Asee peer logo
Displaying results 451 - 480 of 632 in total
Conference Session
Hands-On Activities and Student Learning in Aerospace Engineering - I - Student Papers
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yilin Feng, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette; Lorraine E. Holtaway, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Mary E. Johnson Ph.D., Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Sarah Ryann Congdon, Purdue Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
sector, “there is consensus on primarymechanisms that enable or obstruct systems thinking development in engineers” [12].Experiential learning, such as work and life experiences, is one of the three mechanisms thatenable systems thinking development, and was the top ranked mechanism with 40% or more ofthe interviewees including work or life experiences [12]. The second mechanism was individualcharacteristics and traits, listed as: “thinking broadly, curiosity, questioning, open-minded,communication, tolerance for uncertainty, strong interpersonal skills, and thinking outside thebox”; the third mechanism is a “supportive environment” [12].Critical Systems Thinking CourseCritical Systems Thinking (CST) is a course in the MS Aviation and Aerospace
Conference Session
Engineers and Communities: Critical Reflections of Challenges, Opportunities, and Practices of Engaging Each Other
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Wei Lu, Texas A&M University; Mary E. Campbell, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division
The University of Alabama. She has experi- ence working with many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 1: Methods Refresh: Approaches to Data Analysis in Engineering Education Research
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Aaron Robert Hamilton Thielmeyer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Dina Verdin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brianna Benedict McIntyre, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Rachel Ann Baker; Jacqueline Doyle, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #25276Using Topological Data Analysis in Social Science Research: Unpacking De-cisions and Opportunities for a New MethodDr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and
Conference Session
Hands-on Activities and Student Learning in Aerospace Engineering - II - Student Papers
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tracy L. Yother, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Cooper G. Burleson, Purdue University; James M. Thom, Purdue University; Brian Kozak, Purdue Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
Paper ID #27698The Search for the Commercial Space Technologist: A Comparison of Avia-tion and Commercial Space-related Postsecondary ProgramsMs. Tracy L. Yother, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Tracy L. Yother is an instructor in Aeronautical Engineering Technology and a PhD candidate in Career and Technical Education in the College of Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. Ms. Yother currently teaches the undergraduate Powerplant Systems and Design Supportability courses in the Aeronautical Engineering Technology (AET) program. She possesses a B.S. and M.S. in Aviation Technology. She also holds an
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 22: Perspectives and Evaluation of Engineering Design Education
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University; Seda McKIlligan, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #27505An Exploration of Course Design Heuristics Identified from Design Meetings,Design Artifacts, and Educator InterviewsDr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University Nicholas D. Fila is a postdoctoral research associate in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Indus- trial Design at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engi- neering Education from Purdue University. His current research interests include innovation, empathy, engineering design, instructional design
Conference Session
FOCUS ON EXHIBITS: Welcome Reception & NEW THIS YEAR! 2018 Best Division Paper Nominee Poster Session Sponsored by Engineering Unleashed
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Reeping, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
ASEE Headquarters
Paper ID #28113Board 4: Computers in Education Division: Partnering to Develop Educa-tional Software Applications: A Four-year Retrospective StudyMr. David Reeping, Virginia Tech David Reeping is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and is an NSF Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Engineering Education with a Mathematics minor from Ohio Northern University. He was a Choose Ohio First scholar inducted during the 2012-2013 school year as a promising teacher candidate in STEM. David was the recipient of the Remsburg Creativity Award for 2013 and the DeBow Freed Award for outstanding
Collection
2019 ERC
Authors
Pamela Norris; Julie Martin; Heather Watson
Encouraging Diversity through Communication of the Value of our Science and Engineering Pamela Norris Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving PublicUnderstanding of Engineering -- A free online publication from NAEMath and Science! “I want to be an engineer when I grow up!” What do High School Girls Thinks?• Engineering is for people who LOVE both math and science• Don’t know what it is• Aren’t interested in the field nor do they think it is “for them” “Someone who excels in math and science.... Someone who is motivated, dedicated, and who doesn’t mind sitting in a cubicle all day.” Findings from Extraordinary Women Engineers
Collection
2019 PPC
Authors
Hesham El-Rewini; Kazerounian Kazem
Quick Takes Session 1Kazerounian, Kazem, Dean & Professor Hesham El-Rewini, Dean & ProfessorSchool of Engineering College of Engineering and MinesUniversity of Connecticut University of North Dakota February 5, 2019What is “Quick Take”?Presentations will be on influencing publicpolicy and enhancing public awareness on engineering education and practice, and could include examples about working with legislators locally or nationally,working with education policy makers (K- 16), innovative engagements with movie and media industry and social mediaWMU-CEAS Innovation DayA Celebration of Entrepreneurship
Collection
2018 Gulf Southwest Section Conference
Authors
Kenneth Van Treuren
operate. In pressure ratio, FPR, and the bypass ratio, ALPHA. Theconclusion, the active learning modules and the designproject were effective in challenging and exciting thestudents about the design of gas turbine engines. Thecompany context for teams prepares students for what theymight encounter in industry.1. Introduction Since 2007 Baylor University has been involved withthe Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN).KEEN is “a national partnership of universities with theshared mission to graduate engineers with anentrepreneurial mindset so they can create personal,economic, and societal value through a lifetime ofmeaningful work.” [1] This is accomplished byincorporating entrepreneurially minded learning into the
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Campbell University; Michele Miller, Campbell University; Jacqueline Burgher Gartner, Campbell University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Paper ID #26899Board 58:Need-Based Scholarship Program: Who is Applying, Who is Suc-cessful, and Who is Not Applying?Dr. Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Campbell University Anastasia Rynearson is an Assistant Professor at Campbell University. She received a PhD from Purdue University in Engineering Education and a B.S. and M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her teaching experience includes outreach activities at various age levels as well as a position as Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Kanazawa Technical College and Future Faculty Fellow teaching First
Collection
2019 ERC
Authors
James A. Dodd
% Distribution A. Cleared for public release. 3 What is Basic Research?• Systematic study directed toward greater understanding of fundamental aspects of phenomena, without specific applications towards processes or products in mind• Implications • AFOSR investments impact far-term capabilities • Basic research can be published without restrictions • AFOSR is free to invest internationally with very few restrictions Distribution A. Cleared for public release. 4 Why the AF Invests in Basic Research• To probe today’s technology limits and ultimately lead to future Dr. Chad Mirkin’s research
Collection
2019 CIEC
Authors
Raymond Floyd
2019, American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 465While morals may be considered personal beliefs, ethics are more closely aligned to the mores ofpublic opinion – what does society believe. From that, ethics may change more rapidly, evenyear to year as events occur to change the composite public mind. What is unethical today maywell be accepted next year, or even next week. Many professional organizations, companies, andothers may have a published Code of Ethics. They may codify it as a Code of Ethics, a Creed ofConduct, or simply an Oath of Office. In some cases, the organization may have some form ofmore than one, i.e. both a Code of Ethics
Collection
2019 ASEE Zone I Conference & Workshop
Authors
Brandiff R Caron
, regulate, shape, critique,publicize, and study science, including government scientists, funding agency officers, science-focused interestgroups, science communicators, academics, museum curators, and others.The Graduate Certificate in Innovation, Technology and Society. Social entrepreneurs understand that withinnovation comes responsibility. With past technological fixes contributing to global warming, market crashesand animal extinction, we need creative minds to develop strategies that address the root causes of complexproblems and incorporate them into viable business models. The Graduate Certificate in Innovation,Technology and Society provides you with an environment in which engineers and non-engineers work togetherto cultivate innovative
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nicholas Lux, Montana State University; Brock J. LaMeres, Montana State University; Shannon D. Willoughby; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University; Barrett Frank
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
, technology integration, online course design and delivery, program evaluation, and assessment. Dr. Lux’s current research agenda is STEM teaching and learning in K-12 contexts, technology integration in teacher preparation and K-12 contexts, educational gaming design and integration, and new technologies for teaching and learning.Dr. Brock J. LaMeres, Montana State University Dr. Brock J. LaMeres is a Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Mon- tana State University (MSU) and the Director of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center (MEERC). LaMeres is also the Boeing Professor at MSU where he is responsible for initiatives to im- prove the professional skills of engineering
Conference Session
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rupa Purasinghe, California State University, Los Angeles; Akshay Ghanshyam Patel, Pramukh Mono-Strand Structures Pvt. Ltd.
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies
regards many educators have developed project-based learning exercises in engineering and other courses so that the students will learn by doing.Project-based learning motivates the learners and provides “hands-on” and “minds-on” training.A laboratory-based civil engineering course in Computer Aided Structural Analysis Design andExperimentation is redesigned using Fink’s Taxonomy of significant learning with learning goalsand several dimensions from foundational knowledge, application, integration, human dimension,caring and learning how to learn. In this respect, e-Learning plays a critical role in knowledge andskills development as well as course management. Learning Management System Moodle is usedas an e-Learning tool for communication with
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Megan Patberg Morin, North Carolina State University; Elena Nicolescu Veety, North Carolina State University; Pam Page Carpenter
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
: ● Introduction to Library Resources & Literature Review – Typically condicted at the beginning of the program, this session brings engineering librarian specialists to introduce students to library and online resources available to researchers. Students conduct a literature review with guidance and feedback from mentors. ● Mind Mapping/Systems Thinking – This workshop introduces Mind Mapping [9] as a tool for Systems Thinking. Participants use both software and pen-and-paper methods practice systems level understanding of not just technical, but societal, ethical, and global implications of their topic. They visualize and situate their research in the context of the vision of the Center as well as the broader
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Integrating Computing into the First Year
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adetoun Yeaman, Virginia Tech; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech; Tamara Knott, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Paper ID #25985A Qualitative Investigation of Students’ Problem Solving Strategies in a Spa-tial Visualization CourseMrs. Adetoun Yeaman, Virginia Tech Adetoun Yeaman is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech). She received her MS degree in 2013 in Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering and her BS degree in Biomedical Engineering in 2011, both from Virginia Commonwealth University. She is currently a Graduate Teaching Assistant. Her research interests include empathy, design education, spatial visualization and multimedia learning. Address: Virginia
Conference Session
Track: Collegiate - Technical Session 5
Collection
2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity
Authors
Crystal M. Pee, Virginia Tech; Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech; Jeremi S. London, Virginia Tech; Gilbert Jew, Arizona State University; Teirra K. Holloman, Virginia Tech; Chaneé D. Hawkins Ash , Virginia Tech; Bevlee Watford, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
Collegiate
: Broadening Participation Conceptual FrameworkEstablishing a clear conceptualization as it relates to participating in engineering across pathways(Figure 1) was important because the differences discussed above speak to different kinds ofgoals and, by extension, call for different kinds of data needed to monitor progress. It is withthese differences in mind that we both searched for and analyzed the available data. Research DesignTo establish a cursory understanding of the data landscape as it relates to broadeningparticipation, we leveraged a rapid review approach. A rapid review is a methodology that entailssystematic review methods for collecting and appraising information (e.g., databases or reports),yet is
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kaitlin Tyler, Granta Education Division; Hannah Melia
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Materials
the high degree of connectivity between materials and the processes that create andshape them into the products we used in every-day life. This grounding in real world applicationscan be used to show the value of materials science to those experiencing it for the first time,assisting educators in increasing the field’s interest. The records and associated properties werechosen with a high school audience in mind; all are common in everyday life so personalconnections can be readily made. This commonality could make this tool useful for a basicintroductory engineering course as well, particularly a broad discipline overview or freshmancornerstone course. Figures 3 and 4 showcase mockup material and product database images,while Table 1
Conference Session
M1B: WIP - Learning Experiences 2
Collection
2019 FYEE Conference
Authors
Tim Kane, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Erica Venkatesulu
Tagged Topics
FYEE Conference - Paper Submission
A WORK-IN-PROGRESS: We ARe…DUINO! a project-based first-year experience, collaborative with the IEEE student chapterIn this work-in-progress (WIP) paper, we will invite discussion about our recent and ongoingefforts in developing a first-year experience for Electrical Engineering (EE). A common desireof undergraduates in EE (and we suspect across engineering in general) is for more “hands-on”experiences. What little they get tends to be later in their college career; however, as the Do-It-Yourself (DIY)/Make culture continues to grow, more of our students are walking in the doorready and willing to “get their hands dirty” on
Collection
2018 Gulf Southwest Section Conference
Authors
Tony McClary; Jacqueline A. Zeiber; Patricia Sullivan; Steven Stochaj
and abstract representation” [7]. It is with this inThe purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of mind that the New Mexico Pre-Freshman Engineeringan intensive, two-week project-based engineering program Program (NM PREP) was molded into a project-basedfor high school students on self-efficacy and engineering learning environment where students spend their timeidentity in the participants. Results from this year’s survey going back and forth between abstract ideas on a board andsuggest that participating in the program increased high hands-on activities in an effort to build on the engineeringschool students’ perceived and actual knowledge of the fundamentals that could assist them in pursuing
Conference Session
Mechanics Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Sarah Wodin-Schwartz, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics
Definition and Solution,” Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. 435–455.[3] D. Riley, “Engineering and Social Justice,” Synth. Lect. Eng. Technol. Soc., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–152, Jan. 2008.[4] J. Lucena, J. Schneider, and J. A. Leydens, “Engineering and Sustainable Community Development,” Synth. Lect. Eng. Technol. Soc., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–230, Jan. 2010.[5] L. Winner, “Do Artifacts Have Politics?,” Daedalus, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 121–136, 1980.[6] J. A. Leydens, K. Johnson, S. Claussen, J. Blacklock, B. M. Moskal, and O. Cordova, “Measuring Change over Time in Sociotechnical Thinking: A Survey/validation Model for sociotechnical Habits of Mind,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
Conference Session
M3B: Learning in Context 2
Collection
2019 FYEE Conference
Authors
Darlene Spracklin-Reid P.Eng., Memorial University; Geoff Rideout, Memorial University of Newfoundland
Tagged Topics
FYEE Conference - Paper Submission
, calculations and data. Survey resultsindicate positive outcomes in students’ awareness of the profession, skills required of anengineer, different disciplines, ethics, use of computer tools, core technical skills, and what realengineering problem look like. It is hoped that giving students a holistic view of engineering intheir first year, while helping them acquire the “habits of mind” [3] of professional practitioners,will provide them with a foundation for approaching the remaining curriculum with motivationand increased capacity to connect course material with their life experiences and aspirations.References[1] B. Seely, “Patterns in the History of Engineering Education Reform: A Brief Essay”,Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering
Collection
2019 CIEC
Authors
Gregory Lyman; Jeffery Wilcox; Rowdy Sanford
Session ETD 415 Robotics Retrofit: Renovating Outdated Robotics Platforms to Meet Current Curriculum Requirements Driven by Industry Demand Gregory Lyman, Jeffery Wilcox, and Rowdy Sanford Department of Engineering Technologies, Safety, and Construction Electronics Engineering Technology Program Central Washington UniversityAbstractMany engineering technology programs are implementing robotics and automation platformsinto their undergraduate curriculum. Finding affordable solutions for these subjects can prove
Conference Session
Online Programs and Program Assessment
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University; Teresa A. Johnson, Ohio State University; Jeffrey E. Froyd, Ohio State University; Deborah M. Grzybowski, Ohio State University; David A. Delaine, Ohio State University; Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University; Ana M. Casado, Ohio State University; Alan Kalish, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
Paper ID #27291Outcomes-based Design of a New Graduate ProgramDr. Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University Ann D. Christy, PE, is a professor of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering and a professor of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University (OSU). She earned both her B.S. in agricultural engineering and M.S. in biomedical engineering at OSU, and her Ph.D. in environmental engineering at Clemson University. She worked for an engineering consulting firm before entering academia and continues to collaborate with the consulting industry. She has taught courses in bioenergy, biological en
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 3: Working in Teams
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ed LeRoy Michor, Oregon State University; Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
course, and the confusion is grounded in real world concerns.Using as theoretical framework Productive Disciplinary Engagement [11], [12], we analyze thevideo data episodically, investigating the group’s interactions leading up to and including this“glorious confusion.” We argue the state of engagement characterized as glorious confusionreflects real engineering work and develops ways of sense-making and habits of mind that alignwith the higher-level capabilities needed in practice [13].In this case study, we investigate the following research questions. 1) How do student teams take up an engineering task designed for them to adopt roles reflective of professional engineers? 2) In what ways might confusion be a productive state of
Conference Session
ECE Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Craig J. Scott, Morgan State University; Joi D. Aybar, Morgan State University; Shiny Abraham, Seattle University; Sacharia Albin, Norfolk State University; Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; John Okyere Attia P.E., Prairie View A&M University; Mohamed F. Chouikha, Prairie View A&M University; Shonda L. Bernadin, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; Kenneth A. Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Ibibia K. Dabipi, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; Abdelnasser A Eldek, Jackson State University; Demetris Geddis, Hampton University; Petronella A. James-Okeke, Morgan State University; John Carey Kelly Jr., North Carolina A&T State University; Pamela Leigh-Mack, Virginia State University; Juan C. Morales, Universidad del Turabo; Mandoye Ndoye, Tuskegee University; Kofi Nyarko, Morgan State University; Ben O. Oni, Tuskegee University; Stella A. Quinones, University of Texas, El Paso; Michel A. Reece, Morgan State University; Lei Zhang, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; Saleh Zein-Sabatto, Tennessee State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
Paper ID #26861Board 65: Work in Progress: Growing and Sustaining a Successful Collabo-ration of Programs Developing and Implementing Experimental Centric Ped-agogyDr. Craig J. Scott, Morgan State University Dr. Craig Scott received his Ph.D. and B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Howard University and a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University. His educational scholarly endeavors include conduct- ing pedagogical studies on learning technologies and remedial math preparation for engineering students. He instructs courses in computer vision, computer graphics, computational electrical engineering, elec
Conference Session
Track : Pre-College - Technical Session 10
Collection
2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity
Authors
Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado, Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Pre-College
variable in predicting six-year engineering graduation was the higher educationinstitution or ethnicity—a finding that suggests that the best predictive admissions model isspecific to an individual institution, not an across-institutional model. Standardized test scorewas the most significant predictor in only one of the 11 institutions when modeled separately andin three others after high school grade point average. In seven of the 11 institutions, test scorewas not found to be a significant predictor of six-year engineering graduation forunderrepresented minority students. A better understanding of the admissions profile of eachinstitution might help determine what other factors are at play. Other potential factors that cometo mind are financial
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vignesh Subbian, University of Arizona; Marla Franco, University of Arizona ; Guadalupe Lozano
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
Paper ID #25639STEM Servingness at Hispanic Serving InstitutionsDr. Vignesh Subbian, The University of Arizona Vignesh Subbian is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Systems and Industrial Engineer- ing, member of the BIO5 Institute, and a Distinguished Fellow of the Center for University Education Scholarship at the University of Arizona. His professional areas of interest include medical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and broadening participation in engineering and computing. Subbian’s educational research is focused on ethical decision-making and formation of identities in engineering.Dr
Conference Session
Faculty Development Technical Paper Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hadi Ali, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Constituent Committee
innovation cycle [1].Research Design Considerations and Study AimsIn a precursory study that developed a framework to encourage pedagogical risk-taking amongfaculty [2], the research team developed a set of guiding principles to evaluate interventionsaimed at revolutionizing engineering departments. According to these guiding principles,faculty-based interventions should be “based on faculty-driven (vs. administration-driven)ideas;” “community (versus individually) focused;” and “sustained in duration” (i.e., not a one-off event). In this study, a multiple case study approach is employed to investigate theeffectiveness and impact of a program designed with these principles in mind. We arespecifically interested in understanding how participation in