resonated well with my personal experience in the past withfemale mentorship. Reflecting on how I got to where I am today, I owe much of my success tothe female mentors that have influenced me so positively throughout my high school and collegeyears.Recommendations for Future Camps:For many of the activities there was a scripted part and an additional challenge planned, but timeprohibited most of the girls from thoroughly exploring the additional challenges. In the futuremore time will be allocated to each activity. According to these results, 75-90 minutes peractivity would be sufficient. This will of course limit the number of activities, but the additionaltime spent to master the nuances of each activity is worth the limited exposure.Extending
themselves, there were differences in satisfactionlevels. Students who were not in their first choice major were less likely to agree with beinghappy in their field or intending to stay in their major. However, overall the participants ratedthemselves as having a good understanding of engineering and planning to stay withinengineering as a realm. Descriptors for engineers that were most commonly selected included‘Practical’ and ‘Analytical’ while less commonly selected were ‘Artistic’ and ‘Kind’. A briefdescription of a follow up study is provided.Introduction and BackgroundEngineering education has grown in significance as the focus on engineering development anddiversity grows. One of the key concerns within the realm of engineering education is
(at least) it took several courses to getcomfortable with probability and statistics to the point where I felt competent to apply it.” Theopening remarks should include a reminder of how the scientific method works, and that bothinduction and deduction are aided by statistical thinking and methodology. Then carefullyexplain why the course is required, or at least elective, in the various majors represented. Onecan refer to ABET general and program criteria, for instance discussing collection and analysisof data, planning and conducting experiments, engineering problem solving, and communicationof results/recommendations within ones organization or to customers—using the language ofprobability and statistics to professionally address the
reasoned that with AR there is the potential of a closerintegration between the 3-D object and the abstractions that are a part of engineeringmanipulation, such as the orientation of the X-Y-Z axes and true 90 degree rotations. In addition,we had greater flexibility to create objects for which we did not have a scale physicalrepresentation (e.g., a house or a bicycle). Finally, we had the ability to create interactions thatwould be harder to create with physical objects, like having students identify a sequence ofmoves that would not begin until after locking in those steps, thus requiring a plan for mentalrotations prior to beginning the moves. Figure 1. Student using the augmented reality app to rotate a virtual object.This approach of
program? Excellent O1 Describe at least two professional, technical or academic lessons, learned as N/A part of your participation in the summer program. O2 Based on what you learned during your summer experience, what would you N/A differently as student or teacher in the future? O3 What was the impact of the Summer Research program in your academic and N/A professional life? O4 What do you believe will be the impact of the Summer Research program in N/A your future goals? O5 As a student please describe your future academic plans (University and N/A Program). T1 The summer program
separate designvectors, and to demonstrate the behavior in a physical test or application. The activities will alsoshowcase different modes of failure of mechanical components, and the uncertainty that lieswithin the material itself or within the process of manufacturing. Focusing the activities in a self-learning group environment, students’ learning experience will be greatly improved in tandemwith their soft skills: reporting, communications, and planning [2].To promote a better interest in the overall learning outcomes, the series of activities arestructured to combine their knowledge and culminate to a final project competition for the designof a planar-truss. A competition can bolster the intellectual maturity of students who begin torealize
Paper ID #23735Adding Diversity and Culture to the Engineer’s Toolkit: Evaluating a UniqueCourse Option for Engineering StudentsMs. Chelsea Nneka Onyeador, Stanford University I am a 4th year Mechanical Engineering B.S. student at Stanford University, planning to pursue graduate work in Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT next year. I am a Nigerian-American from central Texas, and I am a devoted advocate for diversity in engineering.Dr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University Shannon K. Gilmartin, Ph.D., is a Senior Research Scholar at the Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research and Adjunct Professor in
projects, describing the ideas,process, and the criteria used. Two types of oral presentations were made: one where the studentsexpress themselves through poems and the second is a final oral presentation describing everystep of each project developed, in presence of the parents, family, and friends. Figure 3represents pictures from the camp.Lessons learned from summer camp:The activities of the camp and the degree of their success will be shared with other CAMmembers to determine the possibility that some of the activities would be implemented on othercampuses. Knowing that other campuses in CAM plan to have similar summer camps, we alsoplan to learn from the success of activities from these camps.During the summer, twelve high school students
fewcourses…they exclude anybody who’s not in their program. This is the only opportunity to dothis path with Python.Another student, who plans to pursue a career as a financial analyst, mentioned the experience ofher cousin as a motivator for enrolling in ACBSS courses. Specifically, she hoped to avoid thechallenges her cousin encountered while on the job due to a lack of programming skills:My cousin [works as a financial analyst] and they require you to have Python and R. She nevertook these classes and she struggles.Three focus group participants discussed the ways in which their perceptions of computingchanged since beginning the ACBSS course sequence. One student described how he initiallyviewed computing as focused mostly on syntax, but now
tocover the design of a multidisciplinary mechatronics system, requiring mechanical, electrical, andcomputer engineering. A multi-disciplinary approach has been popular in capstone courses 1 .Students in the course learn fundamentals of engineering design. Projects are assigned to studentsbased on availability of equipment and facility, as well as the technical interest of students. Class Figure 1: C1 Spider crawlerprojects require planning, proposal presentation, scheduling, engineering, implementation, andwritten and oral presentations of project results. The sequential nature of these assignments in thedesign-build-test model is common for capstone-project courses at elite universities 2 . Students’abilities
circuits class is figuring out what methodto use to solve a particular problem. Students often feel they are swimming in a sea of equations,and that every problem is unique with little or no relationship to others they have solved. Toaddress this challenge, we created a circuit analysis toolbox, shown in Figure 2. Each section ofthe toolbox shows the input and output variables for each method. The sections can be cut intocards (many students glue these to 3x5 cards). Then, the cards can be arranged to plan out themethod to solve a particular problem, matching up the input and output variables for eachmethod, somewhat like dominos.Figure 2 Circuit analysis toolbox. Each block describes input and output variables for eachmethod. These can be cut
related concepts for innovation within thetranscripts, but those in self-described innovative position had “success” as the fifth most relatedconcept, whereas those in non-innovative positions had “initiative”. Indeed, limited opportunitiesand negative experiences were more commonly reported by those in self-described non-innovative positions, and those self-described innovative positions were more likely to reportsatisfaction and plans for continuing on their current career path. Clearly, automated assessment cannot substitute human qualitative judgement in itscurrent form. However, due to the ease and speed of ranking compared to the lengthy and labor-intensive process of manual qualitative content coding, related concepts can be
students and 1 transfer student. High school GPA was onlyreported for 50 students of the total sample including 4 female students and 1 transfer student.The authors realize that the data are limited for this study and plan to keep expanding the data setwith future graduating classes.SAT scores were not available for all students in the sample. In the event that a student reportedACT score but no SAT score, the ACT math score was converted to an equivalent SAT mathscore using College Board’s concordance tables [10]. It should be noted that there is errorassociated with converting between ACT and SAT test scores, however the concordance tablesthat were used achieved a 0.89 correlation between ACT and SAT math scores. With this highcorrelation the
normal distribution [10]Phase three Since the goal is to identify the potential effects of tags that caused for variation of positions and to develop a desirable position of maximum readability for the identification and tracking of shipping carts for inventory control in horticulture industry, the study will focus on three positional factors. The propose of the study is to test the main effect and interaction effect of the following factors: A: Linear Distance B: Angle C: Height To analyze and evaluate different positions, a full factorial experimental design is planned with the three factors. Two levels are selected for each factor, thus resulting in 23 distinct combinations for each replicate. The analysis will
within 6 consecutivesemesters. This is a significant barrier since students who do not pass Calculus I cannot moveforward to enroll in advanced Physics and Engineering courses.Analyses conducted by Skyline College’s Office of Planning, Research, & InstitutionalEffectiveness have found that the most common “attrition points” for students on a STEM-related pathway at Skyline College are the failure to pass MATH 251 (Calculus 1; 60% successrate); PHYS 250 (first-course in the 3-course Calculus-based Physics sequence; 60% successrate); and CHEM 192 (prerequisite to the CHEM I and II sequence, 55% success rate). Studentswho do not pass Calculus 1 are unable to advance for further study in “Calculus-based” STEMdisciplines: Engineering, Math
; Master’s degree holders byage 62, and Doctorate degree holders by age 66. Which means, from January 1, 2008, the ageBoomers first started to turn 62, and then January 1, 2011, the age Boomers first started to turnage 65, we would expect to experience a significant exiting of skilled labor. This clearlyrepresents a trough in the available workforce when compared to the available backfill of GenX’ers.Restating, since January 1, 2011, someone turned 65 years of age at a rate of nearly 10,000 perday, approximately 4 million per year, until 2029. This is not necessarily good or bad, it simplyprovides interesting information for thought and planning in everything from produced goods toservices.Current revisions to the mortality tables used by insurance
tostudents in the traditional course.In the following sections we summarize the differences in the content and pedagogy of thetraditional and novel introductory courses, the success rates for both cohorts of students in theintermediate C programming course, the final results of our studies regarding student identity andefficacy beliefs from the two introductory courses, including for students from underservedpopulations, and our plans to develop a technology-driven version of the intermediate class.Pedagogical differences between the twointroductory C courses Table I.A comparison of assessment weights. The two introductory programming courses are Assessment Novel course Traditional coursequite similar in
students.AcknowledgementThis work is supported through a grant from the National Science Foundation (Awards #1428689 and 1428523).References: 1. Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. 2. Takahira, S., Goodings, D. J., & Byrnes, J. P. (1998). Retention and performance of male and female engineering students: An examination of academic and environmental variables. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(3), 297–304. 3. Tai, R. H., Liu, C., Maltese, A., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144. 4. Tai, R. H., Potvin, G., Loehr, J. F., & Lloyd, S. S. (2008). The doctoral experiences of students and
STILAS programto have students meet frequently with their advisors, the reality is that they would have done soanyway. It is difficult for a student to fall through the cracks. Clearly such an environment supportsthe goals and methods of an S-STEM program. It is unclear how well the STILAS model wouldwork in a less personal setting.Future work focuses on improved recruitment. It proved harder to recruit underrepresentedminorities than to keep them. Academically talented students have many options, some with moreresources to offer. We plan to redouble our outreach to local high schools, and work to improveour bridge and transfer programs.AcknowledgmentsFunding for the STILAS program was provided by NSF under DUE-1154354. We would like tothank the
utilizing a specific skill or process. Theseassessments occurred at several junctures during the project which roughly translates to aboutevery two weeks. The graph below lists an average of frequency of occurrence of each answeracross all teams within a given project year. As we can see construction, planning processes, timemanagement, learning new skills, and expanding existing skills are some of the most notable. A bitof a surprising result is that circuit boards which was the primary skill that launched this processhas now substantially been reduced in focus. A greater focus has been placed on gainingknowledge in another discipline, computer programming, independent research, task delegationand many others. Figure 9. Number
develop anunderstanding of the engineering ecosystem of Black youth. With respect to settings, we plan toinclude both “Black Spaces” and spaces that are not explicitly culturally specific. It is of greatinterest to our team to explore spaces where there is a high concentration of Black and URMcommunities.We anticipate that future findings will not only validate the participant reports from the previousstudy, but will also highlight the ways that these practices develop specific skills and allowaccess to capital. This will contribute to other scholarship at the intersection of African Americanparent roles and cultural capital. Along with providing insights into the role parents can serve onSTEM pathways, the findings from this work can provide
maintaining or dismantling that privilege. We hope that these examples willbe helpful to others interested in integrating such content into their courses.Institutional ContextThe history behind the creation of these courses stems from being at the forefront of institution-wide transformation, including the inauguration of a new university president, theimplementation of a new University Core curriculum, the award of an NSF RED grant, and thecreation of a new General Engineering department [11]. The University of San Diego is amajority undergraduate, private four-year [12], faith-based institution that embraces Catholicsocial teaching in its mission. Our new president has enacted a new strategic plan, TheUniversity has identified six pathways through
-stat = t-stat = t-stat = t-stat = -0.49313 -0.93965 0.45525 -0.46401 -1.14899 -1.6358The grant program has strived to implement a coordinated effort to infiltrate many aspects of thestudent’s college experience with effective interventions to maximize persistence. Foremost, theNational Academic Advising Association (NACADA) [14] recognizes the crucial role played byacademic advising in fulfilling the goals of higher education while ensuring student success.Consistent with this and other studies on advisement [6, 7], every semester, scholars are requiredto meet with an academic adviser from their major departments for course advisement andoptimal graduation planning, as well as with
site in Panama. This second structure will also be used as a trainingdemonstration site for mission teams to visualize and help plan for construction when in Panama.Shop drawings were created based on the design and implementation. This research involvedcommunity-based activity and engagement in Cieneguita, Panama as well as Lineville, AL.This research is the second phase of a multi-phase research effort. The research wasaccomplished as part of a scholarly capstone project in the Auburn University’s McWhorterSchool of Building Science (BSCI) Master of Building Construction (MBC) Program. Thepurpose of the capstone project is to demonstrate the student's ability to independently explore anew topic, demonstrate appropriate application of the
“Living Lab” where town officials can actively monitor the number of parking spots using Cisco Kinetic for Cities digital platform for future planning. Cisco is continuing to upgrade and add new functionalities to its digital platform. One of the new features provides enhanced support for public safety. Cisco Capital has partnered with Digital Alpha Advisors, APG Asset Management and Whitehelm Capital and launched a City Infrastructure Financing Acceleration Program with $1 billion assets to make it easier, faster and more affordable for cities to fund and adopt technologies that will transform their communities (Cisco, 2017).These are only a few examples of a variety of industries who are early adopters of SmartManagement System. Its versatility
moving out of faculty leadership roles. For one team, this drew outnew, deeper participation from faculty. Another team planned to use dislocating team members’authority to shake-up a power imbalance between the team members and the rest of the faculty.Other teams experienced changes in administration at their institutions that were external to theirRED team (e.g., a new president, provost, or dean). These teams were challenged with creatingcommon goals with the new administrators without fully compromising the goals of their project.As one team member explained, “We have a new program chair this year, so he's very excited,but we also have to be careful and making sure that the agenda of our mission and ourrevolution, if you will, isn't just
the Vietnamese engineering research and teaching faculty with the assistance of 4interpreters. Interpreters will translate the questions and the responses instantaneously. Weexpect each interview to last between 30-60 minutes. We are planning to conduct face-to-face orvideo conference interviews with the Vietnamese engineering researchers. The interviews will beaudio recorded and transcribed verbatim by one researcher, and a second researcher will reviewthe transcribed text for accuracy. If any clarification of the data will be necessary, follow-upemails will be carried out. Transcripts will be shared with the Vietnamese engineeringresearchers and
number of activities including asummer camp program that is run on campus and outreach programs in K-12 classrooms duringthe school year. To address one of the three pillars of the SSE strategic plan, diversity inengineering, the programs target local underrepresented K-12 learners, most notably female andindigenous students.The MiM advisory committee, which reports to the Dean of Engineering is comprised of a groupof faculty members from the SSE and the Werklund School of Education (WSE), SSE technicaland administrative staff, and SSE graduate and undergraduate students. The programcoordinator, a full-time staff member, develops and implements the program under the directionof the advisory committee. Specifically, the programs are required to
, thusfacilitating knowledge transfer.Future work in our program will be focused on the examination of transfer of knowledge acrossincoming and remaining cohort. In addition, we are interested in examining how co-presence couldinfluence cognitivist learning outcomes for students. How we plan to assess this is through acomparative study where we continue the class with the current HS but also with a HS class thatis situated in the same location our university is situatedReferences1. Engineers, S.o.M., Workforce Imperative: A Manufacturing Education Strategy. 2012.2. Klawe, M. Why Manufacturing Is Vital To Engineering Education. 2015; Available from: https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/workforce-imperative-manufacturing
retention of the students that initially indicate engineering. Priorstudies have recommended focusing on efforts that would help to retain students. Ohland and associatessuggest “identify programming that retains the students who come to college committed to an engineeringmajor”7. The current study is focused on understanding the affective choices that first-year engineeringstudents make with regards to their major. The exploration and selection of an engineering major is oftena focal point of first-year engineering programs, and this experience has been found to be “polarizing,”either affirming a student’s plans to study engineering (or a specific discipline) or dissuading them alltogether8. Orr and associates conducted a large scale quantitative