country and our families?), logistics and planning(for example, when will we have to engage with students in-person?), or even personal or healthrelated (for example, when will I have access to the vaccine?). Thus, we quickly understood thatthese COVID-19 websites were helping address concerns not only of students and their parentsbut also other stakeholders from diverse backgrounds, who just like us were facing a different setof challenges and looking for answers. We decided to study different university web pages tounderstand how universities were communicating information and changes through the pandemicand collate strategies that administrators were sharing to help their specific learning communitiesface the challenges brought on by the
Work and Schooling,” in Social Studies and Diversity Education What We Do and Why We Do It, 2010, p. 6.[2] K. L. Stokes, “The Impact of the Factory Model of Education in Central Texas,” Baylor University, 2013.[3] W. Au, “Teaching under the new Taylorism: high‐stakes testing and the standardization of the 21 st century curriculum,” vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 25–45, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00220272.2010.521261.[4] E. Van Duzer, “Overcoming the Limitations of the Factory System of Education,” Mar. 2006.[5] M. G. Dolence and D. M. Norris, Transforming Higher Education: A Vision for Learning in the 21st Century. Society for College and University Planning.[6] C. Sleeter, “Multicultural Education vs. Factory Model Schooling,” in
their responses.We also found there were significantly more percentages of female SWD than male SWD in thesurvey (Chisq test p-value < 0.0004). We recognize that there are different adoption levels ofcourse modalities and the usage data is less consistent than other questions about satisfaction andthe MUSIC questions. We have reached out to more courses from 7 courses in Fall 2020 to 49courses in Spring2021 and a larger pool of SWD students and will continue to modify our surveyto improve the consistency about usage responses for future surveys. We also plan to conductanalysis regarding potential bias caused by the discrepancies in instructional tools. In addition,we will analyze the results of semi-structured interviews, and conduct more
independently identify patterns across the action research projects. We performedsubjective intercoder checks for reliability [26]. As more data are collected, this coding structurewill continue to evolve [27].Preliminary Findings Preliminary findings revealed significant disruptions in implementing informal STEMopportunities due largely to the isolation resulting from COVID-19 and the nation’s unrest overracism and police brutality occurring at a time when school team members had planned tocomplete their action research processes. Despite hurried or incomplete action researchprocesses, we identified patterns pointing to the unique characteristics of school culture andleadership that facilitate (or hinder) the successful implementation of
Implications," 2016.[19] I. Gustavsson, T. Olsson, H. Åkesson, J. Zackrisson, and L. Håkansson, "A remote electronics laboratory for physical experiments using virtual breadboards," in Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annaual Conference, 2005, pp. 12-15.[20] "Lon Capa Purdue University." Lon Capa. https://loncapa.purdue.edu/adm/login (accessed March 25, 2020).[21] K. Nikolopoulos, S. Punia, A. Schäfers, C. Tsinopoulos, and C. Vasilakis, "Forecasting and planning during a pandemic: COVID-19 growth rates, supply chain disruptions, and governmental decisions," European journal of operational research, vol. 290, no. 1, pp. 99-115, 2020.[22] "Hantek 2000 Series." Hantek. http://hantek.com/products/detail/13174
issues encountered asproblems and issues to be resolved and often lowers the frustration and dissatisfactionencountered in technical leadership roles.Servant leaders focus on the needs, development and well-being of others and share power orcontrol [20,21]. Difficulties in applying this leadership style are typically due to our trainingwhere we are taught to be independent and defend our views to avoid ‘losing’ or being provedwrong. We can often engage others readily by showing sincere interest in their point of view,ensuring that clear communication of similarities and differences in viewpoint has taken place,and by involving them in planning and implementation of new initiatives or changes in direction.This interdependence culture develops
investigates: What is therelationship, if any, between team dynamics and innovation effectiveness? Can a team achievehigh innovation effectiveness if it has low team dynamics?Literature reviewTeamwork is recognized as a critical engineering skill. ABET devotes a student outcome toteamwork skill: “an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provideleadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meetobjectives” [4]. Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering suggested that“Teamwork should be embedded everywhere – as part of authentic design experiences, ifpossible – and needs to become a meta-skill for every student.” [5, p.21]. Teamwork is valued atthe workplace because it
China's engineering standards and improvingthe internal system of engineering standardsInternationalizing China’s standards is important for shaping its national image, enhancing itsglobal discourse power, and enhancing China’s international prestige. Breaking the long-termmonopoly of the engineering standards market by European countries and the United Statesrequires the Chinese government to publicize China's engineering standards and engineeringculture at the national level. Although China has issued the Action Plan on Belt and RoadStandard Connectivity (2018-2020) twice, up to now the “going out” of Chinese standardshas been hampered by insufficient domestic preparation and international acclimatization.Therefore, the government needs to
with professional societies in ME and outreach efforts to two year colleges.5. Continue to develop and refine a sustainability plan for continued expansion of the CW.The current paper will focus on objectives 1 and 2; to achieve these objectives, we have formed ateam from five diverse institutions: a large research public university, a small private university,a two-year college serving a large number of under-represented students, a large non-PhDgranting public university, and a bilingual research university.The Concept WarehouseThe Concept Warehouse (CW) was originally developed for use in the discipline of chemicalengineering (Koretsky et al., 2014). The CW Project has two goals: (i) to provide content thatdecreases instructional barriers
communicative validation. Ourcurrent preliminary findings include six categories along four dimensions of variation. Recently,we have received additional feedback from an advisory board with expertise in qualitativeresearch, ethics education, and phenomenographic methodology.Objective 2 Overview and ProgressIn parallel to Objective 1, our research team has been identifying critical incidents whichrepresent key experiences that lead to growth of or solidification in ways of experiencingengineering ethics. While our original plan was to utilize a content analytic approach, we slightlyrevised our Phase 2 course of action. Specifically, we applied Critical Incident Technique [46], astrategy that members of our team utilized in two recent studies [47],[48
framework, ConcepTests are typicallyqualitative and require no or very minimal numerical calculation, although they may requiremental imagination of the development of key equations. Also, some ConcepTests are intendedfor summative assessment and should follow specific guidelines; others may be open-ended andintended to provoke debate and force students to verbalize and justify their assumptions whenanswering questions (Beatty et al. 2006).Since the workshop, the team has had virtual meetings every 1-2 months to discuss conceptquestion development and to review progress. A systematic review process was set up toprovide feedback on all of the different questions, and to plan and manage initial student testingconducted at three different institutions
with someonethey are not familiar with. A more personalized approach such as establishing rapport with theparticipants prior to administering the survey or participant interviews may elicit information thatparticipants may initially be hesitant to share.Future WorkData analysis is ongoing and will consist of a complete analysis of the reasons that influenceBlack women to leave their engineering positions. Trends and relationships between otherfactors and the decision to leave will also be examined. We also asked participants for theiremails and permission to contact them about their survey responses. We plan to conduct more in-depth interviews with these women to better understand their experiences within the workforce.Our hope is that this
factor and showed high coefficient alpha (.93) with the final grades in the original MSLQdescription [2].Test anxiety The MSLQ includesd test anxiety as a factor of affective component. This componentincludes both an emotionality and cognitive component. Emotionality refers to affective andphysiological aspects, like worries. The cCognitive component of test anxiety includes cognitiveconcern and preoccupation with performance. Test anxiety was negatively correlated toacademic performance (α = .80) [2].Time and study environment Self-regulation of time and study environment (TSE) is important for one’s successfullearning, and this factor also was highly correlated with the final grade (α = .76). It encompassesscheduling, planning
activitiesfacilitated by OSDS.History of Freshmen Student Support ProgramsGoing on 20 years, MAPS and the EFLC are the longest running student support programsdeveloped by OSDS. The MAPS Program exists to increase the retention and academicperformance of all students who are pursuing a COE degree. Although MAPS was originallydeveloped and implemented through National Science Foundation (NSF) funding, it is now fullyfunded by the University as a key component of the Southern Association of Colleges andSchools (SACS) Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP), known as Prospect For Success (PFS). PFSis designed to foster academic engagement through three specific learning outcomes:Commitment to Success, Inquiry, and Cultural Awareness. For more information regarding
and polling questions were also perceived aspositive on average across demographic groups. The slightly lower score may be due to students’resistance to active learning formats [25]. The largely positive responses to the course structuresupport the plan to continue with this overall template. However, some results warrantadjustments: as mentioned JiT quizzes were already replaced. Assigned groups were rated in thebottom three for both female and black students. This could mean that more care is needed increating groups, or additional support is needed for developing group cohesiveness.This paper presented a small subset of the data collected in the study; much more work is left tobe done. Ongoing analysis will look at other student aspects
. The breadth and depth of engineeringmeant any individual branch within engineering, such as chemical engineering, could easily have46 episodes devoted to within that branch, or even within a single engineering course likethermodynamics. The direction to cover all of engineering meant that achieving a balance betweenall branches of engineering, with appropriate breadth and depth to cover key topics within eachfield, would take significant planning and effort before the series could even be filmed. Mappingout the series took ten months of research, which occurred while the series was being initiallywritten, filmed, animated, produced, and released. The series effectively broke down into several components. The first six episodes
people, equipment, and materials that are housed in our labs, facultymembers’ labs, research labs as well as within other companies. The members share what isneeded and house supplies in whatever location is logical for each project at the time. As plans,partners, and project needs change, our equipment and supplies change and move.One of the priority ongoing projects is the operation of a makerspace laboratory that providesadditive manufacturing services to students, faculty, and external customers. A business graduatestudent oversees the laboratory and other students who staff the facility (Figure 1). The lab isopen to all our university students, and printing is free (up to 500g). Trained student staffmembers operate software and assist
the software has been successful forhomework, there were still several challenges during the transition to utilize it fully forsynchronous online labs. The main challenge was management of student expectations. Studentsinitially demonstrated disappointment that they would not be able to directly apply skill sets tophysical equipment. The students soon saw; however, that the simulation software presentedmore of an opportunity to practice and grasp the key aspects of automation. The availability ofthe simulation software on the student’s PC provided more opportunities for them to practicetheir skill sets (e.g. EDS planning and implementation) as opposed to the hard-wired physicalunits, which have limited access even under normal (pre-pandemic
without negatively impacting other systems (treatment & recovery plan) 5. Monitor the progress (patient feedback if symptoms persist) 6. Engineer controls to prevent similar malfunctions (patient education, diet, prosthetics, etc.)The Coast Guard must intentionally seek out a diversity of “non-traditional” stakeholders duringeach of the steps outlined above. A diversity of experience, thought and perspective enriches theproblem-solving process. Our Diamond Model, shown in Figure 2, illustrates the need for“survivors” to help solve complex medical problems because the doctor alone cannot make adiagnosis without a complete understanding of the symptoms explained by the patient.For example, in a shipyard, the welder may have some
. Thesesessions addressed how to create a professional resume, prepare for interviews, and developpolite follow-ups. While students indicated that they were interested in learning more aboutetiquette, it was a topic that was not sufficiently addressed in the first year. Plans are underwayto address this issue including taking students out to a formal dinner so that they become morecomfortable with tableware and table talk. 6. Financial Security: In some of the sessions, participants quipped that they were feelinganxious about making ends meet. Some voiced they worried about whether they would be able tocomplete their degrees because they were not sure whether they should pay tuition and buybooks, or pay rent, buy food, or baby diapers. While only some
bankruptcy.” That really impacted me, made me conscious about my social class.After being interviewed by the university recruiter, Edgar realized that neither he nor his familywas in the financial position to pay for his dreamed-about education. Therefore, instead ofgiving up, Edgar made use of his aspirational resources and chose to continue with hiseducation in a more affordable university. As the literature from LatCrit theory indicates,resilience and resistance are forms of aspirational capital that Latinx students leverage toaccomplish their goals [3]. Edgar’s account represents an illustrative example of usingaspirational resources to navigate the financial struggle of paying for his college education.After Edgar adapted his plans to a
Workplace: Results of a Survey on Technical Communication Skills,” no. October, 2001.[4] S. Cerri, “EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION SKILLS FOR ENGINEERS,” pp. 625– 629, 2000.[5] A. Keane and I. S. Gibson, “Communication Trends in Engineering Firms: Implications for Undergraduate Engineering Courses,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 115–121, 1999.[6] Society of Manufacturing Engineers Education Foundation, “Manufacturing Education Plan: Phase 1 Report—Industry Identifies Competency Gaps Among Newly Hired Engineering,” 1997.[7] L. A. Riley, P. Furth, and J. Zelmer, “Assessing Our Engineering Alumni: Determinants of Success in the Workplace,” 2000 ASEE/Gulf-Southwest Sect. Annu. Conf., 2000
(afternoon). I am here to present my work onanalyzing the data curated in the resource centercsedresearch.org. The plan is to have about 10 minutes at theend of this presentation for questions, but please, feel free toask questions during the presentation if there are instanceswhere I can provide additional information about our work orprocess.Overall, we are viewing this presentation as an exploration ofdata. We are hoping to start/continue a dialog, but don’tconsider this presentation to be about presenting results, butrather the beginnings of the explorations of what this collectedand curated data may be telling us. 1 K-12 Computing Education is Growing
research intends to use a rubricto evaluate student perceptions regarding context, social interaction, and authentic learning and tocluster students into high, medium, and low categories to conduct a deeper analysis of studentexperiences using sentiment analysis and thematic analysis.AcknowledgementThe research reported in this paper was supported in part by the National Science Foundation underthe awards DMS- 1246818 and EEC-1449238 and by the Lilly Endowment Charting the FuturePhase I Planning Grant, through the Purdue Office of the Provost. This work was also supportedin part by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Programunder Grant No. (DGE-1842166). M.D. Ward's research is also supported by National ScienceFoundation
other community-based making websites and forums to learn about materials,electronics, tools and tooling as well as to find inspiration, methods, and procedures. Websitessuch as TinkerCAD and 123Design coupled with early desktop 3D printer such as the MakerBotbrought digital design, modeling, and printing to the non-expert, while sites such as Thingiverseshowed the non-expert what was possible. Beyond these simple making solutions, the internetprovides extensive making and manufacturing knowledge and inspiration with instruction andprojects for the laser cutter, vinyl cutter, lathe, CNC, waterjet – just to name a few. Everythingfrom how to videos, pictures of projects, and project plans are available. Many of our studentshave grown up
students across different majors, which is situated to helpbring the diversity of thought and capabilities to the innovation experience and better preparestudents for the future of work. Co-learning occurs primarily within design teams, which areassigned by the instructors in the first core integrated course, and students decide their owngroups in the second core integrated course. The program overall is designed to augment the wayin which students learn across multiple semesters and plans-of-study rather than just serving asadditional courses to add to their course load. Therefore, the program is designed to provide allstudents, regardless of their major, a multi-semester learning experience focused on the actualpursuit of innovation. By doing so
dean of engineering and thedepartment chairs of computer engineering and computer science. These visits consisted ofdiscussing Herbie’s presence and influence on campus as well as plans for the future. We tookpictures of Herbie with the campus administrators, which ended up on the university’s majorwebsites, giving Herbie significant exposure to the university community and expandingHerbie’s social network.As Herbie’s recognition progressed, we began to do “Herbie Giveaways.” These giveawaysbegan by having a basket full of candy attached to Herbie’s head and running Herbie around thehallways of campus. Students would recognize Herbie, take a piece of candy, and sometimestake pictures or videos of him. When the social media account first
students had little to no experience withcircuits. The post-workshop survey had 22 responses and slides for 24 final projects werecreated (one group project by two siblings).4.1 Student FeedbackTo help with future planning, a post-workshop survey included a few questions about theactivities and about coding in particular.Table 2 summarizes responses of the participants to the post-workshop survey. The table showsresponses of whether they agree, disagree, or have no opinion to the following statements:I had fun! (FUN)I learned something! (LEAR)The projects were too easy! (EASY)The projects were too hard! (HARD)I want to be an engineer! (ENGIN)Table 2 Post-workshop survey responses (N.O. is ‘No Opinion’) Grade Response FUN LEAR
thelikelihood of women to enter engineering. The review of a robotics program by Weinberg, et al.(2007) as reported in this article indicated that after 7 weeks of participation, girls had a higherinterest in engineering and a more positive attitude towards engineering. Other programs havestruggled to define positive outcomes especially in the long term. [26] evaluated a 2-weekresidential science enrichment program for high-achieving eighth-grade girls. Outcomes weremeasured 4 years after the program, for both program participants and applicants who did notattend. The study found no effect of program participation on a variety of outcomes, includingscience self-concept and interest and plans for a college science major. In previous research bythis
advance their projects. At the same time, they learn and apply professional skills in planning,teamwork, communication, and conflict resolution. The large-scale, long-term projects mirrorsituations students will encounter in the workforce. As they join large ongoing projects, they areonboarded by peers, while also taking responsibility for their own learning as they get up tospeed. They deal with decisions made in previous years and with documentation developed byothers; conversely, their own documentation will become a reference for the team in the future.Students also learn and apply professional communication skills, communicating problems toappropriate teammates and navigating conflict. These skills are addressed in peer evaluations,with