based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0525484. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do Page 15.127.2not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.”toward science-related activities than boys.18 With respect to achievement in courses and moreparticularly on advanced placement exams, females are more likely to excel over male peers inlanguage arts, and males are more likely to excel in science.13, 19, 20, 21 Progress in addressing thisproblem is evident since striking gender inequities in
Technical Legacy of Dr. John McMasters,” AIAA 2009 – 0867, 47th AIAA AerospaceSciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 5-8 January, 2009, Orlando, FL.3. McMasters, J. H., and Matsch, L. A., 1996, “Desired Attributes of an Engineering Graduate – An IndustryPerspective,” AIAA 96-2241, AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Technology Conference, 19th, NewOrleans, LA, June 17-20, 1996.4. “Boeing attributes of an engineer”, http://www.boeing.com/educationrelations/attributes.html, accessed onDecember 14, 20095. “Welliver Faculty Fellowship Program”,http://www.boeing.com/educationrelations/facultyfellowship/index.html, accessed on December 14, 20096. Gorman, M. E., Johnson, V. S., Ben-Arieh, D., Bhattacharyya, S
Induction Generator”, Proc. IEEE,vol 1, No. 125, pp 743-746, 1978.[3] Miller, T. JE, “Reactive Power Control in Electrical Systems”, John Wiley and Sons, 1982.[4] Murthy, S., “Studies on the use on Conventional Induction Motors as Self-excited Induction Generators”, IEEETrans. On Energy Conversion, vol.3, No.4, pp 842-848, 1988.[5] Tandon, A.K., “Steady State analysis of Capacitor Self-excited Induction Generator”, IEEE Trans. On PAS, Vol.PAS-103, No. 3, pp 612-617, 1984.[6] Malik, N.H. and Haque, S.H., “Steady State Analysis and Performance of an Isolated Self-excited InductionGenerator”, IEEE Trans. On Energy Conversion, Vol.EC-1, No.3, 1986
Rineck, Ed Beimborn, George Hanson,Todd Johnson, and Tina Current (all at UWM) for their assistance with this project.Bibliography1. National Science Board. 2003. The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing America’s Potential.Publication NSB 03-69. (www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2003/nsb0369/nsb0369.pdf)2. Augustine, N. “Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a BrighterEconomic Future”, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP), 2007. Page 15.538.93. Bochis, C., Hsia, S., Johnson, P., Boykin, K., Wood, S., Bowen, L, and Whitaker, K. “Integrated EngineeringMath-Based Summer Bridge
. However, this colleague made at leastone critical mistake, and misspelled some MATLAB command(s):clear all;close all;%--------------------------------------------------------% Array of available area widths (a 1D array of numbers)Wmiles = [1:1:150]; % width of the square area in miles (vector)Wmeters = Wmiles*1609; % width of the square area in meters (vector)A = Wmeters.*Wmeters; % area in m^2 (vector); note element-by-element % vector multiplication!%--------------------------------------------------------% Array of available array efficiencies (a 1D array of numbers)E = [1:1:25; % efficiency percentage (vector
. Their design choices will be evaluated on the basis of cost, biocompatibility,marketability, reliability and ultrafiltration coefficient. One key element to developing theengineering epistemic frame is that there is no optimal solution to the problem. That is, there is nosolution for which cost is minimized and the other performance criteria are maximized. Students willhave to find the solution(s) that best meet criteria of a diverse set of stakeholders, which is animportant part of the engineering professional practice. In Nephrotex, the stakeholders are a clinicalengineer, a manufacturing engineer and representatives from marketing and product support, allof whom are non-player characters like the head of research and development. Each
Program, Professor Paul Duesing, andMr. Jon Coullard for the contribution in the presented projects. Last but not least, the authorwould like to thank the students who participated in the projects for providing the samples thatwere presented in the paper.Bibliography1. Duesing, P., Baumann, D., McDonald, D., Walworth, M., and Anderson, R., “Learning and Practicing the Design Review Process in Senior Capstone Design Classes” ASEE Annual Conference proceedings, no. 2465, 2004.2. Miller, R. and Olds, B., “A Model Curriculum for a Capstone Course in Multidisciplinary Engineering Design”, Journal of Engineering Education, , pp 1-6, October 1994.3. Todd, R., Magleby, S., Sorensen, C., Swan, B., and Anthonya, D., “A Survey of Capstone
robotic arm (Lynxmotion model AL5C). You must develop the grasping mechanism and the control and sensory systems for both the robotic arm and grasping mechanism.Motor/Sensory The task will be to move three eggs from one location to another location andTask determine which of the three eggs is the heaviest in the process.Minimum Develop a mechanism that is capable of grasping and holding an egg withoutDesign Goals breaking it while it is moved to a different prescribed location The grasping mechanism and robotic arm should be completely under the control of electromyogram (EMG) or electrooculogram (EOG) potentials recorded from the student operator(s) during the time
that he could fly? And man often attempted to do so often withcatastrophic results bit the urge remained. Before there was the Bernoulli effectthere was the dream.Sometimes the technology is ahead of the science. Petroski tells us about IsambardKingdom Brunel who built the steamships, Great Western and Great Eastern, whichproved that steamships could carry enough coal to make long ocean voyages despitescientific calculations that said this, was impossible (48-49.)Similarly the intercontinental ballistic missile came into being and was deployeddespite the view that the missile could not survive the heat generated by itsmovement through the atmosphere.Also fascinating and important is Petroski”s agreement with engineering educatorHardy Cross
, Richard, "Reaching the Second Tier: Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education." Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286-290, 1993.6. Felder, R.M., Felder, G.N., Dietz E.J., The Effects of Personality Type on Engineering Student Performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 91 (1), 3-17, 2002.7. Fleming, N. D., “I’m Different; Not Dumb. Modes of Presentation (VARK) in the Tertiary Classroom,” in Zelmer, A., (ed.) Research and Development in Higher Education, Proceeding of the Annual Conference if the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australia (HERDSA), Volume 18 pp. 308-313, 1995.8. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T., “Pedagogies
improvement, butevery comment included an observation similar to those below. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2010, American Society for Engineering Education 216“I loved this class, and would take the class again if it was possible just to work on another project! Ireally liked that I could experience the "real world" by working on real projects. The practicepresentation[s] were VERY helpful. We got excellent feedback and let us make the final presentationsuperb. Also, you were very helpful!! Thanks for all your
, when it comes to their mentors, students are more inclined to favorinformal interactions. They thrive under mentors who reach out, talk to the students, engage withtheir learning, and take an active role in their research experience, rather than just mentor fromafar.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0552933.Bibliography1 Terenzini, P. T. (1999) Research and Practice in Undergraduate Education: And Never the Twain Shall Meet?High Educ, 38, pp. 37.2 Kenny, S. S. (1998) Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities. TheState University of New York: Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University.3 Kenny
Science Class.Proceedings of the 17th SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education, 138-143.[2] Bergin, S. & Reilly, R. (2005). Programming: factors that influence success. ACM SIGCSEBulletin, Volume 37 – Issue 1, 411-415.[3] Bateman, C.R. (1973) Predicting performance in a basic computer course. Proceedings of theFifth Annual Meeting of American Institute for Decision Sciences, Boston, MA. 130-133.[4] Butcher, D.F., & Muth, W.A. (1985). Predicting performance in an introductory computer sciencecourse. Communications of the ACM, 28, 263-268.[5] Campbell P. F., & McCabe, G. P. (1984). Predicting the success of freshmen in a computerscience major. Commun. ACM, 27(11):1108–1113.[6] B. Cantwell-Wilson & Shrock, S
Education; National Academy of Engineering and National ResearchCouncil, Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. The NationalAcademies Press: Washington, D.C., 2009.6. Yasar, S.; Baker, D.; Robinson-Kurpius, S.; Krause, S.; Roberts, C., Development of a survey to assess K-12 teachers’ perceptions of engineers and familiarity with teaching design, engineering, technology. Journal ofEngineering Education 2006, 95, (3), 205-216.7. Bailey, R.; Szabo, Z., Assessing engineering design process knowledge. International Journal ofEngineering Education 2006, 22, (3), 508-518.8. Bailey, R., Comparative study of undergraduate and practicing engineer knowledge of the roles of problemdefinition
AC 2010-1098: COURSE-RELATED ACTIVITIES FOR MECHANICALVIBRATION IN THE ABSENCE OF A FORMAL LABORATORYB. Sridhara, Middle Tennessee State University Dr. B. S. Sridhara is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Middle Tennessee State University. He received his B.S.M.E. and M.S.M.E. degrees from Bangalore University and Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. He received his M.S.M.E. and Ph. D. degrees from Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, and Auburn University, Alabama. Dr. Sridhara has published several peer-reviewed articles in the areas of Acoustics, Vibration, finite element methods, and Engineering Education
linked-list simulator.(The names of the students have been changed to preserve their privacy.) Figure 10. Using a form to collect answers to in-class exercisesWhen a student is called to the board towork a problem in a traditionalclassroom, (s)he is often asked to showthe steps in a derivation. The sameeffect can be achieved with a form,where successive questions ask whathappens during successive steps. Figure11 shows a form for collecting thisinformation, and Figure 12 presents theassociated spreadsheet.Note that the last question asks studentswhich row of the classroom they aresitting in. I use this question in myclasses to spot areas of the classroomwhere students are not engaged, and alsoto facilitate competitions among rows
ideas.Bibliography1. Adams, R. (2001). Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior. Dissertation: University ofWashington.2. Adams, R., & C. J. Atman. (1999). Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior. Proceedings ofthe Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, November, San Juan.3. Adams, R. S., & C. J. Atman. (2000). Characterizing Engineering Student Design Processes: AnIllustration of Iteration. Proceedings of the Annual Conference for the American Society ofEngineering Education, June, Charlotte, NC.4. Adams, R. S. (2002). Understanding design iteration: Representations from an empirical study. In D.Durling & J. Shackleton (Eds), Common Ground: Proceedings of the Design Research SocietyInternational Conference at Brunel
and Strategic Projects, College of Engineering, Montana State University and draftpaper reviewers for the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference.Bibliography1. Petersen, A.K., Reynolds, J.H., and Ng, L.W.T. (2008) The Attitude of Civil Engineering Students Towards Health and Safety Risk Management: a Case Study. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 33, Nos. 5-6:499-510.2. Andi. (2008) Construction workers perceptions toward safety culture. Civil Engineering Dimension 10.1: 1-6.3. Choudhry, R., Fang, D., and Mohamed, S. (2009) Closure of: Developing a Model of Construction Safety Culture. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 1: 45-47.4. National Construction Agenda (2008) For Occupational Safety and Health Research and
AC 2010-1286: BREAKING BARRIERS: PATHWAYS TO GRADUATION FORUNDERREPRESENTED TALENTCarol Gattis, University of Arkansas Dr. Carol Gattis is the Associate Dean for the Honors College and an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. She has 17 years of experience in the areas of student recruitment, retention and diversity and has published and presented extensively on these topics. Dr. Gattis is the PI on the NSF S-STEM grant and oversees all aspects of the ECAP program.Todd Shields, University of Arkansas Dr. Todd Shields is professor of political science and director of the Diane D. Blair Center of Southern Politics and Society. His areas of research
a specific time increases their commitment to attend. ≠ Develop an online sign in process to better monitor program utilization. ≠ Develop a privacy policy so users are aware of session recording options.Bibliography1. Avison, D., Baskerville, R., & Myers, M. (2001). Controlling Action Research Projects. Information Technology & People, 14(1), 28-45.2. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 4.3. Bork, A. (2000). Learning technology. Educause Review, 35(1), 74-81.4. Chang, S. L. (2004). The roles of mentors in electronic learning environments. AACE Journal, 12(3), 331-342.5. Elden, M., & Chisholm, R. F. (1993
students: A third decade of research.” SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.[10] Council on Undergraduate Research, CUR At-A-Glance. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from http://www.cur.org.[11] Biren A. Nagda, Sandra R. Gregerman, John Jonides, William von Hippel, and Jennifer S. Lerner, 1998,“Undergraduate student-faculty partnerships affect student retention.” The Review of Higher Education, 22 , 55-72.[12] S. Kieffer and N. Dukham, 2005, “Benefits of Undergraduate Research and Independent Study,” Proceedingsof the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education.[13] J. E. Ondrake, K.C. Lifer, S. P. Haman, J. E. Marquart, H. Shen, 2009, “Single Screw vs. Double Screw Devicefor Femur Bone Fracture”, poster, 4th
, acknowledging that Spanish has not only the potential, but the need ofbecoming one of the official languages of engineering education research. As wisely stated byRey-Rocha and Martín-Sempere, “although we cannot forget that Science is an eminentlyinternational activity, whose results have to be necessarily disseminated amongst theinternational community, we can neither miss the point of its national [local or regional]utility”20 and need for dissemination.Bibliography1. Haghighi, K.; Smith, K. A.; Olds, B. M.; Fortenberry, N.; Bond, S., The time is now: Are we ready for our role? Journal of Engineering Education 2008, 97 (2), 119-121.2. Lohmann, J.; De Graaff, E. In Advancing the global capacity for engineering education research
critical years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Barrows, Howard S. (2000). Problem-Based Learning Applied to Medical Education. Springfield, IL: SouthernIllinois University School of Medicine.Boud, D., Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-based Learning. United Kingdom. London: Kogan PagePublishers.Boylan, H. (1988). The historical roots of developmental education. Part III. Review of Research inDevelopmental Education, 5 (3).Boylan, H., Bonham, B., & Bliss, L. (1992). The impact of developmental programs. Research in DevelopmentalEducation, 9 (5).Boylan, Hunter R. (2001). Making the Case for Developmental Education. Research in Developmental Education,12 (2).http://www.umkc.edu/cad/nade/nadedocs/hbcase95.htmBrier, E. (1984
shear walls, and architectural requirements, such as ceiling type and interstitial space.Each trade initially routes their system to their own advantage. This includes decreasing overalllength, routing close to support points, choosing prime locations for major components, andlocating system runs to facilitate the construction needs of their own trade.During coordination meetings, the participating student work groups compare preliminary routingfor their systems to identify and resolve conflicts. They also decide which trade(s) will revise theirdesign and submit requests for information (RFI) regarding problems that require an engineeringresolution. Deliverables of the project include the following: the building information model,coordinated
from the current injections. The paper documentedthe educational benefits the project provided to the undergraduate researcher. These benefitsincluded enhanced laboratory, problem solving, and communication skills. This project alsofound that having a member of a class take part in an undergraduate research project couldengage other members of classes and attract future students to research projects.Bibliography1. Louis Robert Nerone, “Analysis and Design of a Self-Oscillating Class E Balast for Compact Florescent Lamps”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 48, No. 1, February 2001, pp. 151-160.2. M. A. Shafi, R. A. McMahon, S. Weier, “Investigation of Losses in Commercially Available Self-Resonant Ballasts for
needed to solve a single problem while keeping in mind the manydiffering objectives of the overall project [1]. A multidisciplinary approach to engineering designis valuable in that it asks that students make certain that, “…advances in performance,…technology, or discipline(s), must be much more highly integrated than in the past” [2]. TheFreshman Engineering course at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore is designed to exposestudents to challenging problems that require them to gain experience and increase theirknowledge outside of their normal field of expertise while practicing decision making skillsnecessary to stay on time and on budget.Engaging students within the engineering design principlesStudents in the Spring 2009 Engineering
image and video coding.Siew Koay, Prairie View A&M University Dr. S. T. Koay is currently professor at Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Prairie View A&M University. His current research interests are analytical modeling for spatial tracking of mobile objects for real time applications, statistical signal processing, modeling and simulation.Yonggao Yang, Prairie View A&M University Yonggao Yang is an associate professor in the Department of Computer Science at Prairie View A&M University in Texas. He joined the CS Department at PVAMU as an Assistant Professor in August 2002 immediately upon receiving a Ph.D. degree in Information Technology & Computer
particular,we are looking for a better motivator to attract students who are struggling and help them in away that they feel more directly addresses their problems.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award0757020 (DUE). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation (NSF).Bibliography[1] T. J. Cortina. An introduction to computer science for non-majors using principles of computation. In SIGCSE’07: Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 218–222, New
S A N D S Comments A S D1. The idea is highly creative.2. The idea could lead to a broadly applicable product.3. The idea could serve as a catalyst for furtherideas/products.4. The problem does not respond to a clearly identified need.5. The proposed project fits the problem for which it wascreated.6. The problem description clearly communicates its purpose.7. The problem description appears incomplete.8. The idea shows evidence of careful thought and planning.9. The idea is not very easy to understand.Mark an "X" in ONE category below that best describes Commentsthe idea proposed for the project:10a.The idea is a truly new product
Undergraduate Engineering Education,” J. Engineering Ed., Vol. 94, No. 1, 2005, pp. 121-130.3. Kline, R., “World War II: A Watershed in Electrical Engineering Education,” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Summer 1994, pp. 17-23.4. Dutson, A. J., R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby and C. D. Sorensen, "A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86, No. 1, 1997, pp. 17-28.5. Howard, B. “Enough of this Science and Mathematics, Let’s Do Some Engineering,” Proc. of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 1999, Session 13d2, pp. 8-10.6. Nguyen, D. Q., “The Essential Skills and Attributes of an Engineer: A Comparative Study of Academics, Industry Personnel