. Capobianco BM, French BF, Diefes-Du HA. Engineering Identity Development Among Pre-Adolescent Learners. J Eng Educ. 2012;101(4):698-716. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01125.x.20. Markus H, Nurius P. Possible selves. Am Psychol. 1986;41(9):954-969.21. Shavelson RJ, Marsh RW. On the structure of self-concept. In: Schwarzer R, ed. Self-Related Cognitions in Anxiety and Motivation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1986:305-330.22. Brown Q, Burge JD. MOTIVATE: Bringing out the fun with 3d printing and e-textiles for middle- And high-school girls. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. ; 2014:24.915.1- 24.915.12.23. Lyon GH, Jafri J, St. Louis K. Beyond the Pipeline: STEM Pathways for
provided them in the online videos. In addition,there was time for live student presentation and group discussions with a Q & A on thepresentations. Groups would meet not only on their own out of class to complete a courseassignment, but additionally in-class to apply the concepts they learned in the online modules.For example, groups would spend time on plan reading exercises and the instructor was able tospend time providing feedback to each group.4.3 Data gathering and analysis. Data was gathered through a reflective journal kept by theinstructor and a survey administered quarter into the semester and towards the end (AppendixA). 4.3.a Instructor notes: Given the new approach to teaching the instructor kept weeklynotes about the
: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. (2006).5. STEM integration in K–12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. (The National Academies Press, 2014).6. Mau, W. Factors that influence persistence in science and engineering career aspirations. Career Dev. Q. 51, 234–243 (2003).7. Nicholls, G. M., Wolfe, H., Besterfield-Sacre, M. & Shuman, L. J. Predicting STEM degree outcomes based on eighth grade data and standard test scores. J. Eng. Educ. 209–224 (2010).8. Schunn, C. D. How kids learn engineering: The cognitive science perspective. Bridg. 32–37 (2009).9. Wang, X. Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of
creativity within engineering projects. Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN.23. Atwater, M. M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 821–837.24. Patton, M. Q., (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.25. Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G., (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
0.40 0.59 (α = 0.86) involving technology (q) Identifying technical solutions that are as 0.40 0.50 simple as possible (s) Designing and conducting experiments to 0.55 0.55 test an idea (y) Searching for innovative ways to do things 0.38 0.50 (v) Improving a design to make it more efficient 0.46 0.47 (faster, better, cheaper) (z) Using technology to solve environmental 0.41 0.68 problems (aa) Creating prototypes to test an idea 0.78 0.36 (cc) Designing a system, a part/component of a 0.68
-44 0.000 Figure 4. Values of influence, Figure 3. SDGs influence (I) vs. dependence (D) diagram dependence, influence ratio, net influence, and priority index Figure 2 shows that the double causality table has a total of Q = n2 – n = 272 interactionswhere n = 17 (number of SDGs). The diagonal terms are assumed to be 0 since they represent agoal influencing itself, which mathematically
Press.National Survey of Student Engagement. (2016). About NSSE. Retrieved from nsse.indiana.eduPalmer, J. C., Birchler, K. D., Narusis, J. D., Kowalchuk, R. K., & DeRuntz, B. (2016). LEADing The Way: A Review of Engineering Leadership Development Programs. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana. https://peer.asee.org/25525Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Pierrakos, O., Beam, T. K., Constantz, J., Johri, A., & Anderson, R. (2009). On the development of a professional identity: Engineering persisters vs engineering switchers. Paper presented at the Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in
Dr.Thomas’ initial visit to the class, he delivered a detailed lecture on the technologyinvolved in IVF. Being engineers, the students especially appreciated the technicalelements of his lecture, and they asked many questions about the workings of the devicesand processes he described. But his presence was insignificant to the ethics focus of thecourse. Indeed; the subject of ethics never came up, not in his lecture or in the Q & A.This changed, however, in subsequent years, when students left the classroom to travelacross town, to meet with Dr. Thomas inside of his IVF lab.It was there that the students passed by the waiting room for patients seeking help withreproduction, and then saw with their own eyes, the array of technology involved in
in Spring 2015, the ITD program created new class activitiesto help students understand the difference between their perceptions and experiences of aproblem, and those of the people actually affected by that problem.These activities include: ● Subject Matter Expert (SME) Talks: Experts present on various aspects of the problem, followed by a 20-minute Q&A session. ● User Empathy Experience: Re-creation of the problem context on class premises, where students execute project-relevant tasks. ● Stakeholder Engagement Experience: Students are sent off campus to observe and interact with users/stakeholders. ● A reflection assignment: Analysis of what they thought were problems for the users compared with what
Dysfunctional Cooperative Learning Teams Based on Students' Academic Achievement," J Eng Educ, vol. 99, (1), pp. 45-54, 2010.[16] M. C. Thomas and K. W. Phillips, "When What You Know Is Not Enough: Expertise and Gender Dynamics in Task Groups," Person. Soc. Psychol Bull., vol. 30, (12), pp. 15851598, 2004.[17] A. Joshi, "By Whom and When Is Women’s Expertise Recognized? The Interactive Effects of Gender and Education in Science and Engineering Teams," Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 59, (2), pp. 202-239, 2014.[18] H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner, The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. 2004.[19] L. U. Eric and G. L. Cohen, "Constructed Criteria: Redefining Merit to Justify Discrimination," Psychol. Sci., vol. 16, (6), pp. 474-480, 2005
12ReferencesAina, C., Baici, E., & Casalone, G. (2011). Time to degree: students' abilities, university characteristics orsomething else? Evidence from Italy. Education Economics, 19(3), 311-325.Alexander, M. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.Bensimon, E. M., & Bishop, R. (2012). Introduction: Why" critical"? The need for new ways of knowing. TheReview of Higher Education, 36(1), 1-7.Chen, X. (2013). STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM Fields (NCES 2014-001). NationalCenter for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.Dika, S. L., Pando, M. A., Tempest, B. Q., & Allen, M. E. (2017). Examining the Cultural
students: Results of a longitudinal study,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 69 no. 6, pp. 589-620, 1998.46. P. Q. Hall, Problems and solutions in the education, employment and personal choices of minority women in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1981.47. Datnow, A., & Cooper, R. (1997). Peer networks of African American students in independent schools: Affirming academic success and racial identity. The Journal of Negro Education, 66, 56–72.48. D. A. Guiffrida, “African American student organizations as agents of social integration,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 44 no. 3, pp. 304–319, 2003.49. S. Hurtado, D. F. Carter, “Effects of college transition and
Studies, pp. 587-634, 2001.[14] E. Coyle, L. Jamieson, and W. Oakes, "EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service," International Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 139-150, 2005.[15] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and M. E. Cardella, "Teaching Human-Centered Design with Service-Learning," in 2010 Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, 2010, pp. 1-13: American Society for Engineering Education.[16] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc, 2002.[17] S. R. Daly, R. S. Adams, and G. M. Bodner, "What Does it Mean to Design? A Qualitative Investigation of Design Professionals’ Experiences," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101
Using nStudy Trace Data and the ICAP Framework. Paper presented at the LAL@ LAK.Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of educational psychology, 80(4), 514.Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and psychological measurement, 53(3), 801-813.Pitterson, N. P., Brown, S., Pascoe, J., & Fisher, K. Q. (2016). Measuring cognitive engagement through interactive, constructive, active and passive learning activities. Paper presented at the Frontiers in
solutions, select & prototype concepts, and gather patient/clinical feedback on proposed solutions. Students presented their need, design process, and proposed solution in a video format. Experienced faculty, clinicians, local entrepreneurs, and design faculty from the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and from the School of Architecture were available to question the students about their ideas in an organic and realistic manner in the Q&A following the video presentation. Students were evaluated on 1) the quality and level of accomplishment in their designs, and 2) the quality of the video presentation and communication of the process and outcomes.Assessments in 2017 (both J-Term and
Society of Professional Engineers, Engineering Body of Knowledge, First Edition. Alexandria, VA: NSPE, 2013, 60 pp.[3] AIChE, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Body of Knowledge for Chemical Engineers, Release 1.0. New York, NY: AIChE, 2015, 116 pp.[4] ASCE, American Society of Civil Engineers, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, Second Edition. Reston, VA: ASCE, 2008, 181 pp.[5] American Society for Engineering Education, ASEE. ASEE Papers on Engineering Education Repository, PEER. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/advanced_search?q=leadership+&q_in%5B%5D=title&q_in%5B%5D =conference_session_name&q_in%5B%5D=topics&q_in
on nonresponse in web surveys.Social Science Computer Review, 25(3), 372.[24] Zhu, J., Hu, Y., Liu, Q., & Cox, M. F. (2015). Validation of an instrument for Chineseengineering students’ epistemological development. International Journal of Chinese Education,4(2): 135-161.[25] National Academy of Engineering. (2005). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering inthe new century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
of the home work assignments, whichuses now obsolete Adobe Flash technology. However, at this time, the text book Engineering Me-chanics: Dynamics used in this class by Gray et al. uses the Connect platform only and thus abetter alternative is not available. This OL class uses Piazza [13], an web-based Wiki-style Q&A forum, where students canask questions and both the students and teaching team can contribute to an answer. The systemis designed to be intuitive and easy to use. For this class, which uses a lot of mathematics andequation writing, the support for LateX in the system is hugely beneficial. This is the single mostimportant reason for the author to use Piazza. It has been the author’s experience that Piazza hasmanaged to
. Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551–583, 2017.[17] J. Hess, L. Kisselburgh, C. Zoltowski, and A. Brightman, “The Development of Ethical Reasoning: A Comparison of Online versus Hybrid Delivery Modes of Ethics Instruction,” 2016.[18] R. S. Harichandran, M.-I. Carnasciali, N. O. Erdil, C. Q. Li, J. Nocito-Gobel, and S. D. Daniels, “Developing entrepreneurial thinking in engineering students by utilizing integrated online modules,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015, vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society.[19] S. Walesh, “Resolving Ethical Issues e-Learning Module.” University of New Haven, West Haven, CT., 2017.[20] Texas Tech University, “Guidelines
that influence faculty motivation of effective teaching practices in engineering,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013, https://peer.asee.org/19604[13] A. Furco, and B. E. Moely. “Using learning communities to build faculty support for pedagogical innovation: A multi-campus study,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 83, no. 1, 128-153, 2012.[14] H. M. Matusovich, M. C. Paretti, L. D. McNair, and C. Hixson. “Faculty motivation: A gateway to transforming engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 2, 302-330, 2014.[15] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks
1424 O’Keefe, C. M., & Head, R. J. (2011). Application of logic models in a large scientific research program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 174–184. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.00825 Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.26 Funnell, S. C., Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. San Francisco: Wiley.27 Kelly, A. E. (2014). Design-based research in engineering education: Current state and next steps. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 497–418). New York: Cambridge University Press.28 Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A
prototypes, startingwith a “minimum viable prototype.” Compared to traditional approach, lean start-up favorsexperimentation over elaborate planning, customer feedback over intuition and iterative designover traditional “big design up front” development (Blank, 2013).Student DemographicsStudent participants for the STEM-Inc project were recruited through multiple efforts (Huang,2017). Recruiting flyers were created and distributed to the classes at the four participatingschools via STEM-Inc teacher participants when the school year started. Additionally, a STEM-Inc open house and live engineering/computer science project demonstration with Q&A sessionwas held at each one of the four schools, mostly during the lunch hours in September
Engineering Strategic Goal of Becoming a National Model of Inclusivity and Collaboration. In The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity annual conference. Washington, DC.Bothwell, M., Furman, K., Driskill, Q.-L., Warner, R., Shaw, S., & Ozkan-Haller, T. (2018b). Empowering faculty and administrators to re-imagine a socially just institution through use of critical pedagogies. In Annual Conference of the Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity. Washington, DC.Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and… tensions with professional identity? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 339–346.Bucciarelli, L. L
faculty provided a brief 2-minute overview of their research areas before breaking into small groups to visit the research labs. The program director created small groups of students based on research interests and grouped women students with women research faculty when possible. Research faculty conducted the lab tours and presented the details about their research to students. The presentations ended with Q&A sessions in the research labs. Although only a few majors were represented in the Research 101 workshops, the faculty delivered powerful messages about the importance and excitement of engineering research. Since summer bridge was in the summer, many faculty were away and not
. References[1] TechSmith’s Camtasia Studio software website. Accessed January 2019.Available at: < https://www.techsmith.com/video-editor.html >[2] Definition of flipped learning from the Flipped Learning Network website. Accessed January 2019.Available at: < http://flippedlearning.org/Page/1 >[3] D. Bunce, E. Flens, and K. Neiles (2010). How long can students pay attention in class? A study of studentattention decline using clickers, Journal of Chemical Education, 87, 1438-1443.[4] F. L. Wachs, J. L. Fuqua, P. M. Nissenson, A. C. Shih, M. P. Ramirez, L. Q. DaSilva, N. Nguyen, C. Romero(2018). Successfully flipping a fluid mechanics course using video tutorials and active learning strategies:Implementation and Assessment, in Proceedings
in science,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 669-685, 2010.[7] R. H. Tai, C. Q. Liu, A. V. Maltese, and X. Fan, “Planning early for careers in science,” Science, vol. 312, no. 5777, pp. 1143-1144, 2006.[8] L. Archer, J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong, “Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 881-908, 2012.[9] J. Dewitt, L. Archer, and J. Osborne, “Nerdy, brainy and normal: Children’s and parents’ constructions of those who are highly engaged with science,” Res Sci Educ, vol. 43, pp. 1455–1476, 2013.[10] A. Nick Chambers, E. T. Kashefpakdel, J
Same: A Look at Early Career Engineers Employed in Different Sub-Occupations,” in Proceedings for the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, June 23-26, 2013.[7] S. K. Gilmartin, H. L. Chen, M. F. Schar, Q. Jin, G. Toye, A. Harris, E. Cao, E. Costache, M. Reithmann, and S. D. Sheppard, “Designing a Longitudinal Study of Engineering Interests and Plans: The Engineering Majors Survey Project. EMS 1.0 and 2.0 Technical Report,” Designing Education Lab, Stanford University, Technical Report, Jan. 2017.[8] G. D. Kuh, in High-Impact Educational Practices. HIgh-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter, AAC&U
blind students,” in Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on July 18, 2007, pp. 917-918. [5] Gardner, John A. "Tactile graphics: an overview and resource guide," Information Technology and Disabilities, 3-4, Oct. 1996.[6] A. Mayerson, “The History of the Americans with Disabilities Act, A Movement Perspective,” 1992, [Online]. Available: http://dredf.org/news/publications/the-history-of-the-ada/. [Accessed June 8, 2017].[7] D. Leuchovius, “ADA Q & A: Section 504 & Postsecondary Education,” 1994, [Online]. Available: http://www.pacer.org/publications/adaqa/504.asp. [Accessed June 8, 2017].[8] C. Zaira, M. C. Fastame, T. Vecchi, and C. Cornoldi, “Working
into the project. These stakeholders included theMayor, City Engineer, President of prominent HOA, and the president of an environmentalaction group. Each of these fictional stakeholders had pre-described concerns with a power plantdesign as well as opinions about what a good power plant might do. These stakeholders weredesigned to have some points of commonality, but also points of disagreement on theirwants/needs for the power plant. Once the stakeholders were introduced to the project,documentation that described the requirements and criteria of the project were reducedsubstantially. The information they needed would now be determined by “interviewing” thestakeholders in a Q&A online forum. The instructional staff role-played as the