Arbor) and her Ph.D. (2015) in Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Effective Use of Engineering Standards in Biomedical EngineeringIntroductionThe use of engineering standards is an important skill for biomedical engineering (BME)students to succeed in their post-baccalaureate careers in the engineering profession [1].Engineering standards provide a framework for establishing and defining design constraints,working within regulatory and policy guidelines, and for developing and implementingappropriate design verification and validation methods [2,3]. Across BME departments there is astrong emphasis on the use of standards in Capstone or
active andcollaborative strategies that engage students in their own learning, and in relevant ways, arehighly successful across all disciplines (not just STEM) …” [1], [2]. Our ultimate goals are tomaximize instructional effectiveness and, therefore, student success in, and engagement with,STEM. By “success,” we are referring to a range of variables, including improved completionand pass rates, grade improvement, improved attitudes toward STEM, and improved study andengagement habits.Need for the Project. Institutional data at NDSU uniformly indicates the need for increased resources aimed atbolstering the adoption of innovative learner-focused teaching practices in STEM - especially ingateway courses. The John N. Gardner Institute for
learning platforms.Despite the clear value of increasing access to a variety of students, there is strong evidence thatmany students find succeeding in online courses challenging[1]. In the Department ofBioengineering at the University of Washington, we have recently moved our professionalprogram to a fully online format. Here, I present the structure being used for two fully onlinecourses in the Master in Pharmaceutical Bioengineering program that promotes the success ofour students.Many online programs rely entirely on recorded material, assignments, and discussion boards.This delivery method is effective and allows students to progress through the courses atindividual paces. However, this format does not provide a strong learning community
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018IntroductionScholarships in Engineering, Science, Mathematics and Computer Science (SESMC, “seismic”)is an NSF S-STEM project at Allan Hancock College (AHC), a community college in SantaMaria, California. SESMC was funded at $600,000 for five-years. The first set of scholarshipswas awarded during academic year 2013–14, and the final set was awarded during 2017–18.Project activities were based on four foundations blocks: Financial, Academic Skills,Involvement, and Commitment/Motivation (Figure 1). Each scholar was awarded up to $6,000per year. Scholars were required to attend group study sessions, workshops, guest speaker talks,etc., as well as meet twice per semester with a faculty mentor in
. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Diversity of College Engineering Degrees: The Roles of Geography and the Concentration of Engineering Degree Production Executive SummaryIntroductionTo meet the growing demand for a larger technological and scientific labor force in the UnitedStates, a prominent policy goal is to expand and broaden participation in science and engineeringcollege programs (e.g., [1], [2]). Previous
assist the student in the design process. Included withDigiScope are a library of sampled ECG signals from the PhysioNet ECG database [1]. Once afilter is designed in DigiScope the processing results can be visualized on the included databaseof electrocardiograms.We included concepts of real-time digital signal processing in a book developed for this coursesome time ago [2]. In the Spring semester of 2018, we added lab experiments with real-timemicrocontroller programming of the signal processing algorithms in addition to analysis of pre-recorded signals with the DigiScope program. After an acceptable filter is designed, DigiScopeprovides the coefficients of the designed filter that the students use to implement the filter as areal-time digital
vs. 4-year institutions)are made to feel as outsiders in STEM. Each SEECRS scholar is paired with a faculty mentorwho engages in ongoing mentor training.The project evaluation will determine the efficacy of the project activities in achieving theirintended outcomes. Specifically, we will collect data to answer the research question: To whatextent can a guided pathways approach provide a coordinated and supported STEM experienceat Whatcom Community College that: (1) increases student success, and (2) positively shiftsstudents’ STEM self-identity? The evaluation will employ a quasi-experimental research design,specifically a pretest-posttest design with a matched comparison group.Our first cohort of 14 students was selected over two
engineering-related question and defend their position in front of others, f. Able to describe examples of applications and outline the state of the art in nanobiotechnology, g. Able to contribute to and build upon team ideas through discussion. Active learning can be twice as effective as traditional lecturing4, which is why active learning wasat the core of our design of this course. Indeed, the class-time was structured around three different types ofactivities: 1. Lectures 2. Case studies 3. Case historiesIn-class participation was also encouraged and relevant comments or in-class discussions were rewarded withextra points in the course’s final grade. Lectures made up less than half of the overall class time
nature of this project will foster students’ development ofessential skills in team-work, communication, and time-management, serving them well intotheir professional careers.1.0 Introduction & RationaleAs part of an NSF funded Advanced Technological Education grant (DUE #1400490),Bellingham Technical College (BTC), in partnership with Western Washington University(WWU) and the Pacific Northwest Center of Excellence for Clean Energy (Center), developed anew career-training pathway in Clean Energy that advances the academic capabilities of studentsand increases employability of regional graduates [1]. This work included the development of anAssociate in Applied Science-Transfer (AAS-T) degree with specialized certificates in the areasof power
the last three years, and thus has been steadily increasing the extent ofsustainability concepts included in the courses. Recently, instruction in sustainability conceptswas expanded from the Design III course to the Design II course, as a result of the instructorreceiving internal grant funding for a course-redesign on a Title V I-CARE (Integrating a Cultureof Academic and Research Engagement) federal grant. For the course re-design, a newinstructional module was created on heat integration in chemical processes, and then a short termstudent project was assigned to students.The sustainability concepts that are discussed in the Design II and Design III courses are (1)recycling of unreacted feed or other chemical; (2) heat integration; (3
the gains in student learning, engagement, andskills in the existing course to verify instructor perceptions. Therefore, our goal was tobenchmark a broad snapshot of the current laboratory course sequence before implementing anycourse changes. Due to the complexity of the course learning objectives, the authors took amulti-dimensional approach. By using both self-assessment and direct assessment methods withvarious tools in each of these categories we sought to capture the effects of our currentpedagogical practices while creating a platform to assess future changes to the laboratorycurriculum. The four outcomes of interest were developments in knowledge, laboratory skills,attitudes, and writing skills.Table 1: Proposed assessments that cross
ability to monitor and control theirown learning) and knowledge of effective study strategies. This paper presents preliminaryfindings on this intervention. Pre-post results are discussed for students who received themetacognitive awareness and study strategy intervention versus those who did not.IntroductionRetention and graduation are prominent concerns in engineering education. In 2007, the averageretention rate at U.S. engineering schools was just 56% [1]. Using 2016 data from 150engineering schools, Veenstra et al. [2] states that the 5-year graduation rates vary widely amongcolleges of engineering and is related to the first year retention rate. The research implies thatcolleges with a 90% first year retention rate have a 72% 5-year
considered one of the most effective tools toincrease enrollment and students’ retention. The program activities also impacted other studentsoutside the program, because student clubs, mostly managed and run by students, created anenvironment that appealed to their fellow students outside the NSF-STEM program. As a result,the number of active students in clubs’ activities has significantly increased. The details andimplementation process of the STEM program and its assessment process will be presented anddiscussed during the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.1. IntroductionThis NSF S-STEM program (award #11540000) started in the fall of 2012. The program is titled“Increasing Student Enrollment and Achievement in Engineering and Engineering
the increase of quality assurance and regulations set forth by government agencies,recording of data and results will be an important skill for those students to have. For instance,electronic notebooks can comply with CFR Title 21 Part 11: Electronic Records and ElectronicSignatures of the United States Food and Drug Administration.With increase of personal technology and implementation of “cloud” storage, many companiesare implementing some form of electronic laboratory notebooks. • In 1997, Collaborative Electronic Notebook Systems Association (CENSA) was formed through the support of eleven major pharmaceutical and chemical companies. [1] • In 2014, Takeda Pharmaceutical published an article regarding their E-Notebook Project
Institute, which is a two-day teachingworkshop that introduces community college engineering faculty to the CALSTEP curriculum,and assists faculty in implementing the curriculum and developing alternative teaching andlearning strategies to increase enrollment and improve teaching effectiveness. Results ofcurriculum development and the implementation of the Summer Engineering Teaching Institutewill be highlighted in this paper, as well as future plans to maximize the impact of the program inincreasing access to engineering education among thousands of community college engineeringstudents and strengthening engineering transfer programs in the state.1. IntroductionAddressing the retention problem in the first two years of college is one of the
. Thedemonstration will also include pre- and post-demonstration reflection activities to help studentsface their misconceptions, a feature that has been demonstrated to be key for learning fromdemonstrations [1].The activities will be piloted for the first time during the Spring 2018 semester. In addition tothe previously mentioned reflection activities, improvements in student learning of key conceptswill be assessed indirectly by comparing achievement on relevant quiz and exam questions from2017 and 2018. These preliminary results will be presented at the 2018 ASEE AnnualConference, where the author hopes to receive feedback and ideas for improvement.Activity 1: McCabe-Thiele Quiz GameThe McCabe-Thiele method is a traditional graphical method for
cover the foundational topics of both thermodynamics and transport inCourse 1. Course 2 would then address more application-focused content in boththermodynamics and transport in addition to kinetics and reactor design.After this discussion it was determined that this online CHE bridging course will be offered in twoconsecutive semesters (fall and spring) at the authors’ institution as a distance education course.The two-semester bridging course, entitled “Core ChE Concepts: I and II”, is divided into fourcategories spread over the two semesters, as described in Table 1. As noted previously, the topicsshown in Table 1 are not presented sequentially but are integrated over both semesters.One open question is whether students taking an online
problems.IntroductionIn the 20th century, textbooks were a standard technology for higher education and engineeringeducation. In the 21st century, personalized electronics, such as smart phones and laptops, are usedat a much higher rate than almost any other resources, including textbooks, by digitally nativestudents. Similarly, very little information is available about textbook usage, and most researchshows a majority of college students do not read textbooks [1-6]. However, technology fromreading quizzes to interactive textbooks are beginning to measure positive results related to out ofclass reading and participation [7-15]. Specifically, fully interactive textbooks from zyBooks hasshown excellent results helping students in the lower third of the course as
responsibility as citizens to serve their community, nation, and the world. The objectivesof this program are to (1) recruit diverse students to STEM fields, (2) Retain 85% of scholarshiprecipients in a STEM field, (3) Increase the civic mindedness and engagement amongparticipants, and (4) Achieve a STEM placement for 90% of the program graduates. In order tomeet these objectives, the PI team has implemented a series of well-established methods.Scholarships are awarded to make college more accessible and allow more time for educationalopportunities through reduced need for outside employment. The group of ACES students areformed into a cohort to provide a support structure in a community of like-minded scholars withdiverse backgrounds. That support
implementations[1,2,3]. Researchers have also concluded that training in Spatial Visualization (SV) is associatedwith higher retention rates in engineering, especially for women [4]. Spatial Visualization skillsrefer to one’s cognitive ability to mentally manipulate 2-D and 3-D objects. Well-developedSpatial Visualization skills are considered important for success in many STEM fields [5]. Acomplete restructuring of the 1-credit Introduction to Biomedical Engineering course wascompleted in the fall of 2017 in order to 1) introduce design thinking, 2) enhance spatialrepresentation skills, and 3) increase comradery among the cohort by having team-basedactivities throughout the semester. These three objectives have been achieved through thedevelopment and
address a community challenge from Time 1 (M=3.58,SD=3.403) to Time 2 (M=8.29, SD=1.578), t(21) = -6.848, p
students optimallyeducated to meet business and industry needs. However, recent statistics compiled by the ASEEreveals that engineering graduation and retention rates at U.S. universities are not keeping upwith the nation’s increasing demands for engineering talent 1. In 2000, less than 5% of allundergraduate degrees were awarded to engineers. Engineering bachelor’s degrees have grownonly 1% since 2005 2.To address the needs for a high quality science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) workforce in STEM disciplines, the National Science Foundation has established aScholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) program 3. Theprogram provides “scholarships for low-income, academically talented students
, often posted on the Learning Management System (LMS) (e.g., Canvas,Blackboard), because it allows students to watch at their own pace and typically allows forvisualization of the problems [1]. Viewership of videos typically peaks around exam times,indicating that students are using the videos to prepare for tests [2]–[4]. Research has shown thatthe majority of students generally enjoy learning through videos [2], [4]–[7]. Approximately 70-85% of students report that they find videos helpful and useful [2], [4], [5] Though such videosmay be well-liked, it is important to bridge the gap between how the use of videos relates to thegrades received by students. Some past research shows that student performance improves fromvideo use [5]–[12], others
for Engineering Education c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Virtual Community of Practice to Promote LGBTQ Inclusion in STEM: Member Perceptions and Community OutcomesThe results discussed in this paper are part of a transformative project that links diversityresearch with a faculty development initiative to promote LGBTQ equality in engineering. Theaims of the project are to (1) identify aspects of engineering culture that present barriers toLGBTQ equality, (2) build knowledge and skills to disrupt discrimination and promote LGBTQequality in engineering departments on college campuses and (3) to identify best practices forpromoting LGBTQ equality in engineering. This
solveproblems. The findings may be of interest to design teachers and students in order to proliferatefresh and unconventional solutions to engineering problems, while boosting retention ofengineering majors.IntroductionIn recent years there has been a movement in engineering education to improve the curriculumfor undergraduate engineering students to better prepare them for the challenges of the 21stcentury. Researchers have studied various engineering curriculums and teaching styles todetermine the best system for engineering education. Current research on this topic suggest thattraditional teaching methods (lectures and typical homework assignments) do not meet all theobjective requirements for engineering education [1]. This is not only true for
prerequisite knowledge whichis difficult to accommodate with the limited amount of class time.The advancement of technologies provides an opportunity to help on these challenges. It isestimated that there are over 7 billion mobile phone subscriptions worldwide [1]. Althoughmobile phone subscription doesn’t necessarily reflect the number of mobile phone owners sincethere are multiple mobile subscriptions for individual people and for businesses, it does reflectthe prevalent usage of mobile devices. These devices have prolific use in our everyday life forcommunication, access of information, and entertainment. Besides, mobile devices are beginningto be used in all levels of education because of their easy accessibility and increase incomputational power
module can improvestudents’ knowledge competence and has great potential in increase students’ self-efficacy.IntroductionStudent learning style evolves with time [1, 2]. Gioia and Brass [3] in 1985 noted that the collegestudents being taught then were a “TV Generation”, who were raised in an environmentdominated by visual images. In early 2000, the new “Virtual Generation” appeared withprevalent virtual media such as Internet and videogames [4]. Most recently, the “iGeneration”has been raised with the presence of mobile and handheld technologies (iPod, iTunes, iPhone,Wii, iPad) experienced in an individualized manner [5, 6]. While it may not be necessarily asingle or even dominant learning style for any generation of students, it is necessary
readiness of the students in these majors. Specifically, the NationalScience Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(S-STEM) program provides funding for projects framed around increasing the graduationsuccess and workforce readiness of low-income academically talented STEM students [1]. Withthis, financial aid alone is not enough to increase the graduation rate of these low-income, andusually diverse, population of students. S-STEM projects must incorporate student support andengagement activities that affect the success, retention, and academic/career pathways of thesestudents.In 2014, Western Carolina University (WCU) proposed and received a $625,179 S-STEM grantfor the SPIRIT: Scholarship Program
) identifies 15 components(Listed Below for Reference) of an effective grading scheme:“A grading system must… 1. Uphold high academic standards 9. Save faculty time 2. Reflect student learning outcomes 10. Give students feedback they will use 3. Motivate students to learn 11. Make expectations clear 4. Motivate students to excel 12. Foster higher cognitive development 5. Discourage cheating and creativity 6. Reduce student stress 13. Assess authentically 7. Make students feel responsible for 14. Have higher interrater agreement their grades