underrepresented in engineering. Prior to joining Virginia Tech, Dr. Waller was Interim Director of the Office of Academic Diversity Initiatives at Cornell University. In this role, he was responsible for building academic and professional-development support and resources for undergraduate students who are traditionally underrepresented and/or underserved in higher education. Dr. Waller was the inaugural lecturer and director of the Ronald E. McNair Postbaccalaureate Achievement Program at Cornell Uni- versity. Dr. Waller began his career in student affairs and undergraduate education at Averett University, Radford University, and the University of South Carolina.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
with the knowledgeand tools necessary for success in their chosen careers. In the realm of engineering, artificialintelligence (AI) has emerged as a crucial tool, demanding integration into educational settings.While challenges exist, the benefits of incorporating AI into the classroom far outweigh the risks.In engineering education, AI offers significant advantages when introduced thoughtfully. In anintroduction to computer programming class, three primary benefits of AI were highlighted.Firstly, AI can generate code based on simple prompts, introducing students to promptengineering—an essential skill in modern programming. Although not mandatory at thefreshman level, this exposure lays the groundwork for efficient prompt creation in later
between the two participating universities, with presentations of research on bothcampuses. The program was specifically aimed at both academic and professional preparation inaddition to the general mentorship aspects. The program in [11] focused on multiple themes ofresource recognition, personal preparation, career preparation, and network building, along withmentoring. It required three deliverables from participants, with a requirement to set up aLinkedIn profile, send a resume or c.v. to the program coordinator, and conduct at least oneinformational interview. Professional development components including seminars andworkshops were also reported in [10]. The program at University of New Mexico reported in [19]included workshops and field
Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference 2 Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Educationway, a player can quickly develop an intuitive and familiar expertise with various logical structuresand patterns that are necessary for both coursework and a future career.(a) Basic Logic (b) Arithmetic and (c) ComputerOverview Section Memory Sections Architecture Section Figure 1: Main Skill TreeEach of these computational challenges, akin to puzzles, not only represents a creative undertak-ing but also catalyzes contemplating the scalability of a solution. For students
Department of Engineering Education where she has also served in key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, received the College of Engineering Graduate Student Mentor Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including
PolyPomona). Identifying the CSFs is essential as sociocultural, academic, and environmental factorssignificantly affect transfer students' academic performance. The author composed a series ofquestions that fall into sociocultural, academic, and environmental factors (this survey wasapproved by the CPP IRB 23-003). A total of 41 transfer students responded to the survey, andthe author identified CSFs for transfer students as 1) a sense of belonging, 2) networking withfaculty, staff, and peers, and 3) advising for career development and available resources from theuniversity. The identified factors should be addressed when the university develops a newprogram for transfer students.IntroductionThe State of California, which has the most extensive
totransfer their developing ethical reasoning skills to situations outside the classroom and into theirengineering careers [14]. The inclusion of reflective elements, such as prompts for introspectionand feedback mechanisms, would further enhance this learning process. Participants would beencouraged to articulate and reflect on their decision-making rationale, offering valuable insightsinto their thought processes and ethical perspectives. Additionally, the digital infrastructure ofthis game-based tool would allow for the collection of detailed data on student interactions,decisions, and reasoning processes within the game. This data could include metrics such asdecision times, choice patterns, and pathways taken through the game’s narrative
et al., ‘Assisting students with high-incidence disabilities to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics’, Interv. Sch. Clin., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2012.[14] K. A. Mack et al., ‘Maintaining the Accessibility Ecosystem: a Multi-Stakeholder Analysis of Accessibility in Higher Education’, in Proceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 2023, pp. 1–6.[15] A. Phillips et al., ‘Online disability accommodations: Faculty experiences at one public university.’, J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 331–344, 2012.[16] M. Tamjeed et al., ‘Understanding disability services toward improving graduate student support’, in
of Applied Research in Higher Education, 2019.[5] R. Korte, S. Brunhaver, and S. M. Zehr, "The socialization of STEM professionals into STEM careers: A study of newly hired engineers," Advances in Developing Human Resources, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 92-113, 2019.[6] C. J. Finelli and J. E. Froyd, "Improving Student Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Education by Improving Teaching and Assessment," Advances in Engineering Education, 2019.[7] N. T. Buswell, "The Purpose of a PhD in Engineering: Where Does Teaching Fit In?," Studies in Engineering, 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.8.[8] N. M. Hewitt and E. Seymour, "A long, discouraging climb," ASEE Prism, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 24
) Fluid Dynamics Technical Committee provided the list of CFD-relatedconcepts and different approaches to introduce CFD into a undergraduate engineeringcurriculum [1]. Integrating CFD topics into a fluid mechanics course is a suitable approach tobenefit engineering students in general, while a separate CFD course is more appropriate toengineering students who are interested in CFD research or careers. [2] and [3] designed separateundergraduate CFD courses and provided the detailed information on course contents andassigned projects. There are a number of studies that integrated CFD topics into theirundergraduate fluid mechanics courses to increase students understanding of flow behaviors( [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]). In the present study, the
, listening to and participating inclass discussion, group project work, and using the FBD app; among those who did not use theapp, women reported fewer gains in self-efficacy than men after these controls.Implications: Each year, more than 600,000 students enter engineering programs in the UnitedStates. These students plan to master a challenging skill set that requires them to understand howto model and analyze real world problems. Frustrating core course experiences can dissuadestudents from continuing to pursue an engineering degree and subsequent career. These findingsprovide emerging evidence that gamifying learning can be useful for all students taking statics,but particularly for women.Keywords: statics, women, self-efficacy, content mastery
Obispo and is the Director of the HVAC&R Program. His research interest are HVAC&R applications. Dr. Peuker’s educational research focuses on increasing student retention and success in engineering. He has given talks and workshops nationally on the subject and facilitates faculty learning communities and is the co-author of ”Studying Engineering – A Road Map to a Rewarding Career”. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Integrating Ethics into Engineering Education: A Case-Based Learning ApproachAbstract:This paper introduces an innovative method for infusing ethics into senior design capstonecourses within engineering education
. By analyzingqualitative data from weekly blog post reflections and student interviews, this work aims to unpackthe complex ways global competencies are cultivated among undergraduate and graduateengineering students with varying degrees of prior research experience. The findings of thisresearch are expected to inform future engineering education practices, providing valuable insightsfor educators, policymakers, and institutions aiming to enhance the global competencies of theirstudents through international research collaborations.IntroductionGlobal competence has increasingly become a key differentiator in engineering, significantlyinfluencing an engineer’s employability and career progression [1], [2], [3], [4]. However, workingwith
within education for historically excluded individuals, with a particular focus on women in engineering and computing and STEM education at HBCUs. Additionally, Dr. Fletcher is researching economic equity, and the impact of finances on students’ success and academic persistence. She is a 2022 recipient of the NSF Early CAREER award and has received several awards at the institutional and national levels. Prior to academia, Dr. Fletcher served as the Director of Pre-college for the National Society of Black Engineers and worked for two Fortune 500 companies. You can follow Dr. Fletcher on Twitter @trinalfletcher and LinkedIn.Madiha Qasim, North Carolina State UniversityDestiny M Washington, Florida International
Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair for the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN). He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS) from the National Experimental University of T´achira, Master of Business Administration (MBA) from Temple University, and Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech. ©American
engineering students at the junior level one must realize that they arefocused completely on the task at hand, placing themselves in a career that makes themchemical, mechanical, electrical, or one of the various other forms of being an engineer. Theyhave usually spent the first two years of college rushing through all the humanities, socialstudies, and composition classes that they can to remove those from their radar. Now they havearrived at the time when many colleges accept them into the brother/sister hood of theprofession. They come with a wide perspective on engineering, a number of mathematicscourses, and in many cases nothing more. They seem to understand all that engineering holds butfail to understand what is important in their lives as
LensAbstract:Physics generally falls under engineering programs yet is required for a multitude of differentmajors spanning many departments and disciplines including medicine. When people think aboutthe medical field, their mind immediately goes to classes such as biology, chemistry, anatomyand physiology. However, when looking at the prerequisite courses for medical school or testedMCAT content, there seems to be one subject that doesn’t fit in with the rest: physics. For years,pre-health students have joked that physics is much less applicable to their future careers than theother courses. The goal of this research paper is to tackle the general student assumption thatunderstanding physics will not help them in their respective fields by providing real
student outcome levels are obtained from individual assessmentinstruments. Additionally, conducting assessments in Canvas resulted in higher completion rates.This paper presents the advantages and disadvantages of each assessment tool and outlines anamended process that utilizes Canvas for assessment and mimics and improves upon the reportingin SearchLight by creating a customized dashboard in PowerBI.1 IntroductionFor engineering programs, domestic and abroad, obtaining ABET accreditation is critical to thesuccess of the program, the placement of graduates, and the career advancement of alumni. ABET’ssix-year evaluation cycle ensures alignment between industry needs and academic curriculum. Thecrux of program accreditation lies in the ability
implication that the latter wouldlead to more circumscribed outcomes (e.g., limited career opportunities). Having two differenttracks would permit the institution to boast of a diverse student body, but it would also limit lessprivileged students. In other words, this respondent’s perception was that efforts to continue topromote diversity in a way that comports with the new legal landscape would inadvertently leadto policies that harmed some students.Another participant expressed concern that HEFS might “overreact” and limit efforts beyondwhat is legally required and end up “completely water[ing] down policies and initiatives that aretargeted for [underrepresented] students.” Some concerns about practices were specific to distinctfunctions and roles
who do not seem to care about their circumstances, it is very discouragingand demoralizing.In a traditionally male-dominate field (STEM), Prusko [5] noted that “nontraditional femalestudents are an ever-increasing population who have the benefit of experience and perspective.”She also noted that the lack of relevant support, guidance, and words of encouragement led to thedissonance between the students’ career goals and personal values and that early masteryexperiences had a lasting impact on the students’ belief in their ability to be successful studyingSTEM [5].While there are articles on nontraditional students in engineering, there is hardly any literaturethat delve specifically into support systems. This study intends to fill the gap in
.,[26], [27]) or even the fear, stress, or anxiety of upcoming graded events (e.g., [6], [28]). Forthese reasons, we do assert that most engineering students believe to some degree that there is acost to good grades.Next Steps / Future WorkOur research team is in the process of designing a research study that uses the expectancy-value-cost model of motivation to answer our guiding question: What role do grades play inengineering students’ day-to-day decisions related to how and when they engage with coursecontent? We hope to begin our exploration of by looking into the experiences of students whoare in the first two years of their academic careers in engineering, as it is during this stage in thecurriculum where students are required to take
workshop participation, extracurricular activityparticipation, and interest in the AIMS program. Example workshops that students may haveparticipated in include Introduction to Python and Career Development, among others. Someextracurricular activities that students may have engaged in include a university-sponsoredHackathon, involvement in engineering student organizations, and other campuswideorganizations. We hypothesize that students who go out of their way to participate in additionalopportunities like workshops and extracurricular activities might be afforded more occasions todevelop their ESE and EJ. Interaction terms were not included for the ANOVA, in part due to therelatively small sample size currently available. The outputs used were
) the level of their knowledgein engineering asset management, and 66.7 % stated that they have no experience in the area. Theresponses to the two survey questions are given in Figure 2 and Figure 3. Figure 2: Engineers’ response to the pre-course questions about their graduation year. Figure 3: Engineers’ response to the pre-course question about the knowledge in engineering asset managementFor the post-course survey, the engineers were asked about the course material and its relevanceto the industry. The majority agreed on the significance of the course in relation to the power sector(see Figure 3) and its effectiveness in preparing students for future careers in the area (see Figure4).The interaction between the engineers and
. • Develop assessments addressing technical, societal, and ethical competencies. • Collaborate with industry to offer real-world AI exposure and mentorship.6.2 Future Research DirectionsFuture research should: • Include larger, more diverse samples for generalization. • Address all AI4K12 components, including "Natural Interaction" and "Societal Impact." • Conduct studies on PBL’s long-term impact on career choices and ethical reasoning. • Expand the scope to non-English and gray literature for global perspectives. • Explore hybrid models combining PBL with flipped classrooms.6.3 Final ThoughtsAs AI reshapes industries and society, preparing students to responsibly engage with thesetechnologies
constitute 14% of the U.S. population.Asian Americans also show the highest median household income and highest levelof education of all racial groups, even surpassing native-born White Americans. Forexample, half of Asian American adults ages 25 and older have a bachelor’s degree ormore, compared with 31% of White Americans, 18% of African Americans, and 13%of Latino/a Americans. Their socioeconomic rise is largely due to immigration: Asianimmigrants arrive in the United States with more than average levels of education,job skills, and incomes. Furthermore, the Pew report emphasized that AsianAmericans place more value on hard work, career success, marriage, and parenthoodthan other Americans, and that they are also more satisfied with their lives
undergraduate degree and this modeling would be showcased bythe diverse career pathways of the faculty body. After all, students came to Wake ForestUniversity to combine a traditional liberal arts education with the innovation of an engineeringdegree. Students wanted to use their engineering degree for both engineering and non-engineering pathways and diverse professional pathways. Students wanted a technicalengineering degree but had unique interests to combine general knowledge, engineeringdisciplinary knowledge, and professional knowledge. Faculty with both traditional academicjourneys and faculty with industry experience would need to be recruited and to be united arounda common vision, mission, and values of the new department. As will be visible
○ First gen: improved leadership and communication skills ○ Increased feeling of being prepared for a research role, ○ SG2-4: 129 participants. 90% comp to 40% applied to research position, 40% vs 10% working in lab● Grad students ○ Increases in TA job satisfaction and sense of belonging to community of TAs ○ Increase in ability to succeed, combat self-doubt, and pursue self-empowerment ○ Increases compared to climate survey in believing diversity is imperative to CSE success, feeling respected and valued by primary supervisor ○ Increased confidence in science communication● Creation of career-centric vodcast library for international engineering studentsYear 2 Highlights:Two projects’ efforts were
Paper ID #45189Introducing a Virtual Dashboard to Benchmark and Monitor EngineeringGraduate Degree Retention Trends at Penn StateDr. Enrique D GomezCatherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering
undergraduate education enables students to complete projectsmore effectively and equips them with essential competencies for their future careers. By fosteringthese abilities, engineering programs can better prepare students to navigate the collaborative nature Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX Copyright © 2025, American Society for Engineering Education 2of professional engineering work. Therefore, integrating teamwork skill development into theengineering curriculum is critical to cultivating the next generation of engineers
-Framework_Quickstart-Activity-Guide_2023.pdf Accessed 12.27.24[6] https://www.asce.org/communities/institutes-and-technical-groups/sustainability/sustainability-roadmap Accessed 12.27.24[7] https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2024- 2025/ Accessed 12.27.24[8] https://www.asce.org/-/media/asce-images-and-files/career-and-growth/educators/documents/civil-engineering- program-criteria-commentary---feb-2024.pdf Accessed 12.27.24[9] Buildings & Infrastructure Priority Actions for Sustainability, Embodied Carbon – Concrete. Reference: 07762000-RP-SUS-0003. (2023) https://www.istructe.org/IStructE/media/Public/Resources/ARUP-Embodied- carbon