II) would beheld in the Engineering Education Garage (EG), which is the aforementioned (15,000 ft2)makerspace, and would focus on fundamental engineering skills application and integration.Seven different fundamental engineering topics were mandated by the committee as follows: 1. Engineering Professionalism (ethics, culture, and risk) 2. Basic Computational and Programming skills 3. Communication (graphical, oral and written) 4. Problem Solving 5. Design Analysis 6. Teamwork 7. Project ManagementIt is also pertinent to note the committee additionally mandated that the Paul-Elder CriticalThinking Framework [1-6] be taught and utilized throughout the sequence, and that diversityissues would be discussed as part of the
associated, Bias/Variance Classification Tree based approaches, Neural Networks, Bayes Classifier, Classification modeling, Discriminative Classifications Ethics Privacy, Security, Data Leaks, Biases, Confidentiality, Societal consequences Error measure Evaluation of Models, Confusion Matrices, ROC Graph Association Rules Association Rule Mining, Patterns in frequent
topics in my lesson plans.” The teachers werealso asked to rate the availability of resources in their school. On the question of “Whenit comes to children online, it should be up to parents, not teachers, to teach cybersafety, cyber bullying and cyber security,” all teachers except 4 agreed with the item.Also, on the item “My school/school district does an adequate job of preparing studentsregarding cyber ethics, online safety, and computer security issues,” only two peopleagreed.The results indicate that the only solution to teachers being able to promotecybersecurity topics in their schools is to get support from their schools whichaccording to the results is not available. Teachers seemed to have a good understandingof the basic
to either a control or an experimental group in order to establish thecomparison.Both institutions have defined procedures for research when human subjects are involved. Thelarge private university in Colombia through its Center for Excellence in Teaching (CEDU) hasdeveloped a generic research protocol, approved by the university ethics committee, intended toguide researchers in the treatment and use of information coming from human subjects. At thesmall comprehensive university in the USA, a similar protocol exists and procedures for dealingwith human subjects and research involving them is clearly defined. At both institutions,students will be made aware about the research taking place and the treatment of the dataobtained from them
monitored daily on theplatform to make sure students did not post inappropriate content, materials that could be seen asdocuments for cheating, or engage in highly negative feedback to each other. Students who wereviolating the ethical rules were informed and any post was immediately removed. We observedlittle student activity on the site during the first half of the semester. During this lightly usedtime, the class took two major exams. After the second major exam the students wereencouraged to use the platform by giving them a very minor grade incentive in the form of extracredit. This incentive caused some students to begin using the software very significantly.During this incentive period, the class was given another two major exams. Data
-road management own (usually providing support if needed) Shared Vision with Establishing common goals and team management Employees clear direction for the company Teamwork Group responsibility, working team management together Lead by Example Treating employees how you team management want to be treated and showing the values and work ethic you hope to see in your employees; showing authenticity People-centered Understanding
-based education, engineering ethics, and process safety education.Prof. Hadi Bozorgmanesh, University of Connecticut Professor of Practice, School of Engineering A director with over 20 years of nonexecutive and executive board of director’s experience, with deep knowledge of enterprise and academic entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship. Board of governance experience includes audit & risk management committees, finance and M&A committees, and executive compensation committeesMs. Manisha Srivastava, SurePath Evaluations LLC Ms. Manisha Srivastava is the founder and president of SurePath Evaluations LLC. Her experience in- cludes implementing program assessments at the federal level and serving as the principal
advised them to design a fuel cell stack system that would meet desired power output,conduct experiments, analyze and interpret data, and solve engineering problems. Before thestudents started the course, the project advisor selected the project topic which was thecontinuation of the 2017 REU summer internship project.The course advisor instructed students once a week on topics including: how to write a projectproposal, share responsibilities, design realistic constraints and marketing requirement, maptimeline, identify professional and ethical responsibilities, present collected data, andcommunicate effectively. Once a week, the course advisor assessed students’ performance oncourse assignments and the project advisor evaluated students’ project
engineering practiceAccurate understanding of the 4.04 (0.96) 3.12 (1.06) 6.22 *** effects of engineering practice on the substantial development of environment and societyStrong work ethics and social 4.19 (0.87) 3.51 (1.04) 4.79 *** responsibilitiesAwareness and skills in 4.59 (0.75) 3.40 (1.15) 8.33 *** teamworkCapability of communication 4.55 (0.80) 3.31 (1.03) 9.16 *** and coordinationAbilities in management of 4.25 (0.81) 2.99 (1.01) 9.45 *** engineering projectsAwareness and abilities in 4.27 (0.88) 3.21 (1.15) 6.99 *** lifetime learningNote: *** denotes P < .001.As shown in this table, based on
aboutengineering skills generally and visualization in particular. 44 Students responded to the pre-survey and 24 to the post survey, 37 students completed the course.The course, ECS 101 Introduction to Engineering (Civil), is a required course for civil engineeringmajors. The learning outcomes for the course are that students: get exposure to civil engineering,career opportunities, and the engineering education process; develop an understanding of theengineering code of ethics, professional licensing, and an engineer’s responsibility to society; getexposure to several of civil engineering’s supporting technologies, including infrastructure, soilmechanics, transportation, structures, and materials; develop the skills to “learn” course materialthrough a
interacting with their textbook(s)? Select allthat apply.▢ Physical paper book ▢ e-book purchased from university bookstore / publisher ▢ Non-editable e-book accessed as an open educational resource (free) ▢ Editable e-book created by students, either in-whole or in-part ▢ Other ________________________________________________ Q2.3 What ABET (aside from technical competence) and/or university level outcomes areassessed within this course? Select all that apply.▢ Writing / communications ▢ Safety ▢ Ethics ▢ Regulatory understanding/compliance ▢ Knowledge of environmental / political / social impacts ▢ Evaluation of information sources ▢ Other
e-Graduation 190 4.55 2.29 Total 770 4.43 2.59 Operate in the unknown (i.e. P a-2 yrs before SE 120 4.72 2.83 a, >c, >d, >e c-Just before SE 156 4.96 2.84 a c-Just before SE 156 6.24 2.61 >a d-Just after SE 167 5.62 2.45 e-Graduation 190 5.58 2.26 Total 770 5.75 2.62 Maintain a strong work ethic P a-2 yrs before SE 120 4.89 2.90 a design project c-Just
leadershipexperience.Sample InfluencesAll participants in Focus Group 0 and one participant in Focus Group 2 were either currentlytaking or had previously taken a course on basic engineering management and ethics principlesfrom one of the interviewing researchers. These participants had a preexisting student-professorrelationship with the interviewer and a preexisting knowledge of leadership developmentprocesses, which were covered in the course.The researchers were cognizant of this influence on the participants’ responses in the LeadershipDevelopment and Engineering Leadership Development sections of the focus group protocol.Specific instances of this influence were identified in an effort to minimize the threat to thevalidity of the study. More importantly, the
importance of risk and resilience assessment of engineering systems, which arecritical infrastructures to ensure public health, safety, security, and commerce. According to theVision for Civil Engineering in 2025 [5], civil engineers should serve competently, collaboratively,and ethically to manage risk and uncertainty caused by natural events, accidents and other threats.The future development and the preservation and maintenance of national infrastructure willdemand a more intense focus on risk assessment to mitigate hazards and improve engineeringperformance [10]. Understanding, managing, and reducing disaster risks provide a foundation forresilience against disasters. Resilience analysis is a proactive approach to enhance the ability ofthe
particular, the open-ended responses indicate that college students are thinking critically abouthow to improve the program, are engaging with the younger kids on engineering topics, and aregetting benefits from the experience even when they themselves do not see the benefits.Certainly, a case could be made that the students are exhibiting many of the ABET Criteria a-k,including (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams, (f) an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility, and (i) a recognition of the need for, and ability to engagein life-long learning. Table 2: Sample Responses to Question 4: General Observations/Experiences. Geographic Identifiers have been removed. ID Response from Engineering Student
fundamental computational methods and elementary analytical techniques in sub-disciplines related to construction engineering. In addition, graduates of baccalaureate degree programs will, to the extent required to meet the Program Educational Objectives: (e) produce and utilize design, construction, and operations documents; (f) perform economic analyses and cost estimates related to design, construction, and maintenance of systems associated with construction engineering; (g) select appropriate construction materials and practices; (h) apply appropriate principles of construction management, law, and ethics, and; (i) perform standard analysis and design in at least one sub-discipline related to construction engineering.I have taught
; Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30865 [8] Jack, H. (2010, June), A Risk Assessment Tool For Managing Student Design Projects Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/15672 [9] DeBartolo, E. A., & Robison, W. L. (2018, June), Board 86: Risk Management and Ethics in Capstone Design Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30123[10] Hoffman, T., & Zappe, C., & Shooter, S., & O'Donnell, M. (2002, June), A Study Of Risk Communication In Engineering And Management Curricula Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. https
TechnologyCenter and solar building across the region were particularly well received by scholars (4.6), aswere the presentations of professionals and researchers (4.2) Interactive sessions on RCR (4.4) andCV/ Resume development (4.2) were viewed as valuable by scholars.Table 7: Scholars’ Assessment of Enrichment Activities Activity (1=very dissatisfied to 5 = very satisfied Energy Education Videos 3.9 Responsible Conduct of Research/ Ethics 4.4 CV and Resume Developing 4.2 Tours (Solar buildings solar business, Technology 4.6 Center, power plant, green roof
Effectiveness Assessment [1] W. Baer, “Using videos to teach the ethical use of Effective Pre/Post engineering information,” in 2008 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., Tests 2008. https://peer.asee.org/4197. [2] A. Bradley, D. Latta, and M. Harkins, “Work in progress: Effective Citation Collaboration for quality: A librarian-faculty partnership to Analysis assess students’ information literacy in freshman engineering,” in 2013 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2013. https://peer.asee.org/22767. [3] G. Hart and M. Davids, “Challenges for information literacy Effective Pre/Post education at a university of technology,” Innovation, vol. 41, no
flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Instructor Use of Movable Furniture and Technology in Flexible Classroom SpacesAbstractFlexible classroom spaces, which have movable tables and chairs that can be easily rearrangedinto different layouts, make it easier for instructors to effectively implement active learning thana traditional lecture hall. Instructors can move throughout the room to interact with
from different universities,undeclared first-year students, and a few students in different majors, including students from theSustainable Urban Environments degree program who are required to take this class during theirfirst or second year,The objectives of the Introduction to Civil Engineering course are 1. List the subdisciplines of civil engineering, identify types of projects that engage each, and understand the multidisciplinary nature of most large infrastructure projects; 2. Explain the overall role of civil engineers in design and operation of urban infrastructure, with understanding of the range of typical day-to-day tasks and responsibilities; 3. Discuss the ethical responsibilities of engineers to their
effects ofglobal warming pose a significant challenge to the infrastructure, economic, and social fabricdrivers of the global community. To address the challenge of global warming, this paper discussesan educational effort that integrates socioeconomic, ethics, and leadership skills to addressemerging workforce needs in the areas of greenhouse gases (GHG) reduction and mitigation. Acritical component of a national “green industries/ green/ energy jobs” effort is to motivate studentcommunities and workforce to become proficient in STEM and associated manufacturing fieldsand trades, thus ensuring a 21st-century workforce. This senior design project engages students inthe implementation of an innovative method for improving design and measuring
accomplishthis, however, it must be able to estimate each problem’s difficulty level to determine thestudent’s next problem to solve. The results of the current study provide quantitative data whichcould be used to help develop algorithms to determine a problem’s difficulty level for frame typeproblems.AcknowledgmentsThis work was carried out under the approval of the Research Ethics Board at the authors’University under the project number 100143.References[1] J. Meriam, L. Kraige, and J. Bolton, “Engineering Mechanics: Statics,” 8th ed, Wiley, New Jersey, USA, 2015.[2] R. Hibbeler, “Engineering Mechanics: Statics and Dynamics,” 14th ed, Pearson, Toronto, Canada, 2016.[3] N. Ayesh, N. Qamhieh, F. Tit, and F. Abdelfattah, “The effect of
, lack of tolerance, and censorship among academic and publiclibrarians despite the Library Bill of Rights, which was created to guide collection developmentpractices. Harmayer’s study focused on the librarians’ preference of collections related to pro-choice over those representing pro-life. Quinn (2012) has addressed both the psychological andphilosophical reasons for bias. The latter is related to librarian’s commitment to an ethical codewhereas the former can be both conscious and unconscious. The banning and challenging ofbooks and media has also been an act of censorship whereby works on controversial topics areplaced on a list. Implicit behind this explicit and consciously biased selection of books is thecovert bias against target
* Problems Impact of Hurricanes on Geotechnical Ethical Considerations Infrastructure* Environmental/Water Resources I – Structural Infrastructure I – History Hydrology* Environmental/Water Resources II – Structural Infrastructure II – Materials and Water Treatment & Water Quality* Deflection Environmental/Water Resources III – Structural Infrastructure III and IV – Bridge Stormwater Management* Types and Inspection Environmental/Water Resources IV – Impact of Hurricanes on Structural Infrastructure
, ethical research,proposal writing, presenting research posters/talks, and writing a research paper. The cohorts willbe required to attend 12 weekly meetings per semester during the year-long program in a varietyof settings, including conference room, laboratory, or the field depending on the topic of thatweek’s meeting. During these meetings, they will receive hands-on training in laboratory skillslike extraction techniques, separation techniques, and analytical techniques including nuclearmagnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). They will receive hands-on training in identifying plant species, planting/potting process,propagating plants and harvesting plant material.Objective 2: Develop a
stagger the laboratory activities so that students can continue with other portions of the lab when they finish with any one broadcast. • Interacting with real-world RF signals naturally sparked conversations surrounding use of the electromagnetic spectrum, wireless security, and ethical use of modern SDR technology. One particularly lively conversation stemmed from a student inquiring whether they could capture and reproduce the RF signal from key fobs used to unlock vehicle doors. The ensuing discussion ultimately transitioned to one of vulnerability of wireless systems and strategies to improve security. Instructors should be prepared for and welcome such discussions, as they present an opportunity
papers. The objective of this study is to deepenunderstanding of current practices for the purpose of supporting changes in the way theseassessments are used as learning activities.MethodsA method was developed to address the following questions: How does the quantity of feedbackof different forms (i.e. cross-marks, text phrase, etc.) vary: 1. in relation to solution quality which is measured using the summative mark? 2. in relation to the problems being graded?A research protocol was submitted and accepted by the Research Ethics Board (ID: 37507). Weexamined graded student papers from three electrical engineering courses at a large publicuniversity. The study used 7 problems from each course, resulting in 21 unique
.] lays out a clear methodology and the outline for the various curriculum aspects for EMeducation. ASEM’s recommendations include but not limited to professional ethics, management,operations, engineering economics, strategic management and project management. Major universities inthe U.S. and around the world have developed EM graduate programs focused on key skills developmentfor students supporting the range of curriculum suggested in the ASEM handbook.At the University, the curriculum is divided in to three sections: core courses, specialization courses andcapstone project courses. Students initially complete a set of six core courses as listed below: - Engineering Management Concepts - Project Management Principles - Risk
institutions. Theseevaluations must be done based on engineering professional ethics. The evaluationrecords must be used for program improvement, as well as for substantiation for programtermination. There should be no room for opinions, feelings, and/or hiddenagendas. Therefore, a mutually agreed upon evaluation scheme must be designed at thebeginning and the principles of it must be entered in the MOU. Additionally, the MOUmust have a clause that would underline the consequences in case a party unilaterallyterminates the program without substantiation.Some of the critical areas where there may be pitfalls are listed below: 1. Memorandum of Understanding: Define the duration of the agreement, the conditions under which it will be renewed and