.[21] I. T. Afolabi, A. Ayo, and O. A. Odetunmibi, “Academic collaboration recommendation for computer science researchers using social network analysis,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 487–501, Nov 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08646-2[22] J. Bian, M. Xie, T. J. Hudson, H. Eswaran, M. Brochhausen, J. Hanna, and W. R. Hogan, “Collaborationviz: interactive visual exploration of biomedical research collaboration networks,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 11, p. e111928, Nov 2014.[23] Y. Yu, Y. Wu, X. Liang, C. Ma, and Q. Lu, “Ncovis: A visual analysis framework for exploring academic collaboration networks under new collaborative relationships,” in 2022 IEEE 25th International
Engineering Education (ASEE), “Profiles of engineering and engineering technology, 2021,” Washington, DC, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Engineering-and-Engineering-Technology- by-the-Numbers-2021.pdf[4] M. Curran, Q. Bloom, and S. Brint, “Does cluster hiring enhance faculty research output, collaborations, and impact? Results from a national study of U.S. research universities,” Minerva, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 585–605, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11024-020-09408-3.[5] B. A. Montelone, R. A. Dyer, and D. J. Takemoto, “A mentoring program for female and minority faculty members in the sciences and engineering: Effectiveness and status after 9 years,” J Women Minor Scien Eng, vol. 9, no. 3–4, p
VBA editor (Alt + Q). 2. In an Excel cell, enter the RUT (e.g., 12345678-9). 3. Use the function in an Excel cell as: =ValidarRUT(A1) Where A1 is the cell containing the RUT. 4. The function will return TRUE if the RUT is valid or FALSE if it is not.Example 2: Platform EvaluationPrompt"Assume you are a researcher specializing in ERP systems, and you need to create a comparativetable between various open-source alternatives. Define the parameters that should be used toevaluate the platforms."AnswerWhen creating a comparative table for different open-source ERP systems, it is essential to defineclear parameters that enable an objective and relevant evaluation of each platform. Here are severalcriteria that may be useful for
. W. Reeve, C. Rottmann, Q. Liu, V. Hue, and S. McCullouch, “Engineering Leadership Education: Catalyzing Long-Term Personal and Professional Growth,” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), Nov. 2019, doi: 10.24908/pceea.vi0.13869.[9] J. N. Magarian and R. S. Rahaman, “What Engineering Leaders Lead: The Career Outcomes of an Engineering Leadership Program’s Alumni Community,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Feb. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/what-engineering-leaders-lead-the-career- outcomes-of-an-engineering-leadership-program-s-alumni-community[10] D. L. Kirkpatrick, “Revisiting Kirkpatrick’s four-level model
Post Ratings Q# Category S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 Q1 SE (Learning) 3 4 4 3 4 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 Q5 SE (Learning) 4 3 4 3 4 1 4 5 5 4 4 4 Q9 SE (Learning) 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 Q2 SE (Application) 3 3 4 3 4 2 3 4 5 4 5 4 Q6 SE (Application) 4 3 4 3 3 1 3 4 5 5 4 4 Q10 SE (Application) 3 2 5 2 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 Q3 SE (Performance
library within the RStudio® software [22]: dgamma(x, shape, rate, log = FALSE) pgamma(q, shape, rate, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE) qgamma(p, shape, rate, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE)The dgamma function provides the probability density, the pgamma function provides thedistribution function, and the qgamma function provides the quantile function.ResultsData DisplayMisfuelling events from 1989 to 2024 from the NTSB CAROL query are shown in the dot plotin Figure 2. Misfuelling events occur 0 to 3 times each year, where each dot represents onemisfuelling event. Figure 2. Dot Plot for Misfuelling Events 1989 – 2024 from NTSB CAROL Database (Total: 35).The 35 misfuelling events are categorized according to
focusgroup that measures autism knowledge and attitudes. An additional survey was created to furthermeasure autism knowledge. The survey was developed by adapting the Autism Knowledge Survey -Revised (AKS-R), Autism Awareness Scale/Survey (AAS), Autism Spectrum Knowledge Scale GeneralPopulation (ASKSG), and research from Kuzminski et al. (2019). A survey focused on presuming competence and attitudes towards autistic people was created byadapting the Attitude Towards Autism Questionnaire (ATA-Q) and the Societal Attitudes Towards AutismScale (SATA). Additionally, research from Hanel & Shah (2020), Haddock et al. (1993), Harnum et al.(2007), and Nevil & White (2011) informed the development of the survey. Advocacy skills were
provide consent or who did not meet inclusion criteria were excluded from participationin the survey.The first section of the survey consisted of five demographic questions, which purposefullyavoided asking identifying questions to protect participant anonymity. The next section, titled“Knowledge and Confidence” (Q 8-16), asked participants to perform a self-assessment of theirknowledge of disabilities and their confidence in supporting disabled students with libraryservices and instruction. Each question in this section presented a statement (e.g., “I know a lotabout disabilities”), and asked participants to select the option that best applied to them on a five-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." Participants
development,” 2024.[10] A. N. Kumar, R. K. Raj, S. G. Aly, M. D. Anderson, B. A. Becker, R. L. Blumenthal, E. Eaton, S. L. Epstein, M. Goldweber, P. Jalote, D. Lea, M. Oudshoorn, M. Pias, S. Reiser, C. Servin, R. Simha, T. Winters, and Q. Xiang, Computer Science Curricula 2023. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024.[11] C. T. Force, Computing Curricula 2020: Paradigms for Global Computing Education. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020.[12] P. Abichandani, V. Sivakumar, D. Lobo, C. Iaboni, and P. Shekhar, “Internet-of-things curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment for stem education: A review of literature,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 38 351–38 369, 2022.[13] L. Laird and N
Method,” in Continuum Scale Simulation of Engineering Materials, D. Raabe, F. Roters, F. Barlat, and L.-Q. Chen, Eds., Weinheim, FRG: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2005, pp. 77–114. doi: 10.1002/3527603786.ch4.[11] U. Wilensky, “Restructuration Theory and Agent-Based Modeling: Reformulating Knowledge Domains Through Computational Representations,” in Designing Constructionist Futures: The Art, Theory, and Practice of Learning Designs, N. Holbert, M. Berland, and Y. B. Kafai, Eds., MIT Press, 2020, pp. 287–300.[12] U. Wilensky and S. Papert, “Reformulating Knowledge Disciplines through New Representational Forms,” presented at the Constructionism, Paris, 2010.[13] S. Papert, Mindstorms
qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms,” Theory Pract., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 132–141, Mar. 1992, doi: 10.1080/00405849209543534.[24] M. Esteban-Guitart, E. Iglesias, J. M. Serra, and D. Subero, “Community Funds of Knowledge and Identity: A Mesogenetic Approach to Education,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 307–317, 2023, doi: 10.1111/aeq.12451.[25] N. Gonzalez, L. C. Moll, and C. Amanti, Eds., Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms, 1st edition. Mahwah, N.J: Routledge, 2005.[26] T. J. Yosso *, “Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth,” Race Ethn. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–91, Mar. 2005, doi
STEM Mentoring Offers Unexpected Benefits for Mentors from Traditionally Underrepresented Backgrounds,” Perspect Undergrad Res Mentor, vol. 4, no. 1, p. https://eloncdn.blob.core.windows.net/eu3/sites/923/2019/06/Riggs.GT-et-al- PURM-4.1.pdf, 2015.[28] Qualtrics. (2025). Qualtrics, Provo, Utah, USA. [Online]. Available: https://www.qualtrics.com[29] S. A. Schill, “Understanding Undergraduate Student Mentors’ STEM Identity Development in K-12 STEM Outreach Programs: A Phenomenographical Approach,” University of Colorado Boulder, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/kw52j938q[30] S. Liu, S. Xu, Q. Li, H. Xiao, and S. Zhou, “Development and validation of an