering, and awarenessof the multiple, competing criteria that govern the final results of a design process is essential to engineeringcompetence. Based on results from an informal exit survey from FV, PD was initially designed to increaseawareness of, and appreciation for, all aspects of design. The
, 77, 81-112.2. Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119- 144.3. Carless, D., Slater, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2010). Developing sustainable feedback practices, Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395-407.4. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineering of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century, Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.5. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE Policies, Section 7 – Professional Activities (Part A – IEEE Policies), 7.8 Code of Ethics. Retrieved from http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html.6. McCarthy, A. M., & Garavan, T. N. (2001). 360* feedback
the low-mid range of the scale (levels 1-Knowledge, 2- Comprehension, and 3- Application) designated as an appropriate level for thebachelor’s degree for most outcomes. However, students graduating with a bachelor’s degreeare expected to achieve level 4 (Analysis) for mechanics, experiments, design, breadth in civilengineering areas, communication, and professional and ethical responsibility and level 5(Synthesis) for design.1The University of Memphis (UM) is a learner-centered metropolitan research universitycommitted to providing high quality educational experiences while pursuing new knowledgethrough research, artistic expression, and interdisciplinary and engaged scholarship. The UMDepartment of Civil Engineering currently has 10 full
confronted with the need for probabilistic reasoning in upper division lab courses where they need to make conclusions from measured data which are always probabilistic. Propositional reasoning. This is the classic application of Aristotelian logical statements and Venn diagrams. This type of reasoning rarely shows up in homework type problems, but often can be found in general conversations about personal choices and ethical issues. The lack of propositional reasoning shows up in students being unable to construct logical discussions or essays to reach a supportable conclusion. However, a lack of propositional reasoning skills can be easily found whenever students have to explain why they chose
efforts areconcentrated on providing support, career preparation and augmenting the professional skills,competencies and capacities of graduate women in STEM. This last area of emphasis reflects theABET engineering accreditation criteria which includes not just technical skills but sixprofessional skills essential to educating future engineers.xvi These skills includedcommunication, teamwork, ethics and professionalism, engineering in a societal/global context,life-long learning and knowledge of contemporary issues (awareness skills). Higher educationstudies have shown that the way that graduate students are socialized into their graduate programand supported does make a difference. This process of socialization is influenced by departmentclimate
______ MECH 3751 Stress 1 3 ______ MECH 3725 Heat Transfer 3 ______ MECH 3751L Stress Lab (WI) 1 ______ MECH 3762 Machine Design 3 ______ ECEN 2632 Circuit 1 3 ______ MECH 3762L Mach Des Lab (OI) 1 ______ PHIL 2625 Prof Ethics (GER, PS) 3 ______ ISEN 3710 Engr Statistics * 3 ______ 16 GER Elective ( AL)2, 3 3 ______ 174th Year
sustainability draws from others mentioned in the literature4-6 and illustrates the application of engineering techniques in solving real-world problems by Page 25.1161.2holistically approaching the situation from five vectors of success: energy, environment,education, economics and ethics. Each of these concepts individually addresses specific aspectsof sustainability, shaped by the confluence of the ideals of people, planet, and prosperity.Moreover, it is through the multi-leveled application of the vectors of success that the studentshave developed the means to
question and the minormodifications we made were approved by ACT and used with their permission (seeAppendix C). The pre-test consisted of eight multiple-choice questions related to a printeddiscussion about three ethical viewpoints regarding spending one‟s earnings by giving to charity.It required students to compare and contrast both actual and implied statements to determine thebest of four possible answers for each question. Since the writing instructor monitored the test-taking, students could ask questions about words and phrases they did not understand. Page 25.815.13Consequently, this scenario