10 different knowledge areas, andrecommended contact hours are provided for each topic, as is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Software Engineering Core Coverage [12]In many areas of the guidelines, the change that has occurred since 2014 has been minimal. Much ofthe knowledge in the areas of Computing Essentials, Mathematical and Engineering Foundations, andProfessional Practice has remained unchanged. However, other areas have evolved significantly. Since2014, there is a heightened emphasis on security and a need to develop software with security in mind,and software process has evolved significantly, especially in the areas of CI/CD. This has led in thecorporate world to a shift toward DevOps.An Introduction to
2000” (EC2000, now called the Engineering Criteria) was implemented inthe later 1990s. Many aspects of the new criteria required a new mind-set and were quitedifferent from the Traditional Criteria, which had significant elements of “bean counting.”EC2000 at its heart was to allow greater freedom in how an engineering program defined itselfvia its intent, its constituencies’ needs, and its curriculum [1][2][3]. But, along with freedom tochoose comes the need to properly understand the new criteria and its implications.One item of lingering confusion relates to the program educational objectives and programoutcomes. Even now significant difficulties appear to exist in understanding the meaning of
2006-750: COMBINING REQUIREMENTS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY WORKEric Durant, Milwaukee School of Engineering Eric Durant (M’02) is an Assistant Professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He did his graduate studies at the University of Michigan, receiving the PhD degree in 2002. He teaches courses in both computer and software engineering and does consulting work involving signal processing, genetic algorithms, and hearing aid algorithms. Page 11.332.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Combining
Paper ID #15985The Cards Wager Assignment: Betting Homework Points on Statistical Pro-cess ControlDr. Mathew Schaefer, Milwaukee School of Engineering MATHEW SCHAEFER is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Milwaukee School of En- gineering. Prior to his academic work, Dr. Schaefer worked for G.E. Medical Systems and for Briggs & Stratton Corp. He earned his B.S. and M.S (Mechanical Engineering) and Ph.D (Materials Science) from Marquette University. His experiences in metallurgy, design, and failure analysis come from work in industry, projects and teaching at MSOE and projects completed as an independent
Paper ID #15374Use of Casting Simulation and Rapid Prototyping in an Undergraduate Coursein Manufacturing ProcessesDr. Mathew Schaefer, Milwaukee School of Engineering MATHEW SCHAEFER is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Milwaukee School of En- gineering. Prior to his academic work, Dr. Schaefer worked for G.E. Medical Systems and for Briggs & Stratton Corp. He earned his B.S. and M.S (Mechanical Engineering) and Ph.D (Materials Science) from Marquette University. His experiences in metallurgy, design, and failure analysis come from work in industry, projects and teaching at MSOE and projects completed as an
AC 2009-257: DEVELOPING METRICS TO EVALUATE INSTRUCTIONALSCHOLARSHIP IN ENGINEERINGRichard Taber, National Academy of EngineeringElizabeth Cady, National Academy of EngineeringNorman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering Page 14.456.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Developing Metrics to Evaluate Instructional Scholarship in EngineeringAbstractIf valid and reliable means to assess instructional scholarship are identified, and they areaccepted by the engineering community, then greater attention would be devoted to scholarlyteaching by engineering faculty and departments. With this goal in mind, an ad hoc
education leaders: Aconceptual, strategic, and operational approach. Journal of Leadership Education 16:96–114 [13] National Academy of Engineering [NAE] (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020:Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: The NationalAcademies Press. [14] Gilmore T. Challenges for physicians in leadership roles: Silos in the mind. OrganSoc Dyn 2010; 10:279–296 [15] Magrane DM, Morahan PS, Ambrose S, Dannels SA. Institutional matchmakers,sponsors, and strategists: Roles of academic STEM executives in developing the nextgeneration of leaders. Open J Leaders 2018; 7:168–186 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345778358_Leadership_programs_for_academic_wom en_Building_self
single-minded doggedness to trainstudents that would change the world.On the other hand, success can truly be its own worst enemy. While allowances are made in allengineering curricula for emerging technologies, little attention is paid to emerging global Page 11.366.3economic and cultural realities.6 Encouraged by decades of past success, the Americanengineering pedagogical paradigm has become extraordinarily standardized: attract veryintelligent students with widely diverse skills, interests, and abilities and “funnel” them into astandard “engineering outcome.”7While this approach produces graduates with excellent technical skills, the
growth, from 32% to50%. However, the make-up of those interested consistentlyshowed a higher percentage of males. The most common REFERENCESreasons for why not in the beginning survey was becausethey did not know what it meant to be an engineer. After the [1] https://eie.org/overview/engineering-childrenprogram, those who were still not interested had othercareers and interests in mind. Some of those careers includedthe medical fields and athletics. Others said that they simplydid not enjoy science and math. Those who were interestedgave the reason of already being interested in science andonce a greater understanding was achieved, found fieldspecific reasons for entering into an engineering program.An
Paper ID #42881Cross-functional, Multi-organizational STEM Camp Partnership: TeachingTechnology and Human-Centered Design in a Project-Based Curriculum (Other,Diversity)Dr. Joshua D. Carl, Milwaukee School of Engineering Joshua Carl is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. He received a B.S. degree in Computer Engineering from Milwaukee School of Engineering in 2005, and attended graduate school at Vanderbilt University where he earned his PhD in Electrical Engineering in 2016. He primarily teaches courses in embedded systems, programming, and digital systems.Ms. Amii LaPointe
Paper ID #30836From Cornerstone to Capstone: Students’ Design Thinking and ProblemSolvingKaylee A Dunnigan, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering Kaylee Dunnigan is a fourth-year undergraduate student working towards her B.S. in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the NYU Tandon School of Engineering. They are the head of research and development for the Introduction to Engineering and Design at Tandon. In this position they de- velop semester long design projects for students, hands-on labs, as well as mentor students throughout these projects. They have worked previously at Sandia National Labs Advanced Materials Labs
machines with human-like intelligence. Theemergence of this technology has brought forth the need to educate highly skilled andcomputational minded engineers that can solve the complex technical problems of tomorrow toenable the creation of smart machines that can improve our comfort and well-being. For studentsto be well prepared to take full advantage of the emerging technologies they need to becomputationally minded and understand how to process and plan the solutions to difficult andchallenging problems by leveraging computational tools. “Computation thinking”, as manyauthors underline, is a fundamental skill that should be part of everyone’s analytical toolbelt andis no longer just reserved for programmers or computer scientist [1] and [2
with cultural humility. ´ Remain committed. For a truly collaborative outcome, everyone must remain committed to co-creating a shared vision, priorities, and strategies to benefit the WCEC. ´ Listen well and be respectful. Listen to, and respect, all voices, perspectives and lived experiences. Consider the implications of intersectionality, particularly given our focus on women engineers of color. Guiding Critique ideas, not people. ´ Be collaborative. Be mindful not to exert dominance that excludes
Paper ID #25787Development of a Motion Control Laboratory Focusing on Control Designand Fluid Power EducationDr. Luis Alberto Rodriguez, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Luis A. Rodriguez is an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the Milwau- kee School of Engineering (MSOE). He completed his doctoral training at the University of California- Irvine where he was a National Science Foundation Bridge to the Doctorate Fellow. He completed his master’s degree at the University of Wisconsin-Madison where he was a GEM fellow and Graduate Engi- neering Research Scholar. He also holds a bachelor’s
Paper ID #15238Science Fiction Literature Crossed with Nanotechnology: How ExperientialLearning Enhances Engineering Education?Dr. Anne-Marie Nickel, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Anne-Marie Nickel is a Professor of Chemistry at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). In 2002, she earned her Ph.D. in Inorganic Chemistry from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She earned her B.A. in Chemistry at Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin in 1997. Dr. Nickel is a member of the ASEE and the American Chemical Society (ACS). e-mail:nickel@msoe.eduDr. Jennifer Kelso Farrell, Milwaukee School of Engineering Jennifer
Paper ID #12025A Robotics-Focused Instructional Framework for Design-Based Research inMiddle School ClassroomsMr. Matthew Moorhead, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering Matthew Moorhead received his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno, in 2014. He is currently pursuing a M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, where he is a teaching fellow in their GK-12 program. Matthew also conducts research in the Mechatronics and Controls Laboratory with an interest in robotics and controls.Dr. Jennifer B Listman, NYU Polytechnic School of
Paper ID #21867A Review of Electronic Engineering Logbooks Throughout the Electrical En-gineering CurriculumDr. Steven S Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering Steven S. Holland (M ’13) was born in Chicago, IL, in 1984. He received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), Milwaukee, WI, in 2006, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, in 2008 and 2011 respectively. From 2006 to 2011, he was a Research Assistant working in the Antennas and Propagation Laboratory (APLab), Department of Electrical and
Paper ID #12013Chua’s Circuit for Experimenters Using Readily Available Parts from a HobbyElectronics StoreMr. Valentin Siderskiy, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering Valentin Siderskiy received his B.Sc. degree from the NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering and M.Sc. degree from Columbia University. He conducts research in the Mechatronics and Controls Laboratory, where his interests include controls and chaos. Siderskiy is also the CTO of a technology startup.Mr. Aatif Ahmed Mohammed, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering Aatif Mohammed is currently enrolled in his second year of B.S. Mechanical Engineering at NYU Poly
publications 1665-1994 (introduction), London: ICE, 19954 F.S. Dainton (Chair). Report of the National Libraries Committee. London: HMSO, 19675 Chrimes, M. M. Civil engineering 1839-1889: a photographic history. Stroud: Alan Sutton, 1991.6 Heisig, P. and others. Exploring knowledge and information needs in engineering from the past for the future –results from a survey. Design studies, 31, 2010, 499-5337 Institution of Civil Engineers. State of the nation: infrastructure. London: ICE, 20108 JISC: The digital information seeker: findings from selected OCLC, RIN, and JISC user behaviour projects.London: JISC, 2010.(http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/reports/2010/digitalinformationseekers.aspx#downloads)9 RIN. Minding the skills gap
activity is representative of the processes, habits of mind andpractices used by engineers, or is demonstrative of work in specific engineering fields.i At leastone of those must be within the first four listed, below; i.e., do not only check “other”. Check allthat apply: Use of an engineering design process that has at least one iteration/improvement Attention to specific engineering habits of mind Attention to engineering practices (as described in the NGSS/Framework and as practiced by engineers) Attention to specific engineering careers or fields related to the lesson/activity Other (please describe below)Provide a description of how you will explicitly address these aspects of authentic
Paper ID #37154Equipando Padres: Apoya el éxito de tu estudiante(Empowering parents to make a difference.)Dayna Lee Martínez (Director, Research & Innovation) (Society of HispanicProfessional Engineers, Inc.) Dayna currently serves as a Director of Research & Innovation at SHPE. In this role, she oversees the Equipando Padres program, Noche de Ciencias, as well as different aspects of research and data analysis. An industrial engineer by training, before joining SHPE, Dayna was a faculty member in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department at Northeastern University in Boston, MA after working at
participant of the recent design summit to Cambodia, I incredibly valued the opportunityto partake in the course ‘Engineering for a Humanitarian Context.’ Not only was I able tounderstand the theoretical concepts of designing for vulnerable, disadvantaged andmarginalised individuals and communities, but I was then also given the tools to sensitivelyand appropriately expand my vision as to the role of a humanitarian engineer.By combining the [EfaHC] course with the Engineers without Borders Humanitarian DesignSummit in Cambodia, I was able to apply the courses content to a real life situation anddevelop my community consultation and engagement skills whilst having the opportunity totravel and engage with like-minded students.Multiple Engagements
learning outcomes to instructional practices - Phase III. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. June 12-15, Portland, OR.[9] Chickering, A.W. & Gamson, Z.F., Eds. (1991) Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning.[10] Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R., Eds. (2000) How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academies Press: Washington, DC.[11] American Psychological Association. (1997) Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. Retrieved January 29, 2009 from http://www.apa.org/ed
Paper ID #42315Reflections on Integrating MATLAB Grader across a Mechanical EngineeringCurriculumDr. Patrick M Comiskey, Milwaukee School of Engineering Patrick Comiskey is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. He received his B.S. from that institution and his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Chicago, both in mechanical engineering. His teaching and research interests are in the area of transport phenomena and engineering education.Dr. Prabhakar Venkateswaran, Milwaukee School of Engineering Prabhakar Venkateswaran is an Associate Professor of Mechanical
Paper ID #25820Use of a Design Canvas in a Robotics Workshop and Analysis of its Efficacy(Fundamental)Mr. Abhidipta Mallik, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Abhidipta Mallik received his B.Tech. degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering from the West Bengal University of Technology, Kolkata, India, and M.Tech. degree in Mechatronics from the Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, West Bengal, India. He has one year and ten months of research experience at the CSIR-CMERI, India. He is currently a Ph.D. student in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY
Paper ID #25279Teaching Science with Technology: Scientific and Engineering Practices ofMiddle School Science Teachers Engaged in a Robot-Integrated ProfessionalDevelopment Program (Fundamental)Dr. Hye Sun You, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Hye Sun You received a Ph.D. from a STEM education program at the University of Texas at Austin. She earned her master’s degree in science education and bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Yonsei University in South Korea. Prior to entering academia, she spent several years teaching middle school science. Her research interests center upon interdisciplinary learning and teaching, and
Paper ID #12024Using Robotics as the Technological Foundation for the TPACK Frameworkin K-12 ClassroomsAnthony Steven Brill, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering Anthony Brill received his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno, in 2014. He is currently a M.S. student at the NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering, studying Me- chanical Engineering. He is also a fellow in their GK-12 program, promoting STEM education. He conducts research in the Mechatronics and Controls Laboratory, where his interests include controls and multi-robot systems.Dr. Jennifer B Listman, NYU Polytechnic School
. The practicalclasses and the laboratories take half of the schedule and they approach techniques and locationtechnologies, creation and reproduction of aquatic species and of industrialization. It is aprogram that will fulfill the lack of this kind of engineer in the Atlantic Coast Region of SãoPaulo State, which has a natural vocation to fish. It is because of its large portion of seashore andlarge number of fishing communities besides the industries of fish caught. It is a project that alsohas the goal to change the old orthodox pedagogy for engineering education.1. IntroductionThe mission of Education is most of all, to promote the natural ability of the mind to set and tosolve problems and by inter-relation to stimulate the full usage of
maintainable code is tospend significant effort refactoring a project, or throw out the original project and start from thebeginning. Our approach of incorporating an SPL owner into the project changes the motivationdiscussions and leads to more software reuse. We found that mindfulness of SPL andmaintainability by the whole team from the beginning of a project does delay development offeatures, but ultimately it saved time not having to re-write or refactor as often. Students initiallywere skeptical of the additional costs of SPL engineering, but as they saw the deployment tests,they appreciated the importance of maintainability more, and many cited it as the most significantlearning outcome of the course.6.3 Competition is a strong motivatorBy
AC 2012-3702: GRANTSMANSHIP AND THE PROPOSAL DEVELOP-MENT PROCESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM SEVERAL YEARS OFPROGRAMS FOR JUNIOR FACULTYDr. Laurie S. Garton, Texas Engineering Experiment Station Laurie Garton is a Senior Research Development Associate with the Texas Engineering Experiment Sta- tion Office of Strategic Research Development. She has B.S., M.E., and Ph.D. degrees in civil engineer- ing (environmental) from Texas A&M University and was an engineering faculty member before joining TEES in 1999 where she started working on technical research project grants related to interdisciplinary environmental themes. Currently, she leads the TEES New Faculty Initiative targeting grants such as the NSF CAREER awards