management, design and creativity, engineeringcommunication, engineering as a career, ethics, and engineering estimations and calculationswith an emphasis on unit conversions. Grit is also a topic covered in the course with reference tothe retention of the students in the college of engineering, through to their completion of theengineering degree.Material pertaining to grit was introduced in the course and then an examination of how thismaterial may have increased student grit was conducted. Duckworth et al. (2007) [1] created atwo-factor, twelve item, self-reporting measure of grit. The foundation of this study was basedon the theory of grit as a compound trait. This compound trait was comprised of stamina in twodimensions, and these dimensions
Innovation Center for En- trepreneurship and Director of the Global Leadership program. Her responsibilities include interdisci- plinary program evaluation and assessment, course/workshop instruction in the areas of leadership and human centered design. She received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and an MBA from Wayne State University and is currently working on her PhD at Michigan Technologi- cal University. Before joining MTU she held various engineering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry.Dr. Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University Gretchen Hein is a senior lecturer in Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Tech. She have been teaching
Shannon is Associate Teaching Professor of Biological Sciences at Missouri University of Sci- ence and Technology. She earned her Bachelor of Arts degree in Biology with Honors from the University of North Carolina and her PhD in Cell and Developmental Biology from the Harvard Medical School. She has been active in biology education research since early in her career. She was a fellow in the Seeding Postdoctoral Innovators in Research and Education (SPIRE) as a Postdoc at UNC. In the SPIRE program Dr. Shannon was introduced to the fellowship of teaching and learning. In 2013, she participated in the American Society for Microbiology Biology Scholars Program Research Residency. During her research residency, she
fell into two areas: earning acollege degree or affinity for their major. This finding was surprising given that most earlylearners are uncertain of academic goals [4]. Driven by this evidence, self-reflection shoulddeepen student discipline-specific understandings.Research activities centered on a university-specific electronic portfolio: the PersonalDevelopment Plan (ePDP), enabling students to more effectively map out and navigate theiracademic and co-curricular experiences, as well as their subsequent careers. The ePDP is apersonalized planning process that enables students to understand, implement, and chart progresstoward their degree and college goals. For more than 10 years, the university has integratedpersonal development planning
-step surgical procedure from amanufacturer of similar devices, and video material of a simulated surgery and actual surgeryfrom various websites. In addition, if resources were available, students had an opportunity toobserve for in-class demonstration and to have hands-on experiences with surgical procedureusing artificial bone (SAWBONES. Vashon, WA USA) to obtain a better understanding of therelationship between implant design andsurgical procedures/tools. Instructor hadadequate trainings and experiences in surgicalprocedure for various orthopedic devices duringhis career in medical device industry, and wasable to demonstrate a correct procedure. For thelast three academic years, surgical instrumentof the IM nail, external fixation for long
., 2014). Such experience allows students andinstructors to collaboratively bridge the research and classroom and provide research experiencesfor students relative to traditional individual mentored research. Undergraduates who are involvedin research report cognitive gains such as a) learning to think and analyze, b) affective gains suchas delight, c) psychosocial gains such as belonging to a team, identifying as an effective engineer,and d) behavioral gains such as motivations to pursue graduate education or careers in engineering(Laursen et al., 2010; Lopatto and Tobias, 2010).Studies of undergraduate research experiences have been criticized for some reasons such ascounting on students to convey their own knowledge and skill gains, applying
objectives of any introduction to engineering course are: to spark an initial interest inengineering, to expose students to different disciplines in engineering, and to educate them aboutoverall engineering profession. Recently, there have been a lot of emphases on STEM-relatedprograms across the nation and on the need for more capable, enthusiastic, and effective futureengineers. Over many years, it has been realized that basic freshman and sophomore courses inengineering play an important role on retention, preparation of students for upper-divisioncourses, and ultimately for a productive career in engineering.Most universities and colleges have some introductory course in engineering. The credits varyfrom one to three hours. Some are discipline
anandragogical mindset. However the authors cautioned that undergraduate mechanicalengineering students may lack some of the attributes which form the underlying assumptions ofandragogical learning practices. Specifically, young undergraduate mechanical engineeringstudents may be unable to visualize how their education applies to a future career and may lackthe experiences or intrinsic motivation to be an andragogical learner. Correspondingly, Melnykand Novoselich advocated a deliberate and steady increase in self-directed (andragogical)learning practices as students progress along their undergraduate engineering education pathway(Figure 1). Figure 1: Student transition from youth to adult learning over four-year experience. Methods To
University, Polytechnic campus Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding.Dr. Jeremi S. London, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant
Glen Livesay is a Professor of Biology and Biomedical Engineering; he co-developed and co-teaches the biomedical engineering capstone design sequence at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Glen’s educational research interests include student learning styles, increasing student engagement with hands- on activities, and more recently, creativity & design. He has received an NSF CAREER award and served as a Fellow at the National Effective Teaching Institute.Prof. Jay Patrick McCormack, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Jay McCormack is an associate professor in the mechanical engineering department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Dr. McCormack received his PhD in mechanical engineering from Carnegie
for broadening the participation of African American students inengineering. The central objective of the project is to conduct a comparative study of the factorsaffecting the success and pathways to engineering careers of African American students at aPredominantly White Institution (PWI), the University of Toledo, and a Historically BlackUniversity (Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University). Through this research we hope togain insight into the factors affecting the social and academic well-being of students at PWIs andHBCUs from a psychological and anthropological perspective.For students from underrepresented groups in STEM at both HBCUs and PWIs it is generallyrecognized that social capital in the form of familial, peer and mentor
Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering (BSEE) degree.The main objective of the ECE Scholars program was to increase the number of electricalengineering students graduating from Seattle University and entering the engineeringworkforce. Seattle ECE scholars received financial, academic, professional development, andcommunity building support to ensure their successful progression toward the BSEE degree.Student support services included peer tutoring, informal study partners, industry mentorshipprogram, professional development seminars, and social activities.In this paper, we discuss both the qualitative and quantitative results of this grant. We reporton the academic achievement of the scholars and their career choices after graduation. We
Engineering: U.S.-Trinidad-Anguilla PartnershipIntroductionAfrican Americans are underrepresented in both the engineering workforce and study abroad.61.7% African Americans students who enter engineering programs do not graduate in thismajor.1 This translates to an engineering workforce that comprise; about 4% AfricanAmericans.2 While African American students account for 15% of the overall U.S.undergraduate population, they only represent 5.6% of the over 300,000 U.S. students studyingabroad.3 There are several reasons for this disparity; finances, faculty leadership, high attritionrates, family support, anxiety resulting from travel inexperience, and lack of insight to thecorrelations between global cultural competence and career goals.4, 5
mind thatleads students to seek additional information beyond what is presented. Students who arecurious go beyond what they need to know for the test, ask “Why?” and are better poised totransfer knowledge between courses and in their ongoing careers. This first of EM’s three C’s isalso recognized more broadly as a key attribute; for example, in “Curious” by Leslie, oncedemographic factors are accounted for, it is curiosity and conscientiousness that are correlatedwith student success [2].Closely linked to curiosity, motivation helps describe students’ intention to realize this curiosity.There are a number of lenses through which to view both curiosity and motivation. One usefultheory for describing situational interest is Self-Determination
Knowledge Dimension: What all High School Students Should Know to be Engineering Literate. (Fundamental)Rationale and Background The importance of engineering for P-12 learners continues to increase1-6. This growinginterest can be attributed to the idea that engineering education can contribute to the generaleducation of all students as well as inspire a more diverse, and workforce ready, populace tomeet the needs of high-demand careers of the 21st century2. Engineering education is uniquelypositioned to support interdisciplinary learning experiences to foster rich connections and furtherknowledge and skills of academic disciplines. The inclusion of engineering into P-12 educationis now seen as an approach to address challenges facing
2017 Best Paper, “MeasuringStudents’ Subjective Task Values Related to the Post-Undergraduate Career Search” [9] reads:“The PEPS study is grounded in Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT), which conceptualizesengagement in a task as a function of four subjective task values: attainment value, intrinsicvalue, utility value, and cost. The focus of this research paper is on the development andvalidation of survey measures to capture students’ subjective task values (STV) related to theirpost-undergraduate career search.” The top 10 keywords from that paper, based on their TFIDF,are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Top 10 Keywords in 2017 ERM Best Paper Word Term Frequency in Paper Document Frequency (n=157) TFIDF
Paper ID #23613Project-based Learning as a Vehicle for Social Responsibility and Social Jus-tice in Engineering EducationDr. Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines Greg currently teaches in Humanitarian Engineering at Mines where he bridges the gaps, so to speak, for the many students who do not quite see how their future engineering careers, design, and humanitarianism can be woven together. Greg earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success
PolytechnicState University of San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly). The platform is shown below in Figure 1. Thecourse and platform are being developed by students at Cal Poly, in collaboration with aprofessor who has a vision for the course. What follows is a description of how the course willprepare students for careers in industry; a look at similar courses at other universities; anoverview of the course; a summary of the SSIV development; and a plan for evaluating thecourse. Figure 1. The Small Scale Intelligent Vehicle (SSIV) in its current state of development.Tailoring the Course to Meet Industry NeedsAt Cal Poly, we wanted to make sure that our course in intelligent vehicles would effectivelyprepare students for a career in the industry. To better
engineers and other professionals who are awarded conditional certificates toteach subjects such as physics, chemistry, and advanced mathematics due to the lack of educatorswith these skills.Due to the requirement of advanced degrees in higher education, researchers are recruited toteach despite their relatively little experience teaching. This frequently results in discouraged anddisjoined students at a time that is critical to future studies and careers. This leads us to questionhow much pedagogical training is received by STEM educators, especially in relation to varioustechniques and in developing a course.Formal Training in Education. In general, K-12 educators are expected to be trained in bothteaching pedagogy and their subject area. However
Paper ID #22436Teaching Manufacturing Technology through ’Learning by Doing’ ApproachDr. Zareena Gani, ADMC, Higher Colleges of Technology, UAE Dr. Zareena Gani started her career in Engineering with a degree in Mechanical engineering from MK University, India. She has over 20 years of experience in both academia and industry. She has worked as a Design and Manufacturing engineer in Singapore before joining National University of Singapore from which she obtained her M.Eng degree. She also has worked in Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology (A*STAR) as a Research Fellow before moving to Canada. She gained exposure
to become more student-centered.Issues 1-4 and 6 are addressed by implementing either a Problem-Based or Project-Based Learningapproach. Issue 5, however, is a challenge we will return to later. The distinction between the twoapproaches was well differentiated by a faculty member at Aalborg University in Denmark which basesapproximately half of their curriculum in a blend of these styles [2]. The difference is in Problem-BasedLearning the faculty member plays a role of “process-oriented supervisor” and in Project-Based Learningthe faculty member plays the role of “product-oriented supervisor”[3]. In order for students to be effectivewhen they go off and apply their knowledge in their careers, they need to have both tools for independentlyand
behind an energy transformation project underway in an undergraduateEngineering Technology program. The goal is a new energy systems curriculum that crossestraditional course boundaries to teach students that similar energy conversion processes occur inmany different disciplines.Figure 1 shows that the courses in the energy system curriculum appear in a progression, fromintroductory first year courses to career-related courses taken by graduating seniors (4th year).The unifying and integrating theme, whether 1st year materials or 3rd year thermodynamics, ismodules highlighting basic energy conversion processes. Another aspect of Figure 1 is an effortto maintain continuity between the energy conversion modules in different courses by creatingan
90.48 % 2 4.76 % 1 4.76 %Figure 7: Survey results, Day-3 (3D Printing and Makerspace).Results and DiscussionsSurvey results presented in Figures 5, 6, and 7 show that the lab, project, and makerspaceactivities received highly positive feedback from the students. To assess if these activitiesaffected the students attitude towards engineering, a separate survey was conducted. A set ofsurveys were given at the beginning of the first day of the project (Day-2), end of each of Day-2,Day-3, and Day-4. The results showed that the labs had positive effect in improving the studentsunderstanding of engineering field and career opportunities as well as
authorities, including Boeing, United Airlines, Jeppesen, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Air Traffic Management Bureau of China. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Laboratory design to enhance understanding of statics for aeronautical engineering technology studentsAbstractStudents majoring in Aeronautical Engineering Technology (AET) are expected to have a uniqueblend of theoretical knowledge and hands-on skills. An appropriate educational pathway iscrucial to foster the development of these skills. Statics is one of the theoretical courses thathave been viewed as difficult for students to relate classroom skills to the actual needs of theirfuture careers. In order to
Engineering Integration Prior to NGSSIn order to understand how NGSS has shifted the landscape of K-12 engineering standards, wemust first look at the state of engineering standards integration prior to the NGSS. In a 2012publication, Carr, Bennett, and Strobel asked the question “To what extent is engineering presentin current STEM standards in the 50 states in the USA?” To answer this question, the authorsanalyzed science, math, technology, vocational, career and engineering content standards from2011. They found that 11 states had explicit engineering standards, and another 19 referencedexplicit engineering content from either Project Lead the Way, or the International Technologyand Engineering Educators Association. Of the remaining states, 11
engineering experience, especially within and across cultural boundaries. Through this research, she aims to inform the development and evaluation of these initiatives in a variety of contexts.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and
isdefined as student beliefs regarding their competencies in regards to the tasks [34]. Task valuehas four components. Attainment value is the personal importance of doing well on the task.Intrinsic value refers to the enjoyment, which is a result of performing the activity. Utility valueis the relevance of the task to current and future goals, such as career goals. Cost refers to thenegative aspects of performing a task. This could entail the degree of effort required, anxiety andfear, and the lost opportunities that result from performing that task [34].Utility value is an important factor contributing to student motivation, which is often missing inundergraduate laboratory experiments. Students are usually not given explanations as to whythey
heavily involve students and the fact that nograduate students was available in the school to conduct research, integration of the research toteaching was one of the author’s primary objectives in that period. Furthermore, the knowledgestudent gained during courses is to prepare them for solving real world problems when they starttheir career as an engineer. To achieve these two objectives, between fall 2012 and fall 2016, headded a new element, namely research/design project, to most courses that he taught, particularlythermofluid courses. The objective of these research/design projects was to provide students withan opportunity to apply their overall engineering knowledge, especially in the specific topic ofthe course combined with their
achallenging educational environment by following high quality standards. The course is alsodeveloped to provide to the participants some free time to relax and enjoy the city and all it canoffer.Accommodations are the best possible; students stay in comfortable hotels, with all facilities, indowntown areas of the cities [5].OBJECTIVES, GOALS AND EXPECTED RESULTSThe main objective of the course is to foster curiosity and passion for the engineering profession.Provide engineering students an opportunity to experience different environments in the chosenprofession.Furthermore, the course aims to: Improve the academic skills and leadership; Living in different cultures; Strengthen their career goals
. Thecurriculum then culminates in a twenty-nine hour focus area that customizes the degree plan for aparticular area of the job market. Currently, the degree has a single focus area in Mechatronics,preparing students for careers in the design, development, implementation and support ofelectromechanical systems that are controlled through embedded hardware and software. The MXET degree is now being expanded to include new additional focus areas. The firstone of these areas is STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) TeacherPreparation. In collaboration with the College of Education, a MXET focus area is beingcustomized to produce graduates who can sit for their Mathematics/Science/Engineeringcertification and who can teach at the