development activities with anindustry focus were most effective. We conclude the paper by identifying practical andtheoretical implications for engineering educators, student life professionals, engineering deansand student engagement researchers.Context: Engineering leadership education reformNorth American faculties of engineering have been encouraged by national academies andaccreditation boards to integrate leadership development into their programing since the mid2000s 1-6. The US-based National Academy of Engineering (NAE) published a call for educationreform in 2004—The Engineer of 2020, which encouraged engineering educators to complementtheir strong technical curricula with professional skills development 4. Five years later,Engineers
ability for efficient BTEXdegradation without requiring additional nutrients (e.g. glucose) for more than 1 year.” (Shim etal., 2002, p. 1) The ph-level remained neutral, indicating that conditions were stable and acid-intermediates were not forming. An additional buffer was not required during this process(Berenjian et al., 2012). As an alternative to the use of bacteria, Ahmed and Song (2011) testedthe yeast strain Candida tropicalis as a means of VOC elimination. Their results indicated that C.tropicalis is capable of removing gaseous toluene.When it comes to pursuing research in chemical engineering the student author (Aimee Oz)wants to focus on air quality and pollution control from being encouraged to read about VOCs.After she’s
enables hands-on learning in education:Prototypes unlock cognitive association mechanisms related to visualization, prior experience,and interpersonal communication in ways that favor iterative learning between peers in theproduct development community.1 For engineers, idea-generation and prototyping can becombined through hands-on activities.2 Makerspaces empower their users to develop, build andtest physical prototypes. A prototype serves as a milestone and can be used in various stages ofthe development process to improve communication and learning within a group or organization.It is also an important part of project-centered education and relevant for engineering education.Fisher3 states that makerspaces “fill a variety of needs within an
American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Faculty-Coached, Team-Based, In-Class, Problem Solving in a Systematic Approach Toward Undergraduate Dynamics Abstract This paper describes a new tool in active and participative learning that effectively teaches theory and practice in undergraduate dynamics using in-class problem solving. The proposed approach treats the entire class as a team while ensuring that all students participate in the problem-solving exercise. This approach addresses three key compo- nents that are known to be effective techniques in teaching and learning: 1) student engagement, 2) affective pedagogy, and 3) class
education classes take a case study approach. This paper will describe the implementation of this hybrid GE/senior project course and will present the assessment of the first year of this program’s implementation. Introduction In January 2013, the California State University Board of Trustees mandated that, unless excepted, undergraduate degree programs, including engineering degrees, be limited to 120 units. Title 5 § 40508 [1] states that “[a]s of the fall term of the 2014-2015 academic year, no baccalaureate degree programs shall extend the unit requirement beyond 120 semester units…” This mandate and short timeline for implementation necessitated swift action for proposals to be submitted and approved via campus curriculum committees and
“Degree”, “Minor”, “Certificate”, “Coursework”, and“Other”. These categorizes were operationalized with the following definitions and provided tosurvey participants.1. Degree - A program that offers a degree in Engineering/Technical Leadership or a closelyrelated field.2. Minor - A program that offers a minor in Engineering/Technical Leadership or a closelyrelated field.2. Certificate - A program that offers a certificate in Engineering/Technical Leadership uponcompletion.4. Coursework - A program that offers coursework not part of a degree/minor/certificate inEngineering/Technical Leadership Program.5. Other - Please select other if your program type does not fit into the categories listed above.Selecting other will allow you to provide
exams. The first CI that became widely deployed was the Force Concept Inventory (FCI)1,developed to study the conceptual knowledge in basic mechanics among physics students. Sincethen, dozens of CI’s have been deployed in various branches of engineering and science,including by organized efforts with sponsorship from the National Science Foundation2.However, efforts to perpetually deploy and collect data from CI’s have proven difficult tosustain3. In Engineering Mechanics, the two most widely deployed CI’s are the ConceptAssessment Tool for Statics (CATS), originally named the Statics Concept Inventory (SCI)4, andthe Dynamics Concept Inventory (DCI)5,6. At least two independent efforts to create a conceptinventory for Mechanics of
outcomes from previoussections of ENL/LIN/UWP 106, I synthesized a set of common, top-level Course LearningOutcomes (CLOs) to serve as scaffolding for an experimental offering of 106 standard as 106STEM. Here are the six resulting top-level CLOs: • CLO #1: know the parts of speech (“noun,” “verb,” “adjective,” etc.) and basic sentence structures (“Subject – Verb Intransitive” and “Subject – Verb Transitive – Object,” etc.). • CLO #2: know advanced sentence structures, such as compound, complex, compound- complex, questions, passive vs. active structure. • CLO #3: know how to parse sentences into sentence constituents (individual words) that are ordered, arranged, and labeled using tree diagrams
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 SUCCESS FACTORS FOR MINORITIES IN ENGINEERS: ANALYSIS OF FOCUS GROUP MINI-SURVEYSJacqueline Fleming, National Action Council for Minorities in EngineeringAbstractFocus group conversations were previously reported for minority students from elevenengineering schools.1 This study describes the analysis of a mini-survey administered during thefocus group sessions in order to augment group discussions which can be dominated by strongpersonalities thereby skewing the results. One hundred and forty-four students, comprised of51.4% African American, 36.8% Hispanic, and11.8% of Other ethnicities, completed three open-ended questions on: how they became interested in
various examples and implementations through several oneonone interactions. Oneonone interactions help facilitate a great teaching environment, and are often utilized to teach students about programming misconceptions and errors in an introductory programming course. The repetitive nature of a substantial portion of these interactions makes them a prime candidate for improving scalability through automation. Automated assessment of programming exercises is often utilized to bridge the scalability gap. However, the openended nature of programming assignments can lead to (1) misguided automatic feedback, (2) a disconnection between an errant student solution and proper advice, (3) a complete lack of advice due to the student not understanding
Society of Mechanical Engineers, a Fellow of the Institution of Engineers (India), and a Fellow of the Acoustical Society of India. He is the editor-in-chief of the Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering Grand Challenges Video Competition - A Project Learning Tool in a Cross-Disciplinary ClassAbstract In 2007, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) began working with a marketingcompany to rebrand engineering and better communicate the importance of engineering to thepublic and potential future engineers. The resulting messages were 1) Engineers are creativeproblem solvers, 2) Engineers make a world
assessment for measuring elementary students’ engineering skills andunderstanding-in-use. Finally, we describe the time needed to score the assessments, and discussits utility for larger-scale research studies.IntroductionThe Next Generation Science Standards[1] calls for all American students to learn engineering inaddition to science in grades K-12. The NGSS places particular emphasis on students learningengineering practices and an understanding of engineering design. At the earliest grades, childrenlearn about engineering as solving problems that people want solved. “Emphasis is on thinkingthrough the needs or goals that need to be met, and which solutions best meet those needs andgoals” [1 Appendix I]. Throughout elementary school, students
program’s goal has been to provide a quality program thatmeets accreditation standards while providing the students with a skill set that allows them tosucceed in computing careers. The curriculum content for the Computer Science degree is basedon the 2008 ACM Curriculum Report. The Computer Science degree at UVU is accredited byAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) in 2002 and currently has morethan 850 students. The program also has an advisory board comprised of representatives of localindustry who assist in aligning the program to industry needs and helping to acquire industrysupport and resources.Table 1 and 2 shows the enrollment and graduation trends in the Computer Science program. Ascan be seen from the tables, the
Engineering Education, 2016 Developing a Behavior-Based Rubric for Assessing Professional Skills During HiringAbstract Modern engineers are expected to possess strong leadership, creativity, andcommunication skills in addition to being technically savvy [1]. A recent trend in the engineeringhiring process is the inclusion of team-building games used to analyze engineering candidates forprofessional skills. Current methods of evaluating candidates, such as behavioral interviews, aresubjected to bias, with evaluators scoring candidates based on broad and inconsistent definitionsof traits, and their own perceptions of how well candidates demonstrate these traits [2]. This methods paper describes a
Engineering Design CurriculumAbstractFunctional modeling is often covered as a critical element of the engineering design process inengineering design texts, but little empirical data clearly demonstrates that functional modelingimproves engineering designs or that teaching functional modeling makes students betterdesigners. The overall objective of this project is to determine the impact of teaching function onengineering students’ design synthesis abilities. Two studies are being performed as a part ofthis project: (1) a longitudinal study following students through their sophomore, junior, andsenior year following some being taught functional modeling, while others not, and (2) a yearlystudy looking at capstone project quality of students from
ability of future generations to meet their ownneeds." In today’s global society, the resources and energy humankind presently consumes farexceeds the capacity of the supporting ecosystems,1 Thus, there is little doubt that the currentstate of development is unsustainable, thus making sustainability of all that we do in the future acritical global challenge to every profession, engineering included. As the consequences ofunsustainable ‘overshoot’2 on our planetary resources continues to unfold, it has becomeincreasingly important for educators to introduce students to a common language and vestedinterest in sustainability during the undergraduate years. For engineering students, meaningfulintegration of sustainability into the undergraduate
learning have been discussed in varying contexts from service learning 2-4 , to research experiences 5, laboratory exercises 6, 7,and industry field trips 8. Examinations of theimpact on students have been somewhat cursory to date 3. Very little work exists with respect tothe effects of these activities on individual students in varying types of courses. These practicalactivities pursue active learning processes by transferring theoretical knowledge to pragmatictasks and vice versa 9, 10. Common among these activities is that they are often based on Kolb’sexperiential learning theory that indicates that experience can change learning status throughinteraction between learning and environment 1, 11. Kolb's previous work explored
beingconsidered. Further, because the competition is staged and set to go on the full academic year,the students are interviewed regarding plans on continuing the project beyond the currentsemester when the majority of the team will have graduated.IntroductionThe goal of this project is to create a concept design for an automated lunar ice mining facility.The facility will harvest ice from the moon. There is an estimated 3-trillion tons of water icepresent at the poles of the moon [1]. Knowing this, the water can be extracted and separated intoits constituent parts for use as a LOX-Hydrogen rocket fuel for deep space missions.DesignThe design consists of several main components and can be seen in the figure below. Anoverview of the facility design
and a tablet PC. A qualitativecomprehension quiz was administered using the online course shell through which the studentsaccessed the videos. The homework assignment was posted at the same time as the videos, andwas due one week later. During the first of two 75-minute lecture slots, the instructor completedexamples related to the video topics. The second lecture slot was for student-directed homeworkproblem solving. As a partial control, the final course module was delivered in the traditionalmanner. Students reported a strong preference for moving the theory and derivations out oflectures, and an overall preference for the flipped course format.The biggest challenges were 1) instructor’s perception of diminished connection to the
her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student professional development and training. In addition, she is developing methodologies around affective management of curriculum and instruction in engineer- ing students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Self-Regulated Learning in Engineering Education: A Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site ProgramAbstractThis paper reports the most recent results of an ongoing Research Experiences forUndergraduates (REU) Site program funded by the NSF TUES-Type 1 funds. The 10-weeksummer program focuses on engineering education research on self
sacrificing material coverage or educationalscaffolding. Many educators are beginning to invert their classrooms, but there is limited (or no)data on learning gains currently available. We are rigorously examining the impact of threeinstructors inverting two STEM courses, in engineering (thermodynamics) and mathematics(differential equations), by measuring student learning gains and attitudes towards the coursematerial. Our expected measureable outcomes are: 1. Higher learning gains; 2. Increased ability to apply material in new situations (transfer); 3. Increased interest in and positive attitudes towards STEM fields (affective gains); and 4. Increased awareness by students of how they learn and strategies that
processes.Andrew Phillips, The University of Glasgow c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Inexpensive Hands-On Activities in Solid State LightingHands-on activities were developed as part of an overseas immersion programme (OIP) runby the School of Engineering at the University of Glasgow (UoG). The two-week OIP was acombination of academic and cultural experiences where the academic experience was a 10credit course on solid state lighting. The course was taught for the first time in the summerof 2015 to a cohort of 32 Year 1 and Year 2 students in the undergraduate electronics andelectrical engineering programmes offered at the University of Electronic Science andTechnology of China (UESTC) and the
Paper ID #14495Design and Implementation of an Experiment Setup on Solar ElectricityDr. Linfeng Zhang, University of Bridgeport Linfeng Zhang is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering at the University of Bridgeport. He obtained his Ph.D. from Wayne State University. His current research is on the renewable energy, power system, and electronic devices. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Design and implementation of an experiment setup on the solar electricityAbstract PV module price has fallen 75% to below $1/w
significantly more efficient than previous technologies.Analogously, textbooks became a standard tool for higher education in the 20th century, and formany undergraduate engineering courses, remain as the standard method for informationdissemination and reference. The engineering textbook is primarily used for defining terms andequations. Additionally, worked examples and homework problems are included in mostengineering textbooks. However, the invention and mass production of the smartphone andsimple access to factual information through Internet search engines, including Google, haschanged how students obtain most of the information found in textbooks [1]. The price oftextbooks has risen dramatically to more than $200 per traditional hard cover book
Arthur B. Powell Rutgers University Rutgers University muteb.alqahtani@gse.rutgers.edu powellab@andromeda.rutgers.eduDynamic geometry environments can support learning of geometry through meditating learners’activity. To understand how dynamic geometry environment mediate the activity of mathematicsteachers, we used Rabardel’s categories of instrument mediations in an instrument-mediatedactivity [1, 2]. We analyzed the discursive and inscriptive interactions of 4 mathematics teacherswho worked for 15 weeks in a team to construct geometric figures and solve open-endedgeometrical problems in a collaborative, dynamic geometry environment. In addition
could be implemented in a variety of ways in orderto achieve the same objective.ImplementationThe proposed learning experience was implemented within an undergraduate fluid mechanicscourse. In the studied semester, this course was offered in two sections, scheduled for Mondays,Wednesdays, and Fridays at 8:00-8:50 am (Section 1) and 9:00-9:50 am (Section 2). On everyFriday in each section, an activity named “Fluids Friday!” was conducted for the first 5 minutesof the class period. This activity was run through a digital slideshow, consisting of four primarycomponents: 1. An introductory slide containing a fun picture conveying the message “We are happy that it is Friday!” 2. A picture revealing the “Fluid of the Week” with a link to
undergraduate environment and curriculum.Research DesignResearch questions guiding our work included: 1) To what extent are secondary school studentsin Trinidad and Tobago exposed to engineering as part of their school curriculum?; 2) How doesthe current level of exposure relate to students’ interest in undergraduate engineering studies?;and 3) How well do current engineering undergraduates who attended secondary school inTrinidad and Tobago think their education prepared them for engineering?Participants in the study included a sample of secondary school students in Trinidad and Tobagoand students from Trinidad and Tobago who pursued engineering degrees (Table 1).Table 1. Participant Demographics Students who pursued Engineering
. Most young kids and even some college students seem tobe unaware of what computer science means. These activities help them understand the depthand diversity a computer science undergraduate degree can entail.The paper will provide the details for each of these activities and the learning objectives. Theactivities included are:(1) Binary, Octal, and Hexadecimal Initial Keychains(2) Understanding Variables and Arrays with Paper Bags(3) Branching and Looping Statements with Starburst Candies(4) General Class Structure with Bags, Boxes, and a Bin(5) Dr. Doolittle’s Vet Office: Learning Classes with Stuffed Animals(6) Arrays with Tissue Boxes, DVD Sets, Paper Plates, and other Household Goods(7) Basic Networking, Message Passing, and Security with
quality of life of the general public withtheir skill sets. The long term outcomes of the course are: 1) to be able to communicate andwork with the general public as the ultimate recipients of our engineering goods; 2) to be able totransfer the knowledge to younger generations and to continue to produce professional engineers.Our curriculum includes the service learning requirement as a course for all of our engineeringmajors. This has been a successful class to provide the students with the mindset of an engineer,serving the community. The course also helped our college to be involved with local countyaffairs and helped surrounding elementary schools to high schools with many Science,Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) activities.How is the
Engineering Education, 2016Curiosities Regarding Exam Review Sessions at LSU’s College of EngineeringIntroduction As enrollment increases at Louisiana State University (LSU), it becomes morechallenging for students to be actively engaged with their professors and in their own learningprocesses. The larger class sizes and reduction in state funding contribute to a poorer learningenvironment (1, 2). This struggle is compounded in sophomore level courses, where many studentsconsider dropping out of their respective engineering programs (3). In 2014, the authors publisheda paper discussing how these barriers can be somewhat alleviated by offering peer led activelearning sessions through Supplemental Instruction (SI) (4). The authors found that