outside of corporations.The work presented in this paper borrowed ideas on opportunity identification and marketresearch from the Opportunity Thinktank [9], a set of seven modules that help undergraduateengineering students establish an entrepreneurial mindset through opportunity identification.Different from their work, this paper emphasizes on how to integrate entrepreneurial mindsetconcepts in the teaching of entire engineering design process.Design and ImplementationIn contrast to the existing work, entrepreneurial mindset materials were incorporated in a first-semester freshman Introduction to Engineering course, tightly integrated in an open-endeddesign project. The entrepreneurial materials on opportunity identification, market research
Paper ID #18049Work in progress: First-Year Students’ Definitions of Engineering PracticeMrs. Teresa Lee Tinnell, University of Louisville Terri Tinnell is a Curriculum and Instruction PhD student and Graduate Research Assistant for the Speed School of Engineering and College of Education and Human Development at the University of Louisville. She received a Bachelors in Mathematics and Physics and Masters in Teaching STEM education from the University of Louisville. She is a prior Project Lead the Way Master Teacher and Secondary Educa- tion Engineering Instructor, leading the creation of two engineering programs for
canuniversity administrators structure their own policies and internal affairs to secure substantialconformance within their own institution and institutional contexts? Tensions and powerstruggles exist at every level.Relationship of ABET to Engineering and Engineering EducationTo understand the role of ABET in Engineering and Engineering Education, we must firstunderstand the governance of ABET and their historical roots as an organization. ABET is not amonolithic organization, but a volunteer-based organization with multiple moving parts. Thevolunteer nature of ABET can potentially be problematic for the integration of diverseindividuals who must participate in the review process in order to drive ABET’s accreditation ofprograms. The nature of
human conduct. ISLO 5: Quantitative Literacy A "habit of mind," competency, and comfort in working with numerical data. ISLO 6: Integrative Learning An understanding and a disposition that a student builds across the curriculum and co- curriculum, from making simple connections among ideas and experiences to synthesizing and transferring learning to new, complex situations within and beyond the campus.It was already been stated that Department of Engineering Technology at SSU offers CivilEngineering Technology and Electronics Engineering Technology programs, which are
funded MIST Space Vehicle Mission Planning Laboratory at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore. In 2010, he joined Eastern Michigan University as an Associate Dean in the College of Technology and currently is a Professor in the School of Engineer- ing Technology. He has an extensive experience in curriculum and laboratory design and development. Dr. Eydgahi has served as a member of the Board of Directors for Tau Alpha Pi, as a member of Advi- sory and Editorial boards for many International Journals in Engineering and Technology, as a member of review panel for NASA and Department of Education, as a regional and chapter chairman of IEEE, SME, and ASEE, and as a session chair and as a member of scientific and
SecPro app as an educational tool for teaching engineering mechanics Nicolas Ali Libre Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering Department Missouri University of Science and Technology Rolla, MO, USA libren@mst.edu Abstract—Incorporation of educational apps into classroom curriculum includinggamification, collaboration, self-learning and assessment apps is a major trend in engineeringeducation. Educational applications either in desktop or mobile devices enable students to learnin a modern context when
gives feedback on both attention and comprehension levels.successesOne of the foundational challenges successfully navigated was that involving the alignment ofthe curriculum of the two universities. An important goal was to have students transfer withenough credits to graduate from NAU without needing more than 30 semester hours at NAU.Included in these considerations were ABET accreditation requirements as well as graduationrequirements from both schools. For example, students from CQUPT did not have the prescribedamount of mathematics and science required by ABET accreditation, so they must take anadditional science course. NAU has particular strength in Astronomy, Biology, and Geology andthose classes were added as alternatives to Chemistry
, and particularly forengineering undergraduates (Felder, Felder, and Dietz, 1998; Prince, 2004; Hake, 1998; Colbeck,Campbell, and Bjorklund, 2000; Johnson, Johnson, and Smith, 1998a,b; Springer, Stanne, andDonovan, 1999; Terenzini, 2001). The project was further informed by the positive learning andretention outcomes reported following curricular innovations to integrate math, science, andengineering content in undergraduate engineering programs at other institutions (Carr, 2003;Froyd and Ohland, 2005; Olds and Miller, 2004). The expected benefits for first-yearengineering students of the Engineering Math Workshops innovation include: a more thoroughunderstanding of the mathematical concepts in the core course; an enhanced ability
to focus on women in computing, in which sheexplored what caused women and other marginalized groups to pursue careers in programmingand software engineering. She described how she derived personal and professional meaningfrom her research: “I think it's a[n] interesting blend of, what you said, personal and research stuff…. I like to do outreach activities…. It's fulfilling and it makes me excited about, okay, I'm here to do research, and I'm going to encourage the next wave of people to do the same.” - AngelAs a result of this integration, Angel reported strong, permanent identification as an engineer, inspite of multiple sources of social pressure to do otherwise: “I do see myself as an engineer…. Alot of people in
., S.A. Brownell, and A.T. Dale, The wicked problems in sustainable engineering (WPSE) initiative: Pilot results of a cross-institutional project-based course offering in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 2014: Indianapolis, IN.12. Matthews, D.H., Far-post assessment of a sustainability engineering high school outreach program, in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 2011: Vancouver, BC.13. Sattler, M.L., V.C.P. Chen, B.H. Dennis, S.P. Mattingly, K. Rogers, Y. Pearson Weatherton, M. Rani, and K. Kositkanawuth, Integrating sustainability across the curriculum: Engineering sustainable engineers, in American Society for
; the information provided here can serve as a general guideline, but successfulapplicants will carefully review the specific requirements of each program to which they apply.Overview of the “Typical” Application ProcessMost graduate programs in the United States are set up on an academic calendar year, whichtypically begins in late August or early September. Some graduate programs will only admitnew students to start in this “fall” term, while others will admit most students in the fall and asmaller cohort in the January term. The “fall start” is assumed throughout this document, sincethat is the most common timeline; if you are applying to begin graduate school in a differentterm, you will need to adjust the timelines suggested here
attempt to increase student motivation in engineering courses. The genesis ofthis pedagogical innovation was in the fall of 2013. At that time, faculty from the Department ofEngineering Education and Leadership (E-Lead) taught a required Introduction to EngineeringLeadership seminar course. However, retention in that course was low and the students thatremained heavily critiqued the course. Because E-Lead seeks to emphasize student leadershipdevelopment by encouraging students pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Engineering Leadership(BSEL) to take ownership of not only their education but also the education of their peers, thefaculty offered the students critiquing the course an opportunity to perfect the curriculum andinstructional methods
. Hood Community College. Pam has 38 years of Head Start experience and 29 years as an Early Childhood Instructor. She developed early childhood science curriculum for the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Head Start on Engineering: Early Findings (Work in Progress)Head Start on Engineering (HSE) is a collaborative, NSF-funded research and practice projectdesigned to develop and refine a theoretical model of early childhood, engineering-relatedinterest development. The project focuses on Head Start families with four-year-old childrenfrom low
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Additive Manufacturing in Manufacturing Education: A New Course Development and ImplementationAbstractIn this paper, the importance of incorporating Additive Manufacturing (AM) as part ofmanufacturing curriculum in engineering education is emphasized. A new senior level electivecourse on Additive Manufacturing has been developed and offered as part of the manufacturingsequence to students of all engineering discipline at Mercer University School of Engineering.To provide hands-on experience to students taking this course, a low-cost rapid prototyping (RP)lab has also been developed consisting of CAD software, 3D scanners, 3D printers, CNC mill,and digital
Calculus and Probability (IP) 162 (20%) 72% 239 62% Integral Calculus (IC) 185 (17%) 53% 203 29% Differential Equations (DE) 314 (30%) 54% 321 36% Total 1399 50% 1870 47%The table shows that there was an improvement in some of the courses. For example, for DE andIC, the percentage of students passing the course increased from 36% and 29% to 54% and 53%,respectively. However, there were some other courses in which there was not an improvement(e.g. DC had 53% and then 52%) and a course (PC) in which there was a decline in studentspassing
by teaching at least one graduate course per year.ConclusionTo start and maintain a successful graduate program in Technology, several factors need to beconsidered. An initial environmental scan will help the program to set a curriculum whichaddresses the need of prospective students and employers. The program needs to distinguishitself from an engineering graduate program by having courses on managerial/leadership skills aswell as courses on decision making skills, in addition to technical courses, as part of thecurriculum. A step-by-step approach in growth, by slowly expanding the program, will help theprogram flourish as the offering becomes broader and therefore addresses the needs of a broaderconstituency. The College of Technology at
qualitative interviews withunderrepresented minority engineering students. These allowed us to explore their classroombelonging experiences and showed that classroom belonging is a familiar concept and a functionof two separate sources of belonging: academic belonging and social belonging. Academic self-efficacy, curriculum content motivation and an ability to share academic struggles with otherswere important contributors to academic belonging. Social similarity, successful teamexperiences and a general sense of caring were also considered helpful to building socialbelonging in the classroom. Implications and ideas to build engineering classroom belongingfrom this research are discussed.Key Concepts: social belonging, engineering identity
preparation in mathematics, which has been shown to predict student success in engineeringschool [1, 2, 3]. It is also widely acknowledged that calculus in particular is a significant barrierfor many undergraduate engineers, because many students who do not perform well in their firstsemester of mathematics do not stay in an engineering major [4, 5]. This is a significant challengefor all engineering schools, since calculus is the basis for higher level engineering concepts, andis therefore generally taught at the beginning of engineering programs. It is important to study first year student retention in engineering programs because of thelarge number of reasons that students may leave in their first year. However, it is also important tolook
”pivot thinking,” the cognitive aptitudes and abilities that encourage innovation, and the tension between design engineering and business management cognitive styles. To encourage these thinking patterns in young engineers, Mark has developed a Scenario Based Learning curriculum that attempts to blend core engineering concepts with selected business ideas. Mark is also researches empathy and mindfulness and its impact on gender participation in engineering education. He is a Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50
therapeutics.Dr. Jon D Koch, Trine University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017IntroductionNumerical problems and exercises are foundational to the education of students in natural science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and have been a central feature in the curriculum ofthose majors. The effort that students put forth in solving these problems is a prerequisite for the studentsunderstanding and problem solving ability. Learners can mislead themselves in thinking they havemastered a topic, if they look at the solution to a problem before they expend sufficient effort in solvingthat problem. This self-deception can have a negative impact on student learning4. The temptation tolook at the
could be incorporated into an engineering capstone or senior designcourse and some have potential for freshman introduction to engineering course work (e.g.,exploration of the infrastructure types as an introduction to careers in engineering or a review ofthe Game Changers to showcase engineers as problem solvers and innovators). Use of theFailure to Act studies as part of life cycle cost analysis in engineering mathematics, design,and/or economics courses within an engineering program provides hands-on, real-worldexposure to applications of these concepts. These can be used to help meet or enhance ABET-accredited curriculum goals to “prepare students for engineering practices while incorporatingappropriate engineering standards and multiple
Paper ID #18530Research Experiences for Teachers in Precision Agriculture and Sustainabil-ityDr. Bradley Bowen, Virginia Tech Bradley Bowen is an assistant professor at Virginia Tech in the School of Education’s Integrative STEM program. He has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech and a Master’s of Civil Engineering and an Ed.D. in Technology Education from N.C. State University. Using both his high school and industry work experience, Dr. Bowen specializes in professional development and outreach for integrative STEM education for K-12 educators.Dr. Alan R. Kallmeyer, North Dakota State University Alan Kallmeyer
On-line learning practices of millennial students in the flipped classroomAbstractMillennials designate the generation born between 1982 and 2005. The millennials have aunique relationship to information technology which they consider an integral part of life.They tend to be always busy, impatient, and with a short attention span, which leads them tomultitask using various forms of electronic communication and devices1. Millennial studentsare team-oriented; they prefer working in cooperative groups and learning experientiallythrough trial-and-error (hacking).The flipped classroom approach was popularized around 2007 as millennials were in highschool. In this approach, short recorded lessons available online for the students to viewbefore
mathematical thinking are characterized as analytical skills, in this study. Engineersutilize these analytical skills to develop and assess solutions for feasibility, efficiency, andcorrectness. Schoenfeld 3 defines mathematical thinking as a culmination of an individual’s“mathematical knowledge, their ability to apply mathematical problem solving strategies, theeffective use of cognitive resources, having a mathematical perspective, and engaging inmathematical practices.” See Appendix A for a list of observable mathematical aspects.Engineering curriculum is largely designed around a core mathematics curriculum, whichtypically begins with Calculus and concludes with Differential equations. Therefore, it isimportant to understand how engineers apply
presented by the students to decrease their perception of “harsh” grading and increase their self-confidence and motivation. • The course content discussed in lecture was re-ordered to present integrated devices (operational amplifiers, instrumentation amplifiers, audio and other specialized amplifiers) earlier in the semester. Use of these components is required for multiple laboratories and studying them earlier made the lecture content and laboratories more in tune.A practical limitation of the inquiry-based approach with respect to electronic circuit designis that the laboratory room needs to be stocked with an abundant choice of parts as thestudents may select different combinations of components for the same
Paper ID #19577Engagement in Practice: Community Engaged Scholarship to Address LocalFood InsecurityDr. Kellie Schneider, University of Dayton Kellie Schneider is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Management, Systems, & Technology at the University of Dayton. Prior to joining the faculty at UD, she was an instructor in the Freshman Engineering Program at the University of Arkansas. She received her Ph.D., M.S. and B.S. all in industrial engineering from the University of Arkansas. She has a variety of research interests including quality & reliability, engineering education, and community-based
through a sequence of mechanical engineering courses while participating in our FSGs.Proper assessment of their academic performance will undoubtedly shed more light on theeffectiveness of this supplemental instruction method. Furthermore, as faculty of an institutionthat is primarily devoted to undergraduate education, we recognize that the willingness andcommitment of the teaching faculty to be involved in these activities are also important.Instructor-student interactions, supported by enthusiastic faculty beyond the regular lecturesettings, are an integral part towards the sustainment of such successful instructional practices.Future study components can indeed include examination of faculty attitude towards thesepractices and how their
Paper ID #18551Learning to Anticipate the User in Professional Engineering WorkDr. Alexandra Vinson, Northwestern University Alexandra H. Vinson is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the School of Education and Social Policy at Northwest- ern University. She received her Ph.D. in Sociology & Science Studies from the University of California, San Diego. Her research interests include professional education in medicine and STEM fields.Dr. Pryce Davis, University of Nottingham Pryce Davis is an Assistant Professor of Learning Sciences at the University of Nottingham. He received his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences from Northwestern
design and led multi-institution teams in the development and testing of curriculum materials and assessments for engineering design learning. He is also the owner of Verity Design Learning LLC, a publisher of instructional materials for design reviews and teamwork development. He is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Davis received his PhD in Agricultural Engineering at Cornell University.Ms. Sarah Winfree, The Ohio State University Sarah Winfree is an undergraduate research assistant in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She joined the University in August 2013 working towards a Bachelor of Science degree in Food Engineering. Her career includes
(ROKET) (#EEC-1300370 and #EEC-1009496)was a multidisciplinary RET in the Center for Integrated Access Networks (CIAN), an NSFfunded Engineering Research Center (ERC) at the University of Arizona (UA). ROKETsupported 50 teachers from Native American schools in a 6-week summer research experienceover a 7 year period in labs in the College of Optical Sciences and the College of Science.Applying theories of American Indian identity development to teacher development, the goal ofthis program was to increase cultural awareness in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM) classroom curriculum and build professional mentoring relationships totransform Native American classrooms and pique the interests of Native American youth towardSTEM