to the students, Jenn, Janet, and Harold all recognized that the impact ofthese visits was limited; ideally, the English professor should be more integrated and involved.To increase the impact of writing instruction in the course, for the next academic year (2017-2018), Jenn was embedded within both the junior and senior-level project courses. Workingclosely with the two project course professors, Jenn contributed to course planning, led specificcourse sessions on writing and communication, and provided formative and summative feedbackon student work. After receiving feedback on her involvement, Jenn, Janet, and Harold madeadjustments to Jenn’s role in the second semester, providing more time for Jenn to work one-on-one with students and
gave advice on communication andwriting structure and integration into engineering education practices. The articulation ofscaffolding – “It should be an area of focus with planned progressions in various writing styles:project report, research paper, memo, etc.” – showed faculty conceptualize the progression ofwriting learning [19]. However, this conception focused on learning “how” to perform particularengineering documents rather than the higher level critical thinking skill of rhetoric –understanding why there are genre distinctions, and how to determine these underlying “valuesystems” to adjust writing for future unfamiliar genres. This is a far more valuable skill thanlearning how to write a memo report, because it develops a learner’s
of the program. Several of these mentions were rather ordinary. Alejandro recalledmeeting a man from the United States and talking with him about life and their plans. Kevindescribed meeting locals and discussing sports or comparing their city to Kevin’s home city.Steven reflected on conversations about stereotypes and history with locals. Ben expressed adesire to interact with locals and then described two successful encounters: one about sports andone about U.S. politics. Finally, James described meeting people in bars and meeting a “certifiedcommunist” among other locals. James reflected on his interactions with various non-programparticipants throughout the trip: For me, the most lasting value of RSAP comes down to the countless
to know more people I have classes with. I'm actually being able to get in groups with people that I know actually do their job, which helps tremendously. I’m in 202 right now, and I think this is the first time that I've had a group that everybody actually shows up.Throughout Sean’s military service he grew an expectation of what he believed working in ateam should be like. He believes that his student peers do not meet that expectation and, due tothis belief, he sees them as subpar. Because of his opinions of civilians, Sean spends his timefocused on his studies and his civilian job, but not on social activities with peers. Noted above,he comments on two years into his plan of study being the first time his entire team has
primarily on disaster preparedness planning, inclusion, and capacity-building activities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #29629Dr. Jamie Vickery, Center for the Study of Disasters and Extreme Events, Oklahoma State University Jamie Vickery is a research associate at the Natural Hazards Center within the Institute of Behavioral Science and a postdoctoral fellow at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. She is also an af- filiate with the Center for the Study of Disasters and Extreme Events at Oklahoma State University. Her research interests focus on hazard risk
Code of Ethics [19] requires engineers to“endeavor in good faith to include diverse perspectives, in the planning and performance of theirprofessional services.” Without respectful listening, an engineer will not be aware of thesediverse perspectives. The quality of understanding that is achieved during communication mayvary based on who is being listened to and how one perceives the importance of the other person[20,21]. This idea is acknowledged in IEEE’s Ethically Aligned Design [22]: “stakeholderengagement and deliberative processes can be effective when… more powerful actors participatewith an awareness of their own power and make a commitment to listen with humility, curiosity,and open-mindedness” (p. 84). Further, listening is the first
than moving on without addressing knowledge gaps. ● Developing and instructing additional training in active learning teaching methods for departmental teaching assistants, initially as a discrete course, and then incorporated as a mandatory training courses for student employees in Bioengineering. ● Using ‘scaffolding’, using instructional plans to lead the students from what they already know, such as using prompts, questioning, or cue cards [33], to form a deeper understanding of new material [34] with a fading level of instructor support. ● Implementing ‘exit tickets’, an end of class short task to reflect on learning, such as students noting what was most valuable, and what they are still confused
3Table 1Participant Demographic Information Pseudonym Race/Ethnicity PhD Completion Status Degree Field Becky European American/White Completed Engineering Giselle Hispanic/LatinX Did not complete Biological Sciences Tiara Black/African American, Completed Mathematics European American/White Angela Black/African American Did not complete Engineering Erin European American/White Did not complete Physical Sciences Nadia European American/White Did not complete EngineeringAnalysis Plans A constant-comparative
and Their Impacts on StudentsA growing strand of scholarly dialogue in higher education explores connections betweenstudents’ emotional experiences with pressures and stress, and student achievement andretention. Relevant studies identify general academic pressures including parental expectations,grades, test taking, time pressures, and future plans [19] as well as those unique to engineeringstudents, such as family pressure to study the major [20]. Some studies specifically focus onstudent stress [21, 22] and impacts on students’ mental health [19, 23].Students often experience anxiety due to the stress of these expectations as well as fear of failureto fulfill them [24]. In the context of a study of psychological distress in college
into reauthoring what it means to be an engineer in thecontext of a first-year engineering design course. We begin by describing the institutionalcontext of the course.Context of First-Year Engineering Design CourseThe course that occupies the focus of the present paper is known locally as Introduction toEngineering and is offered in the fall semester at Harding—a private, non-profit, religiouslyaffiliated, teaching-focused university. It is a required course in the degree plans for fiveengineering majors that are offered at the university: biomedical, civil, computer, electrical, andmechanical. Typically, students are enrolled in the first-year engineering design course in theirfirst year of undergraduate. Almost all of the enrolled students
Paper ID #43336Assessment and Impact of a Clinical Observations and Needs Finding Courseon Biomedical Engineering Education OutcomesMs. Jacquelynn Ann Horsey, University of Arkansas Jacquelynn is an undergraduate student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering.Thomas Hudnall McGehee, University of Arkansas Thomas ”Hud” McGehee is an undergraduate student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering. While Hud’s primary research focus is on nanocomposite biomaterials for orthopedic applications, engineering education prevails as another area of interest. Hud plans to pursue higher education by utilizing his engineering
Preuss, EdD, is the Co-founder and Lead Consultant for Exquiri Consulting, LLC. His primary focus is providing assistance to grant project teams in planning and development, through external evaluation, and as publication support. Most of his workDr. Matthew Lucian Alexander P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Alexander graduated with a BS in Engineering Science from Trinity University, a MS in Chemical Engineering from Georgia Tech, and a PhD in Chemical Engineering from Purdue University. He worked for 25 years in environmental engineering consulting befMr. Rajashekar Reddy Mogiligidda, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Rajashekar Mogiligidda is working as a Lecturer in the department of Mechanical and
education, STEM education, and educational psychology. She has also served as a PI, co-PI, advisory board member, or external evaluator on several NSF-funded projects. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring Intervention Research in Statics Courses: A Systematic Review ofASEE Publications from 2013 to 2023AbstractStatics is a foundational subject for many engineering students, exposing students tomathematics and physics of design and planning settings, which is vital for mechanical, civil,and aerospace engineers. This study systematically collected, analyzed, and reviewed the mostrecent 10-year ASEE conference papers about interventions in Statics courses. A total of 37papers were selected
College Student; and Second-LanguageEnglish Speaker. The survey also captured Gender; Sexual Orientation; Ethnic and Racialidentities, using National Institute of Health (NIH) definitions for gender, orientation, ethnicityand race. All identity dimensions included an option to “decline to answer,” and it was rarelyused. The fine-grained approach to demography here was in part motivated by plans to scale thesurvey instrument to a much larger project that leverages key Sociology expertise by members ofthe research team.d. Proximity to VeteransProximity to veterans correlated with the respondents’ personal connections to veterans.Respondents identified their immediate family contacts as well as their distant family oracquaintances. The data also
aspects of that community.Regarding financial status, I would just say that I'm poor. I am one paycheck away fromeverything in my life being uprooted and not being able to pay all my bills, there not being anytype of security blanket for me or a backup plan for me.Q: What are some identity-related challenges you have experienced in engineering?When I was in high school, I never considered computer science. It was one of those majors thatwas reserved, in my mind, for super-smart people. Not people who are just going to do the workand work hard at it. That you had to be super gifted in math, and you had to love science to be inCS. I probably was slated towards business. I was in a marketing association for students in highschool and doing
about gender and thegender binary (per Caroline Perez and Cordelia Fine). Assignments in Race & Technologyinclude an “infrastructure exploration” [25] in which students plan and execute a local journeyinformed by readings from Langdon Winner, Rayvon Fouché, Simone Browne, and others, thenpresent their observations to their classmates in ways that facilitate further discussion. For thecapstone project in Race & Technology, students may choose to propose a redesign of either aspecific technology or a STEM curriculum, drawing on the course readings and discussions. Thereadings lists for both classes are included as Appendices A and B.The Gender & STEM course was developed and taught by Mary Armstrong, a scholar ofliterature and gender
aninstitution. Among the data, participants most saliently discussed pedagogies in engineeringclassrooms, curriculum and student workload, and cultural expectations. Most common wereopinions on Teaching Methods and Mindsets, meaning participants frequently discussed howinstructors approach education, course content, and various pedagogies and assessment methods.One idea was to provide students with realistic advice on planning and studying, as Liladescribed offering “little tips on how to do school, how to manage projects, how to be a person inthe class. And that took like five, maybe ten minutes.” Others mentioned how some standards inacademia can create tension between students, with Audrey providing further context: “I don'tthink it's something like
under thelens of sustainability. Next, students implemented the concept of linear economy to assess the fate of themedical device and formulated a plan to make it more sustainable using circular economy [26].In the following week, students were instructed on lean manufacturing practices and where these principlesalign with sustainability. Students learned about working on an assembly line to increase productionefficiency, scrap reduction, and how mass production could be modified when considering overstocking,i.e., push vs pull systems and inventory management. They researched distribution methods such as B2B,B2C and D2C to determine when medical devices implemented which delivery routes. They exploreddisintermediation and how that can save on
are planned.4. ChallengesThere were various challenges experienced in all iterations of the camps. These can be brokeninto a few distinct categories: student recruitment, logistics and scheduling, and volunteerengagement.4.1 Student Retention and RecruitmentAll iterations of the camp were externally funded and were therefore free for the students. As theMSOE STEM Center has found with all free programs, this resulted in fewer students attendingthe camp than had signed up. This is disappointing to the organization providing the fundingbecause it means that the money they spent to have the faculty develop the content of the campdid not go as far as it could have.Student interest and understanding of the program was a secondary contributor to
instructionalguidance on preparing for an oral exam for both examiners and examinees, need to be consideredand carefully planned. Our StudyThe full project aims at developing oral exams that maximize their formative benefits to ourstudents and addresses the design challenges associated with their scalability and adoption forhigh-enrollment classes. In this paper, we focus on understanding the full picture of oral exams:connecting students’ psychological and learning experiences with their academic performancesacross several courses. We specifically aim at addressing three components of oral exams. First,we examine the overall psychological experience on the student’s end in preparing for, during,and after the oral exam. Specifically, we asked students
collection for this study were: interviews, background information, and memos written directly after the interview. The findings reported in this paper are part of a larger study interested in understanding engineering students' math experiences during COVID and a holistic view of their choice of major. he screening questionnaire asked students to report their current math class, planned major,Tintended major when they started college, demographic information, and questions about their high school years. The participants self-described their gender and racial/ethnic identity, so the descriptors used in the table are the participants' words. Six people were included in this study; their information with pseudonyms can be found
African American (Student Demographics | Institutional Research & Planning, n.d.).Student 11 commented earlier in this paper that she was the only African-American student inmany classes. Yet, these experiences are not limited within the classroom but were alsoexperienced on campus as described by Student 6: We've experienced that as black people at XYZ University in general. Those microaggressions of something as simple…well I guess it's not simple…assuming our major and assuming that we're not engineers at a predominantly engineering school. Or even that we don't even go here when we're on campus. It's kind of like, ‘Oh are you visiting? Are you someone else's friend? Are you from [another university in the
understanding the pressing issues including legislative opportunities (new CSEdcoordinators, call for state CSEd plans, or funding allocated for CSEd).The sessions during the Initial framing phase on subjectivity and bias and, relatedly, on engagingothers with the data story are important in enabling the teams to understand in advance a) howthey want to own their state BPC story and b) how others in the BPC arena make choices abouthow they present data in ways that may be counterproductive to the ECEP team’s BPC advocacywork. These sessions are both cautionary and empowering for the teams.Understanding the data ecosystemWithin the first 6 months of the first CMP cohort the research team designed a process thatallows for a clear understanding of where
dedicate a full class to the issue.This dedication showed great support for our project, but it limited any interventions to 2 hoursin length. The intervention team would need to focus on activities that could be accomplished in2 hours, but that might still have a meaningful effect on this critical issue. This focus set theparameters of our malleability assessment.3.5 Interventional Study DesignAfter discerning the need and scope for intervention through our initial research methods, theeducational intervention was planned with the following guidelines: 1. The intervention should target the first-year engineering classroom to ensure a similar rhetorical infrastructure to the previous research. 2. The intervention should focus on
recognize ourwork will not be complete before making our initial recommendations to the director and studentworkers in the makerspace, we feel the right time to engage in inclusive community building andnorm setting is when a makerspace is first opening. Thus, our initial findings and early-stagerecommendations will be shared midway through this study. In year two, we plan to conductfollow up interviews to track the results of our suggested interventions on the makerspace’sculture in terms of inclusion and exclusion. We imagine the second round of interviews may alsoreveal new areas of importance that we may have missed in our initial round of interviewcollection. Further literature grounding will also occur in year two.To better understand how to
Paper ID #43174Opening the Doors for International Students: Are We Ready?Dr. Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University Sushil Acharya, D.Eng. (Asian Institute of Technology) is a Vice President for Research, Grants and Global Initiative. A Professor of Software Engineering, Dr. Acharya joined Robert Morris University in Spring 2005 after serving 15 years in the Software Industry. His teaching involvement and research interests are in the area of Software Engineering education, Software Verification & Validation, Software Security, Data Mining, Neural Networks, and Enterprise Resource Planning. He also has interest in